A software tool to aid long-term care budget planning at local authority level
Introduction
As people get older, activities of daily living, such as feeding, toileting and self-care, can become difficult. In general, long-term care (LTC), which is provided to people who are unable to look after themselves without some degree of support, embraces all forms of continuous, social, personal and nursing care, and associated domestic services [1]. In this paper, the term LTC refers to residential care (RC) and nursing care (NC) provided in institutional care homes, e.g. residential homes and nursing homes. As the world population is ageing, it is generally believed that LTC will become an even more important issue for an ageing society [2]. Governments around the world have been alerted with the potential difficulties in funding and managing LTC, and are attempting to address the difficulties in their own ways.
Local authorities in England play a major role in running the system of LTC. Under current regulations (i.e. the 1990 NHS and Community Care Act and the Care Standard Act 2000), local authorities are responsible for the placement and finance of all publicly funded residents in LTC that conforms to national standards. The ability to discharge elderly patients to LTC is essential in the planning and running of acute hospital care. Under the Community Care (Delayed Discharges, etc.) Act 2003, local authorities have been facing financial penalties since January 2004 for failing to provide vacancies in institutional care homes for hospital discharges [3].
Given limited resources available, local authorities have a keen interest in knowing the behaviour of the LTC system, in particular, how long residents stay in the system, and ultimately, how much the system will cost. From the prospective of local authorities, the emphasis is placed on the residents who require funding support from the public. A national survey [4] in England showed that 73% of the residents admitted to LTC in 1996 were publicly funded, and most of them were there on a permanent basis, i.e. not expected to go back to their own homes.
Extensive studies have been conducted in Britain to develop macro models for projecting the demand and hence the cost of LTC at the national level [5], [6]. This type of model, which adopts a “whole system” approach, is typically useful for strategic planning for a nation.
However, at a local level, a methodology that takes into account local characteristics in its forecast will be more suitable. Especially, as far as cost is concerned, local authorities need a method that can help their budget planning and allow evaluation of the potential effects of changes in regulations and financial context on the use of resources and costs. Good budget planning is essential to ensure the successful delivery of LTC that balances demand and provision.
In previous studies [7], [8], we developed a forecasting framework for predicting the cost of LTC arising from known commitments from a local authority perspective. The term known commitments refers to the group of publicly funded residents currently in the LTC system. Knowing the projected cost associated with this group of residents is of particular interest to local authorities as it corresponds to the burden they cannot escape. This information will enable local authorities to identify the fraction of the budget that is already committed due to past admission decisions. Given this information, local authorities will also have a fair idea about the resources available for new admissions in a financial year.
In Section 2, we briefly describe the forecasting framework and its data requirement. In Section 3, we describe a software implementation of the framework, which was developed in collaboration with an English borough. In Section 4, we demonstrate the use of the tool based on data from the borough. The usefulness of such a software tool is discussed in Section 5.
Section snippets
Methods and data
In England, RC is intended for older people who are frail but still able to manage their activities of daily living; while NC is for older people who are medically stable and have a greater degree of physical and mental disabilities. Residents can be admitted to RC or NC directly. RC residents may be transferred to NC if their conditions deteriorate to such extent that RC is no longer appropriate for their needs. For publicly funded residents, discharges from LTC are predominantly by death, and
Software implementation
The forecasting framework introduced in Section 2 was tested and implemented as a software tool in collaboration with the London Borough of Merton, UK. The aim of the implementation was to develop a decision aid for local authority budget planners and care service managers by providing them with forecast of cost due to known commitments. The prototype software tool was developed to run on a Microsoft™ WINDOWS™ platform, and consisted of three main components: (i) a graphical user interface
Example
The Housing and Social Service Department of the London Borough of Merton (UK) maintains a database system that contains detailed information on the status of the publicly funded residents’ stays in their LTC system. The database system, which was introduced in 2002, was populated to contain information for residents who were present at the time and all subsequent new admissions to the LTC system. In this example, we queried the database on 24 October 2005 and downloaded all the records related
Discussion
Local authorities face real challenges when it comes to annual budget planning for funding the system of LTC. Uncertainty about the long-term cost of caring for their current residents in the system, in addition to unknown future admissions, have made the tasks of local authority budget managers very complex and demanding. The software tool described in this paper aims to quantify the source of uncertainty related to known and unavoidable commitments and forecasts the resulting financial
Acknowledgements
We thank Mr. Roger Simms and Ms. Heather Lockwood from the Housing and Social Services Department of the London Borough of Merton, England, UK, for assisting in data extraction and providing feedbacks during software development. This work was partly supported by grants from the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GR/R86430/01) and the London Borough of Merton, UK.
References (17)
Aspects of implementing and harmonizing healthcare communication standards
Int. J. Med. Inform.
(1998)- et al.
Implementing health care systems using XML standards
Int. J. Med. Inform.
(2005) Financing Long-Term Care, the Critical Debate
(1993)- et al.
Choice and responsiveness for older people in the “patient centred” NHS
Br. Med. J.
(2004) - et al.
Care Homes for Older People (Volume 1): Facilities, Residents and Costs, Personal Social Services Research Unit (PSSRU)
(2001) - et al.
Demand for Long-Term Care: Projections for Long-Term Care Finance for Elderly People
(1998) - et al.
Demand for long-term care for older people in England to 2031
Health Stat. Q.
(2001)
Cited by (6)
Health O.R. and the industrialisation of healthcare
2012, OR54 Keynote Papers - 54th Conference of the Operational Research Society 2012Capacity planning for publicly funded community based long-term care services
2012, International Series in Operations Research and Management ScienceDevelopment of a web-based system using the model view controller paradigm to facilitate regional long-term care planning
2011, Proceedings - IEEE Symposium on Computer-Based Medical SystemsMeasuring and modelling occupancy time in NHS continuing healthcare
2011, BMC Health Services ResearchData and information quality in geriatric medicine: The patient data analysis information system
2008, 2nd European Conference on Information Management and Evaluation, ECIME 2008