Opinion Paper
Building a compassionate workplace using information technology: Considerations for information systems research

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102261Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Proposes the need for information systems (IS) researchers to pursue work on compassion in organizational workplaces.

  • Highlights the value of IS research on compassion.

  • Discusses how information technology (IT) is intricately related to compassionate phenomena in workplaces.

  • Proposes an integrative framework that maps the scope of organizational compassion in IS.

  • Develops a research agenda that can aid future inquiry into compassion in IS research..

Abstract

This opinion paper presents the need for IS research on compassion in the organizational workplace. Given the current challenges caused by COVID-19, we argue that organizations need to be resilient to counter the adverse effects of this pandemic. Developing a compassionate organizational workplace is an effective way to build resilient organizations. The paper draws attention to the fact that a focus on compassion can be a valuable scope of inquiry within IS research. It proposes an integrative framework mapping the scope of compassion in IS research and develops a research agenda that can aid future inquiry into this phenomenon.

Introduction

Our lives, businesses, and entire societies around the world have been disrupted as never before by the COVID-19 crisis (Venkatesh, 2020). Reacting to this unforeseen disruption, academics and practitioners alike have recognized the need for transformative changes in the nature of work and organizing to address the unprecedented challenges that this pandemic has brought upon us (Davison, 2020; Dwivedi et al., 2020). A prominent transformative idea-that has been forwarded to counter the negative ramifications of this pandemic-is the notion of organizational resilience and the need to improve it in a technology-mediated, fluid, and remote organizational workspace (Rai, 2020; Watson, Ives, & Piccoli, 2020). Resilient organizations are those that “thrive despite experiencing conditions that are surprising, uncertain, often adverse, and usually unstable” (Lengnick-Hall, Beck, & Lengnick-Hall, 2011, p. 243) −conditions that capture the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on organizations quite accurately.

One of the critical pathways to achieving organizational resilience is through the acknowledgement and practice of compassion within organizations (Kanov et al., 2004; Lilius, Worline, Dutton, Kanov, & Maitlis, 2011). Organizational compassion refers to a collective aspect of organizational work, where people notice suffering (amongst one or more colleagues), become empathetic to the sufferer(s), make sense of the cause of suffering, and act collectively so as to alleviate the suffering (Dutton, Workman, & Hardin, 2014; Lilius, Kanov, Dutton, Worline, & Maitlis, 2012). In an organization, compassion generates relational resources, strengthens shared values, and cultivates critical relational skills (Lilius et al., 2011)–factors that generate mutuality within the workforce, a prominent factor in attaining organizational resilience (Kanov, Powley, & Walshe, 2017). In organizations disrupted by pandemics like COVID-19, compassion becomes an important consideration for organizations as employees wrestle with challenges of alienation, increasing technology dependence, possibilities of job loss, psychological pressures to maintain productivity, and managing work-life conflict (Inchausti, MacBeth, Hasson-Ohayon, & Dimaggio, 2020; Torous, Myrick, Rauseo-Ricupero, & Firth, 2020; Walker & Oldford, 2020).

From an IS standpoint, an understanding of the role of technology in the enablement of organizational resilience–by promoting compassion–thus becomes critical. The understanding of how IT enables compassion within an organizational workforce is vital, as arguably, that understanding will shape the future of technology-mediated work to a large extent. The salience of IT to promoting compassion becomes especially relevant given that technology-mediated work is also known to have issues of dehumanizing individuals (Lowry, Zhang, Wang, & Siponen, 2016), resulting in negative outcomes such as technostress (Califf, Sarker, & Sarker, 2020; Pirkkalainen, Salo, Tarafdar, & Makkonen, 2019; Tarafdar, DArcy, Turel, & Gupta, 2015), anxiety (Martínez-Córcoles, Teichmann, & Murdvee, 2017), and severe work-life imbalance (Sarker, Xiao, Sarker, & Ahuja, 2012; Syrek, Apostel, & Antoni, 2013). We fear that the COVID-19 impact will accentuate these harmful consequences. Considering the harmful implications of a technology-mediated dehumanized workforce leads us to reflect upon the salience of IT in the promotion and practice of compassion, as an important antidote to possible dystopic outcomes, and as critical to achieving organizational resilience.

However, technology-mediated work does not always have a dark side. For example, technology can be leveraged to address mental challenges during lockdowns by allowing for the delivering of therapy to alleviate mental challenges (Inchausti et al., 2020). Both the harmful effects of technology on the organizational workforce, and the possibilities of technology allowing us to address challenges related societal distress (e.g. as a result of crises such as the COVID-19 pandemic) increase the salience of investigating compassion within an IT context. This need for compassion in IS research motivates this paper. We focus the rest of the paper on the ways and means of exploring how information technology and systems can facilitate the emergence and enactment of compassion, particularly within an organizational context.1 We are optimistic that the ideas put forward in this paper will be helpful as we attempt to address IT-related workplace issues and build more resilient organizations which can survive challenges such as those posed by the COVID-19 pandemic.

