Elsevier

Neurocomputing

Volume 275, 31 January 2018, Pages 958-968
Neurocomputing

Analysis and pinning control for passivity of multi-weighted complex dynamical networks with fixed and switching topologies

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2017.09.037Get rights and content

Abstract

In this paper, we respectively discuss passivity and pinning passivity of multi-weighted complex dynamical networks. By employing Lyapunov functional approach, several passivity criteria for the complex dynamical network with fixed topology and multi-weights are established. In addition, under the designed pinning adaptive state feedback controller, some sufficient conditions are obtained to ensure the passivity of the multi-weighted complex dynamical network with fixed topology. Furthermore, similar methods are used to derive several criteria for passivity and pinning passivity of complex dynamical networks with switching topology and multi-weights. Finally, two numerical examples with simulation results are given to show the correctness of the obtained passivity criteria.

Introduction

In 1968, passivity was firstly raised by Bevelevich in the circuit analysis [1] which can ensure the internal stability of the system. Since then passivity has received extensive attention and it has been widely used in many fields such as feedback control [2], [3], magnetic suspension system [4], nonlinear descriptor system [5], induction motors [6], [7], and synchronization [8]. Therefore, investigation on the passivity and control problems of different systems is very meaningful.

Over the past two decades, complex networks have aroused the interest of many researchers in physics, economics, biology, mathematics, engineering, and so on. More recently, many authors have studied the dynamical behaviors of complex networks. Especially, as one of the most important dynamical behaviors in complex networks, passivity has been widely investigated by researchers. To our knowledge, the main reason for this is that passivity is a very effective tool to analyze the stability and synchronization of complex dynamical networks [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Fang and Zhao [9] considered the input passivity of complex delayed dynamical networks with output coupling by using Lyapunov functional method. In [10], the authors studied passivity and synchronization of complex dynamical networks including the possible presence of communication time delays. Ren et al. [11] introduced a complex delayed dynamical network with spatial diffusion coupling, and respectively considered passivity and pinning passivity of the proposed network model.

However, in the above mentioned results about passivity of complex dynamical networks, the authors always assume that the dimensions of input and output are the same. But in many real systems, the dimensions of input and output are different. Unfortunately, very few researchers have taken this problem into consideration [15], [16]. In [15], the authors analyzed passivity for two coupled reaction-diffusion neural networks with different dimensions of input and output. Wang et al. [16], respectively, investigated the passivity of directed and undirected coupled neural networks with reaction-diffusion terms by using the designed adaptive laws. Furthermore, in practical applications, the connection between network nodes often changes by switches due to external disturbance and limited communications [17], [18], [19], [20]. Thus, it is also interesting to consider the passivity of complex dynamical networks with switching topology. To our knowledge, the passivity of complex dynamical networks with switching topology and different dimensions of input and output vectors has not yet been studied.

As everyone knows, we can get in touch with others through many channels such as Facebook, Wechat, letters and so on, and each contact method stands for different coupling. In this case, the social network can be modeled by complex dynamical network model with multi-weights. Obviously, multi-weighted complex networks can better reflect the relationship among persons and more properly describe the real social network. Practically, many real-world networks should be modeled by multi-weighed network models, such as communication networks, complex biology networks, transportation networks. But, minority of researchers have investigated dynamical behaviors of complex networks with multi-weights [21], [22], [23]. In [21], the authors considered the global synchronization of the public traffic roads networks with multi-weights based on the Lyapunov stability theory. The synchronization problem of uncertain complex networks with multiple coupled time-varying delays is concerned by Zhao et al. [22] based on robust adaptive principle. However, very few results about the passivity of complex dynamical networks with multi-weights have been reported.

