Optimal harvesting strategies for a multi-cycle and multi-pond shrimp operation: A practical network model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2005.01.018Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce a network formulation of the optimal scheduling model for a multi-cycle and multi-pond shrimp operation grounded on the original optimal harvesting theory for a single production unit. The optimal schedule comprises the harvesting and restocking time that maximizes total profit throughout the planning horizon, bounded by the underlying biological and economic conditions. The model takes into account the information such as harvest size distribution, seasonality of price, temperature and weight-dependent growth, and labor force and market demand constraints. We applied the model to an existing shrimp operation in Hawaii with 40 one-acre ponds and generated the optimal schedule for a year that maximizes overall production. The model schedule is found to be able to increase total production by 5% when compared to the schedule generated using an “educated” trial-and-error procedure currently practiced by this operation. Further insights for this multi-cycle and multi-pond scheduling problem were also generated through several alternate simulations. It is found that labor force and market demand constraints are the key factors in scheduling multi-cycle and multi-pond shrimp operations.

Introduction

The problem of determining the optimal harvest size of farmed fish has first been analyzed and modeled by Bjorndal [2] using an optimal control framework for salmon culture. Arnason [1], Heaps [8], [9], and Hean [7] have extended this model to include optimal feeding schedule, density-dependent growth and mortality and potential culling, and release cost, respectively. Cacho et al. [3] have applied a similar analytical framework to identify the feeding strategies of catfish culture. Springborn et al. [18] have analyzed the optimum harvest time for cultured Nile tilapia using a similar framework. Leung et al. [14] have also employed a similar framework to identify the optimal harvest age for giant clam culture. Recently, Pascoe et al. [15] have applied a similar framework to identify the optimal harvest time for sea bream and tiger prawn. Forsberg [4], [5] has proposed an alternative multi-period linear programming approach to model explicitly the size-structure of farmed fish in determining the optimal stocking and harvesting schedules.

In terms of applications to crustaceans, Leung and Shang [12] have applied Markov process and dynamic programming to model the stocking and harvesting decisions for freshwater prawns. Karp et al. [11] have also applied dynamic programming to determine the optimal stocking and harvesting rates of shrimp in the Southwest U.S. Hochman et al. [10] and Leung et al. [13] have extended the stochastic growing inventory framework to marine shrimp culture for the purpose of identifying the optimal stocking and harvesting schedules. Tian et al. [20] have evaluated the implications of using different shrimp growth functions on optimal harvest size. Purwanto [16] has developed a set of linear and non-linear programming models for optimizing the economic benefits from shrimp farming in Australia and West Java, Indonesia. Tian et al. [19] have also developed a computer simulation model to analyze the economics of shrimp production under different stocking regimes, harvesting schedules and farm sizes.

While the previous research mentioned above has provided the theoretical foundation to model optimal harvesting decisions for finfish and shrimp culture, they are generally not readily applicable to commercial operations for the following reasons. First, most of the models described above used experimental data to model the growth process and they have been shown to differ widely from actual commercial operations. For example, the model by Leung et al. [13] was based on limited data from one growout cycle of marine shrimp in an experimental pond. Second, all of the models are designed primarily as a research inquiry tool rather than an operations management tool for on-farm applications. This is particularly true for the model by Leung et al. [13] where it has been used primarily to investigate the economics of controlled environment. Third, almost all of the models were developed for optimizing the harvest schedule of a single pond or production unit. While it is certainly important to derive and understand the essence of the optimal harvest schedule of a single pond, it is essential to extend this framework into a whole farm setting whereby all the ponds or production units are scheduled in an optimal manner to smooth out production so as to satisfy the labor force and market demand constraints. Against this background, the purpose of this research is to develop, test and operationalize a management model that takes into account the multi-cycle and multi-pond nature of most commercial shrimp farms in order to solve for the optimal growout production schedule of the entire farm.

The paper is organized as follows: Section 2 presents the mathematical representation of the optimal scheduling problem and introduces the underlying biological and economic functions. Section 3 provides the network representation of the optimal scheduling model that is equivalent to the otherwise unsolvable mathematical formulation. Section 4 applies the network model to an existing shrimp farming entity with 40 growout ponds to generate the optimal schedule for a year. Section 5 discusses the results of the optimal scheduling and implications from several alternate simulations. Section 6 concludes the paper.

Section snippets

The mathematical formulation

In this section, we present the mathematical formulation of the optimal scheduling problem and explain the underlying biological and economic functions involved.

