Elsevier

Information Sciences

Volume 581, December 2021, Pages 291-303
Information Sciences

Relationships between symmetry-based graph measures

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.09.029Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper addresses the problem of comparing different measures of graph symmetry. Two measures, each based on the number and respective sizes of the vertex orbits of the automorphism group or a graph, are compared. A real valued distance measure is used to compare the symmetry measures by establishing the limiting value of the distances for several well known classes of graphs.

Introduction

A number of different symmetry measures for networks/graphs have been developed and analyzed, see [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. The differences are due in part to the fact that symmetry can be interpreted in different ways, e.g. by means of knot theory [6] or the automorphism group of a graph. Here, we investigate symmetry in graphs in relation to the automorphism group, with special emphasis on the vertex orbits of the group. One problem we face in this investigation is that there is no general formula for the size of the automorphism group of a graph [7], [8], although many special cases are known [9]. Symmetry based on vertex orbits has long been used to define measures of the structural complexity of graphs. For example, see the seminal work due to Mowshowitz [5], [10], [11], [12] who analyzed several variants of these measures representing the structural information content of a graph.

Symmetry measures have been applied in many disciplines. Such measures have been used in structural chemistry and chemotherapies for characterizing molecular graphs numerically and to solve QSAR/QSPR problems, see [1], [2], [13]. MacArthur et al. [14] determined the size and structure of the automorphism groups of real networks, and discussed how symmetry can be used for applications. A similar study has been performed by Ball and Geyer-Schulz [15] who analyzed symmetries in large graphs. Finally, the role of symmetry in network aesthetics has been investigated by Chen et al. [16]. Finally Algebraic Graph Theory is a classical field where symmetry has been investigated extensively, see [17], [18], [19].

As indicated above, many graph measures have been defined [20], [21], [13]. However, relatively few of them have been examined in much depth. This also holds for symmetry-based graph measures defined in terms of graph automorphisms [3], [5]. This paper focuses on the relationships between symmetry measures for graphs, utilizing real valued distance measures. More precisely, we study limiting values of distances d(I1,I2) between measures (see Section (2.2)) as the number of vertices goes to infinity Here, I1:GR+ and I2:GR+ are two graph measures and G is a class of graphs. In particular, we investigate the symmetry measures δ [3] and Ia [5].

One elegant way to infer symmetry measures for graphs is based on using certain graph polynomials. In general, there exist various ways and techniques to define graph polynomials to determine combinatorial information and algebraic properties from a graph, see [22]. For instance, graph polynomials [23], [22] have been used as counting polynomials and to define graph measures [3], [24]. In [3], Dehmer et al. introduced the concept of the so-called orbit polynomial denoted by OG(z), which is defined in terms of the sizes of vertex orbits and their respective multiplicities. The unique, positive root δ1 of the modified polynomial 1-OG(z) has been shown to serve as a measure of symmetry of a graph, see [3]. The aim of this paper is to establish limiting values of d(δ,Ia) for some special graph classes that have proven useful in chemistry and related disciplines.

Section snippets

Methods and results

After stating the definitions required, we will establish the limiting values of d(δ,Ia) for some special classes of graphs.

Summary and conclusion

This paper has initiated a comparative analysis of alternative quantitative measures of graph symmetry. Two measures based on the automorphism group of a graph were considered. For purposes of comparison a real valued distance measure was introduced, and the limiting values of the respective distances between the two symmetry measures on each of several classes of graphs were established. Although both symmetry measures compared are based on the same variables, namely the number and sizes of

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Yuede Ma: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Software. Matthias Dehmer: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Software, Writing - original draft. Urs-Martin Künzi: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Software, Writing - review & editing. Abbe Mowshowitz: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Software. Shailesh Tripathi: Conceptualization, Software. Modjtaba Ghorbani: Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis, Software. Frank Emmert-Streib:

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

Matthias Dehmer thanks the Austrian Science Funds for supporting this work (project P30031).

References (35)

  • A. Mowshowitz

    Entropy and the complexity of the graphs I: An index of the relative complexity of a graph

    Bull. Math. Biophys.

    (1968)
  • S.-J. Chen et al.

    Symmetries in proteins: A knot theory approach

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (1996)
  • C.J. Colbourn et al.

    Linear Time Automorphism Algorithms for Trees, Interval Graphs, and Planar Graphs

    SIAM J. Comput.

    (1981)
  • M. Razinger et al.

    Graph automorphism perception algorithms in computer-enhanced structure elucidation

    J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci.

    (1993)
  • A. Mowshowitz et al.

    A Symmetry Index for Graphs

    Sym. Culture Sci.

    (2010)
  • A. Mowshowitz

    Entropy and the complexity of graphs II: The information content of digraphs and infinite graphs

    Bull. Math. Biophys.

    (1968)
  • A. Mowshowitz

    Entropy and the complexity of graphs III: Graphs with prescribed information content

    Bull. Math. Biophys.

    (1968)
  • Cited by (2)

    • Szeged and Mostar root-indices of graphs

      2023, Applied Mathematics and Computation
    View full text