Critical decisions for ERP integration: Small business issues

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2009.03.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Small enterprises are facing significant challenges to become suppliers of bigger customers due to the excessive costs associated with accessing a vast market of potential customers. It is essential for small businesses to adopt an ERP system to maintain control of their operations and to compete globally. An ERP implementation is expensive and risky for all businesses, but it is still more challenging for small businesses, which have particular characteristics. We identified from archived literature, key decisions necessary in selecting and implementing an ERP system. While these critical decisions are applicable to all types of businesses, the focus of this research was to recommend the best practices for each one of these key decisions for small businesses. We interviewed six small businesses to recommend best practices for the critical decisions: (1) project team structure, (2) implementation strategy, (3) database conversion strategy, (4) transition technique, (5) risk management strategy and (6) change management strategy. Our results indicate that these best practices greatly enhanced the success of an ERP implementation for small businesses. Further, we recommend studying the impact of ERP systems on the small business’ participation in supply chain management.

Introduction

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems integrate all information and processes of an organization into a coalesced system that concerns how people and organizations access, collect, store, gather, summarize, interpret, and use information. An ERP system integrates different components of computer software and hardware to enable information flow throughout the enterprise. An important element of most ERP systems is the use of a unified database to gather data for the different system modules. ERP technology is complex, and its implementation often entails significant risks. In spite of these risks, organizations implement ERP systems for greater visibility into business process. The greater visibility allows companies to adapt readily in a dynamic business environment that calls for a continuous transformation of business processes (Konicki, 2001, Mabert et al., 2000, Songini, 2002). The continuous transformation of processes occurs at different levels and in different areas of the organization. Continuous transformation encompasses managing (1) activities that promote changes in the patterns of behavior of customers, people, and organizations and (2) information that leads to changes in the way people use information to engage in knowledge focus activities. An ERP implementation usually affects both suppliers and customers due to the transformation that generally occurs through the technical integration of software, hardware and processes.

The ability of a firm to implement an ERP successfully is of significant importance; ERP is an enabler for technological integration that has evolved from basic Material Requirement Systems (MRP, MRPII) to sophisticated and multimillion-dollar systems that aim to link databases and applications in a friendly manner. The implementation of an ERP system is complex and requires significant investment in consulting and software, which is usually doable only for very large corporations (Andriole, 2006). Moreover, the ability of an organization to evaluate the value creation and economic returns from an ERP system is a difficult task. The source of the difficulty seems to be in the necessary organizational changes for ERP implementation and in predicting the return on investment (Mabert, Soni, & Venkataramanan, 2001). These issues are particularly important within small and medium enterprises (SMEs), where the ERP implementation and evaluation of the potential benefits are still more uncertain (Davenport, 1998, Levy and Powell, 2000).

ERP vendors have been moving their attention toward small businesses by offering simplified and cheaper solutions from both the organizational and technological points of view (Chen, 2001). These vendors are concentrating on the customization process needed to match the ERP system modules with the features of existing processes. However, recent research (Koh and Simpson, 2007, Mabert et al., 2001, Quiescenti et al., 2006) shows that configuring and implementing ERP systems is still an expensive task, even more so in small firms. The company's inadequate information about the cost feasibility structure may make or break its decision to either continue or abandon an ERP implementation. Many small businesses either do not have sufficient resources or are not willing to commit a huge fraction of their resources due to the long implementation times and high fees associated with ERP implementation (Cragg and Zinatelli, 1995, Nah and Lau, 2001). There are many factors involved in the cost analysis structure of an ERP system. Babey (2006) documented that total cost of ownership of an ERP system includes not only the implementation costs but acquisition and long-term ongoing support costs as well. Some issues to consider for ERP cost analysis include updating, upgrading, maintenance, and management of the ERP system.

The majority of small businesses (SB) often have significant constraints in their resources. Nonetheless, they (vendor, contractors, and so forth) still need connectivity among employees, other suppliers, customers, and partners. The connectivity is feasible if these businesses develop the technological capacity to integrate their business processes with other business members to maintain a competitive advantage. Integration of key business processes from end user through original suppliers provides product, services, and information that add value to customers and other stakeholders.

