An implicit degree condition for k-connected 2-heavy graphs to be hamiltonian

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipl.2018.01.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We give a sufficient condition for a k-connected 2-heavy graph to be hamiltonian.

  • Our result generalizes a previous theorem of Chen, Egawa, Liu and Saito.

  • We give an example to show that the low bound of implicit degree is best possible.

  • We give an example to show that our result is stronger than the result of Chen et. al.

Abstract

Let id(v) denote the implicit degree of a vertex v in a graph G. An independent set S of G is said to be essential if S contains a pair of vertices at distance 2 in G. A graph G on n3 vertices is called 2-heavy if there exist at least two end-vertices of every induced claw having implicit degree at least n/2. In this paper, we prove that: Let G be a k-connected (k2) 2-heavy graph on n3 vertices. If max{id(v):vS}n/2 for every essential independent set S of order k, then G is hamiltonian.

Introduction

In this paper, we consider only undirected and finite graphs without loops or multiple edges. Notation and terminology not defined here can be found in [3].

Let G be a graph and H be a subgraph of G. For a vertex uV(G), we denote the neighborhood of u in H by NH(u), the degree of u in H by dH(u)=|NH(u)|, the distance between u and v in H by dH(u,v). If H=G, we can use N(u), d(u) and d(u,v) in place of NG(u), dG(u) and dG(u,v), respectively.

Let G1,,Gk be k vertex disjoint graphs. The union of G1,,Gk, denoted by G1Gk, is the graph with vertex set i=1kV(Gi) and edge set i=1kE(Gi). We use kQ instead of G1Gk if each Gi is isomorphic to Q. The join of G1,,Gk, denoted by G1Gk, is the graph obtained from i=1kGi by joining each vertex of Gi to each vertex of Gj for ij.

An induced subgraph of G with vertex set {u,v,w,x} and edge set {uv,uw,ux} is called a claw of G, with center u and end-vertices v,w,x. G is called claw-free if G does not contain an induced subgraph isomorphic to a claw. A vertex v of G is called heavy if d(v)|V(G)|/2. Following [4], a claw of G is called 2-heavy if at least two of its end vertices are heavy. A graph is called 2-heavy if all its claws are 2-heavy.

A cycle in a graph G is called a Hamilton cycle if it contains all vertices of G. G is called hamiltonian if it contains a Hamilton cycle. There are many sufficient conditions for a graph to be hamiltonian, and many of them involve some sort of degree conditions. Dirac's theorem is a classical result among them.

Theorem 1

([10]) Let G be a graph on n3 vertices. If d(u)n/2 for every vertex u in G, then G is hamiltonian.

In 1984, Fan [11] proved that only the pairs of vertices that are at distance 2 are essential in Theorem 1 and the condition can be replaced by a weaker one.

Theorem 2

([11]) Let G be a 2-connected graph on n3 vertices. If max{d(u),d(v)}n/2 for every pair of vertices u and v at distance 2 in G, then G is hamiltonian.

In [8], the authors proved that a k-connected graph is hamiltonian if it contains no independent set S with |S|=k+1. In 1980, by considering the degree sums of vertices in independent sets with k+1 vertices, Bondy [2] obtained a sufficient condition for a k-connected graph to be hamiltonian.

Theorem 3

([2]) Let G be a k-connected graph on n3 vertices. If uSd(u)>(k+1)(n1)/2 for each independent set S of order k+1, then G is hamiltonian.

Let G be a graph and S be a subset of V(G). S is said to be an essential independent set if S is an independent set and contains two distinct vertices u and v at distance 2 in G. Chen et al. [9] gave a Fan-type sufficient condition for a k-connected graph to be hamiltonian by using degrees of vertices in essential independent set of order k.

Theorem 4

([9]) Let G be a k-connected graph on n3 vertices (k2). If max{d(u):uS}n/2 for every essential independent set S with k vertices, then G is hamiltonian.

Moreover, the authors in [9] gave an example to show that the condition “max{d(u):uS}n/2 for every essential independent set S with k vertices” in Theorem 4 can not be exchanged by “max{d(u):uS}n/2 for every essential independent set S with k+1 vertices”.

In order to generalize some classical results about hamiltonian problems, Zhu, Li and Deng [14] gave the definition of implicit degree of a vertex. We use N2(v) to denote the vertices which are at distance 2 from v in G.

