International perspectives on sharing clinical data with patients

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.11.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • International subjects were interviewed about sharing clinical information with patients.

  • Enabling patient access to data is occurring on an international scale.

  • There is considerable variability of sharing and access across countries.

  • Globally, efforts to improve patient access to data are growing.

Abstract

Objective

Engaging patients in their care has become a topic of increasing importance, and enabling patients to have access to their clinical data is a key aspect of such engagement. We investigated, on an international scale, the current state of approaches for providing patients with access to their own clinical information.

Methods

Individuals from 28 countries were invited to participate in a cross-sectional semi-structured interview. Interview questions focused on social and cultural influences that affected patient engagement activities, government support for current and planned initiatives, data ownership models, and technical issues.

Results

Interviews were conducted with individuals from 16 countries representing six continents. Respondents reported substantive initiatives for providing information to patients in the majority of countries interviewed. These initiatives were diverse in nature and stage of implementation.

Discussion

Enabling patient access to data is occurring on an international scale. There is considerable variability in the level of maturity, the degree of government involvement, the technical infrastructure, and the plans for future development across the world. As informaticians, we are still in the early stages of deploying patient engagement technologies and have yet to identify optimal strategies in this arena.

Conclusion

Efforts to improve patient access to data are active on a global-scale. There are many open questions about best practices and much can be learned by adopting an international perspective to guide future implementation efforts.

Introduction

Around the world, people are being encouraged to participate more actively in their healthcare. While individuals in most countries have been able to obtain copies of their medical records for many years, few regularly take advantage of this opportunity. Historically, medical records were kept on paper in disparate locations, thereby making the provision of copies to the patient an arduous task. With the recent proliferation of electronic health records (EHRs), there is much greater potential for patients to access their information [1], [2].

Dr. Warner Slack, an informatician at Harvard University, has commented that “the largest and least-used resource in medicine is the patient” [3]. To increase engagement and allow patients to more fully participate in their healthcare, they need access to their clinical data. Providing patients with their clinical data is associated with increased satisfaction, improved patient knowledge, control and self-care, and may result in better health outcomes [4], [5], [6].

How to best provide patients with access to their clinical data is unknown, particularly as diverse patient populations in various geographical locations may have different needs and capabilities. Previously, we analyzed the situation in the United States concerning the adoption of personal health records (PHRs). This paper found considerable variability in the types of clinical data and data-release timing within PHRs in the US [7]. In the current study, we examine how institutions in different countries around the world are sharing clinical information with patients. Other investigators have studied global patient engagement with a particular focus on components of engagement such as communication with doctors and shared decision-making [8]. They found wide country variation in this type of patient engagement by clinicians, while globally, engaged patients reported more positive views, higher-quality care, and fewer errors. This study is focused specifically on the concept of engaging patients in their care through the sharing of personal clinical information that is maintained by healthcare providers.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

The design of this study was a cross-sectional survey conducted via telephone or videoconference during November and December 2014. Members of the research team conducted semi-structured interviews to learn about clinical information sharing practices across the globe.

The list of interview participants was created using a convenience method of sampling in which research team members identified individuals around the world who had knowledge of patient data-sharing initiatives in their respective

Results

We invited 32 people from 28 different countries to participate in the study. Of the 32, we received responses from 19 individuals representing 19 unique countries (response rate = 59%). Interviews were conducted with individuals from 16 countries representing 6 continents (Fig. 1); the remaining 3 were not conducted due to competing priorities. The countries represented were: Europe (Austria, England, the Netherlands, Portugal, Switzerland), Asia (Iran, Israel, Japan, South Korea), South America

Discussion

We interviewed individuals from a diverse sample of international experts to determine the current state of clinical information sharing with patients throughout the world. We found that the ability to share personal, clinical information directly with patients is a concept of growing global importance.

Among the 16 nations represented in our study, there were a variety of strategies for enabling patients to access their clinical information. These strategies were shaped by maturity and focus of

Conclusion

The sharing of clinical health information with patients is in varying stages of development around the world. The trend is toward increasing engagement of patients and providing more information, especially electronically. Based on this study it is clear that no one country has ‘solved’ how to provide patients with access to their clinical information. Countries should leverage the experiences of others as we all move forward in the deployment of these systems. When patients are empowered with

Conflicts of interest

None.

Author’s contributions

All authors contributed to the formulation of the study and assisted in the recruitment of participants. JP and FP conducted the interviews. JP, FP, and DV contributed to the analysis, and JP created the initial draft of the article. All authors were involved in critically revising the article’s content and in the final approval of the submitted version.

Summary table

What was already known on the topic:

  • Providing patients with access to their clinical information is an important aspect of

References (23)

  • M.F. Furukawa et al.

    Despite substantial progress in EHR adoption, health information exchange and patient engagement remain low in office settings

    Health Aff. (Millwood)

    (2014)
  • J. Adler-Milstein et al.

    A comparison of how four countries use health IT to support care for people with chronic conditions

    Health Aff. (Millwood)

    (2014)
  • T. Goetz

    The Decision Tree: How to Make Better Choices and Take Control of Your Health

    (2011)
  • J.H. Hibbard et al.

    What the evidence shows about patient activation: better health outcomes and care experiences; fewer data on costs

    Health Aff. (Millwood)

    (2013)
  • A. Coulter

    Patient engagement—what works?

    J. Ambulatory Care Manage.

    (2012)
  • T.D. Giardina et al.

    Patient access to medical records and healthcare outcomes: a systematic review

    J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.

    (2014)
  • S.A. Collins et al.

    Policies for patient access to clinical data via PHRs: current state and recommendations

    J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc.

    (2011)
  • R. Osborn et al.

    International perspectives on patient engagement: results from the 2011 commonwealth fund survey

    J. Ambulatory Care Manage.

    (2012)
  • D. Blumenthal et al.

    Giving patients control of their EHR data

    J. Gen. Intern. Med.

    (2015)
  • B.A. Wolfe, B.W. Mamlin, P.G. Biondich, H.S. Fraser, D. Jazayeri, C. Allen, et al., The OpenMRS System: Collaborating...
  • Ministry of Medical Services, Ministry of Public Health Sanitation, Kenya National e-Health Strategy 2011–2017....
  • Cited by (14)

    • Determinants and outcomes of patient access to medical records: Systematic review of systematic reviews

      2019, International Journal of Medical Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      Patient-held paper records have been used in different settings [1], and patient access to medical records, in general, has already been a legal right in many countries [2–4]. Increasingly, patient portals [3–6] provide patients with direct access to information in electronic health records (EHRs) of clinicians. Electronic personal health record systems [7,8] (PHRs) provide patients with their own system to manage their personal health information.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text