Aggregation on lattices isomorphic to the lattice of closed subintervals of the real unit interval
Introduction
Fuzzy sets characterized by membership functions with values from the real unit interval were introduced in 1965 by Zadeh [40]. In this seminal paper, Zadeh introduced basic fuzzy connectives – the minimum and maximum for modeling, respectively, the intersection and union of fuzzy sets. There were also mentioned some other functions as, for example, the product, the arithmetic mean or the bounded sum (only in a partial form). Later, in the framework of fuzzy set theory, many other binary operations were introduced and studied. We only recall triangular norms and conorms [22], fuzzy implications [6], and several types of averaging aggregation functions (also for higher arities), see, e.g., [7], [9], [17], [33]. Two years after Zadeh, Goguen proposed the concept of L-fuzzy sets [16], L being a bounded poset. This generalized view has opened the ways for using some particular lattices, mostly the lattices somehow related to the unit interval . In 1974-1976, the lattice of closed subintervals of was independently introduced to fuzzy set theory by Grattan-Guinness [18], Jahn [20], and also by Zadeh [41]. For more details on the earlier developments in interval fuzzy set theory we refer to [15]. Later, in the framework of generalized fuzzy set theory, several other lattices (algebraically isomorphic to ) were studied and applied. As a most prominent example we recall intuitionistic fuzzy sets proposed in 1986 by Atanassov [3], related to the lattice , see also [5]. Among other lattices isomorphic to (equipped with the partial interval order defined by if and only if and ) we recall the Pythagorean membership grades lattice , see [37], [38], and the lattice of q-rung-orthopair membership grades, , , see [39], and also [2], [29], [31].
Fuzzy sets with membership grades from different lattices have mostly different semantics and thus their study is meaningful. On the other hand, due to possible algebraic relations expressed by some isomorphism, there is no need to reinvent “new” connectives separately in the framework of each bounded lattice L and related L-fuzzy sets, see [23]. For example, such link between interval fuzzy sets (based on the lattice ) and intuitionistic fuzzy sets (based on the lattice ) was observed and discussed by Deschrijver and Kerre in [11]. The aim of this paper is to extend their results to all above mentioned lattices , , P, and with , and to help all interested researchers working with these lattices to avoid tedious proofs of some special results, in particular the results concerning connectives in the framework of L-fuzzy sets, when L is isomorphic to .
The rest of the paper is organized as follows. In the next section, several preliminary notions will be given. Section 3 is devoted to some connectives on , mostly generated by some additive generator , and in Section 4, we introduce the connectives on the lattice derived from the connectives discussed in Section 3. Section 5 is devoted to the connectives on general lattices isomorphic to , including the lattices P and . In the end, several concluding remarks are added.
Section snippets
Preliminaries
We start with the basic bounded lattice , ≤ being the standard total order of reals, considered by Zadeh in [40]. Obviously, its top element equals 1 and the bottom element is equal to 0. Any decreasing involutive function is a continuous bijection, and it is called a strong negation. Due to Trillas [34], each strong negation N is related to an automorphism via , i.e., N is isomophic to the strict negation , , proposed by Zadeh [40]
Interval-valued connectives
In this section, we recall a method how to generalize the connectives discussed in Section 2 for the case of interval-valued connectives, i.e., if the lattice is considered, where We will present the so-called representable approach [14], though there are also other, more general approaches. The reason for making use of this approach is that almost all applications work with representable connectives.
Let us first recall that we consider the standard ordering of intervals
Connectives on the lattice
In 1986, Atanassov [3] introduced intuitionistic fuzzy sets (AIFSs for short) with membership grades from the lattice equipped with the partial order given by if and only if and . Clearly, is a bounded distributive lattice with the top element and the bottom element . An important information for us is that this lattice is isomorphic to the lattice discussed in Section 3. The corresponding isomorphism is
Connectives on lattices related to and isomorphic to
Consider an automorphism and define a lattice , where with the order whenever and . Each of such lattices is isomorphic to the lattice , and the mapping , given by , is one of possible isomorphisms between and . Note that each lattice is then isomorphic to the interval lattice , too.
