Elsevier

Neural Networks

Volume 17, Issue 3, April 2004, Pages 427-440
Neural Networks

A neural network controller for hydronic heating systems of solar buildings

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2003.07.001Get rights and content

Abstract

An artificial neural network (ANN)-based controller for hydronic heating plants of buildings is presented. The controller has forecasting capabilities: it includes a meteorological module, forecasting the ambient temperature and solar irradiance, an indoor temperature predictor module, a supply temperature predictor module and an optimizing module for the water supply temperature. All ANN modules are based on the Feed Forward Back Propagation (FFBP) model. The operation of the controller has been tested experimentally, on a real-scale office building during real operating conditions. The operation results were compared to those of a conventional controller. The performance was also assessed via numerical simulation. The detailed thermal simulation tool for solar systems and buildings TRNSYS was used. Both experimental and numerical results showed that the expected percentage of energy savings with respect to a conventional controller is of about 15% under North European weather conditions.

Introduction

The range of applications of artificial neural networks (ANNs) is constantly increasing. Their use in applications related to energy management started in the early 1990s. Kalogirou (2001) provides a comprehensive overview of ANN applications in renewable energy systems and in buildings. ANNs appear to be particularly suited to control the heating systems of solar buildings. The thermal behaviour of solar buildings is mostly influenced by the solar irradiance and ambient temperature and it involves large time constants. Therefore, a controller having the ability to forecast up to a certain horizon these weather parameters and also their impact to the thermal behaviour of the building can reduce the energy required for maintaining the indoor conditions within the comfort zone.

The need of forecasting is shown in Fig. 1 (Kummert, 2001), showing the typical behaviour of a building with important solar and internal heat gains, during a sunny mid-season day. This situation can be encountered in a passive solar building or a modern commercial building with large south-facing windows. If there is no cooling plant, overheating can occur during a sunny afternoon, despite the fact that heating has been required in the morning. If overheating occurs then it is too late to take a control decision for the heating plant: the heat stored in the building structure cannot be removed. A reduction of energy consumption would have certainly been achieved if the temperature rise had been forecasted, in order to prevent unnecessary heating during the morning hours.

Argiriou, Bellas-Velidis, and Balaras (2000) presented an ANN controller for buildings with such forecasting capabilities. It consisted of a meteorological module, forecasting the ambient temperature and solar irradiance, a heating energy predictor module and the indoor temperature-defining module. The controller was applied to a simple ON/OFF electrical heating system. The performance of the controller was tested experimentally, in the PASSYS outdoor test facility (Vandaele & Wouters, 1994) and in a building thermal simulation environment. It was found that when applied to the PASSYS test building cell, a 7.5% decrease of the annual heating energy consumption was achieved, under the weather conditions of Athens, Greece. The usefulness of that work was mainly to demonstrate the feasibility and the importance of forecasting capabilities of a heating system controller. In practice the applications of such ON/OFF control devices are limited, since the majority of residential buildings use hydronic heating plants. Therefore, it would be interesting to extend the above control concept to hydronic heating systems too. Kanarachos and Geramanis (1998) proposed an ANN for the control of single zone hydronic heating systems. The inputs and outputs of this controller included parameters related to the heating plant and the indoor set-point temperature. No forecasting of either weather parameters or indoor conditions was performed.

The present paper describes the further development of the concept proposed by Argiriou et al. (2000) and its application for the control of hydronic heating systems. The controller was realized and tested experimentally in two rooms of an office building. The following sections present the design concept of the controller and its performance assessment—experimental and in simulation environment. The structure and the development of the controller is presented in Section 2. Section 3 describes the criteria applied for the performance assessment of the controller. The performed experiments and their results are described in Section 4. Since the experimental period could not cover the complete operating season of the heating plant of a building, numerical simulations were required in order to assess the annual behaviour of the system. The simulation results are presented in Section 5. The conclusions of this work are given in Section 6.

Section snippets

Description of the controller

The inputs to the controller are: Nd (yearly normalized), day number (1–365); Nh (daily normalized), hour (1–24); Tamb, ambient air temperature; Gs, solar irradiance on the south vertical plane (i.e. solar radiation impinging on a south facing vertical plane); Ti, indoor air temperature; Ts, water supply temperature (temperature of water supplied to the radiators by the boiler of the heating plant); Tr, water return temperature (temperature of water returning to the boiler). The controller aims

Performance criteria

For the performance assessment of a water supply temperature controller of a hydronic heating plant, several criteria should be taken into account like thermal comfort, operating costs and also environmental concerns (pollution due to energy consumption, etc.). In optimal control theory the above are combined in a so-called ‘cost function’ for which a minimum is sought (Bryson & Ho, 1981). For the purposes of the present work, this cost function is chosen as an expression of the trade-off

Experimental tests

The controller was experimentally tested at the passive solar office building of the Fondation Universitaire Luxembourgeoise, Arlon, Belgium. Two offices of 30-m2 floor area each and the adjacent south facing sunspace were selected for these tests. The sunspace is 1 m deep and totally glazed. It is separated from the offices by a mass wall (25-cm thick heavy concrete) including 10 m2 internal windows. The offices have also 2 m2 external windows in the roof, which can be operated by the

Simulation results

The performance of the ANN controller over a complete heating season and its comparison with a conventional controller was performed using the detailed thermal simulation code TRNSYS (Klein et al., 1994), combined with the MATLAB software (The Mathworks, 1999). The simulation environment, shown in Fig. 6, includes the following components:

  • Building model (TRNSYS TYPE 56 module): This model has been validated by the IEA (Lomas et al., 1994).

  • Radiator and thermostatic valve (TRNSYS Types 182 and

Conclusions

This paper demonstrated the potential of an ANN controller for the control of hydronic heating systems towards energy savings while maintaining thermal comfort. The use of ANNs provides the controller with forecasting capabilities of both weather parameters and indoor conditions. The operation of the controller has been tested both experimentally, on a real-scale office building and via numerical simulation. The implementation of the ANN controller revealed that the absence of ‘boost’ module

Acknowledgements

This work has been partly funded by the European Commission, Directorate General XII (Contract JOE3-CT97-0076).

References (15)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (74)

  • 3.19 - Passive Solar Architecture

    2022, Comprehensive Renewable Energy, Second Edition: Volume 1-9
  • Investigation of phase change materials integrated with fin-tube baseboard convector for space heating

    2019, Energy and Buildings
    Citation Excerpt :

    A study carried out by Rhee et al. [10] proposed individual room control for radiant floor heating system. Anastaselos et al. [11] performed a thorough Life Cycle Analysis with energy, economic, and environmental criteria to improve the energy behavior of residential buildings, and Argiriou et al. [12] employed a neural network controlling method for a hydronic heating system to improve thermal performance.Bojic et al. [13] simulated newly-developed configuration of floor-ceiling radiant panels with floor, wall, and ceiling radiant panels using different heat sources such as natural gas boiler, Ground Source Heat Pump (GSHP), and GSHP with Solar photovoltaic (PV) panels. The simulation results demonstrated that newly-developed floor-ceiling panels performed the best among all panels and GSHP with PV reduce the use of fossil fuel-based electricity.

View all citing articles on Scopus
1

Present address: Solar Energy Laboratory, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1500 Engineering Drive, 1303 ERB, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

View full text