Moreover, small businesses are considered the backbone of the economy of the United and of other countries around the world (IDC, 2006). In the United States, there are 23 million functioning small business firms (U.S. Census Bureau, 2006) that employ 50% of the private workforce (U.S. Small Business Administration, 2006). In spite of a worldwide active economy driven by small businesses, research on most technology-related issues has focused on large corporations. Small and medium enterprises are facing significant challenges to become members of the global strategic partner network and consequently to become suppliers of bigger customers. These bigger customers were previously out of the reach of SMEs due to the prohibitive costs associated with setting up and maintaining a standardized electronic document interchange system for the exchange of documents (invoices, shipping notices, purchase orders, and so forth) between companies Given the access to such a vast market of global strategic partners, it is very advantageous to SMEs to adopt some sort of ERP system in order to maintain control of their operation among the pressures they will face, meeting not only increased demand, but also the service level expectations of their new customers.

Some developments have taken place to assist small business in documents exchange. Software developers and businesses are actively pursuing the next phase of business integration (B2Bi), namely XML-based Web applications These applications can enable inter-enterprise integration. There are many de facto XML initiatives for vertical or horizontal B2Bi, including ebXML, RosettaNet, HL7, and cXML; however, the diversity of XML formats causes difficulty in facilitating XML-based data exchanges (Peishun, Trappey, & Trappey, 2004). Nonetheless, some companies have adopted the XML hub prototype to engage in documents trade. The hub is developed using widely applied web-based technologies (XML, XSLT, HTTP and JDOM). The hub architecture is applicable to smaller suppliers; the architecture is flexible, scalable, extensible and suitable for a distributed networking environment.

Even though some progress has taken place for electronic document exchange in small businesses, there is no adequate research for a sensible and easy integration of ERP implementation systems. Therefore, for a successful ERP implementation, it becomes necessary for SMEs to carefully evaluate some key implementation decisions. This article investigates the key decisions a small business organization must make about technology integration regarding ERP in order to stay competitive. Our research focus is on Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), which facilitates the flow of information throughout the organization, and assists enterprises in automating and integrating corporate cross-functions such as inventory control, procurement, distribution, finance, human resources, and product development.

The organization of the remainder of the paper is as follows: Section 2 examines the research literature concerned with ERP basics and implementation and presents some basics of small business and its unique characteristics. Section 3 presents the methodology used to collect data to illustrate the proposed framework. Section 4 examines critical decisions for ERP implementation and formulates a framework for analysis of small business. Section 5 summarizes and discusses the results. The summary of the main points raised by this research leads us to identify opportunities for future research.

Section snippets

ERP basics

An ERP system is an information system consisting of software support modules. Some of these modules include utilities for marketing and sales, field service, product design and development, production and inventory control, procurement, distribution, industrial facilities management, process design and development, manufacturing, quality, human resources, finance and accounting, and information services (Anderegg, 2000, Larson et al., 2005). According to Al-Mashari and Al-Mudimigh (2003), an

Methodology

The research methodology consisted of primary and secondary sources. Secondary sources included computer searches on academic databases such as ABI Inform, Academic Source Complete, Emerald, and IEEE. The focus of the search was on studies on ERP systems and its implementation; special emphasis was on ERP, factors affecting its implementation, and small business. The terms “ERP implementation” and “small business” were the most desirable keywords in the searches. The selection of the six

ERP framework: critical decisions for implementation

Small businesses must have a broad adaptation of e-commerce and information technologies to be able to compete across various industries and survive as suppliers of other businesses (Peishun, Trappey, & Trappey, 2004). A well-justified ERP system helps identify the potential benefits that can accrue with the ERP implementation. These potential benefits later become yardsticks for the performance of the business (Chen, 2001).

One experience commonly found among companies implementing ERP systems

Conclusions and future research

A summary of the interviews with six SMEs that implemented an ERP system is presented in Table 5. For each critical decision, we list the number of SMEs that emphasized a particular choice, the key consideration that led to that choice, and the reason for the success of the decision.