We believe the message of our paper is consistent with those embraced by movements across different academic communities, particularly the disciplines of management and organizational studies, the Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), and the Association for Information Systems (AIS). The disciplines of management and organizational studies have recognized compassion as a core focus in their disciplines (Tsui, 2013) within a larger emphasis on positive organizational scholarship (POS). POS, which focuses on “what is positive, flourishing, and life-giving in organizations” (Cameron & Caza, 2004, p. 731), includes compassion as a salient focus of inquiry (Rynes, Bartunek, Dutton, & Margolis, 2012). Similarly, the conception of positive computing within the ACM community is consistent with views espoused in this paper. ACM promoted the paradigm of “positive computing” at its annual 2016 CHI conference, as a part of a bigger agenda on “designing technology for wellbeing” (Tondello, 2017, p. 20). Positive computing is based on the idea that design decisions should promote human thriving (Calvo, Peters, & D’Mello, 2015) and is increasingly garnering scholarly interest in the ACM community. Finally, we believe that our paper reflects AIS’ adoption of “the Grand Vision Project for the ICT-enabled Bright Society (in short, the Bright ICT Initiative)” (Lee, 2016, p. 1). The goal of this initiative is to mitigate the adverse effects of IT in businesses and society, as well as specifically use IT for human enrichment (Lee, 2016). We took inspiration from these academic movements while writing this paper.

Our paper proceeds as follows. We first sensitize the IS community on why it is valuable and necessary to conduct research on compassion. Next, we propose a possible integrative framework that captures the phenomenon of compassion as it relates to IS research. Finally, we use this integrative framework to develop some guidelines to energize IS research on compassion.

Section snippets

The value of IS research on compassion

Focusing on organizational compassion allows IS research to examine an increasing promethean dilemma confronting contemporary use and design of technology. While technologies enable organizations to be successful and innovative (Kohli & Melville, 2019; Nambisan, Lyytinen, Majchrzak, & Song, 2017; Nevo & Wade, 2010), the increasing embeddedness of technology in organizations and society has a record of dystopic consequences, where technology has often been a chosen conduit for pursuing an

An integrative framework mapping the scope of compassion in IS

The integrative framework (see Fig. 1 and Table 1) depicts the authors’ perspective of the relevance of IT to organizational compassion. This viewpoint is later used to outline possible considerations for IS research. We invite our colleagues to contribute to the discussion on IS and compassion by proposing alternate viewpoints as well.

To begin, we propose that the enactment of organizational compassion is influenced by two triggers – a) organizational compassionate imperative (OCI) and b)

A compassionate charter: considerations for IS research

The integrative framework described above can help define a Compassionate Charter for IS Research. The different elements of the framework (identified as conceptual areas) are used to develop research themes, leading to research questions based upon salient literature. Specifically, there are four conceptual areas that follow from Fig. 1:

  • Organizational compassionate imperative (OCI)

  • IT-enabled enactment of compassion

  • Infusion of compassion in technology design and information systems development

Conclusion

Organizational compassion can yield varied benefits for organizations that practice it and researchers in other fields have already produced a vigorous and ongoing stream of scholarship on this important topic. Given the workplace challenges due to COVID-19, the time has come for IS researchers to make our unique mark on the study of organizational compassion and perhaps gain some intellectual stake into this important and relevant phenomenon. To encourage distinct contributions by IS

References (95)

  • C.A. Lengnick-Hall et al.

    Developing a capacity for organizational resilience through strategic human resource management

    Human Resource Management Review

    (2011)
  • M. Martínez-Córcoles et al.

    Assessing technophobia and technophilia: Development and validation of a questionnaire

    Technology in Society

    (2017)
  • H. Allcott et al.

    Social media and fake news in the 2016 election

    The Journal of Economic Perspectives

    (2017)
  • Aristotle

    Nicomachean ethics (trans. Terence Irwin)

    (1985)
  • R.M. Bokeno

    Introduction: Appraisals of organizational learning as emancipatory change

    Journal of Organizational Change Management

    (2003)
  • A. Burton-Jones et al.

    From use to effective use: A representation theory perspective

    Information Systems Research

    (2013)
  • C.B. Califf et al.

    The bright and dark sides of technostress: A mixed-methods study involving healthcare IT

    MIS Quarterly

    (2020)
  • R.A. Calvo et al.

