Elsevier

Neurocomputing

Volume 260, 18 October 2017, Pages 32-42
Neurocomputing

Neural adaptive fault-tolerant control for high-speed trains with input saturation and unknown disturbance

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.02.083Get rights and content

Abstract

The problem of the position and velocity tracking control for high-speed trains (HSTs) subject to unknown basic resistance, extra resistance and actuator faults is investigated. Neural adaptive control strategies based on a novel sliding mode surface technique are presented for three different cases (actuator faults and input saturation are neither considered; only the former is considered, and both are considered) to tackle the problem. For each case, the radial basis function (RBF) neural networks is introduced to approximate the unknown extra resistance consisting of ramp resistance, tunnel resistance, curve resistance, and so on; unknown coefficients of sliding mode surface and dynamics formulation are obtained online via adaptive laws. Simulation results demonstrate the effectiveness of the presented control methodologies.

Introduction

Along with the higher and higher requirements of reliability and safety in actual systems, increasing attention on faults, such as actuator faults, sensor faults, components faults, and so on [1], [2], [3], [4], [5] are focused. In [3], to compensate the effect of actuator faults, an adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control scheme is proposed. In [5], sliding mode observers are designed via H concepts to detect and reconstruct actuator and sensor faults. It is well known that the occurrence of faults is inescapable. Consequently, to gain desired performances, tolerant control approach which first originated in the computer system [6], [7] is put forward [8], [9], [10]. During the procedure of designing the tolerant control strategy, there are numerous algorithms to be applied to tackle the above problem, which include proportional-integral-derivative (PID) control [11], [12], sliding mode control [13], [14], adaptive control [15], [16], [17], fuzzy control [18], [19], neural networks control [20], [21], [22], H control [23], [24], [25], disturbance-observer-based control (DOBC) [26], [27], [28], optimal control [29], [30], etc. Specifically, combined with an auto-tuning PID controller, the novel tolerant control algorithm is presented to ensure the convergence of the model predicted tracking error [12]; In [13], to guarantee the asymptotic stability and the robustness of the nonlinear system subject to uncertainties and actuator faults, an integral sliding mode fault-tolerant control by means of fuzzy logic is designed; In [15], the adaptive fault- tolerant control scheme is proposed for the nonlinear system which is subject to actuator faults, input constraints and state constraints; In [21], the radial basis function (RBF) neural networks are investigated to approximate a continuous function; To ensure the stability of the fault networked control system, a fault-tolerant H control scheme is proposed, which is based on a stochastic variable satisfying the Bernoulli random distribution in [24]; A nonlinear DOBC approach is presented to reject the mismatched disturbances and recover the property of nominal performance in [27]; According to an optimal fault-tolerant path-tracking control method, the cost function of the states and inputs of systems is reduced as much as possible in [30].

Note in the above literatures input saturation is not taken into consideration. However, input saturation, which means to impose restrictions on the control input magnitudes to a certain extent, is an extremely crucial element that affects system performances in practical systems [31], [32], [33]. Therefore, it becomes a topic of considerable interest to enhance and better performances for complex systems subject to input saturation [34], [35], [36]. In [34], an adaptive controller is investigated to guarantee the global stability of the dynamic system with input saturation; In [36], based on backstepping approaches and robust adaptive control algorithms, input saturation and unknown external disturbance are taken into account simultaneously.

Obviously, high-speed trains (HSTs) dynamical system is just such a system which is subject to faults and saturation [37], [38]. Although a series of control strategies are put forwards to compensate the effects resulting from faults and saturation, there is few research for HSTs [39], [40], [41], [42]. For instance, Li et al. investigate the adaptive coordinated control strategy to ensure safe and efficient operation for HSTs with input saturation [39]; Song et al. propose a fault-tolerant control of HSTs subject to actuator faults.

Motivated by the current analysis, it is especially necessary and significative to do research for HSTs where faults and saturation are taken into account simultaneously. Consequently, in this paper, the problem of position and velocity tracking control for HSTs subject to traction force, braking force, running resistance, actuator faults and input saturation is to be considered, which is shown in Fig. 1. A novel sliding mode surface is constructed, which is similar to PID control strategy. Differed from the known controller parameters kP and kD of the latter, coefficients of the former is unknown and can be designed via adaptive laws. Furthermore, during the procedure of controller design, neural networks is applied to approximate the unknown extra resistance which is regarded as a disturbance. In order to compensate effects of unknown parameters resulting from sliding mode surface and dynamics formulation, adaptive laws are designed. Under some reasonable assumptions, effective control strategies are presented for three different cases: (1) HSTs dynamical system is subject to neither actuator faults nor input saturation; (2) HSTs dynamical system is subject to actuator faults; (3) HSTs dynamical system is subject to both actuator faults and input saturation.

