Antecedents and consequences of collective empathy in software development project teams

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2014.11.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Collective empathy affects project's process effectiveness.

  • Cognitive-based trust, communication and familairity influences collective empathy.

  • Group norms moderate the relationships between collective empathy and process effectiveness.

Abstract

The term empathy has attracted many researchers from a variety of disciplines; however, a team's collective empathy, which is composed of cognitive, affective, and behavioral dimensions, has rarely been addressed in the literature. In this study, we empirically investigated the relationship between the collective empathy of a team and the effectiveness of its project process. Additionally, we tested the role of team intimacy-related factors, such as interpersonal trust, within-team communication, and team member familiarity, in collective empathy, as well as the moderating role of group norms on the collective empathy-process effectiveness link. By studying 122 software development projects, we found that cognitive-based trust, formal within-team communication, and team member familiarity influence the collective empathy of project teams. We also found that collective empathy affects team learning and product speed-to-market and results in lower project development costs. Furthermore, we determined that the existence of group norms moderates the relationships among collective empathy, speed-to-market, and lower development costs. The managerial and theoretical implications of the study have also been provided.

Introduction

Software development teams, composed of people from different functional areas who have varying technical skills and personalities, are critical for the success of firms’ software development and implementation projects [44]; such projects involve specific activities that start and end at identifiable points in time and produce quantitative and qualitative software deliverables [77]. Researchers have indicated that software development teams are knowledge-intensive social bodies in which team members interact, behave, and organize and then share their information/knowledge to develop better and faster new software products [82]. Additionally, researchers have asserted that software development teams have their own emotions, and each team member's understandingof the other team members’ emotions, similar feelings or relevant feelings, and response (i.e., interpersonal empathy) are vital for enhancing software development project performance [15], [83]. Thus, interpersonal empathy among team members evokes people's altruistic motivations [39], increases their concern for the welfare of the team/group as a whole [17], and helps them to better resolve conflicts within the team [27].

Neverthless, whereas most studies have discussed or investigated the concept of empathy at the individual level, such as interpersonal empathy in work groups or teams [17], few studies have suggested empathy at the team level as a collective phenemenon, that is, collective empathy, in software development teams [4]. Additionally, although the term collective empathy is partially or implicitly mentioned in the studies of emotionally intelligent teams [39], [30], the emotional capability of organizations [4], [48], group emotions [14], [62], group/organizational compassion [50], and corporate philanthropy decisions [73], it has not been conceptualized or operationalized for an empiricaltest in the software development context.

In addition to the lack of operationalization of collective empathy, the antecedents and consequences of collective empathy in software development teams have not been investigated from a managerial perspective in the literature thus far.

Furthermore, the moderating variables that shape the relation between collective empathy and project-related outcomes (i.e., consequences) have received less attention in the literature. Indeed, when a project team has too much collective empathy among its members, team members may develop deep emotions (e.g., sympathy) or a group-think phenomenon. Conversely, with a lower level of collective empathy, team members may display ego-centricity and narcissism, thereby destroying the potential for insightful thinking during the new software development project. Thus, the empirical investigation of whether the relation between collective empathy and project-related outcomes should be regulated with group-related processes is warranted.

To address the above mentioned issues, we argue that team collective empathy can be conceptualized as an appreciation and understanding of what team members are experiencing emotionally, as well as an emotional reaction to other team members’ feelings during the software development project [4], [30], [50], [73], [53]. Specifically, collective empathy is a shared state of empathy that includes more than one person and indicates the extent to which team members collectively empathize within the teamduring the software development project.

Regarding the operationalization of collective empathy, based on individual-level studies [65], [31] and group-level studies [4], [50], [53], [86], we suggest that collective empathy is a multidimensional construct composed of (a) cognitive (i.e., collective perspective taking or the extent to which team members attempt to understand each other by imagining the others’ perspective), (b) affective (i.e., collective empathic concern or the extent to which team members feel concern for a person or group of people), and (c) behavioral (i.e., outward display of empathy or affective responsiveness) dimensions. These dimensions are reflective measures, which are observed variables that serve as manifest indicators of the collective empathy of a project team.

