Elsevier

Neurocomputing

Volume 71, Issues 1–3, December 2007, Pages 333-341
Neurocomputing

Noise enhancement of signal transduction by parallel arrays of nonlinear neurons with threshold and saturation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2006.12.014Get rights and content

Abstract

A classic model neuron with threshold and saturation is used to form parallel uncoupled neuronal arrays in charge of the transduction of a periodic or aperiodic noisy input signal. The impact on the transduction efficacy of added noises is investigated. In isolated neurons, improvement by noise is possible only in the subthreshold and in the strongly saturating regimes of the neuronal response. In arrays, improvement by noise is always reinforced, and it becomes possible in all regimes of operation, i.e. in the threshold, in the saturation, and also in the intermediate curvilinear part of the neuronal response. All the configurations of improvement by noise apply equally to periodic and to aperiodic signals. These results extend the possible forms of stochastic resonance or improvement by noise accessible in neuronal systems for the processing of information.

Introduction

Neurons interconnected in networks are very efficient for signal and information processing, through detailed modalities and mechanisms which are still under intense investigation. Neurons are intrinsically nonlinear devices. It is now known that in nonlinear processes, the presence or even the injection of noise, can play a beneficial role for signal and information processing. This type of useful-noise phenomena have been widely investigated under the denomination of stochastic resonance [15], [1]. Many forms of stochastic resonance or improvement by noise have been reported in various nonlinear systems involved in diverse signal processing operations. Several forms of stochastic resonance have been reported in neural processes (see for instance [14], [12] for early experimental demonstrations, and [21] for a recent overview). At the level of the nonlinear neuron, many reported instances of stochastic resonance essentially rely on the threshold or excitable dynamics inherent to the neuron. In such situations, there is usually a small information-carrying signal, which is by itself too weak to elicit an efficient response from the threshold or excitable dynamics. The noise then cooperates constructively with the small signal, in such a way as to elicit a more efficient neuronal response.

Recently, a new mechanism of stochastic resonance has been exhibited when threshold or excitable nonlinearities are assembled into an uncoupled parallel array. This new form has been introduced under the name of suprathreshold stochastic resonance in [25], [26], because in the array, addition of noise can improve the transmission of an input signal with arbitrary amplitude, not necessarily a small subthreshold signal. A parallel array is a common architecture for neuron assemblies, especially in sensory systems in charge of the transduction of noisy signals from the environment. Stochastic resonance has been shown possible in neuronal parallel arrays, with various models for the threshold or excitable nonlinear dynamics of the neuron. In neuronal arrays, Collins et al. [11], Chialvo et al. [9], and Hoch et al. [18], [19] show stochastic resonance essentially with a subthreshold input signal, while Stocks [24], Stocks and Mannella [27], and Hoch et al. [17] show the novel form of suprathreshold stochastic resonance. In the neuronal arrays, suprathreshold stochastic resonance is shown in [24], [17] with simple threshold binary neurons, meanwhile Collins et al. [11], and Stocks and Mannella [27] for this investigate an excitable FitzHugh–Nagumo model in its subthreshold and suprathreshold regimes.

For isolated nonlinear systems, it has recently been shown that stochastic resonance can also operate in threshold-free nonlinearities with saturation, where the noise has the ability to reduce the distortion experienced by a signal because of the saturation [23], with an extension to arrays of threshold-free sensors with saturation given in [8]. Saturation is also a feature present in the neuronal response, and this effect of stochastic resonance at saturation has been shown to occur [22] in the transmission by a nonlinear neuron in its saturating region. More detailedly, Rousseau and Chapeau-Blondeau [22] demonstrate that in signal transmission by an isolated neuron, improvement by noise can take place both in the region of the threshold and in the region of the saturation; in between, when the neuron operates in the intermediate region avoiding both the threshold and the saturation, then improvement by noise does not take place. In the present paper, we shall consider the same type of neuron model with saturation as in [22]; we shall assemble these neurons into a parallel array, and investigate the impact of added noise in the array. We shall exhibit that different occurrences of stochastic resonance take place in the array. We shall show in the array that stochastic resonance is present in the threshold and in the saturation regimes of the neuronal response, just like in the case of an isolated neuron, but always with an increased efficacy brought in by the array. In addition, we shall show that in the array, stochastic resonance also takes place in the intermediate regime of operation that avoids both the threshold and the saturation of the neuron. Stochastic resonance does not arise in isolated neurons in this regime, but the property becomes possible in neuronal arrays through a truly specific array effect.

