Elsevier

Fuzzy Sets and Systems

Volume 208, 1 December 2012, Pages 79-94
Fuzzy Sets and Systems

A distance metric for a space of linguistic summaries

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fss.2012.03.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Producing linguistic summaries of large databases or temporal sequences of measurements is an endeavor that is receiving increasing attention. These summaries can be used in a continuous monitoring situation, like eldercare, where it is important to ascertain if the current summaries represent an abnormal condition. It is therefore necessary to compute the distance between summaries as a basis for such a determination. In this paper, we propose a dissimilarity measure between summaries based on fuzzy protoforms, and prove that this measure is a metric. We take into account not only the linguistic meaning of the summaries, but also two quality evaluations, namely the truth values and the degrees of focus. We present examples of how the distance metric behaves and show that it corresponds with intuition.

References (32)

  • R.R. Yager

    A new approach to the summarization of data

    Inf. Sci.

    (1982)
  • D. Anderson et al.

    Modeling human activity from voxel person using fuzzy logic

    IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.

    (2009)
  • P. Bosc, D. Dubois, O. Pivert, H. Prade, M.D. Calmes, Fuzzy summarization of data using fuzzy cardinalities, in:...
  • R. Castillo-Ortega, N. Marín, D. Sánchez, Linguistic summarization for business intelligence using the time dimension...
  • R. Castillo-Ortega et al.

    Time series comparison using linguistic fuzzy techniques

  • S.-M. Chen et al.

    A comparison of similarity measures of fuzzy values

    Fuzzy Sets Syst.

    (1995)
  • Cited by (27)

    • The linguistic summarization and the interpretability, scalability of fuzzy representations of multilevel semantic structures of word-domains

      2021, Microprocessors and Microsystems
      Citation Excerpt :

      The interpretability of LSs is an exciting topic that was further globally studied by Lesot et al. [13]. Wilbik and Keller solve the problems of the similarity between two sets of LSs [14] and of computing the distance between summaries [15]; Altintop et al. apply a genetic algorithm to examine L-summarization in operational and financial healthcare data [16]. A new temporal LS prototype for time data series was first studied by J. Kacprzyk et al. [17, 18], Kacprzyk and Wilbik [19], and A. Wilbik. [20].

    • A text summarization method based on fuzzy rules and applicable to automated assessment

      2019, Expert Systems with Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Methods to automatically summarize, compare and assess text data have become progressively important as increasingly large textual datasets have been collected and made available by a variety of systems (e.g., digital libraries (DLs), Virtual Learning Environments (VLEs), social media) (Wilbik & Keller, 2012).

    • Interpretability of fuzzy linguistic summaries This work is dedicated to Francesc Esteva, for his pioneering work in fuzzy logic and his dedication to the fuzzy community, especially in Europe

      2016, Fuzzy Sets and Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      Another solution consists in performing a prior evaluation in order to remove summaries whose value cannot be above a given threshold, using for instance the degree of focus proposed in [24]. This degree of focus allows the same kind of optimisation as the support in association rules [25]. Another way of limiting the number of protoforms to evaluate is the user guided summarisation, where users query the system with instances of protoforms which are evaluated and whose truth values are returned.

    • On the role of linguistic descriptions of data in the building of natural language generation systems

      2016, Fuzzy Sets and Systems
      Citation Excerpt :

      For example, in [95], Díaz-Hermida et al. explore several theoretical aspects such as the use of semi-fuzzy quantifiers to model quantified sentences and the description of some generic methods for pattern detection. Furthermore, [96–101] explore several and mostly convergent evaluation criteria, such as the data coverage percentage, the sentence truth degree, and other inspired by the conversational maxims in the field of human communication [102], including the relevance, specificity, ambiguity or length of the description. In fact, when referring to criteria, it can be stated that there is a solid consensus about which characteristics of a linguistic description can be useful in the task of evaluating and ranking candidate descriptions in an objective way.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text