In many situations, complex dynamical networks are not passive, thus some control strategies are required to make sure the passivity of networks. Nevertheless, it is very tough to control all nodes in the networks, especially in a large-scale network. For this phenomenon, many pinning control schemes have been presented to ensure that complex networks achieve the desired dynamical behaviors [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34]. Li and Yang [24] verified the global pinning synchronization problem for the given complex dynamical network model by planning the adaptive controller and using pinning control scheme. In [25], adaptive pinning synchronization problem on stochastic complex dynamical networks is researched by Li and Yang under the help of algebraic graph theory. Jin and Yang [26] utilized adaptive control techniques and solved the problem of pinning control of synchronization for nonlinearly coupled complex networks. To our knowledge, few researchers have focused attention on the pinning passivity problem [11], [12]. In [12], Ren et al. considered the main problems of passivity and pinning passivity for coupled delayed reaction-diffusion neural networks by constructing suitable pinning controllers. Unfortunately, the problem of pinning passivity for multi-weighted complex dynamical networks has not been considered especially for multi-weighted complex dynamical networks with switching topology.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first paper to consider the passivity and pinning passivity of multi-weighted complex dynamical networks with fixed and switching topologies, which are very significant and meaningful. First, in view of some inequality techniques, several sufficient conditions are established to ensure the passivity of the complex dynamical network with fixed topology and multi-weights. Second, for the complex dynamical networks with switching topology and multi-weights, some passivity criteria are also presented. Third, by employing pinning control technique, passivity problem is also discussed for multi-weighted complex dynamical networks with fixed and switching topologies.

Section snippets

Notations

0XRn×n (0XRn×n) means that matrix X is symmetric and semi-positive (semi-negative) definite. 0<XRn×n (0>XRn×n) means that matrix X is symmetric and positive (negative) definite. ⊗ represents the Kronecker product.

Some useful definitions

Definition 2.1

see [35]

A system with supply rate S(u,y) is called dissipative if there exists a nonnegative function W satisfying t1t2S(u(t),y(t))dtW(t2)W(t1)for any t1,t2[0,+) and t2 ≥ t1, where u(t)Rp and y(t)Rq are input and output of the system, respectively.

Definition 2.2

A system is passive if it is

Network model

The following equation is the mathematical model of complex dynamical network with multi-weights: x˙i(t)=g(xi(t))+r=1σj=1NarGijrΥrxj(t)+Bui(t)+r=1σj=1Na˜rG˜ijrΥ˜rxj(tτ(t)),where i=1,2,,N, xi(t)=(xi1(t),xi2(t),,xin(t))TRn stands for the state vector of the ith node; ar and a˜r are positive real numbers; g(xi(t))=(g1(xi1(t)),g2(xi2(t)),,gn(xin(t)))T is a continuously differentiable vector function; uiRp denotes the input vector; BRn×p is a constant matrix; 0<ΥrRn×n and 0<Υ˜rRn×n are

Network model

In network (1), we select the first l (1 ≤ l < N) nodes being pinned. In this case, we have x˙i(t)=g(xi(t))+r=1σj=1NarGijrΥrxj(t)+Bui(t)+r=1σj=1Na˜rG˜ijrΥ˜rxj(tτ(t))+vi(t),i=1,2,,l,x˙i(t)=g(xi(t))+r=1σj=1NarGijrΥrxj(t)+Bui(t)+r=1σj=1Na˜rG˜ijrΥ˜rxj(tτ(t)),i=l+1,l+2,,N,in which vi(t)=r=1σarkir(t)Υr(xi(t)ϕ),k˙ir(t)=αiar(xi(t)ϕ)TPΥr+ΥrP2(xi(t)ϕ),where 0<αiR, (PΥr+ΥrP)>0, ϕ is defined as similar with system (2).

Define e^i(t)=xi(t)ϕ, we then have e^˙i(t)=g(xi(t))g(ϕ)+r=1σj=1NarGi

Numerical examples

In this section, we give two examples to check the correctness of the above results.

