Corporate portal: a tool for knowledge management synchronization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2003.12.012Get rights and content

Abstract

As the basis of value creation and success of organizations increasingly depends on the leverage of knowledge available internally, knowledge management systems (KMS) are emerging as vital tools for competitive advantage. Among these KMS, corporate portals present the potential of providing organizations with a rich and complex shared information workspace for the generation, exchange, and use of knowledge. But developing corporate portals and building the critical mass of users required to make them successful is not an easy task. In this paper, drawing upon the literature review and an analysis of early adopters of corporate portals, we address the strength of this tool which consists mainly in synchronizing and supporting knowledge processes, put the emphasis on factors inhibiting its adoption by companies and finally propose some perspectives for a successful implementation.

Introduction

The widespread adoption of networks and information technology has vastly increased our ability to store, transfer and generate knowledge, enabling and accelerating the emergence of an economic, organizational and technological landscape, that is knowledge-based (Schwartz, Eamonn, & Boyer, 1999; Romano, Elia, & Passiante, 2001). This perspective builds upon and extends the resource-based view (RBV) of the firm initially promoted by Penrose (1959) and expanded by others (Barney, 1986; Chandler, 1992; Prahalad & Hamel, 1990; Teece, Pisano, & Shuen, 1997). The premise of the RBV is that organizations employ a mix of acquisition and configuration of resources to change how their business is accomplished. Knowledge is often the basis for the effective utilization of many important resources. In this context, Information and Communication technologies may play an important role in effectuating the knowledge-based view of the firm by enhancing the firm's capability to manage the knowledge it possesses. This awareness is one of the main reasons for the exponential growth of knowledge management systems (KMS). KMS are technologies that support knowledge management in organizations, specifically, knowledge generation, codification, and transfer (Ruggles, 1997). In fact, a 2000 survey conducted by KPMG shows that the use of KMS is common in organizations worldwide and has numerous benefits (KPMG, 2000). However, despite the potential benefits from KMS, the report also finds that companies were experiencing difficulties in effectively using these technologies. To address this issue, this paper focuses on a particular type of KMS, which is corporate portal, that presents the potential of providing organizations with a rich and complex shared information workspace for the generation, exchange, and use of knowledge. Building upon a large literature review, insights from eight case studies of early adopters and our own experience in dealing with some aspects of the implementation phase of STMicroelectronics portal, we address the strengths of this tool which consist mainly in supporting knowledge development phases and focus on challenges and problems that organizations may face during its implementation.

The paper is organized as follows: Section 1 presents a review on knowledge, knowledge management processes and systems. The following section focuses on a particular tool of KMS, that is the corporate portal; we present a comprehensive view of definitions and characteristics of this tool based on a comparative analysis of eight case studies in order to identify the potential role of corporate portal features in the various stages of the knowledge management processes. We then focus on the major barriers limiting its adoption and use by organizations. In the final section, building on the factors identified, we provide some perspectives for a successful implementation.

Section snippets

Knowledge management processes and systems

Before focusing on portals as KMS, its necessary to define knowledge and knowledge management processes.

Portal definitions

Portals enable e-business by providing a unified application access, information management and knowledge management both within enterprises, and between enterprises and their trading partners, channel partner and customers (Gartner Group, 1998). From this definition, we can distinguish two types of corporate portals: extranet portals which provide depth content rather than breadth of content, offer special advantages for business-to-business, e-commerce because they can provide something

Factors inhibiting the adoption of corporate portals

There are three categories of factors: managerial, technical, and social that stimulate or inhibit the successful adoption of corporate portals (see Fig. 2).

Perspectives for a successful implementation

Based upon the earlier analysis, we can offer some perspectives in order to define, implement and execute effective corporate portals.

Conclusion

This article, based on an analysis of eight case studies of early adopters of corporate portal, focused mainly on the benefits and challenges presented by this tool. Corporate portals seem to present the potential of providing organizations with a rich and complex shared information workspace for the generation, exchange, and use of knowledge. They synchronize knowledge and applications, creating a single view into the organization's intellectual capital. But developing corporate portals and

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to Prof. Aldo Romano Director of the e-Business Management School for his generous support.

Hind Benbya is a Ph.D. candidate at the E-business Management school (EBMS), Lecce University, Italy. Her areas of interest include, E-Business, Knowledge management processes and systems and organizational culture. After her graduation from the ISCAE Casablanca (Morocco) in Marketing, she followed a DEA at the IAE of Aix en Provence in Management sciences in France in the field of Marketing and then hold a master in E-Business in Italy.

References (39)

  • Alavi, M. (1997). KPMG Peat Marwick U.S.: One Giant Brain, Case 9-397- 108 Boston, MA: Harvard Business...
  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (1999). Knowledge Management Systems: Issues, Challenges, and Benefits. Communications of the...
  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. (2001). Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual foundations and...
  • Aneja, A., Rowan, C., & Brooksby, B. (2000). Corporate portal Framework for transforming content Chaos on Intranets....
  • Arthur Andersen, & The American Productivity and Quality Center. (1996). The Knowledge Management Assessment Tool:...
  • Barney, J. (1986). Organizational Culture: Can it be a source of sustained competitive advantage?. Academy of...
  • Bartlett, C. (1996). McKinsey & Company: Managing Knowledge and Learning, Case 9-396-357, Boston, MA: Harvard Business...
  • Chandler, A. (1992). Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise. Journal of...
  • T Davenport et al.

    Working knowledge how organizations manage what they know

    (1998)
  • D.W DeLong et al.

    Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management

    Academy of Management Executive

    (2000)
  • Detlor, B. (2000). The corporate portal as information infrastructure: Towards a framework for portal design....
  • Drucker, D. (2001). Knowledge management: Theory doesn’t equal practice. Internet Wee. January 29,...
  • Gartner Group. (1998). Knowledge Management Scenario. Conference...
  • Garvin, D. (1994). Building a Learning Organization. Harvard Business Review,...
  • Gottschalk, P. (2000). Knowledge management systems: a comparison of law firms and consulting firms. Informing science,...
  • J Griffiths

    Social, behavioral and ethical factors

    Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science.

    (1999)
  • Hickins, M. (1999). Xerox shares its knowledge. Management Review, September,...
  • Holsapple, W., & Joshi, D. (1998). In search of a Descriptive framework for Knowledge Management: preliminary Delphi...
  • KPMG (2000). The knowledge management research report 2000....
  • Cited by (193)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Hind Benbya is a Ph.D. candidate at the E-business Management school (EBMS), Lecce University, Italy. Her areas of interest include, E-Business, Knowledge management processes and systems and organizational culture. After her graduation from the ISCAE Casablanca (Morocco) in Marketing, she followed a DEA at the IAE of Aix en Provence in Management sciences in France in the field of Marketing and then hold a master in E-Business in Italy.

    Giuseppina Passiante is associate professor at the department of Innovation Engineering and at ISUFI- e-Business Management School, University of Lecce, Italy. Her research fields concern models of local systems development in the digital/knowledge economy, and more specifically the management of learning processes. She is also expert in Innovation Management, and has realized programs and projects for Science and Technological Parks; she has published several papers on these topics.

    Nassim Aissa Belbaly is a Ph.D. candidate at the E-business Management school (EBMS), Lecce University, Italy. His areas of interest are Knowledge management and organizational learning. After his graduation from the ISCAE Casablanca (Morocco) in Marketing, he followed a DEA at the IAE of Aix en Provence in Management sciences in France in the field of Marketing and then hold a master in E-Business in Italy.

    View full text