The rest of the paper is structured as follows. In Section 2, a description of HSTs dynamical system which is subject to the basis resistance and additional resistance is presented and RBF neural networks are briefly explained. In Section 3, the main results are gained and the stability is analyzed by appropriate Lyapunov functions. To illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed control strategies, some theoretical results for three separate cases are demonstrated in Section 4 which is followed by a conclusion in Section 5.

Section snippets

System description

The force diagram of HSTs subject to traction force, braking force, running resistance is plotted in Fig. 2, in which running resistance consists of basic resistance and extra resistance.

Based on Newton’s second law, the signal-point-mass model of HSTs is established as follows: mx¨(t)=u(t)cocvx˙(t)cax˙2(t)d(t)where m represents the total equivalent mass of the vehicle; x(t), x˙(t) and x¨(t) are position, velocity and acceleration; u(t) combines the traction force and braking force; co, cv

Controller design and analysis

In this section, different control strategies are proposed for Eq. (1), which will guarantee better position and velocity tracking performances. During the procedure of designing controllers, there are various difficulties resulted from unknown parameters, unknown extra resistance, unknown actuator faults and input saturation. To overcome these, the position tracking error between x(t) and xd(t) is defined as follows: e(t)=x(t)xd(t)and its first-order derivative and second-order derivative are

Illustrative example

For sake of demonstrating the effectiveness of control schemes proposed above, some simulation experiments are carried out for HSTs, where the additional resistances d(t) satisfies d(t)={wr+ws+we,t(0,100]ws+we,t(100,250]wr+ws+wi+we,t(250,600]wr+we,t(600,1000]we,t(1000,2000]where ramp resistance, curve resistance, tunnel resistance and other resistance are wi=mgsin(θ),wr=10.5αrmg/(1000lr),ws=0.00013lsmg/103, and we=0.08mgsin(0.2t)cos(0.2t)/103 [49].

In the simulation, the operation

Conclusion

In this paper, the tracking performance of HSTs subject to actuator faults and input saturation is drawn in a comprehensive discussion. Neural adaptive fault tolerant control methodologies proposed for three different cases. The appropriate Lyapunov functions are introduced to prove the feasibility of control schemes and the stability of the system. Simulation results verify that the presented control strategies are effective to improve tracking performances of the system.

Xue Lin received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in automation and control theory and control engineering from the University of Jinan, Jinan, China, in 2010 and 2013, respectively. She is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China. Her current research interests include adaptive control, nonlinear control systems, fault-tolerant control and related applications to high-speed trains.

References (49)

  • LiuQ. et al.

    A speculative approach to spatial-temporal efficiency with multi-objective optimization in a heterogeneous cloud environment

    Secur. Commun. Netw.

    (2016)
  • FuZ. et al.

    Toward efficient multi-keyword fuzzy search over encrypted outsourced data with accuracy improvement

    IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur.

    (2016)
  • H. Niemann

    Fault tolerant control based on active fault diagnosis

    Proceedings of the American Control Conference, 2005

    (2005)
  • WangY. et al.

    Active fault-tolerant control for a class of nonlinear systems with sensor faults

    Int. J. Control Autom. Syst.

    (2008)
  • I. Sadeghzadeh et al.

    Active fault tolerant control of a quadrotor UAV based on gainscheduled PID control

    Proceedings of the 25th IEEE Canadian Conference on Electrical & Computer Engineering (CCECE)

    (2012)
  • YuD. et al.

    Fault tolerant control of multivariable processes using auto-tuning PID controller

    IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B: Cybern.

    (2005)
  • HaoL. et al.

    Fuzzy logic systems-based integral sliding mode fault-tolerant control for a class of uncertain non-linear systems

    IET Control Theory Appl.

    (2016)
  • LiuM. et al.

    Fault-tolerant control for nonlinear Markovian jump systems via proportional and derivative sliding mode observer technique

    IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.-I: Regul. Pap.

    (2011)
  • JinX.

    Adaptive fault tolerant control for a class of input and state constrained MIMO nonlinear systems

    Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control

    (2016)
  • TongS. et al.

    Observer-based adaptive decentralized fuzzy fault-tolerant control of nonlinear large-scale systems with actuator failures

    IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.

    (2014)
  • DongH. et al.

