Elsevier

Neural Networks

Volume 24, Issue 6, August 2011, Pages 602-616
Neural Networks

2011 Special Issue
Multi-site stimulation of subthalamic nucleus diminishes thalamocortical relay errors in a biophysical network model

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2011.03.010Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents results on a computational study of how multi-site stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), within the basal ganglia, can improve the fidelity of thalamocortical (TC) relay in a parkinsonian network model. In the absence of stimulation, the network model generates activity featuring synchronized bursting by clusters of neurons in the STN and internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi), as occurs experimentally in parkinsonian states. This activity yields rhythmic inhibition from GPi to TC neurons, which compromises TC relay of excitatory inputs. We incorporate two types of multi-site STN stimulation into the network model. One stimulation paradigm features coordinated reset pulses that are on for different subintervals of each period at different sites. The other is based on a filtered version of the local field potential recorded from the STN population. Our computational results show that both types of stimulation significantly diminish TC relay errors; the former reduces the rhythmicity of the net GPi input to TC neurons and the latter reduces, but does not eliminate, STN activity. Both types of stimulation represent promising directions for possible therapeutic use with Parkinson’s disease patients.

Introduction

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established clinical intervention for Parkinson’s disease (PD), essential tremor, and dystonia that is now being explored for use in a variety of disorders (reviewed in McIntyre and Hahn, 2010, Wichmann and DeLong, 2006). In the PD case, DBS is implemented by an implanted pulse generator that delivers an ongoing stream of high frequency current pulses. Although this form of therapy has achieved remarkable success, improvements in DBS would be desirable in order to reduce the associated energy use and need for invasive battery changes, help patients with symptoms that do not respond to current DBS paradigms, and allow for individualized optimization of DBS strategies (Deuschl et al., 2006, Feng et al., 2007a, Feng et al., 2007b, Hauptmann et al., 2007, Rodriguez-Oroz et al., 2005, Volkmann, 2004). Efforts to develop such improvements are hampered, however, by a lack of theoretical understanding of the mechanisms through which DBS achieves its clinical efficacy.

Parkinson’s disease (PD) and experimental models of parkinsonism are associated with changes in activity patterns of neurons in the basal ganglia, including increases in synchrony, firing rates, and bursting activity in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and internal segment of the globus pallidus (GPi) (Bergman et al., 1994, Boraud et al., 1998, Brown et al., 2001, Hurtado et al., 2005, Levy et al., 2003, Magnin et al., 2000, Nini et al., 1995, Raz et al., 2000, Wichmann et al., 1999, Wichmann and Soares, 2006). Since motor outputs from the basal ganglia emanate specifically from the GPi (Alexander et al., 1990, Kelly and Strick, 2004, Middleton and Strick, 2000), it seems likely that changes in GPi activity contribute to the development of parkinsonian motor complications. Furthermore, because motor outputs from GPi target the anterior ventrolateral nucleus of the thalamus (VLa) (DeVito and Anderson, 1982, Kelly and Strick, 2004, Yoshida et al., 1972), which serves to relay signals between cortical areas (Guillery and Sherman, 2002a, Guillery and Sherman, 2002b, Guillery and Sherman, 2002c, Haber, 2003), we and other authors have hypothesized that pathological GPi outputs may induce parkinsonian signs by changing thalamic activity patterns or information processing (Dorval et al., 2010, Dorval et al., 2008, Garcia et al., 2005, Grill et al., 2004, Montgomery and Baker, 2000, Xu et al., 2008) or, in particular, by compromising thalamocortical (TC) relay (Cagnan et al., 2009, Guo et al., 2008, Pirini et al., 2009, Rubin and Terman, 2004). This idea is consistent with the properties of TC neurons, specifically their tendency to fire rebound bursts when exposed to phasic synaptic inhibition, such as that induced by burstiness in the GPi under parkinsonian conditions. According to this viewpoint, DBS achieves its therapeutic efficacy for PD by restoring TC relay fidelity. Importantly, computational models and analysis suggest that returning STN, GPi, and TC activity patterns to their non-parkinsonian states is not necessary for achieving this goal, in as much as a variety of alternative activity patterns can also be associated with successful relay in computational models or alleviation of bradykinesia in human patients with parkinsonism (Dorval et al., 2010, Feng et al., 2007a, Feng et al., 2007b, Guo et al., 2008, Rubin and Terman, 2004).

