Elsevier

Neurocomputing

Volume 408, 30 September 2020, Pages 31-41
Neurocomputing

Brief papers
Synchronization in duplex networks of coupled Rössler oscillators with different inner-coupling matrices

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2019.10.011Get rights and content

Abstract

The traditional and extended master stability framework cannot work for multiplex networks with different inner-coupling functions on different layers. In this paper, we thoroughly investigate the influence of inner-coupling functions on the synchronized regions with respect to intra- and inter-layer coupling strength in two-layer multiplex networks composed of linearly coupled Rössler oscillators with identical or nonidentical intra-layer topological structures. We focus on three typical inner-coupling matrices, representing the classical bounded, unbounded and empty synchronized regions. We numerically investigate intra-layer synchronization (synchronization of nodes within each layer), inter-layer synchronization (synchronization of node pairs across layers) and global synchronization (synchronization of all nodes) in duplex networks with identical or nonidentical intra-layer structures, for all the combinations of the three typical inner-coupling matrices. Interestingly, we find that whatever the inner-coupling matrices are, the intra-layer synchronized regions of the two layers will become the same type in most cases, which should be due to the interaction between layers. Particularly, the inner-coupling matrix that leads to an empty synchronized region in an isolated network does not necessarily result in empty synchronized regions within or across layers, though it will lead to empty global synchronized regions while working as the inter-layer inner-coupling function. Numerical results also imply that structural difference of the two intra-layer networks will weaken inter-layer as well as intra-layer synchronizability.

Introduction

Many real-world systems can be described as a network of connected elements [1], which has stimulated tremendous investigations into consensus and synchronization [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], control [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], bifurcation [13], ranking [14], structure identification [15], [16], among many others. Yet, many phenomena do not involve a single network in isolation but rely on a group of connected networks or multilayer networks. In fact, the model of multilayer networks [17], [18], [19], [20], [21] widely exists and has been applied to numerous research and practical fields. For instance, a person has several social network accounts [22], [23], various kinds of diseases are propagated in the crowd [24], [25], and the airport in a metropolis is always a traffic hub for different transportation systems [26], [27]. We can easily find that, an individual will play different roles in different network layers. Later on, researchers used multiplex networks to characterize the above scenarios. Actually, a multiplex network is a multilayer network in which there exists a ‘one-to-one’ correspondence between those nodes in different layers, where the topological structures and the coupling functions between nodes within each layer might be different, and the number of nodes in one layer is the same as those in other layers. Especially, when there are only two layers, we call it a duplex network.

Synchronization is a universal phenomenon in nature, such as fish gathering, ant clustering, and applause synchronization. Generally speaking, synchronization is about a group of nodes arriving at the same behavior. During the last two decades, synchronization in single-layer networks has been widely investigated [28], [29], [30], [31], [32]. With the development of theoretical and computation techniques, more and more interests have been placed on synchronization analysis of multiplex networks, since the multiplex network model is more proper for describing real complex systems than isolated networks. In multiplex networks, there are three typical kinds of synchronization, that is, intra-layer synchronization, inter-layer synchronization, and global synchronization. As shown in Fig. 1, the left panel represents intra-layer synchronization in a duplex network with nonidentical intra-layer structures, where nodes within each layer reach synchronization, and the right panel represents inter-layer synchronization with each node in one layer being synchronized with a counterpart in the other layer. In this paper, the three typical kinds of synchronization mentioned above are investigated in duplex network. Specifically, synchronized regions of these three kinds of synchronization will be taken into consideration, in the spanning parameter space of the intra- and inter-layer coupling strength.

In 2016, Sevillaescoboza et al. [33] analytically derived the necessary conditions for the existence and stability of inter-layer synchronization. Gambuzza et al. [34] studied synchronization of N oscillators indirectly coupled through a network medium, where the model used in their work is a duplex network and one of its two layers has no intra-layer couplings. Nicosia et al. [35] investigated the collective phenomena emerging from the interactions between different dynamical processes in a duplex network that can model the neural activity and energy transport in human brain. Gómez et al. [36] used supra-Laplacian matrix to analyze the physics of diffusion processes on top of multiplex networks. Granell et al. [37] built a duplex network with an information layer and an epidemics layer, and then discussed the interaction between information dissemination and disease propagation.

It is well-known that, in networks, nodal dynamics, network topologies and inner-coupling functions play crucial roles in determining the networks’ evolutionary mechanisms and functional behaviors. Besides, nodes in multiplex networks are always involved with different features and functions. Naturally, the coupling functions in each layer are usually different [38], [39], [40], [41]. Take the brain as an example [40]. On one hand, the brain functioning is the synchronization of neurons, on the other hand, the brain also needs blood flow to supply necessary oxygen. The ways that neurons transmit electrical signals and blood cells deliver nutrients are obviously different. Thus, a duplex network characterizing this process consists of the neurons layer and the vascular layer, and the coupling functions in each layer are diverse. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that, the coupling function between nodes across different layers is also particular and different from those within layers [41]. Therefore, duplex network models with different intra- and inter-layer coupling functions are practical and worth further investigation, which have actually attracted wide research passion in the past few years.