    Fuzzy-model-based robust fault detection with stochastic mixed time delays and successive packet dropouts.

    IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part B-Cybern.

    (2012)
  • LiH. et al.

    Reliable fuzzy control for active suspension systems with actuator delay and fault

    IEEE Trans. Fuzzy Syst.

    (2012)
  • LinF.J. et al.

    Fault-tolerant control of a six-phase motor drive system using a Takagi–Sugeno–Kang type fuzzy neural network with asymmetric membership function

    IEEE Trans. Power Electron.

    (2013)
  • ShenQ. et al.

    Novel neural networks-based fault tolerant control scheme with fault alarm

    IEEE Trans. Cybern.

    (2014)
  • Cited by (36)

    • Sliding mode consistency tracking control of multiple heavy haul trains under input saturation and safety distance constraints

      2023, Journal of the Franklin Institute
      Citation Excerpt :

      The HHTS characterised by long distances, heavy loads, low energy consumption and safety have become the main carriers of railway transportation at present [1–3]. However, the incongruous power provided by the power system due to the effect of complex working conditions, such as road sections [4] and environments [5], on HHTS and actual needs of each locomotive causes the input saturation of each locomotive [6,7] whilst causing the occurrence of collision accidents of multiple trains running in front and behind between adjacent locomotives and between adjacent trains under the condition of absence of safety distance constraint [8]. Therefore, investigating the input saturation control method [9] and safety tracking algorithm [10] of multiple HHTS is crucial for the stable operation of multiple trains.

    • Robust efficient cruise control for high-speed train movement based on the self-triggered mechanism

      2021, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies
      Citation Excerpt :

      Guo et al. (2016) studied the adaptive fuzzy fault-tolerant control problem for high-speed trains in the presence of actuator faults and unknown non-linear dynamics. Lin et al. (2017) investigated the position and velocity tracking control for high-speed trains subject to unknown basic resistance, extra resistance and actuator failures. Tang et al. (2018) designed a delay dependent controller to compensate the uncertainty property of the train mass and time-varying state delays.

    • An RBMs-BN method to RUL prediction of traction converter of CRH2 trains

      2019, Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fig. 8 shows the topology of the traction converter. The converter consists of a single-phase rectifier, a dc-link circuit and a three-phase inverter, which is of great importance for energy supply of the high-speed railway traction system (Lin et al., 2017; Gou et al., 2016). The key components with degradation in the converter include IGBTs, capacitances and resistances.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Xue Lin received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in automation and control theory and control engineering from the University of Jinan, Jinan, China, in 2010 and 2013, respectively. She is currently a Ph.D. candidate in the State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China. Her current research interests include adaptive control, nonlinear control systems, fault-tolerant control and related applications to high-speed trains.

    Hairong Dong (M’12–SM’12) received the B.S. and M.S. degrees in automatic control and basic mathematics from Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China, in 1996 and 1999, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in general and fundamental mechanics from Peking University, Beijing, China, in 2002. She is currently a Professor with the State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University. She was a Visiting Scholar with the University of Southampton, Southampton, U.K., in 2006; the University of Hong Kong, Pokfulam, Hong Kong, in 2008; the City University of Hong Kong, Kowloon, Hong Kong, in 2009; and the Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, in 2010, as well as KTH Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden, in 2011. In 2007, she served as a Project Level-3 Expert with the Department of Transportation for the Beijing Organizing Committee for the Olympic Games. Her research interests include stability and robustness of complex systems, control theory, intelligent transportation systems, automatic train operation, and parallel control and management for rail traffic.

    Xiuming Yao received the B.S. degree in measurement, control technology and instrument from North China Electric Power University, Baoding, China, in 2005, and the Ph.D. degree in control science and engineering from the Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, in 2010. From September 2010 to March 2011, she was a Research Associate in the School of Computing and Mathematics, University of Western Sydney, Australia. From May 2011 to December 2014, She worked towards her postdoctoral research in the National Key Laboratory on Aircraft Control Technology, Beihang University, Beijing, China. She is now associate professor in Beijing Jiaotong University. Her current research interests include Markovian jump systems, pedestrian dynamics, and robust control and filtering.

    Weiqi Bai received the B.S. degree in automation from Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China, in 2013. He is currently working toward the Ph.D. degree in the State Key Laboratory of Rail Traffic Control and Safety, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China. His current research interests include fault diagnosis, modeling of high-speed trains; energy-saving optimal control and parallel control and management for rail traffic.

    This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61490705,61203041,61273152 and 61322307, and by the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities under Grant 2015RC051.

    View full text