A network-based analytic approach to uncovering the relationship between social and cognitive presences in communities of inquiry

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2019.05.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This paper presents a method to analyze the relationship between social and cognitive community of inquiry presences.

  • It uses epistemic network analysis to extract more details about this relationship.

  • We also used the same method to study the effectiveness of an instructional intervention.

  • Finally, we evaluated how the the relationship between social and cognitive presences change over time during the course.

Abstract

This paper presents a network-based approach to uncovering the relationship between the elements of social and cognitive presences in a community of inquiry. The paper demonstrates how epistemic network analysis (ENA) can provide new qualitative and quantitative insights into the students' development of social and critical thinking skills in communities of inquiry. More specifically, ENA was used to accomplish three different research goals: i) uncovering links between social and cognitive presences of communities of inquiry; ii) evaluating the effectiveness of two instructional interventions on student experience as measured by connections between cognitive and social presences; and iii) exploring how the relationship between social and cognitive presences changed over time during a course. The proposed approach was applied to the coded transcripts of asynchronous online discussions performed in a fully-online graduate level course. The results of this study showed that indicators of social presence had more association with the exploration and integration phases of cognitive presence. Besides, indicators of the affective category of social presence had stronger links with the two high levels of cognitive presence (i.e., integration and resolution), while indicators of interactive messages of social presence were more connected to the two low levels (triggering events and exploration) of cognitive presence.

Introduction

Asynchronous online discussions are fundamental to facilitate social interaction within fully online and blended courses in higher education (Anderson & Dron, 2010). They play an essential role in educational experience of students encouraging them to increase their course participation by answering questions, sharing resources, and solving problems, for instance (Hew & Cheung, 2008). Researchers have shown several benefits of online interactions (critical thinking, creativity, and argumentation) rising the need to better understand how asynchronous online discussions can be used to promote learning and knowledge (co-)construction in a group of students (Garrison, Cleveland-Innes, & Fung, 2010; Dawson, Tan, & McWilliam, 2011).

The social constructivist model called Community of Inquiry (CoI) is a well-known framework that aims to outline how asynchronous online communication shapes student learning and their cognitive development (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 1999). The CoI model defines three dimensions that mold the learning experience (i.e., social presence, cognitive presence, and teaching presence) and assumes an overlapping relationship among the three presences that enhance the students on-line learning capability (Kozan & Richardson, 2014). Over the years, many studies have shown the practical value and benefits of the CoI model, such as the influence on the engagement of students and learning outcomes (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2010), applications in computer-supported collaborative scenarios (Joksimović, Gašević, Kovanović, Adesope, & Hatala, 2014), and the relationships between use of educational technology by the learners and the dimensions of the CoI model (Kovanović, Gašević, Joksimović, Hatala, & Adesope, 2015).

This paper proposes the adoption of a network analytic approach to advance insights into the relationship between social and cognitive presences in asynchronous online discussions. Unlike most of studies that focused on this relation with self-report instruments, the current study uses coded transcripts of asynchronous online discussions. The methodological contribution of this study is the use of Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA) (Shaffer et al., 2009) to study the association between the social and cognitive presences. ENA allowed for better understanding of the association between the four phases of cognitive presence and the indicators of social presence. The proposed network analytic approach was further applied to assess the effects of an intervention aimed to foster higher levels of cognitive presence in a fully-online graduate-level course in software engineering over six offerings. Finally, the way how the relationship between social and cognitive presences changes over time was also investigated with ENA. The study presented here has practical implications both in terms of the use of the proposed network-based analysis and the results of the application of the methodology of analysis.

