Elsevier

Microelectronics Reliability

Volume 55, Issues 3–4, February–March 2015, Pages 572-581
Microelectronics Reliability

Maximum pulse current estimation for high accuracy power capability prediction of a Li-Ion battery

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microrel.2014.12.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Accurate information regarding the available maximum pulse current is required.

  • Implementation of the dual EKF-based work for parameter identification is presented.

  • Lumped resistance can be obtained by numerical equation on the estimated values.

  • Obtained lumped resistances are compared with those extracted by the HPPC and DCIR.

  • This work is appropriate for providing the reliable power capability prediction.

Abstract

This study gives insight to the design and implementation of the dual extended Kalman filter (dual EKF)-based maximum pulse current estimation for high accuracy power capability prediction of a Li-Ion battery. The information on the lumped resistance, which represents the magnitude of the voltage variance during the predefined time, can be obtained using numerical equations based on two values of the state-of-charge (SOC) and series resistance Ri estimated by the dual EKF. These obtained lumped resistances are properly compared with those extracted by the hybrid pulse power capability prediction (HPPC) technique and the direct current internal resistance (DCIR) technique. Through experimental results that shows little difference between the estimated lumped resistance and those extracted by the HPPC and the DCIR techniques, it can be certainly mentioned that this work sufficiently provides an outstanding solution related to the available maximum pulse current estimation of a Li-Ion battery to be operated within the safety discharging/charging range. Consequently, our proposed dual EKF-based approach is clearly appropriate for providing information regarding the reliable power capability prediction.

Introduction

Currently, rechargeable Li-Ion batteries have become a more and more attractive selection for power electronics applications, portable devices, and renewable energy storage systems (RESSs) [1], [2], [3]. In particular, Li-Ion batteries have been gradually recognized as a promising resolution for electric-powered transportation, such as electric vehicles (EVs) and hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]. These activities require accurate and reliable information on the electrochemical characteristics in order to assure the overall system performance; that is, they require a battery management system (BMS) [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. The role of the BMS is to measure the experimental voltage, current and temperature of the Li-Ion battery and pack and specifically to manage the opening and closing of high/low voltage relays related to sequences and protections. In this case, failure to accomplish a well-designed BMS, leading to over-charging and over-discharging, may result in permanent internal degradation of the battery [15]. Therefore, in recent years, much research work has been performed to attempt to find an optimal BMS that can resolve the above weakness. Above all, great attention has been shown regarding the question of the state-of-charge (SOC) and state-of-health (SOH), which are considered as representative factors in the BMS for supporting optimal battery performance and safety in EVs and HEVs [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40]. Specifically, current BMSs should have well-established SOC estimation and SOH prediction algorithms. In practical applications, precise SOC and SOH information is crucial for efficient battery management, for example, where it is necessary to determine how long the battery will last in order to predict a reliable operating range, and when to stop charging and discharging in order to prevent the batteries in EVs and HEVs from over-charging and over-discharging [30].

Nowadays, the SOH implementation can be achieved by capacity-based [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38] and pulse power-based predictions [39], [40], [41], [42]. In the case of capacity-based prediction, the authors in Refs. [31], [32], [33] presented that this analysis, the most common method, can provide real information, but can suffer from cycle-life testing which is time-consuming, costly, and labor intensive, and that the life prediction from such tests often has limited applicability under the assumption that the fading mechanisms in the course of testing remain the same. On the other hand, the other method, pulse power-based prediction, is known to be an implementation of power capability prediction under a charging/discharging pulse current. Examples of this approach are the hybrid pulse power characterization (HPPC) technique and the direct current internal resistance (DCIR) technique. Unfortunately, these tests are generally implemented at a specific SOC range, therefore, it may be almost impossible to provide correct information of the power capability for the entire SOC range. Ref. [43] showed that the magnitude of the internal resistance at the middle SOC range is smaller than at the low and high SOC ranges. Moreover, due to the differences in the electrochemical characteristics among Li-Ion batteries, repeated parameter measurements for power capability prediction of an arbitrary Li-Ion battery is generally inevitable [44].

