Brain activation associated with evaluative processes of guilt and embarrassment: an fMRI study
Introduction
Although there have been numerous neuroimaging studies on primary emotions (fear, disgust, happiness, and sadness) that have led to a better understanding of the neuroanatomical correlates of emotions (Phan et al., 2002), only a few studies on complex social emotions such as guilt, shame, and embarrassment have been reported. These social emotions have been viewed as moral emotions because they occur in response to moral violation and promote moral behavior, interpersonal etiquette, and personal hygiene (Eisenberg, 2000, Haidt, 2003). At the same time, these emotions inhibit transgression of social standards and motivate reparative action such as apology, confession, and atonement.
Impairment of possessing the mental states of these moral emotions could lead to amoral, inappropriate behaviors observed in neurological and psychiatric disorders such as brain injuries (Anderson et al., 1999, Beer et al., 2003), frontotemporal dementia (Miller et al., 2003, Snowden et al., 2002), autism (Capps et al., 1992, Frith, 2001, Hillier and Allinson, 2002), and antisocial personality (Brower and Price, 2001, Moll et al., 2003). Studying the neural substrates of judgments of moral emotions should add to the understanding of the neural basis of amoral behaviors observed in neurological and psychiatric disorders.
From a psychological point of view, guilt, shame, embarrassment, and pride are categorized into the same emotion family, “self-conscious emotions”. “Self-conscious emotions” are emotions founded in social relationship and arise from concerns about others' opinions of self or the behavior of self (Eisenberg, 2000, Haidt, 2003, Tangney and Dearing, 2002). Negative evaluation of self or the behavior of self is fundamental to guilt, shame, and embarrassment, while positive evaluation of self leads to pride. In other words, one needs the ability to represent the mental states of others (intention/emotion), that is, Theory of Mind (ToM), to recognize self-conscious emotions. The recognition of negative self-conscious emotions involves understanding of the violation of social norms and the negative evaluation of self, both important aspects of ToM. Children with autism demonstrating impaired ToM showed impaired recognition of self-conscious emotions (Heerey et al., 2003). In line with this notion, a recent functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) study demonstrated activation in the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC), temporal regions, and orbitofrontal cortex (OFC) during the emotional judgments of embarrassment (Berthoz et al., 2002). These areas have been implicated in ToM, social cognition, and moral judgment (Adolphs, 2001, Allison et al., 2000, Frith, 2001, Frith and Frith, 1999, Greene and Haidt, 2002, Greene et al., 2001, Moll et al., 2003, Pinkham et al., 2003). However, a previous positron emission tomography (PET) study using a guilt-related script reported a slightly different activation pattern in anterior paralimbic regions during the experience of guilt (Shin et al., 2000). In the former fMRI study, an emotional judgment task was used. Participants read various kinds of stories depicting embarrassing situations and were instructed to imagine what the story protagonist (participant himself or a third person in the story) would feel. In the latter PET study, an emotion induction method was used. Participants listened to audio-taped personal events involving the most guilt they had actually experienced. They recalled and imagined the event as if they were actually participating in it again. These two studies differed in the emotional tasks and measurement methods, making it difficult to compare the results directly. To our knowledge, no neuroimaging study has as yet investigated the different types of self-conscious emotions and compared the neural activation patterns directly in one session.
Although the distinctions among guilt, shame, and embarrassment are not clear-cut, psychologists have challenged this issue. Although embarrassment has traditionally been considered to be a variant of shame (Lewis, 1993), recent psychological data support the notion that embarrassment is an emotion distinct from other self-conscious emotions (Keltner and Buswell, 1997). Embarrassment has higher affinity to violation of social conventions, while guilt and shame have higher affinity to violation of a moral norm (Eisenberg, 2000, Haidt, 2003, Tangney et al., 1996). In this sense, among the negative self-conscious emotions, distinction between guilt and embarrassment is considered to be relatively clear-cut. Therefore, we focused on these two emotions.
We used block-design fMRI to measure regional activation associated with judgments of guilt and embarrassment during an emotional judgment task presenting short sentences. Emotion processing is composed of evaluative, experiential, and expressive components. We did not intend to induce emotional states because we thought it would be difficult to induce emotional states of guilt or embarrassment by merely having the subjects read short sentences. Moreover, it would be difficult to control the situation so as not to induce emotions other than guilt and embarrassment (e.g., anger, shame, sadness) as reported in the previous induction study (Shin et al., 2000). We aimed to elucidate the similarities and differences between the evaluative process of guilt and that of embarrassment at the neural basis level by measuring neural activation during judgments of both emotions in a session using fMRI.
