Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 23, Issue 3, November 2004, Pages 936-946
NeuroImage

A general linear model for MEG beamformer imaging

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.06.031Get rights and content

A new general linear model (GLM) beamformer method is described for processing magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. A standard nonlinear beamformer is used to determine the time course of neuronal activation for each point in a predefined source space. A Hilbert transform gives the envelope of oscillatory activity at each location in any chosen frequency band (not necessary in the case of sustained (DC) fields), enabling the general linear model to be applied and a volumetric T statistic image to be determined. The new method is illustrated by a two-source simulation (sustained field and 20 Hz) and is shown to provide accurate localization. The method is also shown to locate accurately the increasing and decreasing gamma activities to the temporal and frontal lobes, respectively, in the case of a scintillating scotoma. The new method brings the advantages of the general linear model to the analysis of MEG data and should prove useful for the localization of changing patterns of activity across all frequency ranges including DC (sustained fields).

Introduction

In recent years, beamformer techniques have been used to improve spatial localization in magnetoencephalography (MEG). See, for example, Dziewas et al., (2003), Gaetz and Cheyne (2003), Hashimoto et al., 2001a, Hashimoto et al., 2001b, Herdman et al., (2003), Hirata et al., (2002), Ihara et al., (2003), Ishii et al., 1999, Ishii et al., 2002, Ishii et al., 2003, Iwaki et al., (1999), Kamada et al., (1998), Ploner et al., (2002), Robinson and Vrba (1999), Robinson et al., (2002), Sekihara et al., 2001, Sekihara et al., 2002, Taniguchi et al., (2000), Ukai et al., (2002), van Drongelen et al., (1996), van Veen et al., (1997), Xiang et al., (2001, 2003), Hall et al., (2004), Hillebrand and Barnes (2003), Fawcett et al., (2004), and Furlong et al., (2004). In essence, a beamformer is a collection of spatial filters, each optimally tuned to a particular image voxel (Van Veen et al., 1997). Raw MEG data are projected through these spatial filters to obtain an estimate of electrical activity at each voxel. Some metric can then be applied to assess task-related change in electrical activity and, by applying it to all voxels, a spatial map of task-related change can be generated.

Typically, metrics comprise simple two-sample tests that compare the source power between predefined active and passive time–frequency windows (Barnes and Hillebrand, 2003, Vrba, 2002). A widely used nonlinear beamformer method in MEG is synthetic aperture magnetometry (SAM) (Robinson and Vrba, 1999). SAM can be used to create statistical parametric maps (SPMs) showing the spatial distribution of cortical power change. This is achieved by integrating power in specified frequency bands over active and passive time windows. By subtracting source power in the passive time window from source power in the active time window and dividing the result by an estimate of noise magnitude, a pseudo T statistic may be obtained (Robinson and Vrba, 1999, see also Discussion) for each vertex in a 3D lattice stretching across the source space. These pseudo-T statistics can then be used to create 3D volumetric images of power change across the brain. This use of SAM has greatly enhanced the potential of MEG as a functional brain imaging technique. In addition, a recent SAM study (Singh et al., 2002) has demonstrated that a striking similarity exists between the spatial distribution of oscillatory power change and the fMRI BOLD response.

Despite these successes, simple two-sample tests do not allow for complex experimental designs where, for example, the hypothesis involves the covariation of oscillatory power with some physiological metric (such as galvanic skin response). Nor does it allow for investigation of covariant temporal behavior in different frequency bands (Friston, 2000). Also, despite recent reports (Forss et al., 2001; Lammertmann and Lutkenhoner, 2000) demonstrating that low-frequency sustained field effects are observable in MEG studies, spatially mapping such fields using SAM has proved difficult. In this study, we generalize the beamformer methodology through application of the formalism of the general linear model (GLM) (Friston et al., 1996, Seber, 1977, Worsley and Friston, 1995). We demonstrate the method using simulations, showing that it can be used to obtain the spatial distribution of both low-frequency sustained fields as well as changes in oscillatory electrical activity. We go on to show the utility of the technique using experimental data through the identification of linear modulation in gamma oscillations in a scintillating scotoma study (Hall et al., 2004).