During the past decades, the master-stability function (MSF), one of the most important methods to study network synchronization, has achieved many works [42], [43], [44], [45]. In 2009, Huang et al. [42] simulated the master-stability synchronized regions of chaotic systems in single-layer networks when the oscillators are coupled in different ways. They also divided master stability regions into three representative categories, and presented typical inner-coupling matrices of each category. Very recently, Tang et al. [45] extended the traditional master stability function framework to a certain type of multiplex networks and derived three master stability equations that can determine the necessary regions of global synchronization, intra-layer synchronization and inter-layer synchronization. However, it is required that the intra-layer inner-coupling functions of different layers be identical, and the inter-layer and intra-layer supra-Laplacian matrices be commutable. Thus, we wonder what the synchronized regions will be for more general duplex networks, especially those with various inner-coupling functions.

Motivated by above discussions, we will intensively investigate the influence of different inner-coupling functions on synchronization of duplex networks. The rest of this paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, the duplex network model and two order parameters describing synchronization capabilities are introduced. Then, three typical inner-coupling matrices and their corresponding synchronized intervals with respect to coupling strength in single-layer networks of Rössler oscillators are presented. In Section 3, synchronized regions with respect to the parameter space of intra- and inter-layer coupling strength for duplex networks with the same as well as different intra-layer structures are explored, where all the combinations of the three typical inner-coupling matrices are taken into consideration. Finally, conclusions are drawn in Section 4.

Section snippets

Model and method

For simplicity, we first consider a duplex network with an identical intra-layer topological structure. The method and results can be easily extended to general duplex networks.

The dynamical equations used to describe a duplex network with identical intra-layer topologies are as follows:{x˙i[1]=f(xi[1])λintraj=1NlijH1xj[1]+λinterΓ(xi[2]xi[1]),x˙i[2]=f(xi[2])λintraj=1NlijH2xj[2]+λinterΓ(xi[1]xi[2]),where i=1,2,,N, xi[1] and xi[2] represent the state vector of the ith oscillator in the

Results

We consider a duplex network, where each single layer is the BA network of 100 Rössler oscillators generated with m0=2 and m=2, and the network is described by Eq. (1). Synchronization of this duplex network includes intra-layer synchronization, inter-layer synchronization and global synchronization. All kinds of synchroniztion are affected by the combinations of inner-coupling matrices, including inner-coupling matrix of the first layer, the second layer and that across layers. Thus, using the

Conclusions

In this paper, we focus on duplex networks with identical and nonidentical intra-layer structures, and investigate the impact of inner-coupling functions on synchronized regions in the parameter space of intra- and inter-layer couplings. We obtain some very interesting results, as follows: (i) An easy-to-synchronize inter-layer inner-coupling function will facilitate one layer to synchronize through the coupling of the other layer, even if a layer can never synchronize when it is isolated, and

Declaration of Competing Interest

No conflict of interest exits in the submission of this manuscript, and manuscript is approved by all authors for publication. I would like to declare on behalf of my co-authors that the work described is original research that has not been published previously, and not under consideration for publication elsewhere, in whole or in part. No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support our conclusions. All the authors listed have approved the manuscript that is enclosed.

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to express their sincere gratitude to Miss Xiuqi Wu for her thorough review and grammatical corrections. This work is supported in part by National Key Research and Development Program of China under Grant 2018AAA0101100, in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grants 61973241, 61573011, 61703442 and 61763010, and in part by the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province under Grant 2019CFA007.

Xiaoqun Wu received the B.Sc. degree in applied mathematics and the Ph.D. degree in computational mathematics from Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, in 2000 and 2005, respectively.

She is currently a Professor with the School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University. She held several visiting positions in Hong Kong, Australia and America over the last few years. Her current research interests include complex networks, nonlinear dynamics, and chaos control. She has published over 70 SCI

References (48)

  • SunW. et al.

    Synchronization of the networked system with continuous and impulsive hybrid communications

    IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.

    (2019)
  • JiaZ. et al.

    Generalized projective synchronization of a class of chaotic (hyperchaotic) systems with uncertain parameters

    Chin. Phys.

    (2007)
  • LiuH. et al.

    Structure identification of uncertain general complex dynamical networks with time delay

    Automatica

    (2009)
  • A.L. Barabási et al.

    Emergence of scaling in random networks

    Science

    (1999)
  • SuH. et al.

