Internet health information seeking is a team sport: Analysis of the Pew Internet Survey

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2012.09.008Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

Previous studies examining characteristics of Internet health information seekers do not distinguish between those who only seek for themselves, and surrogate seekers who look for health information for family or friends. Identifying the unique characteristics of surrogate seekers would help in developing Internet interventions that better support these information seekers.

Objective

To assess differences between self seekers versus those that act also as surrogate seekers.

Methods

We analyzed data from the cross-sectional Pew Internet and American Life Project November/December 2008 health survey. Our dependent variable was self-report of type of health information seeking (surrogate versus self seeking). Independent variables included demographics, health status, and caregiving. After bivariate comparisons, we then developed multivariable models using logistic regression to assess characteristics associated with surrogate seeking.

Results

Out of 1250 respondents who reported seeking health information online, 56% (N = 705) reported being surrogate seekers. In multivariable models, compared with those who sought information for themselves only, surrogate seekers were more likely both married and a parent (OR = 1.57, CI = 1.08, 2.28), having good (OR = 2.05, CI = 1.34, 3.12) or excellent (OR = 2.72, CI = 1.70, 4.33) health status, being caregiver of an adult relative (OR = 1.76, CI = 1.34, 2.30), having someone close with a serious medical condition (OR = 1.62, CI = 1.21, 2.17) and having someone close to them facing a chronic illness (OR = 1.55, CI = 1.17, 2.04).

Conclusions

Our findings provide evidence that information needs of surrogate seekers are not being met, specifically of caregivers. Additional research is needed to develop new functions that support surrogate seekers.

Highlights

► The characteristics of those individuals who seek health information online for themselves differ from those who seek for themselves and others (surrogate seekers). ► The markers of caregiving are positively associated with surrogate seeking. ► Self- and surrogate-seekers differ in their patterns of online health information seeking. ► Findings provide a foundation for intervention research in the realm of computer tailored health interventions for caregivers.

Introduction

Internet access is prevalent in the United States [9], [21]. In 2005, a majority of adult Americans had access to the Internet [33]. Even more users have access to the Internet now through their mobile phones [36]. The Internet has great potential to support health care and self-care [3], [5], [23], [33]. A majority of Internet users have reported searching the Internet for health information, with some estimates of 40–70% of Internet users or 90–160 million people using the Internet for this purpose [6], [8], [10], [19], [33]. Internet health information has the potential to influence health behaviors and outcomes.

In addition to searching for themselves, many Internet information seekers are also surrogates who seek health information for others in their social network. Findings from the Pew Internet and American Life Project health survey (2002 and 2008) indicated that 57% and 56%, respectively, of users reported acting as surrogate health information seekers [15], [18]. Previous studies have not compared surrogate-seekers to those information seekers who seek only for themselves (self seekers). Who are these surrogate seekers? Are surrogate seekers caregivers for sick patients or concerned with the health status of their friend or family? What information are surrogate seekers looking for online and does the information found online impact surrogate seekers similarly to self seekers? Answering these questions will assist in the development of Internet interventions that better support the needs of surrogate seekers.

In this paper, we report our analysis of data from the Pew Internet & American Life Project [18], a nationally representative dataset collected in 2008. Our primary objective was to compare self seekers versus those that acted as surrogate seekers. We sought factors independently associated with surrogate seeking and the types of information they sought.

Section snippets

Study design

Our analysis was conducted using data from the Pew Internet and American Life Project November/December 2008 Health Survey [18]. Telephone interviews were conducted in English and Spanish by Princeton Survey Research Associates International between November 19 and December 20, 2008. The data was primarily collected to describe Internet use and health information seeking. In this more detailed secondary analysis, we took the opportunity to compare those who reported seeking for themselves with

Results

Our final sample included 1250 information seekers who reported looking for health information online. Out of these, 56% (N = 705) reported looking for health information for others the last time they sought health information on the Internet.

Discussion

Using the Pew Internet and American Life study, we found that looking for health information for others online (surrogate seeking) was common. This is consistent with prior reports using multiple measures of health information seeking including a proximal marker (the last time you went online…) or a longer time period (within the past year). Expanding beyond prior research, we demonstrated that race, a common disparity to Internet access, was not different among surrogate seeking and

Conclusions

The Internet provides the opportunity to influence the health of a significant proportion of the population. Internet information seekers look for information for themselves as well as others. Studies which seek to further understand these Internet information seekers will enhance our ability to design and implement more effective Internet-based interventions. Our findings, based on analysis of the Pew Internet and American Life Project November/December 2008 Health Survey, provide further

Authors’ contributions

RSS conducted the data analysis with the oversight of TKH and JA, and drafted the initial manuscript along with K. TKH reviewed and approved the final draft. SCL, SLS, TKH, and JA participated in the critical review, edited, and approved the final draft.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Summary points

What was already known on the topic:

  • It is estimated that around 200 million individuals in the United States now have online access, thus making the Internet a potential mode in which to influence health behaviors.

  • Past research has demonstrated that characteristics (race, age, etc.) may be influential to online health-seeking behaviors. Yet, there has been no distinction made between individuals who seek health information

References (49)

  • D. Dinh et al.

    Towards a context sensitive approach to searching information based on domain specific knowledge sources

    Web Semantics: Sci. Services Agents World Wide Web

    (2012)
  • J. Cohen et al.

    Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences

    (1983)
  • M. Kreuter

    Tailoring Health Messages: Customizing Communication with Computer Technology

    (2000)
  • J.M. Bernhardt

    Health education and the digital divide: building bridges and filling chasms

    Health Educ. Res.

    (2000)
  • T.K. Houston et al.

    Users of Internet health information: differences by health status

    J. Med. Internet Res.

    (2002)
  • L. Baker et al.

    Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey

    JAMA

    (2003)
  • S. Fox

    Health Information Online 2003

    (2004)
  • P.W. Slattum et al.

    Caregiver burden in Alzheimer's disease

    Consult. Pharm.

    (2004)
  • J.G. Anderson

    Consumers of e-Health

    Soc. Sci. Comput. Rev.

    (2004)
  • S. Fox

    Health Information Online 2005

    (2005)
  • E.S. Berner et al.

    Data quality in the outpatient setting: impact on clinical decision support systems

    AMIA Annu. Symp. Proc.

    (2005)
  • X. Shen et al.

    Context-sensitive information retrieval using implicit feedback

  • T. Lancaster et al.

    Self-help interventions for smoking cessation

    Cochrane Database Syst. Rev.

    (2005)
  • L.E. Moody

    E-health web portals: delivering holistic healthcare and making home the point of care

    Holist. Nurs. Pract.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text