For antecedents of collective empathy, we investigated team intimacy-related factors. The rationale is that, whereas previous studies identified a variety of factors, such as social connections [90], role clarity [72], and information sharing [33], that influence the development of empathy in interpersonal relations, there is a common argument, influenced by attachment theory [19], in the literature that intimacy (i.e., feelings of closeness, connectedness in relationships) plays a critical role in empathy formation [51]. For example, in their studies on attachment theories, Mikulincer and Shaver [70] discovered that what encourages or muddles empathy is the sense of security and closeness that people feel within themselves. de Vignemont and Singer [23] also suggested that attachment theories provide support for empathy. Nevertheless, intimacy-related factors, such as interpersonal trust (i.e., reliance on the integrity, ability, or character of team members) [49], within-team communication (i.e., the exchange of information in a formal and informal manneramong team members) [61], and team member familiarity (i.e., team members’ past interactions) [25], as contributors to the development of collective empathy at the project team level, are not explored in the literature; this warrants empirical study, as recommended by Rosh et al. [87].

Regarding the consequences of empathy, we investigated project process effectiveness as implicitly recommended by Reus and Liu [83], Nicholson and Sahay [75], and Akgün et al. [4]. Specifically, whereas past studies demonstrated that interpersonal empathy influences group cohesiveness [86], conflict reduction, group motivation [17], [27], and ethical decision making [73], [68], the role of collective empathy in project performance in general; in addition, process effectiveness, in particular, has not been empirically investigated in software development projects. Here, based on the project management literature, the process effectiveness variables in which project managers have the most interest are team learning (i.e., gathering and implementing new knowledge, solving software product-related problems), development cost, and speed-to-market (i.e., developing and implementing software products quickly) [3].

Finally, for a moderating variable, we selected one of the group process variables, the existence of group norms, as recommended by Kelly and Barsade [53] and Bagozzi et al. [11]. Indeed, researchers have suggested that empathy is shaped or regulated through the establishment and reinforcement of group norms [31], as shown by the forms of feeling rules and display rules [39], [48], [50], [53]. Nevertheless, we know less regarding how the existence of group norms moderates the relation between collective empathy and process effectiveness in software development project teams.

Therefore, as shown in Fig. 1, this study investigated (a) the role of team intimacy-related variables (e.g., interpersonal trust, within-team communication, team member familiarity) on collective empathy formation, (b) the impact of collective empathy on software development project process effectiveness (e.g., team learning, speed-to-market, lower development cost), and (c) the moderating role of group norms on the relation between collective empathy and software development project process effectiveness.

Section snippets

Collective empathy in project teams

The concept of collective empathy, influenced by intergroup emotions theory [14], [62], which describes how individual empathic emotion converges to become collective, and affective events theory [99], which illustrates how the needs of others arouse empathy in individuals, is a relatively new research area in the management and group behavior literature. At the group level of studies, for instance, Kelly and Barsade [53], in their mood and emotions studies, described the collective empathy

Antecedents of team collective empathy

We argue that interpersonal trust, which includes cognitive-based trust (i.e., beliefs regarding others’ competence and reliability) and affective-based trust (i.e., beliefs regarding reciprocated care and concern) [64], fosters the development of collective empathy by providing a psychologically safe environment for team members [83]. This means that when team members face user and implementation-related uncertainties and lack information regarding other people's intentions and feelings, they

Measures

To test the above hypotheses, we developed or adopted multi-item scales from prior studies for the measurement of variables. We used 5-point Likert scales ranging from “strongly disagree” (1) to “strongly agree” (5) to measure our variables. However, as control variables, we assessed project team size and duration questions with a ratio scale. The appendix includes the measures used. A summary of the measures follows.

