Computing of the contribution rate of scientific and technological progress to economic growth in Chinese regions

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.12.032Get rights and content

Abstract

According to the new economic growth theory, a new method of computing the contribution rate of scientific and technological (S&T) progress to economic growth based on the Cobb–Douglas production function and the Solow residual value method is proposed in this paper. This method includes three steps: Firstly, according to their levels of S&T progress, fuzzy soft clustering of thirty one Chinese regions is performed to obtain the membership degree of these places to the categories. Secondly, to calculate the contribution rates that different categories of levels of S&T progress contribute to economic growth. Thirdly, to multiply the obtained contribution rate of each category by the membership degree of the place belonging to this category, from which the contribution rate of S&T progress to economic growth in each place is obtained. Finally, this method is used to calculate the contribution rates of S&T progress to economic growth in thirty one Chinese regions during the period from 1998 to 2007. Last but not least, some reasonable suggestions and conclusions are proposed by analyzing the computing results.

Highlights

► Computes the contribution rate of scientific and technological(S&T) progress to economic growth in Chinese 31 regions. ► Adopt the method of soft computing fusion with hard computing. ► For contribution rate, Shanghai is the highest, the second highest is Beijing and the lowest is Sichuan.

Introduction

Economy is a product of the co-operation of science, techniques, labors and capital. Seeing from the strategic angle of the economic development, in order to realize the economic development in a continual, stable, and highly efficient way, we have to adjust the proportion of various input factors in the economy. It is important to obtain the contribution rate of each factor to economic growth, especially the contribution rate of S&T progress, which can help the leader make reasonable macro policies. The contribution rate of S&T progress to economic growth, in the broad sense, refers to the sum of contributions rate of other factors to output increase, excluding those of the increase in labor force and capital (Robert, 1996, Li, 1995, Sun, 1998). Mokhtarul Wadud (2004) and Lewis (1954) had proposed the total factor productivity (TFP). Since then, the idea that S&T progress has been an important factor in economic growth which attracted the attention of economists. In 1957, Solow (1957) adopted residual value method in computing the contribution rate of S&T progress, which created the measurement of S&T progress operational. After that economists have made continuous improvement in studying the contribution rate of S&T progress to economic growth (Hilbrink, 1989, Jorgenson, 2001, Sengupta, 2004, Shipley et al., 2004, Tallon and Kraemer, 1999), among which Denison’s research in the 1970s is relatively significant. Denison, when analyzing economic growth reasons from the year of 1929 to 1969 in the USA, divided the total input and total factors productivity into several small factors, and based on this classification he made a quantitative measurement of the effect of each individual factor on economic growth (Denison, 1962).

The study on S&T progress in China starts relatively late. In the 1980s, Jia (1997) initiated the potential analysis method with Chinese characteristics to estimate contribution rate of S&T progress to economic growth, which is based on the active decision theory. In 1983, the research group guided by Shi and Qin the first time completed the analysis of the effect of industrial technological progress in China (Shi & Qin, 1985). In 1998, the Department of Science and Technology of the former State Planning Committee in China launched research program on measuring the effect of S&T progress on economic growth (Jia, 1997). In 2000, Lu, Fan, Wei, and Xu (2000) had adopted such methods as the Solow function, the Denison’s analysis on economic growth factors, the Jogenson’s analysis of production efficiency and the production function to measure the effect of S&T progress on economic growth and had made empirical analysis. In 2002, Li (2003) had utilized the input and output method to measure the contribution rate of S&T progress to economic growth. Song (2003) had improved the measuring method of S&T progress by adopting the potential analysis theory. Zhou (2008) had applied the Cobb–Douglas production function in measuring the contribution rate of S&T progress to economic growth in 10 regions in Henan Province of China in the year of 2005. Liu (2006), by taking the Cobb–Douglas production function as the basic method, had measured the contribution rates of S&T progress, capital and labor force to economic growth respectively during the period of 1985–2002 and the period of 1995–2002 in Hebei province of China. Wu (2008) had measured the contribution rate of S&T progress in agriculture in Henan Province of China from the year of 1996 to 2005, and used the gray production function metabolizing model (Liu, 1997, Liu et al., 2004, Liu et al., 1999) in predicting the contribution rate of S&T progress in agriculture in Henan province of China from the year of 2006 to 2015.

It is obvious that Chinese and overseas scholars have made encouraging achievements in measuring the contribution of S&T progress to economic growth, but these researches are limited to use data in one specific country or region when at a given period of time. The limited data may have negative impact on the accuracy of parameter estimation in the production function. What’s more, the contribution rate of the same S&T progress in different regions may be significantly different and incomparable. In addition, the social and economic system is complicated and nonlinear, and the same S&T progress may make different contributions in different regions. So the new method proposed in this paper aims at measuring the contribution rates of S&T progress to economic growth in thirty one regions of China from the year of 1998 to 2007, by adopting the soft computing approach, the Cobb–Douglas production and the Solow residual value method. In the new method, we first make soft clustering of S&T progress in thirty one regions of China, then compute the contribution rates of S&T progress at various classifications to economic growth. And then calculate the contribution rate in each region by summing up the products of the contribution rate of each classification and the membership degree of this region to each classification. Finally, comparison of the rates in different regions is provided and rational suggestions to the economic development in various regions are presented.

