International student mobility spurs scientific research on foreign countries: Evidence from international students studying in China

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2021.101227Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The impact of international student mobility on scientific research in china was explored.

  • Fixed-effect negative binomial regression and instrumental variable approach were employed.

  • The inflow of international students contributes to china's publications on origin countries.

Abstract

The international mobility of scientists fosters knowledge exchange by increasing cross-country research collaboration between destination and origin countries. To the best of our knowledge, the mobility of international students, most of whom are not scientists, has not been linked to knowledge production involving both destination and origin countries in previous studies. The question of this research is whether international student mobility (ISM) contributes to science in China. To address this research question, we determined the annual number of international students studying in Chinese universities from 1999 to 2018, from the Concise Statistics of International Students in China compiled by the International Exchange Department of the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, and corresponding publication records including the source country names in the titles, from the Web of Science database of Clarivate Analytics. We then used the fixed-effects negative binomial model and instrumental variable approach to explore the linkage from ISM to knowledge production and found that ISM led to the destination countries’ scientific research on foreign countries. The findings shed light on the discussion of the global mobility of talent, and contribute to the understanding of ISM's influence on science, the measurement of which is promising in future studies.

Introduction

International mobility of scientists enhances the scientific process and scholarly knowledge production. This mobility is linked to knowledge transfer and exchange through international networks, learning new approaches, gaining knowledge, and more effective working environments (Bauder, Hannan & Lujan, 2017; Netz, Hampel & Aman, 2020). Therefore, it is a important topic in the field of Informetrics to measure the contribution of scientist mobility to science. Since most international students do not publish and are not scientists, it is worthwhile to explore the broader contributions of international student mobility (ISM) to science, which contributes to our understanding of global mobility and its influence on science.

Compared with the mobility of scientists, ISM is more prevalent and complex. According to statistics from UNESCO (2019), there were 1.17 million international students worldwide in 1990, 2.1 million in 2000, and 5.31 million in 2017. The flow of international students has traditionally been from developing countries to developed countries, with East Asian countries as the main sending region and North America and Europe as the dominant destinations (Choudaha, 2017). Take the U.S. for example, more than 54% of postdoctoral researchers working at research universities were on temporary visas (Stephan, Scellato & Franzoni, 2015). As highly talented individuals, international students have made significant contributions to knowledge production and innovation in host countries (Stephan & Levin, 2001; Chellaraj, Maskus & Mattoo, 2008; Hunt & Gauthier-Loiselle, 2010). In addition to filling research assistant vacancies, faculty members in host institutions have suggested that foreign students also help to establish connections with the source country and promote relevant research by taking advantage of students’ linguistic, cultural, and other embodied knowledge (Dunne, 2009; Harrison, 2015; Trice, 2003). These benefits are more obvious in the fields with context-specific components (Szanton, 2004; Williams & Baláž, 2008).

Skilled emigration, which has been labeled "brain gain" for the receiving countries, has been long a policy concern for sending countries (Beine, Docquier & Rapoport, 2001, 2011). As statistics have shown, China is now the world’s largest exporter of overseas students and has the highest global trade deficit in services for studying abroad. In 2017 alone, it sent 928,000 students abroad, almost three times as many as India, the world’s second largest sender, and twice the number it attracted in the same year (UNESCO, 2019). To cope with the severe “brain drain,” the Chinese government put forward an initiative called Several Suggestions on Opening Up Education in the New Era with the goal of promoting the return of domestic students and foreign students to study in China, and cultivate and attract more outstanding talent to serve the country (The State Council, 2016). With numerous “Study in China” initiatives and the increasing number of government scholarships, the number of international students studying in China has grown considerably. While in 1999, only 44,700 international students were studying in China, in 2018, 492,200 international students were enrolled in Chinese institutions, making China the largest overseas destination in Asia for study (Wen & Hu, 2018).

Although the global pattern of ISM is changing and China is emerging as a new regional hub for overseas education, few studies have evaluated international students’ contributions to China's science. Furthermore, for a non-western country with a “semi-peripheral” position in the asymmetrical structure of knowledge exchange, the influx of international students has created an environment of internationalization at home for Chinese domestic academics and students, giving them a better understanding of the outside world by increasing social diversity on campus (Bevis & Lucas, 2007; Mulvey, 2021). Hence, the expansion of international students in China is expected to broaden the geographic scope of what is being researched rather than merely impact on scientific productivity. However, this reciprocal knowledge spillover and its impacts on China's science has not been sufficiently addressed and appropriately assessed.

The main purpose of this study is to explore the influence of ISM on science by taking the international students studying in China as an example. It is intended to shed light on the theoretical and empirical understanding of the contributions of ISM to science. The remainder of this paper is organized as follows. After a review of the relevant literature in Section 2, we introduced the data, methodology, and empirical model of this study in Section 3. The estimation results are presented in Section 4. In Section 5, we discuss the mechanism of the linkage between ISM and science, and the policy implications. In Section 6, we conclude.