For the cognitive empathy variable, we modified the question items from

Measure validity and reliability

After data collection, we assessed the reliability and validity of measures by employing a purification process [6], [36]. Because the collective empathy construct is new, we first conducted an exploratory factor analysis including 17 measured items of three variables, using a principle component with a varimax rotation and an eigen value of 1 as the cutoff point. We found that the Kaiser–Meyer–Olkin (KMO) measure of sampling adequacy was 0.89, and the Bartlett test of sphericity was

Discussion and implications

This study has demonstrated the interrelations among team intimacy-related factors, collective empathy, and process effectiveness variables in software development project teams. Specifically, this study first empirically showed that interpersonal trust in general, and cognitive-based trust in particular, is positively related to the development of collective empathy in software development teams, which elevates the previous studies on interpersonal trust in software development teams. Whereas

Limitations and future research

There are some methodological limitations to this study. Specifically, this study is prone to common method bias because the same respondents answered questions for the dependent variables and independent variables in a cross-sectional manner. We checked this potential problem with the Harman one-factor test [80]. The results of an unrotated principal component analysis indicated that common method variance is not a problem because several factors with an eigenvalue greater than 1 were

Conclusion

Collective empathy is an emergent group property that provides the capability to team members to identify and work with the emotions felt/expressed as a result of group interactions. However, how collective empathy can be enhanced and its effect on project performance is missing from and should be added to the literature. In this study, we tested the role of collective empathy on project process effectiveness and the impact of intimacy-related variables on the development of collective empathy.

Ali E. Akgün is a professor of science and technology studies in the School of Business Administration at Gebze Institute of Technology, Turkey. He received his PhD in technology management from Stevens Institute of Technology and his MS in Engineering Management from Drexel University. His research areas are new product/technology development, organizational learning, and cognitive and social psychology in innovation management.

References (100)

  • L.S. Aiken et al.

    Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions

    (1991)
  • A.E. Akgün et al.

    Learning process in new product development teams and effects on product success: a socio-cognitive perspective

    Ind. Mark. Manag.

    (2006)
  • A.E. Akgün et al.

    Antecedents and consequences of team potency in software development projects

    Inf. Manag.

    (2007)
  • A.E. Akgün et al.

    Antecedents and results of emotional capability in software development project teams

    J. Prod. Innov. Manag.

    (2011)
  • D.G. Ancona et al.

    The comparative advantage of X-teams

    MIT Sloan Manag. Rev.

    (2002)
  • J.C. Anderson et al.

    Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach

    Psychol. Bull.

    (1988)
  • B.E. Ashforth et al.

    Emotion in the workplace: a reappraisal

    Hum. Relat.

    (1995)
  • Y.A. Au et al.

    Virtual organizational learning in open source software development projects

    Inf. Manag.

    (2009)
  • R.P. Bagozzi et al.

    Public service advertisements: emotions and empathy guide

    J. Mark.

    (1994)
  • R. Bagozzi et al.

    Assessing construct validity in organizational research

    Adm. Sci. Q.

    (1991)
  • R.P. Bagozzi et al.

    Culture moderates the self-regulation of shame and its effects on performance: the case of salespersons in the Netherlands and the Philippines

    J. Appl. Psychol.

    (2003)
  • A. Bandura

    Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory

    (1986)
  • R. Baron et al.

    The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations

    J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.

    (1986)
  • S.G. Barsade

    The ripple effect: emotional contagion and its influence on group behavior

    Adm. Sci. Q.

    (2002)
  • S.G. Barsade et al.

    To your heart's content: a model of affective diversity in top management teams

    Adm. Sci. Q.

    (2000)
  • C.A. Bartel et al.

    The collective construction of work group moods

    Adm. Sci. Q.

    (2000)
  • C.D. Batson et al.

    Using empathy to improve intergroup attitudes and relations

    Soc. Issues Policy Rev.

    (2009)
  • S. Bolton

    Emotion Management in the Workplace

    (2005)
  • J. Bowlby

    Attachment and loss

    Attachment

    (1982)
  • R.E. Boyatzis

    How and why individuals are able to develop emotional intelligence

  • E. Carmel et al.

    Small is beautiful: a study of packaged software development teams

    J. High Technol. Manag. Res.

    (1997)
  • W.W. Chin

    The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling

  • F. de Vignemont et al.

    The empathic brain: how, when and why?

    Trends Cogn. Sci.

    (2006)
  • J. Decety et al.