    Positive computing: Technology for wellbeing and human potential

    (2014)
  • R.A. Calvo et al.

    When technologies manipulate our emotions

    Communications of the ACM

    (2015)
  • K. Cameron et al.

    Organizational and leadership virtues and the role of forgiveness

    Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies

    (2002)
  • K.S. Cameron et al.

    Contributions to the discipline of positive organizational scholarship

    American Behavioral Scientist

    (2004)
  • J.L. Carlo et al.

    A knowledge-based model of radical innovation in small software firms

    MIS Quarterly

    (2012)
  • P. Castel et al.

    Institutional change as an interactive process: The case of the modernization of the French cancer centers

    Organization Science

    (2010)
  • D.F. Cates et al.

    Choosing to feel: Virtue, friendship, and compassion for friends

    Journal of Religious Ethics

    (1998)
  • S. Chakraborty et al.

    Applying the grounded theory method to derive enterprise system requirements

    Paper Presented at the Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligences, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing, 2009. SNPD’09. 10th ACIS International Conference on

    (2009)
  • S. Chakraborty et al.

    Getting to the shalls: Facilitating sensemaking in requirements engineering

    ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems

    (2015)
  • S. Chatterjee et al.

    Strategic relevance of organizational virtues enabled by information technology in organizational innovation

    Journal of Management Information Systems

    (2015)
  • S. Chatterjee et al.

    Information Technology and organizational innovation: Harmonious information technology affordance and courage-based actualization

    The Journal of Strategic Information Systems

    (2020)
  • S. Chatterjee et al.

    A deontological approach to designing ethical collaboration

    Journal of the Association for Information Systems

    (2009)
  • S. Chatterjee et al.

    Ethical information systems development: A Baumanian postmodernist perspective

    Journal of the Association for Information Systems

    (2009)
  • L.M. Cysneiros et al.

    A framework for integrating non-functional requirements into conceptual models

    Requirements Engineering

    (2001)
  • R.M. Davison

    The transformative potential of disruptions: A viewpoint

    International Journal of Information Management

    (2020)
  • A.L. Delbecq et al.

    Organizational compassion: The need for leader and collegial support beyond expressing condolences

  • G. DeSanctis et al.

    Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory

    Organization Science

    (1994)
  • J.E. Dutton et al.

    Compassion at work

    Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

    (2014)
  • Y.K. Dwivedi et al.

    Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on information management research and practice: Transforming education, work and life

    International Journal of Information Management

    (2020)
  • M. Feldman et al.

    Theorizing practice and practicing theory

    Organization Science

    (2011)
  • M. Feldman et al.

    Organizational routines as sources of connections and understandings

    Journal of Management Studies

    (2002)
  • B. Friedman et al.

    Value sensitive design and information systems

  • U. Gal et al.

    Identity orientation, social exchange, and information technology use in interorganizational collaborations

    Organization Science

    (2014)
  • J.J. Gibson

    The ecological approach to visual perception

    (1986)
  • T. Hagendorff

    The ethics of AI ethics: An evaluation of guidelines

    Minds and Machines

    (2020)
  • H. Hansen et al.

    This is going to hurt: Compassionate research methods

    Organizational Research Methods

    (2016)
  • R. Hirschheim et al.

    Four paradigms of information systems development

    Communications of the ACM

    (1989)
  • E. Hollensbe et al.

    Organizations with purpose

    Academy of Management Journal

    (2014)
  • Q.N. Huy

    Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change

    The Academy of Management Review

    (1999)
  • J. Iivari et al.

    A paradigmatic analysis contrasting information systems development approaches and methodologies

    Information Systems Research

    (1998)
  • J. Iivari et al.

    A dynamic framework for classifying information systems development methodologies and approaches

    Journal of Management Information Systems

    (2000)
  • F. Inchausti et al.

    Psychological intervention and COVID-19: What we know so far and what we can do

    Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy

    (2020)
  • A. Jobin et al.

    The global landscape of AI ethics guidelines

    Nature Machine Intelligence

    (2019)
  • T.M. Jones

    Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model

    Academy of Management Review

    (1991)
  • T.M. Jones et al.

    The link between ethical judgment and action in organizations: A moral approbation approach

    Organization Science

    (1997)
  • J. Kanov et al.

    Is it ok to care? How compassion falters and is courageously accomplished in the midst of uncertainty

    Human Relations

    (2017)
  • J.M. Kanov et al.

    Compassion in organizational life

    American Behavioral Scientist

    (2004)
  • R. Kohli et al.

    Digital innovation: A review and synthesis

    Information Systems Journal

    (2019)
  • J.K. Lee

    Invited commentary—Reflections on ICT-enabled bright society research

    Information Systems Research

    (2016)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text