We hypothesized that both emotional conditions would commonly activate the components of the neural substrates (MPFC, superior temporal sulcus (STS)) that have been implicated in social cognition (Adolphs, 2001, Allison et al., 2000) or ToM (Frith, 2001, Frith and Frith, 1999), and at the same time, would show differences in the extent of activation of the components.
Section snippets
Participants
Nineteen healthy right-handed Japanese subjects (10 men, mean age 30.8 years, SD = 6.2; nine women, mean age 25.1 years, SD = 3.2) were recruited from the surrounding community. Their mean educational achievement level was 16.2 years (SD = 2.1). They did not meet criteria for any psychiatric disorder. None of the controls were taking alcohol or medication at the time, nor did they have a history of psychiatric disorder, significant physical illness, head injury, neurological disorder, or
Self-rating
The neutral sentences were judged as carrying neither guilty nor embarrassing contents. The mean ratings of guilt and embarrassment for neutral sentences were, respectively, 1.0 (SD = 0.0) and 1.0 (SD = 0.0), for guilt-related sentences 4.1 (SD = 0.7) and 1.6 (SD = 0.7), and for embarrassing sentences 1.5 (SD = 0.4) and 3.7 (SD = 0.6). The mean ratings of guilt were significantly greater for guilt-related sentences than for embarrassing sentences (t = 10.6, df = 36, P < 0.001). The mean ratings
Discussion
We investigated the neural response associated with evaluative processes of self-conscious moral emotions. Recent neuroimaging studies have reported the neural substrate of moral judgment (Greene et al., 2001, Moll et al., 2002a, Moll et al., 2002b). However, few reports are available on specific moral or social emotions (Berthoz et al., 2002, Shin et al., 2000). This study showed similarities and differences during evaluative processes of two moral emotions, guilt and embarrassment, at the
Acknowledgments
We thank Professor Toru Nishikawa of the Section of Psychiatry and Behavioral Science, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University. The staff of the Section of Biofunctional Informatics, Graduate School of Medicine, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, and of Asai Hospital are gratefully acknowledged. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (15390348), a research grant
References (47)
The neurobiology of social cognition
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(2001)Investigating the cognitive neuroscience of social behavior
Neuropsychologia
(2003)- et al.
Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2000) - et al.
Reading the mind from eye gaze
Neuropsychologia
(2002) - et al.
Movement and mind: a functional imaging study of perception and interpretation of complex intentional movement patterns
NeuroImage
(2000) - et al.
Other minds in the brain: a functional imaging study of “theory of mind” in story comprehension
Cognition
(1995) Mind blindness and the brain in autism
Neuron
(2001)- et al.
Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: an fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks
Neuropsychologia
(2000) - et al.
Embarrassment and social phobia: the role of parasympathetic activation
J. Anxiety Disord.
(2003) - et al.
How (and where) does moral judgment work?
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2002)
Functional networks in emotional moral and nonmoral social judgments
NeuroImage
Functional neuroanatomy of emotion: a meta-analysis of emotion activation studies in PET and fMRI
NeuroImage
Activation of anterior paralimbic structures during guilt-related script-driven imagery
Biol. Psychiatry
Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: an event-related fMRI study
Neuron
Impairment of social and moral behavior related to early damage in human prefrontal cortex
Nat. Neurosci.
Social intelligence in the normal and autistic brain: an fMRI study
Eur. J. Neurosci.
The regulatory function of self-conscious emotion: insights from patients with orbitofrontal damage
J. Pers. Soc. Psychol.
An fMRI study of intentional and unintentional (embarrassing) violations of social norms
Brain
Neuropsychiatry of frontal lobe dysfunction in violent and criminal behaviour: a critical review
J. Neurol., Neurosurg. Psychiatry
Understanding of simple and complex emotions in non-retarded children with autism
J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry
Moral cognition and its neural constituents
Nat. Rev., Neurosci.
Autism, Asperger syndrome and brain mechanisms for the attribution of mental states to animated shapes
Brain
Emotion, regulation, and moral development
Annu. Rev. Psychol.
Cited by (279)
Environmental concern as a moderator of information processing: A fMRI study
2022, Journal of Cleaner ProductionThe powerful brain: Neural correlates of sense of power and hope
2022, NeuropsychologiaLoss of superiority illusion in bipolar depressive disorder: A combined functional and structural MRI study
2022, Journal of Psychiatric ResearchEgo-Dystonia: a Review in Search of Definitions
2022, Revista Colombiana de PsiquiatriaNeurobiological and epigenetic perspectives on hedonism, altruism and conscience
2023, BJPsych AdvancesSubgenual activation and the finger of blame: individual differences and depression vulnerability
2022, Psychological Medicine