The decision to implement an ERP system in a SME usually has a profound impact on the organization and on all members of the supply chain. The ERP implementation should be planned very carefully. The needs and

Rajiv Malhotra is an Engineering Manager at Advanced Micro Devices in Austin, Texas, in the area of Management of Technology. He has over 25 years of experience in the semiconductor industry and as a consultant in the Information Technology (IT) industry at various levels of Management and Technology Development. His technology experience is in the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) Software Development, microchip Product Development Methodology, Project Management, deployment of technology and

References (54)

  • Anderegg, T. (2000). ERP: A-Z implementer's guide for success (Resource...
  • S. Andriole

    The collaborate/integrate business technology strategy. Association for Computing Machinery

    Communications of the ACM

    (2006)
  • M. Avital et al.

    SAP implementation at Metalica: An organizational drama in two acts

    Journal of Information Technology

    (2000)
  • E.R. Babey

    Costs of enterprise resource planning system implementation—And then some

    New Directions for Higher Education

    (2006)
  • M. Baker

    Benefit gigs

    Financial Management

    (2003)
  • J. Careless

    Do you need ERP?

    Technology & Learning

    (2007)
  • I.J. Chen

    Planning for ERP systems: Analysis and future trends

    Business Process Management Journal

    (2001)
  • W.W.C. Chung et al.

    The development of a network strategy for continuous improvement in SMEs: A case study

    International Journal of Networking and Virtual Organisations

    (2002)
  • T.H. Davenport

    Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system

    Harvard Business Review

    (1998)
  • T.H. Davenport et al.

    Enterprise systems and ongoing process change

    Business Process Management Journal

    (2004)
  • R.G. Eshelman et al.

    When small companies implement big systems

    Strategic Finance

    (2001)
  • C. Francalanci

    Predicting the implementation effort of ERP projects: Empirical evidence on SAP/R3

    Journal of Information Technology

    (2001)
  • Gable, G., & Stewart, G. (1999). SAP R/3 implementation issues for small to medium enterprises. Citing online sources:...
  • W. Holland et al.

    Is your IT system vested?

    Strategic Finance

    (2001)
  • S.-Y. Hung et al.

    Critical factors of adoption for small and medium sized enterprises: An empirical study

  • A.B. Ibrahim et al.

    Perceived causes of success in small businesses

    American Journal of Small Business

    (1986)
  • IDC Market Research Inc. (2006). Profile of hispanic-owned U.S. small businesses 2005. Citing online sources: Available...
  • Cited by (0)

    Rajiv Malhotra is an Engineering Manager at Advanced Micro Devices in Austin, Texas, in the area of Management of Technology. He has over 25 years of experience in the semiconductor industry and as a consultant in the Information Technology (IT) industry at various levels of Management and Technology Development. His technology experience is in the Electronic Design Automation (EDA) Software Development, microchip Product Development Methodology, Project Management, deployment of technology and Software Engineering. He has management experience in software Product Life Cycle Management, Negotiation and Management of global EDA software contracts, Management of R&D budgets, Management of microchip Product Development R&D teams and IT Management and consulting for small businesses. He is currently an ABD at the University of Texas. His research interests are in the area of Management of Technology, Management of Knowledge, Business and Technology Forecasting, and the Financial Valuation of engineering software and services in the high technology industry. His research work has been presented at several professional conferences including the IEEE Engineering Management Conferences, the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Systems Management, and the annual AMD Engineering Conferences. Rajiv is also an active member of several professional organizations.

    Cecilia Temponi is a Professor of Operations and Supply Chain Management at Texas State University, San Marcos, Texas. Dr. Temponi holds a dual appointment from the McCoy College of Business and the Ingram School of Engineering. She has over ten years of national and international industry experience in several sectors of the economy - including oil, software, and consulting - and at various levels of management. She currently chairs the initiative to develop the graduate program at the Ingram School of Engineering. Her research experience and interests are in Enterprise Modeling of manufacturing and business processes (Quantitative and qualitative), Scalable Enterprise Systems Management, Supply Chain Management, Small Business Issues, and Quality. Her major contributions are in modeling of enterprise systems and in continuous improvement models for industrial and academic organizations. Dr. Temponi's publications have appeared in journals such as European Journal of Operational Research, International Journal of Production Economics, Journal of Quality Assurance, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, and other such journals.

    Dr. Temponi is a member of the Institute for Operations Research and Management Science (INFORMS), the Academy of Management (AOM), the Institute of Electronics and Electrical Engineers (IEEE) and its Engineering Management division.

    View full text