In this paper, we study a form of STN DBS that has been suggested in the literature as an alternative to standard DBS, namely multi-site STN stimulation with delays between stimulation periods at different stimulation sites (Hauptmann et al., 2007, Hauptmann et al., 2005, Tass, 2003). We consider such stimulation with two types of current injection, one using periodic square pulses and another based on a local field potential signal recorded from the STN population (Hauptmann et al., 2007, Hauptmann et al., 2005, Rosenblum and Pikovsky, 2004b, Tukhlina et al., 2007). To perform our investigation, we introduce these stimulation paradigms into a computational model based on our earlier work (Rubin and Terman, 2004, Terman et al., 2002). This model consists of a small network of conductance-based STN, GPe (external segment of the globus pallidus), GPi, and TC neurons that, by design, generates parkinsonian activity patterns in the absence of stimulation. We simulate the delivery of an excitatory input train to the model TC neurons and compare TC relay performance across simulations without stimulation and simulations with coordinated reset or LFP-based delayed feedback stimulation of various amplitudes and periods. Although the forms of stimulation that we study were introduced previously (Hauptmann et al., 2007, Hauptmann et al., 2005, Tass, 2003), this represents the first work in which they are incorporated into a biophysically-detailed basal ganglia network model and in which their impact on TC relay fidelity is explored. We find that both forms of multi-site stimulation, applied to the STN, regularize GPi outputs and significantly diminish TC relay errors. While both can completely suppress STN activity if introduced with a large enough amplitude, both can also restore TC relay performance without such a drastic effect. Moreover, multi-site delayed feedback stimulation based on the LFP in particular requires relatively small currents (see also Hauptmann et al., 2007, Hauptmann et al., 2005, Tukhlina et al., 2007) and, unlike stimulation with a constant current of similar magnitude, maintains STN responsiveness to its own excitatory inputs (e.g., from the hyperdirect pathway). Hence, these results support the idea that multi-site delayed feedback stimulation of STN merits further consideration as a possible alternative to standard forms of DBS for PD.

Section snippets

The network model

We use a network of conductance-based, single-compartment model neurons adapted from earlier work by Rubin and Terman (2004) to explore how well different patterns of subthalamic nucleus stimulation can improve thalamic relay responses in parkinsonian conditions. The model includes neurons in the thalamus and several nuclei of the basal ganglia, namely the internal and external segments of the globus pallidus and the subthalamic nucleus. It is known that the subnetwork consisting of the

Coordinated reset stimulation

We first investigate whether coordinated reset stimulation (CRS) can improve TC relay performance in the parkinsonian network. In a previous study, we evaluated the ability of a model TC neuron to relay excitatory inputs under the influence of inhibitory GPi signals generated from experimental data (Guo et al., 2008). We found that GPi firing patterns, and corresponding synaptic outputs, produced in parkinsonian conditions without high frequency stimulation of STN switch rhythmically between

Multi-site delayed feedback stimulation

The second type of stimulation that we apply to our parkinsonian network is the multi-site delayed feedback stimulation based on LFP of STN population. Similar stimulation has been studied in other neuron models in previous work (Hauptmann et al., 2005, Popovych et al., 2006, Rosenblum and Pikovsky, 2004b).

There is no clear evidence on how the LFP is related to synaptic and ionic currents of a single neuron. Computational models sometimes simulate LFP by summing the membrane potential changes

Discussion

In this paper, we consider a network of synaptically-connected, conductance-based model neurons from the STN, GPe and GPi in the basal ganglia, based on previous modeling work (Guo et al., 2008, Rubin and Terman, 2004, Terman et al., 2002). The model is tuned to generate activity patterns featuring synchronized, rhythmic bursts fired by clusters of neurons, with different clusters bursting in alternation, which we take to represent a parkinsonian state. Inhibitory outputs from the GPi are

Acknowledgements

JR received support from NSF awards DMS 0716936 and DMS 1021701.

References (72)

  • F.A. Middleton et al.

    Basal ganglia output and cognition: evidence from anatomical, behavioral, and clinical studies

    Brain and Cognition

    (2000)
  • K.H. Pettersen et al.

    Amplitude variability and extracellular lowpass filtering of neuronal spikes

    Biophysical Journal

    (2008)
  • T. Wichmann et al.