Section snippets

The combined model of production function

The combined model of the extended Cobb–Douglas production function (C–D production function) and the Solow residual value method is employed in measuring the contribution rate of S&T progress to economic growth in various Chinese regions. The combined model is described as follows:Y=AKαLβHγa=y-αk-βl-γh

Eq. (1) is the C–D production function, in which Y represents the output, K represents the capital input, L represents the labor input, H represents the actual human capital, A represents the

The fuzzy soft clustering of 31 Chinese regions according to S&T progress

The Eq. (1): A = YKαLβHγ, indicates that S&T progress in one region is dependent to a certain extent on the output, the fixed assets stock, the labor input and the human capital in this region. In this paper per capita output, per capita fixed assets stock, the ratio of employers to the total population, and the actual human capital are taken into consideration which are shown in Table 2, GA-ISODATA (Zhu, Su, & Li, 2005) is used in fuzzy soft clustering of S&T progress in thirty one Chinese

The estimation of the model parameters of the four clusters and the calculation of the contribution rate of S&T progress

From the combined model, the key to calculate the contribution rate of S&T progress to economic growth is to estimate the parameters α, β and γ in Eq. (1), and to find the growth rate of four indexes y, k, l and h in Eq. (2). Next, we use the appropriate methods to estimate these parameters.

The calculation process and results

According to the membership degree of thirty one regions in Table 4, and the contribution rate of the factors to the total output growth in Table 7, the contribution rate of the factors of the thirty one regions to total output growth can be calculated as in Table 8. Fig. 2 shows the contribution rate comparison of the thirty one regions’ .

The contribution rate of S&T progress of each region to economic growth: EAj=CA1μ1j+CA2μ2j++CAiμij

The contribution rate of fixed assets stock of each region

Conclusions

In 1970s, Denison analyzed the courses of economic growth of the United States through the accounting method of the sources of economic growth. Since then, many scholars have not only started to study the contribution rate of S&T progress to economic growth, but also proposed many measuring methods. In the late 1980s, China began to explore thoroughly and systematically the relationship between S&T progress and economic growth. Based on longitudinal data, however, current researches mostly

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China No. 71103163 and 71103164, by Research Foundation of Humanities and Social Sciences of Ministry of Education of China No. 10YJC790071, by the Fundamental Research Founds for National University, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) No. CUG090113 and CUG110411, by China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant No. 20090461293, by special grade of the financial support from China Postdoctoral Science Foundation Grant No.

References (30)

  • Byeongju Jeong

    Measurement of human capital input across countries: A method based on the laborer’s income

    Journal of Development Economics

    (2002)
  • C.B. Mulligan et al.

    A labor income-based measure of the value of human capital: An application to the states of the United States

    Japan and the World Economy

    (1997)
  • E.F. Denison

    The sources of economic growth in the U.S. and the alternative before

    (1962)
  • H.X. Guo et al.

    Soft computing of economic contribution rate of education in China and each area

    China Soft Science

    (2008)
  • J.O. Hilbrink

    Economic impact and technical change

    IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

    (1989)
  • Y.F. Huang et al.

    Capital stock estimates in Chinese manufacturing by perpetual inventory approach

    China Economic Quarterly

    (2002)
  • Y.W. Jia

    On initiative decision theory: Non-ideal system decision

    China Soft Science

    (1997)
  • Y.W. Jia

    Adjustment of coefficient of elasticity and improvement of calculation of contribution rate

    The Journal of Quantitative and Technical Economics

    (1997)
  • Jorgenson, D. W. (2001). In J. W. Li (Transl.), Relative productivity levels: An international comparison (Vol. I)....
  • W.A. Lewis

    Economic development with unlimited supplies of labor

    The Manchester School

    (1954)
  • J.W. Li

    An inquiry into the technology nature and causes of the wealth of nations

    (1995)
  • B. Li

    Studies on the measurement method of technical change based on input–output table

    The Journal of Quantitative and Technical Economics

    (2003)
  • S.F. Liu

    The trap in the prediction of a shock disturbed system and the buffer operator

    Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology

    (1997)
  • M. Liu

    Examples analysis of technological advances on economic growth in Hebei Province

    Teaching and Research of Shijiazhuang Vocational College of Law and Commerce

    (2006)
  • S.F. Liu et al.

    Grey model: Theory & application

    (2004)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Technological innovation and structural change for economic development in China as an emerging market

      2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change
      Citation Excerpt :

      The conclusions and corresponding policy suggestions are provided in Section 5. Economic development must result comprehensively from the cooperation of labor, capital, techniques, energy, and environment (Guo et al., 2012). To build a sustainable, steady, and effective economic entity from a strategic perspective, governments should enhance the level of resource utilization by improving technological progress.

    • A comprehensive survey of traditional, merge-split and evolutionary approaches proposed for determination of cluster number

      2017, Swarm and Evolutionary Computation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Clustering algorithms have a strong relationship with many other fields, especially with statistics and science. Their typical real-world applications include spatial database applications (e.g. GIS or astronomical data [21,22], sequence and heterogeneous data analysis [23]), Web applications [24,25], computational biology [26], computing of the contribution rate of scientific and technological progress [27] and many others [28]. Clustering algorithms can be systematically categorized as follows:

    • The effect of tourism and technological contribution on economic growth-The case of Vietnam and other East Asian members

      2023, Impact of Industry 4.0 on Sustainable Tourism: Perspectives, Challenges and Future
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text