    Positive edge-consensus for nodal networks via output feedback

    IEEE Trans. Autom. Control

    (2019)
  • ZhouJ. et al.

    Adaptive synchronization of an uncertain complex dynamical network

    IEEE Trans. Autom. Control

    (2006)
  • MeiG. et al.

    Finite-time stabilization of complex dynamical networks via optimal control

    Complexity

    (2016)
  • LiuX. et al.

    Discontinuous observers design for finite-time consensus of multiagent systems with external disturbances

    IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst.

    (2017)
  • XiaoM. et al.

    Bifurcation and oscillatory dynamics of delayed cyclic gene networks including small RNAs

    IEEE Trans. Cybern.

    (2019)
  • WuX. et al.

    Coreness and h-index for weighted networks

    IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Regul. Pap.

    (2019)
  • MeiG. et al.

    Compressive-sensing-based structure identification for multilayer networks

    IEEE Trans. Cybern.

    (2018)
  • HuangY. et al.

    Sequential restorations of complex networks after cascading failures

    IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern.: Syst.

    (2018)
  • S. Boccaletti et al.

    The structure and dynamics of multilayer networks

    Phys. Rep.

    (2014)
  • LiuH. et al.

    An encryption scheme based on synchronization of two-layered complex dynamical networks

    IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.-I: Regul. Pap.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (9)

    • Dynamic event-triggered control for intra/inter-layer synchronization in multi-layer networks

      2023, Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation
    • Pinning impulsive synchronization of two-layer heterogeneous delayed networks

      2022, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
      Citation Excerpt :

      In recent years, synchronization of a multiplex network has rapidly aroused more and more concern and achieved many meaningful research results [15–17]. Moreover, various synchronization types, including complete synchronization [18], intralayer synchronization [19], interlayer synchronization [20–23], cluster synchronization [24], etc., have been defined and studied, which greatly broaden and enrich research contents of network science. As everyone knows, time delays are unavoidable due to the finite speed of information transmission in interactive networks, which may cause some unanticipated dynamical behaviors such as accelerating or impeding network synchronization.

    • Interlayer synchronization of duplex time-delay network with delayed pinning impulses

      2021, Neurocomputing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Obviously, the existence of multiple types of interactions is an important feature of multiplex networks different from single networks. And because of this, this kind of network model, which can better describe the structural or functional characteristics of various realistic networks from nature to man-made society [2–6], has attracted tremendous interest of many researchers in various fields [7–10]. Besides, the existence of time-delay is inevitable in realistic networks due to the information transmission and spreading.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Xiaoqun Wu received the B.Sc. degree in applied mathematics and the Ph.D. degree in computational mathematics from Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, in 2000 and 2005, respectively.

    She is currently a Professor with the School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University. She held several visiting positions in Hong Kong, Australia and America over the last few years. Her current research interests include complex networks, nonlinear dynamics, and chaos control. She has published over 70 SCI journal papers in the above areas.

    Prof. Wu was a recipient of the Second Prize of the Natural Science Award from the Hubei Province, China, in 2006, the First Prize of the Natural Science Award from the Ministry of Education of China in 2007, and the First Prize of the Natural Science Award from the Hubei Province, China, in 2013. In 2017, she was awarded the 14th Chinese Young Women Scientists Fellowship and the Natural Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars of Hubei Province. She is serving as an Associate Editor for IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II.

    Quansheng Li received the B.Sc. degree in engineering and automation from Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, in 2013 and M.Sc. degree in applied mathematics from Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, in 2018.

    His current research interests include nonlinear dynamics and complex networks.

    Congying Liu received the B.Sc. degree in mathematics and applied mathematics from Three Gorges University, Yichang, China, in 2014 and M.Sc. degree in applied mathematics from Northeast Forestry University, Harbin, China, in 2017. She is currently pursuing the Ph.D. degree in computational mathematics with the School of Mathematics and Statistics, Wuhan University, Wuhan.

    Her current research interests include nonlinear dynamics and complex networks.

    Jie Liu received the B.S. degree in mathematics from Hubei Normal University, China, in 1997 and the M.S. degree and Ph.D. degree in application mathematics and computation mathematics from Wuhan University, China, in 2003 and 2006, respectively. He is currently a professor in mathematics department at Wuhan Textile University, Wuhan, China.

    His research interest includes the analysis of dynamical nonlinear systems, control of complex systems, modelling and analysis of complex networks. He is the author of more than 50 journal and conference papers.

    Chengwang Xie received the M.Sc. degree from Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, China, in 2005, and the Ph.D. degree from Wuhan University, Wuhan, China, in 2010, respectively. He is currently a professor with the School of Computer and Information Engineering, Nanning Normal University, Nanning, China.

    His current research interests include Swarm Intelligence, and multi-objective optimization.

    Fully documented templates are available in the elsarticle package on CTAN.

    View full text