Review
On the exploitation of the blockchain technology in the healthcare sector: A systematic review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118897Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Blockchain technology in the health sector.

  • Smart, secure, and transparent management of Electronic Health Records.

  • Blockchain-based strategies to support research activities in the health sector.

Abstract

The blockchain is a disruptive technology born in the last few years, which possible applications in different domains are being extensively studied. In this context, healthcare appears to be a very attractive application domain for the blockchain because, due to its characteristics, it can provide the necessary guarantees on the secure processing, sharing and management of sensitive patient data. In this paper, we perform a systematic review of the literature on the adoption of the blockchain technology in healthcare, focusing on applications implemented in real contexts. Our goal is to investigate the current state of the art in this specific field, emphasizing limitations and possible future developments.

Publications extracted from Scopus, PubMed and Web of Science that satisfy some predetermined search criteria were collected by means of appropriate queries. These papers were analyzed and classified into five main categories, based on the specific sub-domain on which the applications were projected.

The performed analysis highlighted that research activities are currently focused on data security and on the implementation of electronic health records through the Blockchain. On the other hand, some other areas are still under-explored, including that related to IoT or to the implementation of automated diagnosis systems.

Introduction

In 2008, Satoshi Nakamoto proposed a solution to the double spending problem (Nakamoto, 2008), that refers to the possibility of spending a digital currency multiple times, due to its inherent ease to be duplicated. Nakamoto’s innovative idea was to use the blockchain, and proposed the specific blockchain nowadays known as Bitcoin, together with its native cryptocurrency.

A blockchain is a database of sequential blocks containing transactions, distributed in a peer-to-peer network, where each node of the network owns its own copy. The Bitcoin blockchain, like other blockchains subsequently proposed, is public. The main advantages of public blockchains are the transparency, the immutability, the traceability and, therefore, the reliability of the stored data. These characteristics make the blockchain applicable in many contexts besides the storage and verification of cryptocurrency transactions.

One of the most interesting applications of the blockchain technology, on which companies and researchers are focusing their efforts, is that of the healthcare. In this context, research activities are being conducted on the design of proper processes to share data, such as records, reports and images, between healthcare institutions without involving third parties that may possibly alter it (Rakic, 2018). Other lines of research include archiving patient health data (Shahnaz et al., 2019), enforcing transparency and verifiability of medical experiments (Bell et al., 2018), and supporting the traceability of drugs to prevent counterfeiting issues (Kuo et al., 2017).

In this scenario, the goal of our work is to perform a systematic review of blockchain applications in healthcare that have been proposed in the literature and/or have been actually implemented in real contexts. The motivations of this work live in the need of assessing the current state of the art, outlining challenges and opportunities, as well limitations of current solutions, in order to pave the way for future research activities in this field.

Existing works in the literature have been selected using the PubMed PubReminer tool,1 focusing on Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science, using blockchain as a seed keyword in the title of the articles. We refined the set of identified paper by eliminating duplicates (since copies of the same article can be found in different repositories), and by removing papers without an abstract, a DOI, or keywords provided by the authors. This step was followed by a manual selection based on the abstracts and/or the full content of the articles. In particular, a paper has been included in this review if it describes an application in the healthcare sector that is actually implemented, even through a small prototype. Therefore, papers describing purely theoretical ideas were excluded. This manual selection led to a total of 64 articles, that were subsequently been categorized into research areas, in order to provide researchers with some clues about the challenges, the opportunities and the gaps for which further research activities are needed. The details of the methodology adopted to refine the query are reported in Section 4.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows: Section 2 provides a brief introduction on the blockchain technology; in Section 3, we describe the specific challenges arising while adopting the blockchain for healthcare applications, briefly review existing surveys, and outline the contribution of this paper; in Section 4, we define the methodology we followed to conduct our systematic review; in Section 5 we discuss the outcome of our review, specifically focusing on the identified categories; in Section 6, we outline possible research directions; finally, Section 7 concludes the paper and outline some possible future work.

Section snippets

Background on blockchain technology

A blockchain is a database of sequential blocks, stored in multiple decentralized and independent nodes. Chaining is implemented by injecting some information about a given block into the following block. More specifically, the hash of the previous block in the chain is added to the header of the current block (Vujicic et al., 2018). Hashes are strings, of fixed or variable length, generated by an algorithm (SHA256 in the case of the Bitcoin blockchain) which goal is to produce a non-reversible

Challenges and contributions

In this section, we briefly discuss the challenges raised by the adoption of the blockchain technology in healthcare. Indeed, although several advantages can be provided by the blockchain technology to different application scenarios in healthcare, mainly due to its inherent reliability, verifiability, and robustness to tampering, it also introduces some criticisms. Among them, the first aspect to consider is the fact that data related to health are generally personal, and possibly sensitive,

Methodology

We conducted a systematic review of major applications of blockchain technologies in healthcare by performing a set of queries on 3 different repositories, i.e., Pubmed, Web Science and Scopus. We performed the queries in July 2022, and adopted the well-established Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement (Moher et al., 2009). In the following, we briefly describe the main steps that we followed, according to the PRISMA statement (see Fig. 2).

Blockchain-based applications in healthcare

In this section, we present the selected papers. We first classify them according to their main topic, namely according to the specific domain the described applications were designed for. Our ultimate goal is to understand the aspects where blockchain research and development has focused most, achieving interesting results, and to highlight the main gaps where challenges have still to be solved.