Section snippets

Literature review

With increasing globalization and specialization of science, international mobility of scientists and the impact on knowledge production has captured increasing intellectual attention in the last few decades (Geuna, 2015). There is abundant literature on the measurement of contributions of scientific migration on the knowledge productivity of destination countries (Levin & Stephan, 1998; Stuen, Mobarak & Maskus, 2012). For example, Black and Stephan (2010) found that 39.6% of the

Data source

In this study, we used panel data including the annual number of international students enrolled by each Chinese university and the annual number of research papers published by each university, the titles of which contain international students’ source countries. The data of international students were derived from Concise Statistics of International Students in China compiled by the International Exchange Department of the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China from 1999 to

The distribution of China's international students

The scale and proportion of foreign students in degree program (foreign degree students) in China also experienced significant growth, as shown in Fig. 1a. In 1999, the total number of foreign degree students was 11,479, accounting for 25.7% of the total number of foreign students in China. In 2018, the number of foreign degree students increased to 258,122, and the proportion increased to 52.4%. The growth rate of overseas students at the post-graduate level and those with scholarships has

The mechanism of the linkage between ISM and knowledge production

We manually checked the titles of 60 randomly selected doctoral and master dissertations in Nanjing University during 1999–2008 in China's Outstanding Ph.D. and Master Dissertations Database of CNKI, and found that 36 (60%) contain the names of origin countries. Then, we manually searched the publication records of the 36 foreign names with Nanjing University to verify where they received their master and doctoral degrees and identified only five records in the Web of Science database.

Conclusions

This paper applied the fixed effect model to investigate the influence of ISM on China's scientific research on foreign countries, by collecting the number of international students of each university and searching corresponding publication records from the Web of Science. We found that there is a positive significance between the number of international students and publications. Furthermore, we classified international students by degree level (associate degree students, undergraduate

Authors’ contributions

Xingbo Yin performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript;

Xiaohua Zong contributed to the conception and design of the study.

Declaration of Competing Interest

We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Funding

This work was financially supported by: National Social Science Fund Project “On the Research Performance Evaluation and Funding Mechanism of ‘Double First-class Universities’ in China” (Project Approval No. : BFA180066)

References (59)

  • Z. Zhao et al.

    An investigation of the relationship between scientists’ mobility to/from China and their research performance

    Journal of Informetrics

    (2020)
  • D. Acemoglu et al.

    Population and Conflict

    The Review of Economic Studies

    (2020)
  • D. Acemoglu et al.

    Institutions, Human Capital, and Development

    Annual Review of Economics

    (2014)
  • D. Acemoglu et al.

    Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution

    The Quarterly Journal of Economics

    (2002)
  • V. Aman

    Transfer of knowledge through international scientific mobility: Introduction of a network-based bibliometric approach to study different knowledge types

    Quantitative Science Studies

    (2020)
  • H. Bauder et al.

    International experience in the academic field: Knowledge production, symbolic capital, and mobility fetishism

    Population, Space and Place,

    (2017)
  • T.B. Bevis et al.

    International students in american colleges and universities

    (2007)
  • B. Bilecen et al.

    International doctoral students as knowledge brokers: Reciprocity, trust and solidarity in transnational networks

    Global networks (Oxford)

    (2015)
  • G. Black et al.

    The economics of university science and the role of foreign graduate students and postdoctoral scholars

  • G. Chellaraj et al.

    The Contribution of International Graduate Students to US Innovation

    Review of International Economics

    (2008)
  • R. Choudaha

    Three waves of international student mobility (1999–2020)

    Studies in Higher Education

    (2017)
  • F.L.L. de Leon et al.

    The Role of Conferences on the Pathway to Academic Impact

    JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES

    (2020)
  • C. Dunne

    Host Students’ Perspectives of Intercultural Contact in an Irish University

    Journal of Studies in International Education

    (2009)
  • L. Fleming

    Recombinant uncertainty in technological search

    Management Science

    (2001)
  • J.G. Foster et al.

    Tradition and Innovation in Scientists’ Research Strategies

    American Sociological Review

    (2015)
  • R.J. Funk et al.

    A Dynamic Network Measure of Technological Change

    Management Science

    (2017)
  • W. Gardner et al.

    Regression analyses of counts and rates: Poisson, overdispersed Poisson, and negative binomial models

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1995)
  • N. Harrison

    Practice, problems and power in ‘internationalisation at home’: Critical reflections on recent research evidence

    (2015)
  • J. Haupt,

    Short-Term Internationally Mobile Academics and Their Research Collaborations Upon Return: Insights From the Fulbright U.S. Scholar Program

    Journal of Studies in International Education,

    (2021)
  • View full text