The conventional dual extended Kalman filter (dual EKF)-based approaches facilitated an improved SOH prediction from the suppression of the above drawbacks, in addition to providing SOC estimation [43], [44]. In these approaches, the experimental results obviously showed that two factors such as SOC and capacity for degraded Li-Ion batteries were well estimated [43], [44]. However, because of the use of an identical value for lumped resistance for the entire SOC range, these works cannot provide a sufficient satisfaction in the pulse power-based SOH prediction. As a result, it has been further shown that these approaches were slightly vulnerable to over-voltage and under-voltage operating conditions. In general, the Li-Ion battery has an allowable operating voltage range (which is narrow) between the fully charged voltage and the case of over-voltage. When the battery is operated in the over-voltage range, it suffers from irreversible deterioration or permanent damage. Therefore, at a high SOC, the battery must be prevented from being operated at the over-voltage range through the power flow control of the energy management algorithm of a vehicle controller. For the same reason, the battery must be prevented from being operated in the under-voltage range [45]. From this overall perspective, a definitive answer that uses a lumped resistance properly varied depending on the SOC range should be considered in the exist the dual EKF approaches for efficient pulse power-based SOH prediction.

This research aims to introduce a new approach for the design and implementation of the dual EKF-based parameter identification for high accuracy power capability prediction. The nonlinear equivalent circuit model (ECM) earlier considered in Ref. [43], [44] is applied to this work (Fig. 1). Through this work, the SOC and series resistance Ri can be concurrently estimated. The estimated SOC and Ri are initially applied to numerical equation and used to obtain the lumped resistance, which represents the magnitude of the voltage variance during the predefined time. For reference, the RC-ladder that is comprised of the diffusion resistance Rd and the diffusion capacitance Cd is sensitive to the battery degradation. Fortunately, because of the characteristics of the HEV driving current profile which includes a frequent charging/discharging process, it can be assumed that there is little influence on the RC-ladder, therefore, the constant values of Rd and Cd are applied to this work. For verification of this approach, the obtained lumped resistances are compared with those extracted by the HPPC technique and the DCIR technique. The comparison clearly shows that there are little differences between the obtained lumped resistances and the extracted values. The lumped resistances are intimately linked with the available maximum charging/discharging pulse current considered as an essential prerequisite for improved power capability prediction. The experimental results showed the clearness of the dual EKF-based approach for reliable power capability prediction. This work has been extensively verified by the experimental results conducted on 18,650 Li-Ion batteries that had a rated capacity of 1.3 Ah [46].

The remainder of this approach is organized as follows. This approach is divided into six parts, including this introduction section. To begin with, a review of the theoretical background on the dual EKF applied to the ECM is presented in Section 2. Section 3 shows the experimental setup for the implementation of the charging/discharging cycle for Li-Ion batteries. In the following section, the proposed approach for achieving the significant purpose of the maximum charging/discharging pulse current estimation is explained. The experimental results that show the robustness of the proposed approach are presented in Section 5. In the final section, some conclusions and final remarks are given.

Section snippets

Basic concept of the dual extended Kalman filter (dual EKF)

The dual extended Kalman filter (dual EKF) [43], [44], [47], [48], [49], [50], [18], [51], [52], [53], [54], which makes use of two EKFs running in parallel, is extensively used for simultaneous state and model parameter estimations. In contrast with the Kalman filter applied for linear and Gaussian systems, this dual EKF is specifically known to be suitable adaptive algorithm based on recursive estimation for nonlinear and non-Gaussian systems. The concept of the dual EKF is to combine the

Experimental setup

In this work, prismatic 18,650 Li-Ion batteries that had a rated capacity of 1.3 Ah and a nominal voltage of 3.7 V are used. The experimental setup for this approach is presented in Fig. 3. This setup contains the computer-control unit based on the C++ MFC virtual measurement system with a PC as its platform, and the programmable stand-alone instrument was operated independently, supporting a wide variety of functions. As shown in Fig. 3, the experimental setup was comprised of a power supply for

Estimation of the lumped resistance

In general, the lumped resistance is defined as a term which represents the magnitude of the internal resistance inside the battery with respect to the constant discharging or charging pulse current during the predefined time. There are two representative ways to measure the lumped resistance. First of all, the hybrid pulse power characterization (HPPC) technique is widely used to test the power and energy capability of the battery [55]. The main objective of this technique is to demonstrate

Validation of the proposed approach

For an elaborate estimation of the lumped resistance, the SOC should be previously estimated with high accuracy. Our research [44] showed that the SOC estimation results with initial value errors satisfy the specification within ±5%. In this approach, the validation of the estimated lumped resistance can be implemented by comparison between the estimated values and the extracted values by the HPPC technique and the DCIR technique. As previously mentioned, it is assumed that there is little

Conclusion

This paper concludes by mentioning the necessity of the proposed work investigated in detail. To be operated within the safe charging/discharging voltage range, it goes without saying that accurate and reliable knowledge with regard to the available maximum charging/discharging pulse current should be required for the determination of the magnitude of the acceptable power capability. Unfortunately, because of the use of an identical value for the lumped resistance for the entire SOC range, the

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by a research fund from Chosun University, 2014.