    Deep brain stimulation for neurologic disorders

    Neuron

    (2006)
  • G.E. Alexander et al.

    Basal ganglia thalamo-cortical circuits: parallel substrates for motor, oculomotor, “prefrontal” and “limbic” functions

    Progress in Brain Research

    (1990)
  • M.S. Baron et al.

    Effects of transient focal inactivation of the basal ganglia in parkinsonian primates

    The Journal of Neuroscience

    (2002)
  • H. Bergman et al.

    The primate subthalamic nucleus. II. Neuronal activity in the mptp model of parkinsonism

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (1994)
  • J. Best et al.

    Transitions between irregular and rhythmic firing patterns in excitatory–inhibitory neuronal networks

    Journal of Computational Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • P. Brown et al.

    Dopamine dependency of oscillations between subthalamic nucleus and pallidum in Parkinson’s disease

    The Journal of Neuroscience

    (2001)
  • H. Cagnan et al.

    Frequency-selectivity of a thalamocortical relay neuron during Parkinson’s disease and deep brain stimulation: a computational study

    European Journal of Neuroscience

    (2009)
  • M. Castro-Alamancos et al.

    High-pass filtering of corticothalamic activity by neuromodulators released in the thalamus during arousal: in vitro and in vivo

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2001)
  • M.R. DeLong et al.

    Circuits and circuit disorders of the basal ganglia

    Archives of Neurology

    (2007)
  • G. Deuschl et al.

    A randomized trial of deep-brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease

    The New England Journal of Medicine

    (2006)
  • J.L. DeVito et al.

    An autoradiographic study of the efferent connections of the globus pallidus in Macaca mullata

    Brain Research

    (1982)
  • A.D. Dorval et al.

    Deep brain stimulation alleviates parkinsonian bradykinesia by regularizing pallidal activity

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2010)
  • A. Dorval et al.

    Deep brain stimulation reduced neuronal entropy in the MPTP-primate model of Parkinson’s disease

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2008)
  • X. Feng et al.

    Optimal deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus—a computational study

    Journal of Computational Neuroscience

    (2007)
  • X. Feng et al.

    Toward closed-loop optimization of deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease: concepts and lessons from a computational model

    Journal of Neural Engineering

    (2007)
  • W. Grill et al.

    Deep brain stimulation creates an informational lesion of the stimulated nucleus

    Neuroreport

    (2004)
  • R. Guillery et al.

    The role of thalamus in the flow of information to the cortex

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences

    (2002)
  • R. Guillery et al.

    The thalamus as a monitor of motor outputs

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B Biological Sciences

    (2002)
  • Y. Guo et al.

    Thalamocortical relay fidelity varies across subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation protocols in a data-driven computational model

    Journal of Neurophysiology

    (2008)
  • P.J. Hahn et al.

    Modeling shifts in the rate and pattern of subthalamopallidal network activity during deep brain stimulation

    Journal of Computational Neuroscience

    (2010)
  • T. Hashimoto et al.

    Stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus changes the firing pattern of pallidal neurons

    The Journal of Neuroscience

    (2003)
  • C. Hauptmann et al.

    Control of spatially patterned synchrony with multisite delayed feedback

    Physical Review E

    (2007)
  • C. Hauptmann et al.

    Desynchronizing the abnormally synchronized neural activity in the subthalamic nucleus: a modeling study

    Expert Review of Medical Devices

    (2008)
  • C. Hauptmann et al.

    Effectively desynchronizing brain stimulation based on a coordinated delayed feedback stimulation via several sites: a computational study

    Biological Cybernetics

    (2005)
  • Cited by (44)

    • Coordinated Reset Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus Produces Long-Lasting, Dose-Dependent Motor Improvements in the 1-Methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine Non-Human Primate Model of Parkinsonism

      2016, Brain Stimulation
      Citation Excerpt :

      Furthermore, its desynchronizing effects are hypothesized to endure beyond treatment delivery, such that intermittent therapy may yield benefits that outlast cessation of stimulation by days or weeks [9,14]. Although the effects of CR DBS currently are well-supported by theoretical models [13,19–22], in vivo, preclinical or clinical data are limited [14,15]. Here we used the 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine (MPTP) non-human primate model of parkinsonism to examine the acute, sub-acute and long-term efficacy profile of CR relative to tDBS.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text