Definition 1

([14]) Let v be a vertex of a graph G and d(v)=l+1. Set M2=max{d(u):uN2(v)} and m2=min{d(u):uN2(v)}. If N2(v) and d(v)2, then let d1d2d3dldl+1 be the degree sequence of vertices of N(v)N2(v). Defined(v)={m2,      if     dl<m2;dl+1,      if     dl+1>M2;dl,      otherwise. Then the implicit degree of v is defined as id(v)=max{d(v),d(v)}. If N2(v)= or d(v)1, then define id(v)=d(v).

Clearly, id(v)d(v) for every vertex v from the definition of implicit degree. The authors [14] gave a sufficient condition for a 2-connected graph to be hamiltonian by considering the relationship between the order of the graph and the implicit degree sum of nonadjacent vertices.

Theorem 5

([14]) Let G be a 2-connected graph on n3 vertices. If id(u)+id(v)n for every pair of nonadjacent vertices u and v in G, then G is hamiltonian.

For more results using implicit degree conditions, we refer to [6], [5], [7] and [12]. Recently, Li, Ning and Cai [13] gave a sufficient condition for a k-connected graph to be hamiltonian by replacing the degree sum in Theorem 3 by implicit degree sum.

Theorem 6

([13]) Let G be a k-connected graph on n3 vertices. If uSid(u)>(k+1)(n1)/2 for each independent set S with k+1 vertices, then G is hamiltonian.

The main purpose of this paper is to generalize Theorem 4 in the way as Theorem 3 to Theorem 6 and give an implicit Fan-type sufficient condition for a k-connected graph to be hamiltonian by using implicit degrees of vertices in essential independent sets. We will prove the following result.

Theorem 7

Let G be a k-connected 2-heavy graph on n3 vertices (k2). If max{id(v):vS}n/2 for every essential independent set S with k vertices, then G is hamiltonian.

The proof of Theorem 7 will be given in next section. Now we present the following remarks. The first one shows the sharpness of Theorem 7 and the other one shows a graph which does not satisfy the condition of Theorem 4 but it can be easily verified to be hamiltonian by using Theorem 7.

Remark 1

Let G=Kk(k+1)K1. It is easy to check that G has n=2k+1 vertices and G is a k-connected nonhamiltonian graph. And for each essential independent set S with k vertices, max{id(x):xS}=(n1)/2 and each induced claw with two vertices of degree (n1)/2. This implies that the lower bound n/2 of Theorem 7 is best possible.

Remark 2

Let k2 be a nonnegative integer. Set V(Kk2)={x1,x2,,xk2} and V(kK1)={y1,y2,,yk}. We choose a graph G with V(G)=V(Kk2kK1) and E(G)=E(Kk2){yixk(i1)+j:i,j=1,2,,k} (see Fig. 1). It is easy to see that G has n=k2+k vertices and G is a hamiltonian graph not satisfying the conditions of Theorem 4. But since id(x)=k2>n/2 for each xV(G), G satisfies the conditions of Theorem 7. This shows that our result in Theorem 7 does strengthen the result in Theorem 4.

Section snippets

Lemma

For a cycle C in G with a given orientation and a vertex x in C, x+ and x denote the successor and the predecessor of x in C, respectively. And for any IV(C), let I={x:x+I} and I+={x:xI}. For two vertices x,yC, xCy denotes the subpath of C from x to y. We use yC¯x for the path from y to x in the reversed direction of C. A similar notation is used for paths.

For a path P=x1x2xp with x1=x and xp=y connecting x and y of a graph G, let lP(x)=max{i:xiV(P)andxixE(G)}. A path in G is called

Proof of Theorem 7

Suppose G is a graph satisfying the condition of Theorem 7 and G is not hamiltonian. Set X={xV(G):id(x)n/2}.

Claim 1

There is a cycle C in G containing all vertices of X.

Proof

Suppose to the contrary that there is no cycle in G containing all vertices of X. Choose a cycle C in G such that C contains as many vertices of X as possible. Without loss of generality, we give C a clockwise orientation. Then there is a vertex x(V(G)V(C))X. Since G is 2-connected, by Menger Theorem there are two internally

References (14)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (1)

This work is supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 11501322).

View full text