International student mobility spurs scientific research on foreign countries: Evidence from international students studying in China
Introduction
International mobility of scientists enhances the scientific process and scholarly knowledge production. This mobility is linked to knowledge transfer and exchange through international networks, learning new approaches, gaining knowledge, and more effective working environments (Bauder, Hannan & Lujan, 2017; Netz, Hampel & Aman, 2020). Therefore, it is a important topic in the field of Informetrics to measure the contribution of scientist mobility to science. Since most international students do not publish and are not scientists, it is worthwhile to explore the broader contributions of international student mobility (ISM) to science, which contributes to our understanding of global mobility and its influence on science.
Compared with the mobility of scientists, ISM is more prevalent and complex. According to statistics from UNESCO (2019), there were 1.17 million international students worldwide in 1990, 2.1 million in 2000, and 5.31 million in 2017. The flow of international students has traditionally been from developing countries to developed countries, with East Asian countries as the main sending region and North America and Europe as the dominant destinations (Choudaha, 2017). Take the U.S. for example, more than 54% of postdoctoral researchers working at research universities were on temporary visas (Stephan, Scellato & Franzoni, 2015). As highly talented individuals, international students have made significant contributions to knowledge production and innovation in host countries (Stephan & Levin, 2001; Chellaraj, Maskus & Mattoo, 2008; Hunt & Gauthier-Loiselle, 2010). In addition to filling research assistant vacancies, faculty members in host institutions have suggested that foreign students also help to establish connections with the source country and promote relevant research by taking advantage of students’ linguistic, cultural, and other embodied knowledge (Dunne, 2009; Harrison, 2015; Trice, 2003). These benefits are more obvious in the fields with context-specific components (Szanton, 2004; Williams & Baláž, 2008).
Skilled emigration, which has been labeled "brain gain" for the receiving countries, has been long a policy concern for sending countries (Beine, Docquier & Rapoport, 2001, 2011). As statistics have shown, China is now the world’s largest exporter of overseas students and has the highest global trade deficit in services for studying abroad. In 2017 alone, it sent 928,000 students abroad, almost three times as many as India, the world’s second largest sender, and twice the number it attracted in the same year (UNESCO, 2019). To cope with the severe “brain drain,” the Chinese government put forward an initiative called Several Suggestions on Opening Up Education in the New Era with the goal of promoting the return of domestic students and foreign students to study in China, and cultivate and attract more outstanding talent to serve the country (The State Council, 2016). With numerous “Study in China” initiatives and the increasing number of government scholarships, the number of international students studying in China has grown considerably. While in 1999, only 44,700 international students were studying in China, in 2018, 492,200 international students were enrolled in Chinese institutions, making China the largest overseas destination in Asia for study (Wen & Hu, 2018).
Although the global pattern of ISM is changing and China is emerging as a new regional hub for overseas education, few studies have evaluated international students’ contributions to China's science. Furthermore, for a non-western country with a “semi-peripheral” position in the asymmetrical structure of knowledge exchange, the influx of international students has created an environment of internationalization at home for Chinese domestic academics and students, giving them a better understanding of the outside world by increasing social diversity on campus (Bevis & Lucas, 2007; Mulvey, 2021). Hence, the expansion of international students in China is expected to broaden the geographic scope of what is being researched rather than merely impact on scientific productivity. However, this reciprocal knowledge spillover and its impacts on China's science has not been sufficiently addressed and appropriately assessed.
The main purpose of this study is to explore the influence of ISM on science by taking the international students studying in China as an example. It is intended to shed light on the theoretical and empirical understanding of the contributions of ISM to science. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. After a review of the relevant literature in Section 2, we introduced the data, methodology, and empirical model of this study in Section 3. The estimation results are presented in Section 4. In Section 5, we discuss the mechanism of the linkage between ISM and science, and the policy implications. In Section 6, we conclude.