Section snippets

The community of inquiry model

According to (Garrison, Anderson, & Archer, 2010), the Community of Inquiry (CoI) model is the most widely-used and researched theoretical framework that outlines the important facets of social interactions in online and blended education. CoI explains behaviors of students and instructors with the purpose of describing how educational experience can be more effective by providing three indicators of their relationships, known as presences (Garrison et al., 1999):

  • Social presence measures the

Research questions

Section 2.2 stressed the importance of analyzing the relationship between social and cognitive presences. As presented, several studies have addressed this relationship, in general, using correlation analysis between self-reported measures. However, there has been much less research on that association with the use of content analysis. Moreover, the existing research offers little insight into how phases and indicators of cognitive and social presences are related to each other. Thus, the first

The data and course design

The data used in the present study consisted of six offerings (Winter 2008, Fall 2008, Summer 2009, Fall 2009, Winter 2010, Winter 2011) of a master level research-intensive course in software engineering offered entirely online, through the Moodle LMS, at a Canadian public university between 2008 and 2011. In those six offerings, a total of 81 students posted 1747 messages. The course encompassed six modules that covered 14 different topics related to software engineering. The students were

Research question 1

Fig. 1 shows the group-average graph for all students with the relationships between social and cognitive presences. The visualization was done using svd1 and svd2, which accounted for 19.2 and 12% of variability of the epistemic networks created by the students, respectively. The results obtained indicate that the Y-axis (i.e., svd2) primarily distinguishes between students focusing more on the early phases (triggering event and exploration) or the later phases (integration and resolution) of

Research question 1

The results of the current study unveiled that the codes representing indicators of social presence were distributed over the X-Axis, Fig. 1. Interactive indicators were located more on the right-hand side of the graph, especially the Asking_Question indicator. The Cohesive indicators were in the middle and the Affective on the left-hand side. This can be explained by the fact that the Interactive category of social presence is generally associated with the Triggering Event phase of cognitive

Conclusions and lines for further work

The primary contribution of the present study is a novel network analytic method for the assessment of the relationship between social and cognitive presences. Through a graph-based analysis, called Epistemic Network Analysis, in-depth insights into the connections among the social presence indicators and the cognitive presence phases were uncovered. Moreover, by examining these two presences at the student level instead of at the message level, a much richer understanding of the development of

References (45)

  • V. Kovanović et al.

    Analytics of communities of inquiry: Effects of learning technology use on cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions

    The Internet and Higher Education

    (2015)
  • K. Kozan et al.

    Interrelationships between and among social, teaching, and cognitive presence

    The Internet and Higher Education

    (2014)
  • S.M. Lee

    The relationships between higher order thinking skills, cognitive density, and social presence in online learning

    The Internet and Higher Education

    (2014)
  • J.C. Richardson et al.

    Social presence in relation to students' satisfaction and learning in the online environment: A meta-analysis

    Computers in Human Behavior

    (2017)
  • S. Schrire

    Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis

    Computers & Education

    (2006)
  • P. Shea et al.

    Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education

    Computers & Education

    (2009)
  • T. Yu et al.

    Examining reliability and validity of a korean version of the community of inquiry instrument using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis

    The Internet and Higher Education

    (2015)
  • Z. Akyol et al.

    The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence

    Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks

    (2008)
  • T. Anderson et al.

    Three generations of distance education pedagogy

    The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning

    (2010)
  • T. Anderson et al.

    Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context

    Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks

    (2001)
  • R. Aviv et al.

    Network analysis of knowledge construction in asynchronous learning networks

    Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks

    (2003)
  • Z. Cai et al.

    Epistemic network analysis and topic modeling for chat data from collaborative learning environment

  • Cited by (56)

    • Critical thinking in the community of inquiry framework: An analysis of the theoretical model and cognitive presence coding schemes

      2023, Computers and Education
      Citation Excerpt :

      In recent years, coding schemes have also been used in automated content analyses for the purpose of learning analytics dashboard development2 (Farrow et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2022; Neto et al., 2018; O'Riordan et al., 2021; Rolim et al., 2019). Most relevant to our study, numerous empirical studies (cf. Appendix A) that refer to the practical implementation of the theoretical framework claim to investigate students' critical thinking (e.g., Chen et al., 2019; DuBois et al., 2019; Guo et al., 2021; Lee et al., 2022; Liu et al., 2022; Rolim et al., 2019). However, what critical thinking means in the CoI framework is insufficiently addressed in these studies.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text