Section snippets

The nonlinear beamformer

The nonlinear beamformer approach requires that for any particular source location, the projected power must be minimized subject to the linear constraint that the filter maintains a unity passband at the location itself (Van Veen et al., 1997, Robinson and Vrba, 1999). Briefly, this involves the computation of data covariance over a predefined time–frequency window, known as the covariance window. The minimization of projected variance ensures the suppression of energy from all active sources

Simulation of data

Initially, simulated data were used to examine the accuracy of the GLM beamformer method. For all simulations, the third order gradiometer configuration of a 151 channel Omega system (CTF Systems Inc., Port Coquitlam, Canada) was used. The source space was based on a subject's head shape measured from an anatomical MRI scan. Two separate sources were positioned on the cortical surface, which had also been extracted from the subject's anatomical MRI scan. The orientation of each source was

Results

Fig. 2B shows the localization of the simulated DC source using the GLM beamformer method. The green marker shows the position of the Top-Hat source. The red overlay shows the volumetric T statistic image. The discrepancy between the peak of the volumetric image and the actual source position was found to be 9.7 ± 5 mm. Fig. 2C shows the localization of the 20-Hz source. Again, the green marker shows the position of the 20-Hz source and the red overlay shows the corresponding volumetric T

Discussion

The GLM beamformer method that we describe is accurate in a wide variety of applications, however because the method rests heavily on the nonlinear beamformer, the problems intrinsic to such techniques are still present in our approach. In particular, it has been shown (Van Veen et al., 1997) that use of the beamformer technique causes spatially separate but covariant sources to be suppressed. However, using a larger time window means that there is less chance of covariance between source time

Conclusion

The GLM beamformer method that we introduce in this paper shows how the Hilbert transform and general linear model can be applied to MEG beamformer data to identify the spatial distribution of known temporal effects. Our initial simulation demonstrates the accuracy of the technique locating low-frequency effects that are time and phase locked to external stimuli. Potentially, the GLM beamformer method can therefore be used to locate the auditory sustained field (Lammertmann and Lutkenhoner, 2001

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to the Wellcome Trust for a Major Equipment Grant, and for continuing support of the MEG laboratory at Aston University and G.R.B. We are also grateful to the Medical Research Council for Programme Grant support (Grant Number G9900259) and a research studentship for M.J.B.

References (46)

  • M. Hirata et al.

    Frequency-dependent spatial distribution of human somatosensory evoked neuromagnetic fields

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2002)
  • R. Ishii et al.

    Current source density distribution of sleep spindles in humans as found by synthetic aperture magnetometry

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2003)
  • K. Kamada et al.

    Responses to silent Kanji reading of the native Japanese and German in task subtraction magnetoencephalography

    Cognit. Brain Res.

    (1998)
  • C. Lammertmann et al.

    Near DC magnetic fields following a periodic presentation of long duration tonebursts

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2001)
  • V.V. Nikouline et al.

    Somatosensory evoked magnetic fileds: relation to pre-stimulus Mu rhythm

    Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2000)
  • K.D. Singh et al.

    Task related changes in cortical synchrony are spatially coincident with he haemodynamic response

    NeuroImage

    (2002)
  • K.D. Singh et al.

    Group imaging of task-related changes in cortical synchronisation using nonparametric permutation testing

    NeuroImage

    (2003)
  • M. Taniguchi et al.

    Movement-related desynchronization of the cerebral cortex studied with spatially filtered magnetoencephalography

    NeuroImage

    (2000)
  • S. Ukai et al.

    Parallel distributed processing neuroimaging in the Stroop task using spatially filtered magnetoencephalography analysis

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (2002)
  • J. Vrba

    Magnetoencephalography: the art of finding a needle in a haystack

    Physica C

    (2002)
  • K. Worsley et al.

    Analysis of fMRI time series revisited—Again

    NeuroImage

    (1995)
  • G.R. Barnes et al.

    Statistical flattening of beamformer images

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2003)
  • J.M. Blackledge

    Digital Signal Processing

    (2003)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text