Our whole-farm optimal scheduling model is grounded on the optimal harvesting theory pioneered by Bjorndal [2]. The problem for the planner at hand is to determine the schedule of harvesting and restocking time that maximizes total profit for a multi-pond shrimp operation for a finite planning horizon that can accommodate several

The network representation

As we have done previously, we will introduce how to convert our mathematical formulation into a network representation by first considering a representative pond.

Fig. 1 illustrates the network structure for a representative pond. The node (circle) represents one discrete time in the planning horizon when a managerial decision can take place. Node 0 denotes the time when the planner prepares the schedule. The series of nodes from 1 to T represents the set T. The arc from each node to each later

An application

In this section, we apply our optimal scheduling network model to an existing shrimp farming entity to test its applicability, validity and reliability. This commercial shrimp farm under investigation currently operates 40 one-acre ponds throughout the year. Presently, the year ahead harvesting and restocking schedule is decided by a manager through an “educated” trial-and-error process. So, we will test our present network model based on the same information as used by this manager in order to

Baseline and alternative simulation results

The above network model consists of 30,000 binary variables and is implemented on MS Excel using Frontline's Large-Scale Linear Programming Solver. It takes several hours for Solver to crunch the optimal managerial schedule.

Fig. 6 provides the optimal model managerial schedule for the planning horizon of 1 year for the baseline simulation. All harvests are guaranteed to result with shrimp within the target size range by this schedule. In contrast, the existing “educated” trail-and-error

Concluding remarks

In this paper, we introduce a practical scheduling model for a shrimp operation practicing multiple cycles per year in a multiple ponds setting to derive the optimal harvesting and restocking schedule. By converting the scheduling problem into a network formulation allows us to solve this otherwise unsolvable hard integer programming problem. The successful application to an existing shrimp operation in Hawaii has illustrated the model's ability and reliability in improving the quality of

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Paul Bienfang of CEATECH USA, Inc. who has contributed significant insights into the construct of the present model and also for providing valuable farm information without which this study would not be possible. This study was made possible by the generous support of the United States Department of Agriculture Cooperative State Research, Education and Extension Service (USDA grant 2003-34167-14034).

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (29)

  • Aquaculture production optimisation in multi-cage farms subject to commercial and operational constraints

    2020, Biosystems Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    This method is focused on improving the performance of multiple objectives with a low computational cost by synchronising seeding and harvesting decisions and the feed and fingerlings selection. Regarding aquaculture management, although PSO has been successfully applied to solve many multi-objective problems in other sectors (de Campos, 2019), there have only been a few applications of it and they have a single economic aim, such as those by Yu and Leung (2005, 2009) and Cobo, Llorente, and Luna (2015). Therefore, this study constitutes a novel contribution to the existing state of the art of data-driven approaches to fish farming, integrating a MCDM model and an Artificial Intelligence (AI) metaheuristic technique, PSO.

  • A model for restocking and harvesting aquaculture: A case of multi-pond, multi-cycle, and multi-fish type farming

    2018, Biosystems Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    An optimised scheduling for commercial aquaculture has been demonstrated to improve both the productivity (Yu & Leung, 2005) and profitability (Yu, Leung, & Bienfang, 2006) of a commercial aquaculture farm.

  • Pricing and inventory problem in shrimp supply chain: A case study of Taiwan's white shrimp industry

    2016, Aquaculture
    Citation Excerpt :

    However, they focus simply on the cost structure but not on the performance of the supply chain. Other relevant studies such as Yu and Leung (2005) and Yu et al. (2006) discussed similar issues. The common feature of the reviewed wild and cultivated shrimp fishery studies is that they focus primarily on maximizing the profit of or minimizing the costs for farmers and do not incorporate the market concerns of the shrimp supply chain.

  • Mathematical principles of production management and robust layout design: Part III. 2500-ton/year fish farming in marine net cages

    2013, Aquacultural Engineering
    Citation Excerpt :

    The third approach is a variation of linear programming (LP) and dynamic programming (DP). LP has been frequently used in production planning in aquaculture production, such as for cost minimization in oyster farms (Lipschultz and Krantz, 1980) and profit maximization in prawn farms (Shaftel and Wilson, 1990; Wilson and Schaftel, 1991), multicycle and multiponds operation of shrimps farms (Yu and Leung, 2005; Yu et al., 2006), salmonid hatcheries (Johnson, 1974) and salmonid grow-out farms (Gates et al., 1980; Varvarigos and Home, 1986). We refer to (Forsberg, 1996) who discussed LP vs. DP in the aquaculture context and indicated that neither LP nor DP are adaptable to all aquaculture systems.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text