Remark 5.1 An alternative view on lattices follows from the fact that if and only if
Concluding remarks
Based on the standard fuzzy set theory connectives, such as negations, triangular norms and conorms, weighting functions, and weighted means, we have recalled introducing the corresponding interval-valued connectives on the lattice of closed subintervals of using the so-called representable approach [14]. Most of these connectives are based on strict t-norms, i.e., they can be derived by means of a single decreasing bijective function , an additive generator of the
Declaration of Competing Interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Acknowledgement
R. Mesiar and A. Kolesárova kindly acknowledge the support of the project APVV-18-0052. A. Kolesárová was also partially supported by the grant VEGA 1/0267/21 and R. Mesiar by the grant Palacký University, Olomouc IGAPrF2021.
References (41)
Intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Fuzzy Sets Syst.
(1986)New operations defined over the intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Fuzzy Sets Syst.
(1994)- et al.
On averaging operators for Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets
Inf. Sci.
(2011) - et al.
Weighted triangular norms-based aggregation operators
Fuzzy Sets Syst.
(2003) L-fuzzy sets
J. Math. Anal. Appl.
(1967)Fuzzy sets
Inf. Control
(1965)The concept of a linguistic variable and its applications to approximate reasoning. Part I
Inf. Sci.
(1975)Lectures on Functional Equations and Their Applications
(1966)Another view on q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets
Int. J. Intell. Syst.
(2018)Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications
(1999)
Fuzzy Implications
Aggregation Functions: A Guide for Practitioners
A Practical Guide to Averaging Functions
On the relationship between some extensions of fuzzy set theory
Fuzzy Sets Syst.
On the representation of intuitionistic fuzzy t-norms and t-conorms
IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.
A generalization of operators on intuitionistic fuzzy sets using triangular norms and conorms
Notes IFS
Aggregation operators in interval-valued fuzzy and Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy set theory
Interval-valued fuzzy sets, possibility theory and imprecise probability
Aggregation Functions
Fuzzy membership mapped onto intervals and many-valued quantities
Z. Math. Log. Grundl. Math.
Cited by (7)
Using I-subgroup-based weighted generalized interval t-norms for aggregating basic uncertain information
2024, Fuzzy Sets and SystemsTransfer-stable aggregation functions: Applications, challenges, and emerging trends
2023, Decision Analytics JournalIntuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators in the framework of Aczel-Alsina triangular norms and their application to multiple attribute decision making
2023, Expert Systems with ApplicationsCitation Excerpt :As per the analyses and research done previously, the methodology described in this paper outperforms the other techniques centred on the algebraic operation, the Einstein operation, and the Hamacher operation, respectively. In the future research, we intend to enhance these aggregation operators to the interval valued numbers, and we will apply them to text document clustering (Abualigah, 2019), “computer methods in applied mechanics and engineering” (Abualigah, Diabat et al., 2021), “meta-heuristic optimization algorithm” (Abualigah, Yousri et al., 2021), “sine cosine algorithm” (Abualigah & Diabat, 2021), supplier selection problem (Khoshaim et al., 2021), logistics service value concretion (Naeem, Qiyas et al., 2021), choice of a superior software package (Senapati & Chen, 2021), capital budgeting techniques (Sergi et al., 2022), and other domains in uncertain cases (Dey et al., 2020; Jana, Senapati, Pal, 2019; Jana, Senapati, Pal, Yager, 2019; Mesiar et al., 2022; Naeem, Khan et al., 2021; Qiyas et al., 2021, 2019, 2020; Saha et al., 2021; Senapati & Yager, 2019a, 2019b, 2020; Senapati, Yager et al., 2021). Additionally, it may be advantageous to construct certain consensus models for the IF MADM challenges that are centred on AA triangle norms and to apply the outcomes of such frameworks to real-world issues and challenges.
Interval Type-3 Fuzzy Differential Evolution for Parameterization of Fuzzy Controllers
2023, International Journal of Fuzzy SystemsA Novel SIR Approach to Closeness Coefficient-Based MAGDM Problems Using Pythagorean Fuzzy Aczel-Alsina Aggregation Operators for Investment Policy
2022, Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society