References (58)

  • R. Xiong et al.

    A data-driven adaptive state of charge and power capability joint estimator of lithium-ion polymer battery used in electric vehicles

    Energy

    (2013)
  • L. Xu et al.

    Kalman filtering state of charge estimation for battery management system based on a stochastic fuzzy neural network battery model

    Energ Convers Manage

    (2012)
  • H. Dai et al.

    Online cell SOC estimation of Li-Ion battery packs using a time-scale Kalman filtering for EV applications

    Appl Energ

    (2012)
  • M.-H. Hung et al.

    State-of-charge and state-of-health estimation for lithium-ion batteries based on dynamic impedance technique

    J Power Sources

    (2014)
  • S. Sepasi et al.

    A novel on-board state-of-charge estimation method for aged Li-Ion batteries based on model adaptive extended Kalman filter

    J Power Sources

    (2014)
  • J. Lee et al.

    Li-Ion battery SOC estimation method based on the reduced order extended Kalman filtering

    J Power Sources

    (2007)
  • R. Xiong et al.

    A data-driven multi-scale extended Kalman filtering based parameter and state estimation approach of lithium-ion polymer battery in electric vehicles

    Appl Energ

    (2014)
  • S. Sepasi et al.

    Improved extended Kalman filter for state of charge estimation of battery pack

    J Power Sources

    (2014)
  • X. Chen et al.

    A novel approach for state of charge estimation based on adaptive switching gain sliding mode observer in electric vehicles

    J Power Sources

    (2014)
  • X. Chen et al.

    Adaptive gain sliding mode observer for state of charge estimation based on combined battery equivalent circuit model

    Comput Chem Eng

    (2014)
  • I.-S. Kim

    The novel state of charge estimation method for lithium battery using sliding mode observer

    J Power Sources

    (2006)
  • Y. Zhang et al.

    Cycling degradation of an automotive LiFePO4 lithium-ion battery

    J Power Sources

    (2011)
  • A.P. Schmidt et al.

    Model-based distinction and quantification of capacity loss and rate capability fade in Li-Ion batteries

    J Power Sources

    (2010)
  • A.T. Stamps et al.

    Analysis of capacity fade in a lithium ion battery

    J Power Sources

    (2005)
  • C. Lu et al.

    Li-Ion battery capacity estimation: a geometrical approach

    J Power Sources

    (2014)
  • Y. Zheng et al.

    LiFePO4 battery pack capacity estimation for electric vehicles based on charging cell voltage curve transformation

    J Power Sources

    (2013)
  • G.L. Plett

    Recursive approximate weighted total least squares estimation of battery cell total capacity

    J Power Sources

    (2011)
  • W. He et al.

    Prognostics of lithium-ion batteries based on Dempster–Shafer theory and the Bayesian Monte Carlo method

    J Power Sources

    (Dec. 2011)
  • W. He et al.

    State of charge estimation for electric vehicle batteries using unscented Kalman filtering

    Microelectron Reliab

    (Jun. 2013)
  • Cited by (14)

    • Covariance controlled state-of-charge estimator of LiFePO<inf>4</inf> cells using a simplified hysteresis model

      2018, Electrochimica Acta
      Citation Excerpt :

      When a suitable ECM is constructed for expression of a LiFePO4 cell's electrochemical characteristics, it should be further required to decide an algorithm that can facilitate an improved SOC estimation. Specifically, the extended Kalman filter (EKF) has been extensively chosen as a representative method because of its advantages of being closed-loop and online, and having the dynamic SOC estimation error range available [39–42]. However, it is risky that the convergence speed of the SOC estimation is dependent on the initial SOC value of the EKF.

    • Butler-Volmer equation-based model and its implementation on state of power prediction of high-power lithium titanate batteries considering temperature effects

      2016, Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Therefore, we prefer to evaluate maximum discharge and charge power of the LTO battery under the constraint of voltage rather than other factors. On the other hand, the commonly used methods for verification of SOP prediction can be divided into two categories [16–20], i.e., methods using the constant current pulse and methods based on the constant voltage pulse. The former approach is to assume that limit of voltage is reached at the end of time horizon, while the latter one is built on the supposition that this limit is immediately reached and hold at this voltage during the whole time horizon.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text