Global continuous output-feedback stabilization for a class of high-order nonlinear systems with multiple time delays

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2014.05.003Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper addresses the global output-feedback stabilization for a class of high-order nonlinear systems with multiple time delays. A distinct property of the systems to be investigated is that powers on the upper bound restrictions of nonlinearities are allowed to take values on a continuous interval, another remarkable one rests with the existence of multiple time delays in growth conditions. By introducing a combined method of sign function, homogeneous domination and adding a power integrator, an output-feedback controller based on Lyapunov-Krasviskii theorem is designed recursively to guarantee the equilibrium of the closed-loop system globally uniformly asymptotically stable.

Introduction

The study on the high-order nonlinear systems has attracted a lot of attention during the past decade, and achieved a series of results with the aid of the adding a power integrator approach, see References [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9] and the references therein.

It is worth pointing out that [2] has obtained breakthrough results on output-feedback control design of high-order nonlinear systems by using the homogeneous domination method, the novelty of which is that no precise information about the nonlinearities is needed. Furthermore, [3] generalized the homogeneous domination method through relaxing the conditions imposed on nonlinearities, based on such a method, [5], [10] investigated stochastic nonlinear systems and upper-triangular nonlinear systems, respectively. However, a common assumption of [2], [3] is that powers on the upper bound restrictions of nonlinearities are required to take values on some isolated points, therefore, an interesting question is naturally proposed:

Is it possible to allow powers to take values continuously on an interval? Moreover, under the weaker conditions, if system state includes multiple time delays, how to design an output-feedback stabilization controller?

In this paper, we shall investigate the aforementioned question and give an affirmative answer to a class of high-order nonlinear systems with multiple time delays. The contributions of this article are characterized by four aspects. (i) This paper may be the first investigation on output-feedback stabilization problem for high-order nonlinear systems with multiple time delays, where system nonlinearities depend on not only the time-delay output but also the unmeasurable time-delay states. (ii) The growth restriction on system nonlinearities is relaxed, the sign functions are introduced in control design, several crucial lemmas and propositions are reestablished. (iii) Due to the existence of time-delay terms and the introduction of the sign functions, it is hard to find a new positive definite and radially unbounded Lyapunov–Krasviskii (L–K) functional, whose time derivative along the solutions of the resulting closed-loop system is negative definite. (iv) By successfully solving several troublesome obstacles (see Remark 1, Remark 2, Remark 3, Remark 4, Remark 5 for the details) in the design and the analysis procedure, a global continuous output-feedback controller is constructed to guarantee that the resulting closed-loop system is globally asymptotically stable.

Notations: R+ stands for the set of all the nonnegative real numbers. For a vector x(t)Rn, we let x¯i(t)=[x1(t),,xi(t)]Ri, i=1,,n1. x(t) denotes the Euclidean norm of a vector x(t)Rn, that is, x(t)=i=1nxi2(t), and xtC=supτθ0x(t+θ), t0, τ is a known positive constant. In Section 4 and Appendix B, we frequently use a generic constant c which represents any finite positive constant and may be implicitly changed in various places, and use c(g¯i) to indicate its dependence on g1,,gi with i=1,,n. A continuous function h:R+R+ satisfying h(0)=0 is called a K function if it is strictly increasing and lims+h(s)=+. A sign function sgn(x) is defined as follows: sgn(x)=1, if x>0; sgn(x)=0, if x=0; and sgn(x)=1, if x<0. Besides, the arguments of functions (or functionals) are sometimes omitted or simplified, for instance, we sometimes denote a function f(x(t)) by simply f(x) or f(·) or f.

Section snippets

Problem formulation

It is well known that time-delay phenomena are usually encountered in mechanical, electrical, biological and chemical systems, and its emergence is often a significant reason of instability or serious deterioration in the system performance. Therefore, the design and analysis of controllers for time-delay systems have received much attention, one can consult References [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16] and the references therein. However, until now, there are few results on high-order

Key transformations

Introduce the following scaling transformations:xi(t)=Γdiηi(t),i=1,,n,u(t)=Γdn+1v(t),where Γ1 is a positive constant to be determined later, and d1,,dn are defined as d1=0, di=(di1+1)/pi1, i=2,3,,n+1.

With the scaling transformations (3) in hand, system (1) can be rewritten as{ẋi(t)=Γxi+1pi(t)+f˜i(x(t),x1(tτ1),,xn(tτn)),ẋn(t)=Γupn(t)+f˜n(x(t),x1(tτ1),,xn(tτn)),y(t)=x1(t),where for each i=1,,n, f˜i(·)Γdifi(·) satisfies|f˜i(·)|=|Γdifi(·)|CΓ1ςij=1i(|xj(t)|(ri+ω)/rj+|xj(tτj)|(

State observer and output-feedback control design

In this section, we shall design a reduced-order, observer-based output-feedback controller. Motivated by [3], we construct the following reduced-order observer:ξ^̇i=ΓLi1x^ipi1,i=2,3,,n,where Li>0,i=1,,n1, are observer gains to be specified in later design, andx^1x1,x^i=sgn(ξ^i+Li1x^i1)|ξ^i+Li1x^i1|ri/ri1,i=2,3,,n.Thus, applying the certainty equivalence principle to Eq. (14), we get an output-feedback controllerupn(z^n)=sgn(z^n)gnrn+1pn/σ|z^n|rn+1pn/σ,wherez^n=sgn(x^n)|x^n|σ/rn+i

Main results

Before stating the main results of this paper, we would rather give a fundamental proposition which reveals the dynamic characteristic of the resulting closed-loop system via a L–K functional. In proving it, we present the recursive relationship between the gain parameters L1,,Ln1,Γ and the virtual controller coefficients g1,,gn.

Proposition 4

There exist K functions π1(·), π2(·) and π3(·), such that the continuously differentiable functional V:R+×Rn×Rn1R defined by V(t,Xt(θ))=Vn(t,xt)+Un(x(t),ξ^2(t),ξ^

Simulation example

Consider the following example: η̇1(t)=η25/3(t)+120η14/3(t1)·cos(η2(t)),η̇2(t)=v3(t),y(t)=η1(t).Obviously, Assumption 1 holds with p1=53, p2=3, C=120, r1=1, ω=13, r2=45, σ=75. If we introduce the coordinate transformations x1(t)=η1(t), x2(t)=Γ3/5η2(t), v3(t)=Γ8/5u3(t), then the original system can be rewritten as x1(t)=Γx25/3(t)+120x14/3(t1)·cos(Γ3/5x2(t)),x2(t)=Γu3(t),y=x1(t).In terms of the control design in 3 State-feedback control design, 4 State observer and output-feedback control

Concluding remarks

Under the weaker assumptions, with the help of the constructions of an appropriate reduced-order observer and a delicate L–K functional, a class of high-order nonlinear systems with multiple time delays are globally stabilized via an output-feedback controller by means of the extended adding a power integrator method. In this direction, there are still remaining problems to be investigated. For example, an interesting problem is how to design a finite-time output-feedback stabilization

References (20)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (57)

View all citing articles on Scopus

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (61004013, 61203013, 61273125, 61374004), the Shandong Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (ZR2010FQ003, ZR2012FM018), the National Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education under Grant 20113705120003 and the Program for the Scientific Research Innovation Team in Colleges and Universities of Shandong Province.

View full text