Example 5.1

Consider the complex network with switching topology as follows: x˙i(t)=g(xi(t))+j=16a1Gij1,kΥ1xj(t)+j=16a2Gij2,kΥ2xj(t)+Bui(t)+j=16a˜1G˜ij1,kΥ˜1xj(tτ(t))+j=16a˜2G˜ij2,kΥ˜2xj(tτ(t)),where i=1,2,,6,k=1,2,g(xi(t))=(xi1(t),2xi2(t),3xi3(t))T, Υ1=diag(0.4,0.6,0.5), Υ2=diag(0.7,0.5,0.6), Υ˜1=diag(0.6,0.7,0.4), Υ˜2=diag(0.8,0.5,0.4), a1=0.1, a2=0.02, a˜1=0.1, a˜2=0.05, C=diag(0.1,0.2,0.1), and the matrices

Conclusion

This paper has discussed the problems of passivity and pinning passivity for multi-weighted complex dynamical networks with fixed and switching topologies, in which the dimensions of input and output are different. Using some inequality techniques and Lyapunov functional approach, some passivity criteria for multi-weighted complex networks with fixed and switching topologies have been derived. Furthermore, we have investigated the passivity of multi-weighted complex networks with fixed and

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61773285, 61403275, 11501411, and the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin, China, under Grant 15JCQNJC04100.

Xiao-Xiao Zhang received the B.E. degree in Computer Science and Technology from Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China, in 2016. She is currently pursuing the M.E. degree in Computer Science and Technology with the School of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin, China. Her current research interests include complex networks, stability, passivity, synchronization, neural networks.

References (35)

Cited by (34)

  • Outer synchronization of two different multi-links complex networks by chattering-free control

    2021, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
    Citation Excerpt :

    As mentioned in [1–4], MLCNs can better describe some real-world networks than the networks with single-link. Therefore, some investigators have paid more attention to dynamical behaviors of MLCNs in recent years [9–16]. Chattering phenomenon, which attracts some scholars attention, has been studied from different perspectives [34–38].

  • Event-triggered distributed fault detection and control of multi-weighted and multi-delayed large-scale systems

    2020, Journal of the Franklin Institute
    Citation Excerpt :

    The characteristic feature of such complex systems is that they are composed of interconnected subsystems with multiple coupling links between them and all links may have different coupling weights and delays. The existing works on multi-weighted complex networks are mostly focused towards synchronization control and passivity analysis of these systems, see for example [12–19]. Furthermore, these works either completely ignore the coupling time delays [14,15], consider the same time delay in all the coupling forms between subsystems [12,16,17], or assume that the coupling delays in all the links between a pair of neighboring subsystems are the same but among distinct pairs of neighboring subsystems are different [13,18,19].

View all citing articles on Scopus

Xiao-Xiao Zhang received the B.E. degree in Computer Science and Technology from Tianjin University of Technology and Education, Tianjin, China, in 2016. She is currently pursuing the M.E. degree in Computer Science and Technology with the School of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin, China. Her current research interests include complex networks, stability, passivity, synchronization, neural networks.

Jin-Liang Wang received the Ph.D. degree in control theory and control engineering from the School of Automation Science and Electrical Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China, in 2014. In January 2014, he joined the School of Computer Science & Software Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin, China. He was a Program Aid with Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha, Qatar, in 2014, for two months. From June 2015 to July 2015 and from July 2016 to August 2016, he was a Postdoctoral Research Associate with Texas A&M University at Qatar, Doha, Qatar. Dr. Wang serves as an Associate Editor of the Neurocomputing. His current research interests include complex networks, multi-agent systems, and distributed parameter systems.

Yan-Li Huang received her Ph.D. degree in applied mathematics from School of Mathematics and System Sciences, Beihang University, China, in 2012. Currently, she is an associate professor in the School of Computer Science and Software Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University. Her research interests include complex networks, switched system, passivity and stability theory.

Shun-Yan Ren received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Langfang Teachers University, Langfang, China, in 2007. She is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in mechanical design and theory with the School of Mechanical Engineering, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin, China. Her current research interests include complex networks, stability, passivity, and distributed parameter systems.

View full text