Analysis and pinning control for generalized synchronization of delayed coupled neural networks with different dimensional nodes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2018.05.055Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper investigate the generalized synchronization and pinning adaptive generalized synchronization for delayed coupled different dimensional neural networks with hybrid coupling, respectively. First, some sufficient conditions for reaching the generalized synchronization and pinning generalized synchronization of the considered network are acquired by using some inequality techniques and Lyapunov functional method. Second, because the precise parameter values of network cannot be obtained in some situations, we also purse the study on the generalized synchronization analysis and pinning control for the case of coupled different dimensional neural networks with parameter uncertainties. Third, two numerical examples are provided for substantiating the effectiveness of the derived results.

Introduction

In the past several decades, a great deal of attention has been paid to complex networks because of their potential applications to model and study many systems, e.g., global economic markets, metabolic systems, communication networks, and so on [1], [2], [3], [4], and many meaningful results about the dynamical behaviors including stability, synchronization and passivity for complex networks have been obtained [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Coupled neural networks (CNNs), a special class of complex networks, have been applied into many scientific and engineering fields, such as harmonic oscillation generation, pattern recognition, secure communication and image encryption, thus have attracted considerable attention from lots of researchers recently [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18]. In [16], Tang et al. examined the mean square exponential synchronization of delayed impulsive CNNs, several criteria have been established based on the comparison principle and Lyapunov stability theory. The problem of synchronization for randomly delayed CNNs with Markovian jumping was solved by Yang et al. [18], and several synchronization criteria were established by making use of some inequalities and Lyapunov functional method. As is well known, the exact values of parameters in CNNs usually cannot be obtained in many cases because of environmental noises and model errors. For better analysis of dynamical behaviors of CNNs, it is very necessary and meaningful to investigate the robust dynamical behaviors of CNNs with parameter uncertainties, and some results on this topic have been emerged in [19], [20], [21], [22]. With the help of stability theory and impulsive control method, Li et al. [21] gained some robust synchronization conditions for CNNs with parameter uncertainties.

To the best of our knowledge, many CNNs cannot realize synchronization by themselves in practical situations, so suitable controllers should be applied for achieving synchronization in these networks. So far, a large number of controllers have been developed such that CNNs achieve synchronization, for instance, pinning control [23], intermittent control [24], impulsive control [25], fuzzy control [26] and so on. Generally speaking, it is unrealistic to apply control schemes to all nodes in CNNs when the size of the considered network is extremely huge. Therefore, pinning control, in which a small fraction of nodes are chosen to be controlled, has provoked a rapid growing attention recently. From the engineering point of view, pinning control scheme is a more effective way comparing with other control strategies due to greatly reducing the number of controlled nodes and consumption. To date, there have been some results about CNNs by exploiting pinning control methods [27], [28], [29], [30], [31]. In [29], Wang et al. proposed two kinds of CNNs with state coupling and spatial diffusion coupling, respectively, and acquired some synchronization conditions via pinning control technique and Lyapunov functional method. However, very few researchers considered CNNs with parameter uncertainties by utilizing pinning control strategies [32]. Zheng and Cao [32] focused on robust synchronization for CNNs with mixed delays, and derived some synchronization conditions by means of intermittent pinning control and Halanay inequality.

However, in the most existing results [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], there is a common assumption that the nodes composing the networks are identical. Nevertheless, the assumption that the nodes are completely identical is not realistic in many real-world networks [33], such as in the neural networks, where the internal neurons in the nervous system are impossible to be totally identical due to the differences of the parameters. As is well known, many researchers have considered the networks with non-identical nodes of the same state dimension [34], [35], [36], [37], [38]. By designing some controllers, the finite-time synchronization problem of complex networks with non-identical nodes that have discontinuous functions was concerned by Yang et al. in [37]. Unfortunately, the non-identical nodes in the above-mentioned literatures [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38] have the same state dimension. However, a network with different dimensional non-identical nodes can reflect more real complex networks than those with non-identical nodes of the same state dimension. Therefore, it is worthwhile to study the dynamical behaviors of complex networks with different dimensional non-identical nodes, and some results on this topic have been reported [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44]. In [43], the authors devoted to studying the complex networks with nodes of different dimensions, and established several synchronization criteria by designing suitable controllers. Regrettably, there exists very little research on CNNs with different dimensional nodes [45]. By designing decentralized controllers and utilizing matrix inequalities, the stabilization condition for CNNs with different dimensional nodes was derived by Tan in [45]. Therefore, it is necessary and important to devote more efforts on the CNNs with different dimensional nodes. As far as we know, the model of CNNs with different dimensional nodes and parameter uncertainties and the synchronization problem of such network via pinning control method have never been studied.