Section snippets
Literature review
With increasing globalization and specialization of science, international mobility of scientists and the impact on knowledge production has captured increasing intellectual attention in the last few decades (Geuna, 2015). There is abundant literature on the measurement of contributions of scientific migration on the knowledge productivity of destination countries (Levin & Stephan, 1998; Stuen, Mobarak & Maskus, 2012). For example, Black and Stephan (2010) found that 39.6% of the
Data source
In this study, we used panel data including the annual number of international students enrolled by each Chinese university and the annual number of research papers published by each university, the titles of which contain international students’ source countries. The data of international students were derived from Concise Statistics of International Students in China compiled by the International Exchange Department of the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China from 1999 to
The distribution of China's international students
The scale and proportion of foreign students in degree program (foreign degree students) in China also experienced significant growth, as shown in Fig. 1a. In 1999, the total number of foreign degree students was 11,479, accounting for 25.7% of the total number of foreign students in China. In 2018, the number of foreign degree students increased to 258,122, and the proportion increased to 52.4%. The growth rate of overseas students at the post-graduate level and those with scholarships has
The mechanism of the linkage between ISM and knowledge production
We manually checked the titles of 60 randomly selected doctoral and master dissertations in Nanjing University during 1999–2008 in China's Outstanding Ph.D. and Master Dissertations Database of CNKI, and found that 36 (60%) contain the names of origin countries. Then, we manually searched the publication records of the 36 foreign names with Nanjing University to verify where they received their master and doctoral degrees and identified only five records in the Web of Science database.
Conclusions
This paper applied the fixed effect model to investigate the influence of ISM on China's scientific research on foreign countries, by collecting the number of international students of each university and searching corresponding publication records from the Web of Science. We found that there is a positive significance between the number of international students and publications. Furthermore, we classified international students by degree level (associate degree students, undergraduate
Authors’ contributions
Xingbo Yin performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript;
Xiaohua Zong contributed to the conception and design of the study.
Declaration of Competing Interest
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Funding
This work was financially supported by: National Social Science Fund Project “On the Research Performance Evaluation and Funding Mechanism of ‘Double First-class Universities’ in China” (Project Approval No. : BFA180066)
References (59)
- et al.
A panel data analysis of the brain gain
World Development
(2011) - et al.
Brain drain and economic growth: Theory and evidence
Journal of Development Economics
(2001) - et al.
Mobility versus job stability: Assessing tenure and productivity outcomes
Research Policy
(2010) - et al.
The mover's advantage: The superior performance of migrant scientists
Economics Letters
(2014) What year? Difficulties in identifying the effect of policy on university output
Journal of Informetrics
(2017)- et al.
Research upon return: The effect of international mobility on scientific ties, production and impact
Research Policy
(2013) The effectiveness of international knowledge spillover channels
European Economic Review
(2006)- et al.
The effects of Wal-Mart on local labor markets
Journal of Urban Economics
(2008) - et al.
Funding, evaluation, and the performance of national research systems
Journal of Informetrics
(2018) - et al.
International return mobility, learning and knowledge transfer: A case study of Slovak doctors
Social Science & Medicine
(2008)
An investigation of the relationship between scientists’ mobility to/from China and their research performance
Journal of Informetrics
Population and Conflict
The Review of Economic Studies
Institutions, Human Capital, and Development
Annual Review of Economics
Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution
The Quarterly Journal of Economics
Transfer of knowledge through international scientific mobility: Introduction of a network-based bibliometric approach to study different knowledge types
Quantitative Science Studies
International experience in the academic field: Knowledge production, symbolic capital, and mobility fetishism
Population, Space and Place,
International students in american colleges and universities
International doctoral students as knowledge brokers: Reciprocity, trust and solidarity in transnational networks
Global networks (Oxford)
The economics of university science and the role of foreign graduate students and postdoctoral scholars
The Contribution of International Graduate Students to US Innovation
Review of International Economics
Three waves of international student mobility (1999–2020)
Studies in Higher Education
The Role of Conferences on the Pathway to Academic Impact
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES
Host Students’ Perspectives of Intercultural Contact in an Irish University
Journal of Studies in International Education
Recombinant uncertainty in technological search
Management Science
Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies
American Sociological Review
A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change
Management Science
Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models
Psychological Bulletin
Practice, problems and power in ‘internationalisation at home’: Critical reflections on recent research evidence
Short-Term Internationally Mobile Academics and Their Research Collaborations Upon Return: Insights From the Fulbright U.S. Scholar Program
Journal of Studies in International Education,
Cited by (9)
Research Progress on the Impact of Returned Overseas Talent on Regional Development
2024, Tropical GeographyCorrelation Analysis of International Student Exchange and the Enhancement of China’s International Cultural Communication Power Based on the Subsumption Sorting Algorithm
2024, Applied Mathematics and Nonlinear SciencesCan international students help increase China's total factor productivity?
2023, Managerial and Decision EconomicsInfrastructure development, human development index, and CO<inf>2</inf> emissions in China: A quantile regression approach
2023, Frontiers in Environmental Science