Voronoi languages: Equilibria in cheap-talk games with high-dimensional types and few signals☆
Highlights
► We study a communication game with infinite types and finite messages. ► Strict Nash equilibria of this game are Voronoi languages and vice versa. ► There are strict but unstable and stable but inefficient Nash equilibria. ► We illustrate stability of some languages with non-uniform types and many messages.
References (33)
Revisiting strategic models of evolution: The concept of neighborhood invader strategies
Theoretical Population Biol.
(1997)- et al.
Categorization generated by extended prototypes – An axiomatic approach
J. Math. Psych.
(2007) - et al.
Evolutionary stability in games of communication
Games Econ. Behav.
(1993) - et al.
Stability of the replicator equation for a single-species with a multi-dimensional continuous trait space
J. Theoretical Biol.
(2006) Evolutionary and continuous stability
J. Theoretical Biol.
(1983)- et al.
What to maximize if you must
J. Econ. Theory
(2007) - et al.
Brown–von Neumann–Nash dynamics: The continuous strategy case
Games Econ. Behav.
(2009) Cheap talk and cooperation in a society
J. Econ. Theory
(1991)Dominance solvability and Cournot stability
Math. Soc. Sci.
(1984)- et al.
On the dynamic foundation of evolutionary stability in continuous models
J. Econ. Theory
(2002)
Efficiency in evolutionary games: Darwin, Nash, and the secret handshake
J. Theoretical Biol.
Cheap talk, coordination and evolutionary stability
Games Econ. Behav.
Genericity with Infinitely Many Parameters
Stability Theory of Dynamical Systems
Cited by (44)
Fragile meaning - an experiment
2024, Journal of Economic TheoryCommunication between unbiased agents
2023, Games and Economic BehaviorEndogenous ambiguity and rational miscommunication
2023, Journal of Economic TheoryReacting to ambiguous messages: An experimental analysis
2022, Games and Economic BehaviorFailure of common knowledge of language in common-interest communication games
2018, Games and Economic BehaviorCitation Excerpt :Thus, when there is high probability that the receiver assigns high probability to some language type (which may vary with the language state), the expected payoff gain from making the sender's language type common knowledge would be insignificant. I have focused on limited message availability both because of the precedents in the literature on communication games (e.g. Jäger et al., 2011; Crémer et al., 2007; and Sobel, 2015) and because it expresses natural constraints on sender strategies that might be implied by unfamiliarity with an organizational code or a foreign language. Other constraints worth investigating include commitments to specific maps from payoff states into messages and actions resulting, for example, from conflicting externally given language uses.
Finite languages, persuasion bias, and opinion fluctuations
2018, Journal of Economic Behavior and OrganizationCitation Excerpt :This may be due to conflicts between individuals similar to the cheap talk framework of Crawford and Sobel (1982).2 But it may as well be simply because people only understand finitely many words and use them differently depending on their cultural background, vocabulary knowledge and personal taste, while the information to communicate is a much more complex object, see Blume and Board (2013), Cremer et al. (2007), and Jäger et al. (2011). A more concrete example are financial markets where agents often report stock ratings (evaluations of a stock’s expected performance and risk level) according to a finite rating scale and may use the scale differently.
- ☆
We would like to thank Joseph Hofbauer from University of Vienna and the audiences of the North American Summer Meeting of the Econometric Society in Boston, 2009, the annual meeting of the German Economic Association in Magdeburg, 2009, and the economic seminars at TU Dortmund and Max-Planck-Institute for Economics, Jena, for their comments. The feedback that we received from the audience of the workshop “Game Theory and Communication: Prospects and Syntheses” at Stanford University, especially Chris Pottʼs detailed commentary, were also very helpful. The research that led to this paper has been supported by project A6 of the CRC 673 “Alignment in Communication” and by the International Research Training Group EBIM (“Economic Behavior and Interaction Models”), both of the German Research Foundation, DFG, which is gratefully acknowledged.