Section snippets

The model of neuronal array

We consider the neuron model of [22]. The input signal to the neuron, at time t, is taken as the total somatic current I(t). This input current I(t) may result from presynaptic neuronal activities, or also from an external stimulus of the environment for sensory neurons, a situation to which stochastic resonance effects are specially relevant. The output response of the neuron is taken as the short-term firing rate f(t) at which action potentials are emitted in response to I(t). A classic

Assessing nonlinear transmission by the array

To demonstrate a neuronal transmission aided by noise, we consider that the input current I(t) to the array is formed asI(t)=s(t)+ξ(t).In Eq. (4), s(t) is our information-carrying signal, which will be successively considered to be a periodic and an aperiodic component. s(t) conveys an image of the information coming from presynaptic neurons or from the external world for sensory cells. Also in Eq. (4), ξ(t) is a white noise, independent of s(t) and of the ηi(t), with probability density

Array transmission aided by noise

Direct numerical evaluations of Rout and Csy can be realized through numerical integration of the integrals of Eqs. (9), (10), (11), (12). Alternatively, to push further the analytical treatment, it is possible to consider the following situation. The Lapicque function g(.) of Eq. (1) can be approximated for I(t) sufficiently above the threshold Ith by using ln(1-Ith/I)-Ith/I, yielding the approximationf(t)=g[I(t)]=0forI(t)Ith,1/Tr1+(τm/Tr)(Ith/I(t))forI(t)>Ith,which is also depicted in Fig. 1

Discussion

The results presented here can be viewed as extensions concerning the various forms of stochastic resonance or improvement by noise in signal transduction by neurons. In this context, stochastic resonance has been widely studied for noise-enhanced signal transmission by neurons operating in the region of the threshold of activity. Here, by contrast, we have also investigated signal transmission away of the threshold, in the curvilinear part of the neuronal response, and beyond in the saturation

Solenna Blanchard received a M.Sc. degree in Signal Processing in 2004 and a M.Sc. degree in Electronics in 2005, both from the University of Rennes, France. She is currently a Ph.D. student in the field of nonlinear signal processing and stochastic resonance at the University of Angers, France.

References (27)

  • F. Chapeau-Blondeau et al.

    Nonlinear SNR amplification of a harmonic signal in noise

    Electron. Lett.

    (2005)
  • D.R. Chialvo et al.

    Stochastic resonance in models of neuronal ensembles

    Phys. Rev. E

    (1997)
  • J.J. Collins et al.

    Aperiodic stochastic resonance in excitable systems

    Phys. Rev. E

    (1995)
  • Cited by (21)

    • Enhancing threshold neural network via suprathreshold stochastic resonance for pattern classification

      2021, Physics Letters, Section A: General, Atomic and Solid State Physics
    • Positive role of fractional Gaussian noise in FitzHugh–Nagumo neuron model

      2021, Chaos, Solitons and Fractals
      Citation Excerpt :

      The research of SR is helpful for the neuroscientists to understand how the brain encodes and transmits information from the sensory stimuli to the spike activity of the neurons. It is always measured by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) or mutual information [9,10]. SR often referred to as positive role of noise.

    • Vibrational resonance without tuning in a neuronal parallel array

      2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      Parallel structure makes the propagation of the signal more robust. SR phenomena in neuronal parallel arrays have been investigated with various models [21–24]. Additionally, aperiodic stochastic resonance (ASR), which refers to the aperiodic input signals can characterize the SR-type behavior in excitable system, is also widely studied [5,25–27].

    • Spurious correlation as an approximation of the mutual information between redundant outputs and an unknown input

      2014, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      This setting takes a very important role in engineering applications [8,7,10,19], where a single unknown signal is often measured by multiple sensing elements. The same setting assumes great importance in biology as well [16,20], because information is often coded and transmitted using populations of neurons [21–23]. In fact, it was shown that information transmission through multiple low capacity pathways turns out to be more efficient, in terms of metabolic cost, than a single high bit-rate communication channel.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Solenna Blanchard received a M.Sc. degree in Signal Processing in 2004 and a M.Sc. degree in Electronics in 2005, both from the University of Rennes, France. She is currently a Ph.D. student in the field of nonlinear signal processing and stochastic resonance at the University of Angers, France.

    David Rousseau was born in 1973 in France. He received the Master degree in acoustics and signal processing from the Institut de Recherche Coordination Acoustique et Musique (IRCAM), Paris, France in 1996. He received, in 2004, the Ph.D. degree in nonlinear signal processing and stochastic resonance at the Laboratoire d’Ingénierie des Systèmes Automatisés (LISA), University of Angers where he is currently a Maître de Conférences of physics and information sciences.

    François Chapeau-Blondeau was born in France in 1959. He received the Engineer Diploma from ESEO, Angers, France, in 1982, the Ph.D. degree in electrical engineering from University Paris 6, Paris, France, in 1987, and the Habilitation degree from the University of Angers, France, in 1994. In 1988, he was a research associate in the Department of Biophysics at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA, working on biomedical ultrasonics. Since 1990, he has been with the University of Angers, France, where he is currently a professor of electronic and information sciences. His research interests are nonlinear systems and signal processing, and the interactions between physics/biophysics and information processing, including neural information processing.

    View full text