Identification of a threshold value for the DEMATEL method using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to find critical services provided by a semiconductor intellectual property mall
Introduction
The DEMATEL (Decision-Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) method, developed by the Science and Human Affairs Program of the Battelle Memorial Institute of Geneva between 1972 and 1976, was used to research and solve complicated and intertwined problem groups (Fontela and Gabus, 1974, Fontela and Gabus, 1976). DEMATEL was developed in the hope that pioneering the appropriate use of scientific research methods could improve the understanding of a specific problematique, a cluster of intertwined problems, and contribute to the identification of workable solutions through a hierarchical structure. The DEMATEL method is based on graph theory, enabling us to plan and solve problems visually, so that we may divide the relevant factors into cause and effect groups in order to better understand causal relationships. The methodology can confirm interdependence among variables and aid in the development of a directed graph to reflect the interrelationships between variables.
The applicability of the DEMATEL method is widespread, ranging from analyzing world problematique decision-making to industrial planning (Chiu et al., 2006, Hori and Shimizu, 1999, Huang et al., 2007, Tzeng et al., 2006). The most important property of the DEMATEL method used in the multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) field is to construct interrelations between criteria. After the interrelations between criteria were determined, the results derived from the DEMATEL method could be used for fuzzy integrals to measure the super-additive effectiveness value or for the Analytic Network Process method (ANP) (Liou et al., 2008, Saaty, 1996, Tsai and Chou, 2009) to measure dependence and feedback relationships between certain criteria. When the DEMATEL method is used as part of a hybrid MCDM model, the results of the DEMATEL will influence the final decision.
There are four steps in the DEMATEL method: (1) calculate the average matrix, (2) calculate the normalized initial direct-influence matrix, (3) derive thetotal relation matrix, and (4) set a threshold value and obtain the impact-relations map (in Fig. 1, we divided Step 4 into two steps). In Step 4, an appropriate threshold value is necessary to obtain a suitable impact-relations map as well as adequate information for further analysis and decision-making. The traditional method followed to set a threshold value is conducting discussions with experts. The researcher sets an adequate threshold value and then outlines an impact-relations map to discuss whether the impact-relations map is suitable for the structure of the problematique. If not, the threshold value is replaced by another value, and another impact-relations map is obtained until there is a consistent opinion among the majority. Sometimes, after the researcher obtains the input data for Step 1 using questionnaires, it is difficult to choose a consistent threshold value, especially if there are too many experts to aggregate at the same time. When the factors of the problem are many, the work involved in obtaining a consistent threshold value becomes more complex. In order to obtain a reasonable threshold value with respect to difficulty in the discussions with experts, the researcher may choose the value subjectively. The results of the threshold values may differ among different researchers.
In contrast to the traditional method, which confronts the loop from a “set a threshold value” to obtain “the needed impact-relations map”, as shown in Fig. 1, we propose the maximum mean de-entropy (MMDE) algorithm to obtain a threshold value for delineating the impact-relations map. This algorithm based on the entropy approach can be used to derive a set of dispatch-nodes, the factors which strongly dispatch influences to others, and a set of receive-nodes, which are easily influenced by another factor. According to these two sets, a unique threshold value can be obtained for the impact-relations map.
In the numerical example, a real case is used to discover and illustrate the key services needed to attract Semiconductor Intellectual Property Mall (SIP) users and SIP providers to an SIP Mall. Research in the current study enabled the derivation of the interrelated services and their structural interrelationships using the DEMATEL method, where the threshold value is selected through discussions with experts. By using the proposed MMDE algorithm to choose the threshold value, both impact-relations maps from the traditional method and the algorithm we propose are the same, although the procedures are different.
The rest of this paper is organized as follows: Section 2 briefly describes the DEMATEL method. The steps of the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm will be described, explained, and discussed in Section 3. In Section 4, a numerical example, a real case where the goal is to find out the interrelated services that should be provided by a semiconductor intellectual properties mall and the structural interrelationship between them, is shown in order to explain the proposed algorithm and discuss the results. Finally, in Section 5, we draw conclusions.
Section snippets
DEMATEL method
The end product of the DEMATEL process—the impact-relations map—is a visual representation of the mind by which the respondent organizes his or her own action in the world. This organizational process must occur for the respondent to keep internally coherent and to reach his or her personal goals. The steps of the DEMATEL method (Tzeng et al., 2006) are described as follows:
- Step 1:
Find the average matrix.
Suppose there are h experts available to solve a complex problem and there are nfactors to be
Maximum mean de-entropy algorithm (MMDE)
As we mentioned above, the threshold value is determined by asking experts or by the researcher (as a decision maker). Choosing a consistent threshold value is time-consuming if the impact-relations maps are similar when threshold values are changed slightly. If we consider the total relation matrix as a partially ordered set, the order relation is decided by the influence value. The question about deciding a threshold value is equal to a real point set divided into two subsets: one subset
Numerical case of the semiconductor intellectual property mall
In this section, a real case is shown by using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm to set the threshold value. The original threshold value was determined through discussions with experts. By using the maximum mean de-entropy algorithm, the threshold value is different from the original result, but the impact-relations maps from these two threshold values are similar.
Conclusions
In the DEMATEL process, an appropriate threshold value is important in order to obtain adequate information to delineate the impact-relations map for further analysis and decision-making. Until now, the threshold value has been determined through discussions with respondents or chosen subjectively by researchers. It is time-consuming to make a consistent decision on the threshold value, especially when the number of factors in the problematique makes it too difficult to discuss the adequacy of
References (13)
- et al.
Designing methods of human interface for supervisory control systems
Control Engineering Practice
(1999) - et al.
Reconfiguring the innovation policy portfolios for taiwan’s SIP mall industry
Technovation
(2007) - et al.
Building an effective safety management system for airlines
Journal of Air Transport Management
(2008) - et al.
Selecting management systems for sustainable development in SMEs: A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP, and ZOGP
Expert Systems with Applications
(2009) - et al.
Graph theory: Modeling, applications, and algorithms
(2007) - et al.
Marketing strategy based on customer behaviour for the LCD-TV
International Journal of Management and Decision Making
(2006)
Cited by (218)
A product co-design team performance evaluation method with considering both satisfaction and collaboration
2024, Advanced Engineering InformaticsAnalyzing the relationship between digitalization and energy sustainability: A comprehensive ISM-MICMAC and DEMATEL approach
2024, Expert Systems with ApplicationsFueling the future: Overcoming the barriers to market development of renewable fuels in Germany using a novel analytical approach
2024, European Journal of Operational ResearchBarriers to compulsory waste sorting for a circular economy in China
2023, Journal of Environmental ManagementA novel framework for investigating organizational adoption of AI-integrated CRM systems in the healthcare sector; using a hybrid fuzzy decision-making approach
2023, Telematics and Informatics Reports
- 1
Distinguished Chair Professor.