On asymmetric periodic solutions in relay feedback systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfranklin.2020.10.024Get rights and content

Abstract

Asymmetric self-excited periodic motions or periodic solutions which are produced by relay feedback systems that have symmetric characteristics are studied in the paper. Two different mechanisms of producing an asymmetric oscillation by a system with symmetric properties are noted and analyzed by the locus of a perturbed relay system (LPRS) method. Bifurcation between the ability to excite symmetric and asymmetric oscillation with variation of system parameters is analyzed. An algorithm of finding asymmetric solutions is proposed.

Introduction

Design of a control system usually involves an assumption of the existence of a unique globally stable equilibrium point. However, even for a system with a unique equilibrium point and bounded solutions, the absence of attractors revealed through excitation of the oscillations from the vicinity of the equilibrium point cannot guarantee global stability. The reason is the existence of the so-called hidden attractors (limit cycles and chaotic attractors) that reveal themselves only in certain circumstances. If an attractor is revealed as a motion that can be excited from an initial point in the vicinity of an equilibrium point, we shall call this attractor “self-revealing”; otherwise it is hidden.1 In contrast to the self-revealing attractor, the basin of attraction for a hidden attractor is not connected with equilibria. Therefore, special analytical and numerical methods must be developed to discover these hidden attractors through finding suitable initial points for solving the differential equations of the system or by using other means.

In relay feedback systems that usually do not have stable equilibrium points but have limit cycles, the problem of finding hidden attractors is of high importance too. Undesirable operating modes due to the existence of hidden attractors may occur in power inverters and converters. It is necessary to have methods that might identify their existence. Most of the developed approaches to analysis of relay feedback systems are aimed at finding or designing symmetric or asymmetric unimodal limit cycles2 [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. More general methods of analysis of nonlinear systems are used for this purpose too (see [9], [10]). These methods proved their efficiency in the analysis of symmetric periodic solutions. Some of them can also be used for analysis of asymmetric solutions caused by an asymmetric relay or an external biasing signal. However, the problem of finding and analyzing asymmetric oscillations in a relay feedback system that has fully symmetric properties was not addressed by these or other methods. Analysis of stability of the periodic solutions is done by the methods earlier proposed in [4], [5], and for dead-zone relays and relay systems with delays in [11], [12].

In the present paper, two classes of relay feedback systems that are capable of producing asymmetric oscillations in a system having fully symmetric properties are considered. This formulation of the problem is different from analysis of asymmetric oscillations caused by external signals or using asymmetric oscillations for process dynamics identification [13], [14]. A method of analysis of these oscillations is proposed. It is based on the Poincare map, the locus of a perturbed relay system (LPRS) method [15] and an extension of the latter that are being introduced in the present paper. It is also proposed that analysis of bifurcation of the modes of the oscillations be done through finding the orbital stability boundary conditions. Analysis of stability of the periodic solutions is done by the methods earlier proposed in [4], [5] and extended to systems with dead-zone relays and delays in [11], [12]. Further, by using the LPRS method the mechanism of generation of asymmetric oscillations in one of the considered classes is explained and precisely analyzed. Despite the concepts of the LPRS method were developed for a system having an external input signal, it is found in the present paper that it can be successfully used for analysis of asymmetric oscillations in a relay system having fully symmetric properties and no external signals. Finally, an algorithm of finding asymmetric limit cycles in a symmetric relay feedback system is proposed.

Section snippets

System model

Consider the following relay feedback system having hysteresis in the relay switching:x˙=Ax+Bu,y=Cx,u(t)={+c,ifσ=fybor{σ>bandu(t0)=c},c,ifσ=fybor{σ<bandu(t0)=c},where xRn is a state vector, yR1 system output, σR1 error, ARn×n, BRn×1, CR1×n are matrices, all quantities are real, f is an input signal, u is the control and u(t0) is the control value at the time immediately preceding the current time, y is the output, b and c are the hysteresis value and the amplitude of the relay.

Mathematical description of asymmetric oscillations

Here we introduce an analytical-numerical algorithm for localizing unimodal asymmetric periodic trajectories and determining the values of their parameters, namely, the frequency, the amplitudes and relative pulse duration, as well as possible initial states for producing an oscillation through simulations. Consider the solution of a linear plant given by Eq.  (1) having a constant control u:x(t)=eAtx(0)+A1(eAtI)Bu.

Now if we assume that asymmetric limit cycle exists and time t=0 corresponds

The system considered by Atherton [20]

Consider the following relay control system proposed by Atherton in [20]:A=(01000110d2d10d2),B=(001),C=(100)T,and d is a parameter.

The linear part of the system (25) is defined by the transfer functionWAth(s)=1(sd)(s2+2s+10).The system has two symmetric unstable saddle-focus equilibrium points:S±=±(110d,0,0)with one-dimensional unstable manifold.

It is known [20] that depending on the parameter d there can exist either symmetric or asymmetric periodic motions. According to [22], two

Conclusion

Analysis of asymmetric limit cycles in relay feedback systems with fully symmetric properties is undertaken in the paper. Among the examples known from the literature, two types of systems are identified: with non-zero constant term (bias) in the output oscillation and with zero constant term. It is shown that different mechanisms of asymmetry generation in the oscillations are involved. One of these mechanisms is explained through the LPRS method and supported by analysis of eigenvalues of the

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation 19-41-02002 and the Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi Project CIRA-2018-104.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References (26)

  • I. Boiko

    Discontinuous Control Systems: Frequency-Domain Analysis and Design

    (2008)
  • B. van der Pol

    On relaxation-oscillations

    Philos. Mag. J. Sci.

    (1926)
  • N. Krylov et al.

    Introduction to Non-Linear Mechanics (in Russian)

    (1937)
  • Cited by (8)

    • Efficient disturbance rejection of gimbaled inertial stabilization platform via relay controller

      2022, Journal of the Franklin Institute
      Citation Excerpt :

      The primary mission of ISP is to maintain the line-of-sight jitterless under a certain level of disturbance torque, as we discussed in Section 2.1. If a piecewise linear system like ISP has a stable limit cycle, then the limit cycle is known to suppress the error signal [10,12]. This adaptive feature is explained by the incremental gain of a relay, or the equivalent gain [5].

    • Fixed-time SOSM controller design subject to an asymmetric output constraint

      2021, Journal of the Franklin Institute
      Citation Excerpt :

      The constraint problem may also arise from the perspective of safety such as the maximum output voltage of circuits and the maximum rotation angle of the manipulator joints [19–22]. It can be observed from the existing literatures that there are some results about asymmetric constraints, such as [23,24]. Nevertheless, these methods can only be used to solve asymmetric input constraint rather than asymmetric output constraint.

    • Sliding-Mode Control of Phase Shift for Two-Rotor Vibration Setup

      2023, Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text