From above discussions, we deal with the generalized synchronization and pinning generalized synchronization problems for delayed CNNs (DCNNs) with different dimensional nodes in this paper. There are three main novelties in our work. First, the models of DCNNs consisting of different dimensional nodes with and without parameter uncertainties are presented, respectively. Second, several criteria are established to guarantee the generalized synchronization of DCNNs with and without parameter uncertainties by virtue of Lyapunov functional method and some inequality techniques. Third, by designing appropriate pinning adaptive controllers, we derive some sufficient conditions to ensure pinning generalized synchronization for these two types of networks.

Section snippets

Notations

Let R=(,+), Rn be a n-dimensional Euclidean space, R+=[0,+).* in the matrix L corresponds to the null matrix with suitable dimensions. Rn×nL>0(Rn×nL<0) means the matrix L is symmetric and positive (negative) definite. AT represents the transpose of matrix A. λM( · ) presents the largest eigenvalue of the corresponding matrix. For any e(t)=(e1(t),e2(t),,en(t))TRn,e(t)2=(i=1nei2(t))12.

Lemmas

Lemma 2.1

(see [46]) For any constant matrix Rq×qQ>0, vector function ω:[ϵ,ρ]Rq(ϵ<ρ) such that the

Generalized synchronization of DCNNs

In this section, we analysis the generalized synchronization problem for DCNNs with different dimensional nonidentical nodes. By choosing suitable Lyapunov functionals and using some inequality techniques, several generalized synchronization and pinning generalized synchronization criteria for the considered network model are proposed.

Generalized synchronization of DCNNs with parameter uncertainties

Considering the parameter uncertainties in DCNNs, we focus on the generalized synchronization for the DCNNs with different nodes and parameter uncertainties in this section, and several sufficient conditions for generalized synchronization and pinning adaptive generalized synchronization of the considered network are obtained.

Numerical examples

Two numerical examples are provided in this section to validate the correctness of obtained results.

Example 5.1

The following DCNNs with three different dimensional nodes is considered: x˙i(t)=Dixi(t)+Aifi(xi(t))+Bigi(xi(t)¯)+Ji+j=1NcijHijxj(t)+j=1Nc^ijH^ijtσ(t)txj(s)ds, where i=1,2,3,n1=3,n2=n3=2,fl(i)(μ)=gl(i)(μ)=|μ+1||μ1|4,τl(i)(t)=0.04il0.04ilet,τ(1)=0.12,δl(1)=0.04l,τ(2)=0.16,δl(2)=0.08l,τ(3)=0.24,δl(3)=0.12l,l=1,2,,ni,σ(t)=0.10.1et,σ=ς=0.1,D1= diag (2,5,7),D2= diag (1,3),D3= diag (2,4).J

Conclusion

In this paper, we have studied generalized synchronization of DCNNs with different dimensional nodes. On one side, by taking advantage of Lyapunov functional and pinning adaptive control method, we have established several criteria for generalized synchronization of the network without parameter uncertainties. On the other side, the generalized synchronization and pinning adaptive generalized synchronization problems for DCNNs with parameter uncertainties have also been solved. Finally, the

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank the Associate Editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions. They also wish to express their sincere appreciation to Prof. Jinliang Wang for the fruitful discussions and valuable suggestions which helped to improve this paper. This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 11501411, 61503010 and 61773285, in part by the open fund of Guangxi Key Laboratory of Hybrid Computation and IC

References (61)

  • ZhangL.L. et al.

    Delay-dependent synchronization for non-diffusively coupled time-varying complex dynamical networks

    Appl. Math. Comput.

    (2015)
  • XuS. et al.

    Global robust exponential stability analysis for interval recurrent neural networks

    Phys. Lett. A

    (2004)
  • C. Maharajan et al.

    Impulsive cohen-grossberg BAM neural networks with mixed time-delays: an exponential stability analysis issue

    Neurocomputing

    (2018)
  • G. Rajchakit et al.

    Improved exponential convergence result for generalized neural networks including interval time-varying delayed signals

    Neural Netw.

    (2017)
  • R. Manivannan et al.

    Design of extended dissipativity state estimation for generalized neural networks with mixed time-varying delay signals

    Inf. Sci.

    (2018)
  • R. Manivannan et al.

    Ahmed Alsaedi exponential stability and extended dissipativity criteria for generalized neural networks with interval time-varying delay signals

    J. Frankl. Inst.

    (2017)
  • R. Manivannan et al.

