Regular articleRelation of cognitive reserve and task performance to expression of regional covariance networks in an event-related fMRI study of nonverbal memory☆☆
Introduction
Several studies have suggested that differential susceptibility to age-related memory changes and dementia is related to variables such as education and IQ Elias et al., 2000, Qiu et al., 2001, Scarmeas et al., 2001, Schmand et al., 1997. These studies provide epidemiological evidence for the presence of cognitive reserve (CR), where subjects with greater reserve may show less severe effects of the aging process. Cognitive reserve may represent individual differences in how tasks are processed (i.e., differences in the component processes), or in the underlying neural circuitry (of the component processes). These differences may result from innate differences in intelligence or they may be acquired through life events such as educational or occupational experience. Different levels of reserve would result in some subjects being less susceptible to the effects of aging or pathology than others Stern, 2002, Stern, et al., 2003.
In this scheme, CR would be equally present in similarly aged individuals who are unaffected by any disease pathology. In contrast to the epidemiologic literature, recent cognitive neuroimaging research dealing with the aging process (Cabeza et al., 1997a,Cabeza et al., 1997b, Reuter-Lorenz, 2002, Stern et al., 2000 highlighted many age-related differences in brain activation, but did not explicitly relate these findings to CR. To our knowledge there is only one study so far (Scarmeas et al., 2003) that could associate age-related differences between young and elderly with CR.
Prompted by the finding of a relation between CR and age-related activation differences between age groups, we asked whether CR might also affect differences in activation within one age group and potentially account for variability that is routinely observed during performance of cognitive neuroimaging tasks. Focusing on one age group should keep the cumulative CR aspect of life experience constant, while allowing an investigation of the innate component of CR that is already present at low age. In particular, young subjects would be expected to show differences in neural activation during task processing that might be related to differences in CR measures such as IQ or education. Rather than focusing on differences in functional connectivity across groups Cabeza et al., 1997a, Cabeza et al., 2002, Grady et al., 1999, we set out to map out commonalties in functional connectivity within a group of health young adults. We predicted that the level of expression of the same activation pattern would be related to the level of CR in each subject.
We used fMRI to examine healthy young adults during performance of a nonverbal serial recognition test. There were two task conditions. The low demand (L) condition required encoding and recognition of single items. The titrated demand (T) condition required the subject to encode a larger list of items. Prior to scanning, this study list size (SLS) was adjusted for each subject, such that recognition accuracy was 75%. This procedure was intended to control for task difficulty, matching difficulty across subjects. Our intention was to explore how individual differences in measured CR are related to changes in expression of a reserve- and task-related brain network from the low to the titrated demand task.
We have previously reported univariate General Linear Model (GLM) analyses (Stern et al., 2003) that demonstrated a correlation between IQ and task-related activation differences between low and titrated demand conditions. In contrast, the regional covariance analysis employed in this paper first aimed to identify a network that underlies task performance in the experiment. We then determined whether individual expression of this network differed as a function of our reserve variables. Therefore, our method offers a more parsimonious account than the different voxels identified on the sole basis of the correlation of their activation with CR variables in the univariate analysis. Specifically, a task-related network whose expression also correlates with CR would provide a more convincing demonstration of having isolated a true neural substrate of CR via manipulation through an experimental design. The type-I error of erroneously detecting such a confluence of factors should be smaller than in univariate analyses where voxels of CR-related activation might bear no relationship to the task performed in the cognitive experiment.
Because univariate and multivariate analyses are truly complementary and focus on different signatures of the BOLD signal, it is difficult to judge whether they give congruent or incongruent results on the basis of statistically significant voxels identified in both analyses. For a scenario of very good experimental control it might be conceivable that a covariance pattern can be isolated whose highest voxel weights also exhibit significant group differences in a univariate analysis. However, the converse seems to be true more often: when several cognitive processes are simultaneously operational, only one of which is successfully manipulated by the experimental design, univariate and multivariate analyses might identify different brain regions. This is understandable given their different premises.
Section snippets
Methods
Seventeen healthy young adults between the ages of 21 and 30 participated. All subjects were carefully screened to ensure that they had no neurological or psychiatric disease. All subjects were right-handed. Informed consent was obtained after the nature and risks of the study were explained.
Study phase
OrT CVA was performed on the combined data from study conditions L and T. The first six principal components served as predictors in a discriminant analysis that probed for a linear combination network whose expression differed maximally on the mean between the L and T condition. Although this multiple linear regression model was not significant itself (P = 0.20), it yielded the lowest number of subject exceptions (two exceptions) to the rule of increasing expression from L to T, and the lowest
Discussion
Activation patterns were recovered from the study and test phases using regional covariance methods. In each activation pattern, the change in pattern expression with increased cognitive load correlated with subject memory performance and CR variables.
The study phase revealed an activation pattern that exhibited an ordinal trend, i.e., increasing subject expression for 15 of 17 subjects from L to T condition, and was associated with CR, i.e., showing greater changes in expression for
References (24)
- et al.
A parametric fMRI study of overt and covert shifts of visuospatial attention
Neuroimage
(2001) - et al.
A temporoparietal and prefrontal network for retrieving the spatial context of lifelike events
Neuroimage
(2001) - et al.
Aging gracefullycompensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults
Neuroimage
(2002) - et al.
fMRI activation in a visual-perception tasknetwork of areas detected using the general linear model and independent components analysis
Neuroimage
(2001) - et al.
Spatial pattern analysis of functional brain images using partial least squares
Neuroimage
(1996) New visions of the aging mind and brain
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2002)- et al.
Characterizing the response of PET and fMRI data using multivariate linear models
Neuroimage
(1997) Testing for neural responses during temporal components of trials with BOLD fMRI
Neuroimage
(2000)- et al.
Individual differences in PET activation of object perception and attention systems predict face matching accuracy
Neuroreport
(1999) - et al.
Model Selection and Multimodel Inference
(2002)
Age-related differences in neural activity during memory encoding and retrievala positron emission tomography study
J. Neurosci.
Age-related differences in effective neural connectivity during encoding and recall
Neuroreport
Cited by (70)
Cognitive Reserve from the Perspective of Preclinical Alzheimer Disease: 2020 Update
2020, Clinics in Geriatric MedicineThe Relationships Between Cognitive Reserve and Psychological Symptoms: A Cross-Sectional Study in Healthy Individuals
2020, American Journal of Geriatric PsychiatryEvaluating Cognitive Reserve Through the Prism of Preclinical Alzheimer Disease
2018, Psychiatric Clinics of North AmericaWorking memory activation of neural networks in the elderly as a function of information processing phase and task complexity
2015, Neurobiology of Learning and MemoryCitation Excerpt :It identifies a group-level covariance pattern of task-related brain regions having monotonic increasing (or decreasing) levels of brain activation with increasing task load. This method has been described elsewhere (Habeck et al., 2003, 2005). A single covariance pattern represents one preferred direction in the vector space determined by the value of activation in each voxel of the image.
Cognitive reserve modulates ERPs associated with verbal working memory in healthy younger and older adults
2015, Neurobiology of Aging
- ☆
Supported by NIA grant AG 14671.