    Putting together phylogenetic and ontogenetic perspectives on empathy

    Dev. Cognit. Neurosci.

    (2012)
  • L.A. DeChurch et al.

    Maximizing the benefits of task conflict: the role of conflict management

    Int. J. Conf. Manag.

    (2001)
  • J. Dhaliwal et al.

    Alignment within the software development unit: assessing structural and relational dimensions between developers and testers

    J. Strateg. Inf. Syst.

    (2011)
  • V.U. Druskat et al.
  • E.W. Duggan et al.

    Integrating nominal group technique and joint application development for improved systems requirements determination

    Inf. Manag.

    (2004)
  • A.C. Edmondson

    Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams

    Adm. Sci. Q.

    (1999)
  • H.A. Elfenbein et al.

    Team emotion recognition accuracy and team performance

  • E.M. Engelen et al.

    Current disciplinary and interdisciplinary debates on empathy

    Emot. Rev.

    (2012)
  • J.A. Espinosa et al.

    Familiarity, complexity, and team performance in geographically distributed software development

    Org. Sci.

    (2007)
  • H. Fallon

    The joint implementation process: a workshop technique for coordinating the implementation of information systems

    J. Syst. Manag.

    (1995)
  • M.J. Fay

    Informal communication of co-workers: a thematic analysis of messages

    Qual. Res. Org. Manag.

    (2011)
  • S. Fineman et al.

    The emotions of control: a qualitative study of environmental regulation

    Hum. Relat.

    (1999)
  • C. Fornell et al.

    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error

    J. Mark. Res.

    (1981)
  • M.J. Gelfand et al.

    Crosscultural organizational behavior

    Ann. Rev. Psychol.

    (2007)
  • D. Goleman
  • D. Goleman et al.

    The emotional reality of teams

    Glob. Bus. Org. Excell.

    (2002)
  • A. Griffin et al.

    PDMA success measurement project: recommended measures for product development success and failure

    J. Prod. Innovat. Manag.

    (1996)
  • J.J. Gross et al.

    Hiding feelings: the acute effects of inhibiting negative and positive emotion

    J. Abnorm. Psychol.

    (1997)
  • D.H. Gruenfeld et al.

    Group composition and decision making how member familiarity and information distribution affect process and performance

    Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec.

    (1996)
  • J.H. Hair et al.

    Multivariate Data Analysis

    (2006)
  • J. He et al.

    Team cognition: development and evolution in software project teams

    J. Manag. Inf. Syst.

    (2007)
  • A. Hochschild

    The Managed Heart

    (1983)
  • M. Hoegl et al.

    Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence

    Org. Sci.

    (2001)
  • R.F. Hurley et al.

    Innovation, market orientation, and organizational learning: an integration and empirical examination

    J. Mark.

    (1998)
  • Q.H. Huy

    Emotional capability, emotional intelligence, and radical change

    Acad. Manag. Rev.

    (1999)
  • P. Kanawattanachai et al.

    Dynamic nature of trust in virtual teams

    Strateg. Inf. Syst.

    (2002)
  • J.M. Kanov et al.

    Compassion in organizational life

    Am. Behav. Sci.

    (2004)
  • Cited by (0)

    Ali E. Akgün is a professor of science and technology studies in the School of Business Administration at Gebze Institute of Technology, Turkey. He received his PhD in technology management from Stevens Institute of Technology and his MS in Engineering Management from Drexel University. His research areas are new product/technology development, organizational learning, and cognitive and social psychology in innovation management.

    Halit Keskin is a professor of science and technology studies in the School of Business Administration at Gebze Institute of Technology, Turkey. He received his PhD in management and organization from Gebze Institute of Technology. His research interests include technology and innovation management, knowledge management, and human resource management in high-tech firms.

    A. Yavuz Cebecioglu is a PhD student at the Department of Business Administration at Gebze Institute of Technology, Turkey. His research focuses on software development and management.

    Derya Dogan is a PhD student at the Department of Business Administration at Gebze Institute of Technology, Turkey. Her research focuses on social networks and new product/technology development.

    View full text