    Further improved results on stability and dissipativity analysis of static impulsive neural networks with interval time-varying delays

    J. Frankl. Inst.

    (2017)
  • R. Manivannan et al.

    Global exponential stability and dissipativity of generalized neural networks with time-varying delay signals

    Neural Netw.

    (2017)
  • L.A. Adamic et al.

    Growth dynamics of the world wide web

    Nature

    (1999)
  • S.H. Strogatz et al.

    Coupled oscillators and biological synchronization

    Sci. Am.

    (1993)
  • ZhengZ.W. et al.

    Adaptive trajectory tracking control of a fully actuated surface vessel with asymmetrically constrained input and output

    IEEE Trans. Control Syst. Technol.

    (2017)
  • ZhengZ.W. et al.

    Error constrained LOS path following of a surface vessel with actuator saturation and faults

    IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber. Syst.

    (2017)
  • WangJ.L. et al.

    Passivity of directed and undirected complex dynamical networks with adaptive coupling weights

    IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.

    (2017)
  • ZhangZ.Y. et al.

    Finite-time stabilizability and instabilizability for complex-valued memristive neural networks with time delays

    IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cyber. Syst.

    (2017)
  • WangJ.L. et al.

    Analysis and control of output synchronization in directed and undirected complex dynamical networks

    IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.

    (2017)
  • LiZ. et al.

    Global synchronization and asymptotic stability of complex dynamical networks

    IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. II Express Briefs

    (2006)
  • C.M. Gray

    Synchronous oscillations in neuronal systems: mechanisms and functions

    J. Comput. Neurosci.

    (1994)
  • F.C. Hoppensteadt et al.

    Pattern recognition via synchronization in phase-locked loop neural networks

    IEEE Trans. Neural Netw.

    (2000)
  • ZhouJ. et al.

    Chaotic lag synchronization of coupled delayed neural networks and its applications in secure communication

    Circuits Syst. Signal Process.

    (2005)
  • ZhangX.M. et al.

    Synchronization for arrays of coupled jumping delayed neural networks and its application to image encryption

    Proceeding of the Fifty-Sixth Annual Conference on Decision and Control

    (2017)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Matrix projective synchronization for a class of discrete-time complex networks with commonality via controlling the crucial node

      2021, Neurocomputing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Although some synchronization mechanisms have been proposed for discrete-time networks, the following open issues are still needed to be further discussed: Firstly, the nodes possessing different state dimensions usually exist in realistic networks [26–34,37] and some synchronization strategies have been proposed for several kinds of continuous-time networks with different state dimensions [26–33,37]. However, to the best of our knowledge, the synchronization problem for discrete-time networks with different dimensional nodes is still vacant.

    • Global fixed-time synchronization of chaotic systems with different dimensions

      2020, Journal of the Franklin Institute
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, the result of GFTS is extended to the networked chaotic systems with nonidentical dimensions. There exist some researches [39,40] investigating the synchronization of networked systems with different dimensions, but the GFTS can not be achieved. However, this paper obtain the result of the GFTS for different dimensional networked chaotic systems.

    • Exponential synchronization in inertial Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with time delays

      2019, Journal of the Franklin Institute
      Citation Excerpt :

      Synchronization is an important dynamical behavior, which plays a key role in security communication, image processing and biological computing, such as sampled-data synchronization control of systems [1,2], stochastic sampled-data controller for exponential synchronization of chaotic Lur'e systems [3], novel master-slave synchronization criteria of chaotic Lur'e systems using sampled-data control [4], finite-time synchronization and Robust synchronization of discontinuous Cohen–Grossberg neural networks [5,6], fixed-time synchronization of coupled Cohen–Grossberg neural networks with and without parameter uncertainties [7], passivity and synchronization for coupled reaction-diffusion Cohen–Grossberg neural networks and coupled reaction–diffusion neural networks [8,9], fixed-time synchronization of quaternion-valued memristive neural networks with time delays [10], pinning control of coupled neural networks with different dimensional nodes [11], exponential lag synchronization for memristor-based neural networks with mixed time delays via hybrid switching control [12].

    • Input-to-state stability of delayed reaction-diffusion neural networks with impulsive effects

      2019, Neurocomputing
      Citation Excerpt :

      The diffusion phenomenon may be ineluctable, which is caused by the movement of electrons in a nonuniform electromagnetic field in the networks (see [8–12]). Moreover, impulsive effects ([13–15]) are unavoidable in the neural networks when they are encountered with instantaneous perturbations or experience critical change at certain instants, which may be resulted in switching, abrupt frequency change or other sudden disturbance (see [16–25]). Accordingly, the study for impulsive RDNNs with variable delays becomes a significant topic.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text