In Fig. 6, we graphically depict the identified categories, while in Fig. 7, we depict the total

Research directions

As mentioned in Section 3, the adoption of the blockchain in healthcare can introduce additional challenges, some of which have not yet been fully addressed in the literature. Focusing on EMRs (see Section 5.1), the developed systems allow to store and selectively share patients’ data, also taking care of their privacy. The main advantage over centralized systems appears to be the robustness to tampering operations, which may affect the possibility to trace the full history of the patients and

Conclusions and future work

The purpose of this study was to identify existing blockchain applications in the healthcare sector, that have been implemented in a real-world environment. To achieve this goal, a systematic review was conducted by properly querying three among the major databases, namely Scopus, PubMed, and Web of Science. The results were used to identify current trends in academic research in this area. Specifically, we identified that the research is mostly focused on the exploitation of different

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Valeria Merlo: Conceptualization, Methodology, Data curation, Writing – original draft. Gianvito Pio: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Francesco Giusto: Conceptualization, Supervision. Massimo Bilancia: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Supervision.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (92)

  • AgboC.C. et al.

    Blockchain technology in healthcare: A systematic review

    Healthcare

    (2019)
  • Akhter Md HasibK.T. et al.

    Electronic health record monitoring system and data security using blockchain technology

    Security and Communication Networks

    (2022)
  • AndolaN. et al.

    Shemb:a secure approach for healthcare management system using blockchain

  • ArunkumarB. et al.

    Blockchain-based decentralized and secure lightweight e-health system for electronic health records

  • AttiaO. et al.

    An iot-blockchain architecture based on hyperledger framework for health care monitoring application

  • BellL. et al.

    Applications of blockchain within healthcare

    Blockchain in Healthcare Today

    (2018)
  • BhattacharyaP. et al.

    Bindaas: Blockchain-based deep-learning as-a-service in healthcare 4.0 applications

    IEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering

    (2021)
  • BiswasS. et al.

    Interoperability and synchronization management of blockchain-based decentralized e-health systems

    IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management

    (2020)
  • BonomiF. et al.

    Fog computing and its role in the internet of things

  • BuzachisA. et al.

    On the design of a blockchain-as-a-service-based health information exchange (baas-hie) system for patient monitoring

  • CaoY. et al.

    Hybrid blockchain–based privacy-preserving electronic medical records sharing scheme across medical information control system

    Measurement and Control

    (2020)
  • ChaseB. et al.

    Analysis of the xrp ledger consensus protocol

    (2018)
  • ChentharaS. et al.

    A novel blockchain based smart contract system for ereferral in healthcare: Healthchain

  • ChukwuE. et al.

    A systematic review of blockchain in healthcare: frameworks, prototypes, and implementations

    IEEE Access

    (2020)
  • ConsortiumW.W.W.

    Verifiable credentials data model 1.0: Expressing verifiable information on the web

    (2019)
  • DaraghmiE.-Y. et al.

    Medchain: A design of blockchain-based system for medical records access and permissions management

    IEEE Access

    (2019)
  • DengY.-q. et al.

    Kp-habe: A fully secure key-policy hierarchical attribute-based encryption

    DEStech Transactions on Computer Science and Engineering

    (2017)
  • DonawaA. et al.

    Scaling blockchains to support electronic health records for hospital systems

  • Fernández-CaramésT.M. et al.

    Enabling the internet of mobile crowdsourcing health things: A mobile fog computing, blockchain and iot based continuous glucose monitoring system for diabetes mellitus research and care

    Sensors

    (2019)
  • FigueroaS. et al.

    An attribute-based access control model in rfid systems based on blockchain decentralized applications for healthcare environments

    Computers

    (2019)
  • FuJ. et al.

    Privacy-preserving in healthcare blockchain systems based on lightweight message sharing

    Sensors

    (2020)
  • GanC. et al.

    Blockchain-based access control scheme with incentive mechanism for ehealth systems: patient as supervisor

    Multimedia Tools and Applications

    (2020)
  • GervaisA. et al.

    On the security and performance of proof of work blockchains

    (2016)
  • GhaffaripourS. et al.

    Application of blockchain to patient-centric access control in medical data management systems

  • GriggsK.N. et al.

    Healthcare blockchain system using smart contracts for secure automated remote patient monitoring

    Journal of Medical Systems

    (2018)
  • HessF.

    Efficient identity based signature schemes based on pairings

  • HuangJ. et al.

    Medbloc: A blockchain-based secure ehr system for sharing and accessing medical data

  • JabarullaM.Y. et al.

    Blockchain-based distributed patient-centric image management system

    Applied Sciences

    (2021)
  • JabbarR. et al.

    Adopting formal verification and model-based testing techniques for validating a blockchain-based healthcare records sharing system

  • KakarlapudiP.V. et al.

    Design and development of a blockchain-based system for private data management

    Electronics

    (2021)
  • KhatoonA.

    A blockchain-based smart contract system for healthcare management

    Electronics

    (2020)
  • KhezrS. et al.

    Blockchain-based model for sharing activities of daily living in healthcare applications

  • KimJ.W. et al.

    Patient-centric medication history recording system using blockchain

  • KoushikA.S. et al.

    Performance analysis of blockchain-based medical records management system

  • KumarR. et al.

    Scalable and secure access control policy for healthcare system using blockchain and enhanced bell–lapadula model

    Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing

    (2021)
  • KuoT.-T. et al.

    Blockchain distributed ledger technologies for biomedical and health care applications

    Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

    (2017)
  • Cited by (24)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text