Social and interactional practices for disseminating current awareness information in an organisational setting
Introduction
People acquire information in many ways. Understanding the variety of ways in which information is acquired and how these play out in situ is of key interest to researchers and system designers interested in understanding how to design for more effective information interactions. Whilst a good deal of information behaviour research has focussed on active information seeking, there is a dearth of literature on information behaviours surrounding passive information acquisition. Included within this is the way in which people access and use current awareness services. And yet systems that support current awareness monitoring provide an increasingly significant way in which users obtain information. Professionals, in particular, represent a significant user-group, given their need to stay abreast of developments in their field. Information providers are reacting to this need through the provision of increasing numbers of electronic current awareness services (otherwise known as ‘alerting services’, ‘auto alerts’, ‘selective dissemination of information’ (SDI), or ‘notification systems’). To take an example from the domain on which we focus in this paper, Lexis®PSL brings together a range of different information and resources specifically for lawyers working in different areas of law. As an addition to this service subscribers can receive a regular update which alerts them to legal developments in their area and new resources provided by the service.
Since current awareness services respond to information needs that remain relatively stable over time, they naturally lend themselves to the construction of relatively stable infrastructures for information delivery. In organisational settings these are particularly evident, their role being to control and incrementally adjust the flow of information, rather like irrigation systems controlling and diverting the flow of water. In modern organisations they are typically sociotechnical in nature, involving both people and technology in coordinated action to make the organisation as a whole more knowledgeable and effective. Understanding how these systems operate in their natural contexts represents a key resource for informing the development of user-technologies to make such systems more effective.
This provides the context for the current paper in which we report a naturalistic study of electronic current awareness distribution in a large, London law firm. Our aim was to understand the ways in which legal workers interact with and collaborate around the propagation of current awareness information in different parts of the company. Data was gathered through contextual inquiry observations with 21 lawyers and knowledge management workers. We observed their interactions with current awareness information and used these situations to prompt discussion of broader contextual issues. From this we developed a systemic perspective on the distribution of current awareness alerts which provides insights into what people do and how they collaboratively organise action and interaction.
The remainder of the paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, we discuss the research context relating to collaborative information seeking and electronic current awareness information. In Section 3 we describe our data-gathering and analysis method. In Section 4 we report our findings and in Section 5 we discuss these with particular reference to how automated systems might augment prevalent sociotechnical distribution systems.
Section snippets
Background
In order to explicate where gaps lie in current information seeking research, Bates (2002) mapped out some dimensions on which information seeking episodes can vary. One of these dimensions was the distinction between active and passive information seeking. Information seeking is active when an information end-user does something active to acquire information. Information seeking is passive when the information user is simply passively available to absorb it (Bates, 2002). To date, the
Method
We conducted a contextual inquiry (Beyer & Holtzblatt, 1998) with lawyers and knowledge management workers within the London office of an international law firm. Contextual inquiry is a user-centred design method in which a researcher performs one-on-one observations with users whilst discussing their activity. Rather than following a fixed interview protocol, a contextual inquiry is structured by the activity itself. The role of the researcher is to observe and ask pertinent questions
Participant roles and their context of work
Our participants included fee-earning lawyers (or fee-earners) and knowledge management staff. Fee-earners are qualified solicitors who work directly on client cases (or ‘matters’). They are so named because their time is used as a basis for charging clients. They may spend this time providing advice on legal rights and duties, preparing legal contracts for commercial transactions such as mergers and acquisitions, performing regulatory investigations or executing litigations.
Knowledge
Discussion
In this paper we have taken a systemic perspective on the distribution of electronic current awareness alerts within a corporate environment. From this perspective, current awareness information distribution operated as a collaborative activity in which actors across the organisation, who each operated locally and interacted with nearest neighbours, together created a network through which current awareness information was filtered, communicated and stored in local caches. Within the
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to all participants in this study, and to the organisations that made the study possible. This work is funded by EPSRC Grant EP/D056268.
References (29)
- et al.
Design and empirical evaluation of search software for legal professionals on the WWW
Information Processing and Management
(2000) - et al.
Collaborative use of individual interaction histories: Grounding a new awareness approach
Interacting with Computers
(2008) - et al.
Investigating the information-seeking behaviour of academic lawyers: From Ellis’s model to design
Information Processing and Management
(2008) - et al.
Organisational communication and awareness: A novel solution
Health Informatics Journal
(2005) Towards an integrated model of information seeking and searching
- et al.
Contextual design: Defining customer-centered systems
(1998) - et al.
Reflections on a work-oriented design project
Human Computer Interaction
(1996) - et al.
Evaluation of an information system in an information seeking process
Lecture Notes in Computer Science
(2004) The concept of relevance in IR
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
(2003)- et al.
Relevance: The search for a definition
A behavioural approach to information retrieval system design
Journal of Documentation
A comparison of the information seeking patterns of researchers in the physical and social sciences
Journal of documentation
Modelling the information seeking patterns of engineers and research scientists in an industrial environment
Journal of Documentation
Information encountering
Cited by (29)
Social networks and open innovation: Business academic productivity
2021, Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and ComplexityDeterrence and prevention-based model to mitigate information security insider threats in organisations
2019, Future Generation Computer SystemsCitation Excerpt :Siponen, Adam Mahmood [11], Ma, Jiang [12] and Sohrabi Safa, Von Solms [13] consider the idea that complying with organisational information security policies and procedures (OISPs) is an effective and efficient avenue for mitigating information security breaches. Information security knowledge sharing has been presented as another approach that decreases information security threats whilst increasing the knowledge and awareness of employees in the organisation [14,15]. Conscious care behaviour, which is based on information security awareness and experience, has been presented as another effective approach that mitigates human mistakes in the domain of information security [16].
Beyond traditional collaborative search: Understanding the effect of awareness on multi-level collaborative information retrieval
2018, Information Processing and ManagementCitation Excerpt :Although such concepts have previously been investigated by a number of researchers (Halvey et al., 2010; Morris & Horvitz, 2007; Shah & Marchionini, 2010), to the best of our knowledge, there has not yet been any investigation into the effect of existing CIR and CIS concepts on MLCIR. Previous work presented by Attfield et al. (2010), Bjurling and Hansen (2010), Handel and Wang (2011), and Karunakaran and Reddy (2012) has been based on observations and did not provide a systematic solution to solve the problems with MLCIR. In order to systematically evaluate the impact of non-uniform information access in CIR, we conducted a simulated user study (Htun et al., 2015).
On domain expertise-based roles in collaborative information retrieval
2014, Information Processing and ManagementCitation Excerpt :The e-Discovery domain refers to the management of electronic data in order to use them in the case of a civil or criminal litigation and government inspection (Conrad, 2007). The complexities of data management, involving the review, the selection, the circulation of privileged materials requires such different responsibilities, skills and qualifications that a collaboration is needed (Attfield et al., 2010). Two collaboration scenarios can be considered:
Introduction to the special issue
2010, Information Processing and ManagementExploring the factors and outcomes of collaborative information monitoring: Findings of a cross-case analysis
2024, Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology