Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 28, Issue 2, 1 November 2005, Pages 490-499
NeuroImage

Lateralization, connectivity and plasticity in the human central auditory system

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.06.024Get rights and content

Abstract

Although it is known that responses in the auditory cortex are evoked predominantly contralateral to the side of stimulation, the lateralization of responses at lower levels in the human central auditory system has hardly been studied. Furthermore, little is known on the functional interactions between the involved processing centers. In this study, functional MRI was performed using sound stimuli of varying left and right intensities. In normal hearing subjects, contralateral activation was consistently detected in the temporal lobe, thalamus and midbrain. Connectivity analyses showed that auditory information crosses to the contralateral side in the lower brainstem followed by ipsilateral signal conduction towards the auditory cortex, similar to the flow of auditory signals in other mammals. In unilaterally deaf subjects, activation was more symmetrical for the cortices but remained contralateral in the midbrain and thalamus. Input connection strengths were different only at cortical levels, and there was no evidence for plastic reorganization at subcortical levels.

Introduction

The structure and function of the central auditory system in humans is still relatively poorly understood as compared to, e.g., the visual and somatosensory systems. The flow of information from the ears to the cortex has been studied intensively in animals using electrophysiological techniques, but because of their invasive nature, similar studies can hardly be performed on humans. Instead, non-invasive techniques like functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) have been used. However, most of these studies are confined to the auditory cortex, and only a minority encompasses the various subcortical processing centers (Backes and van Dijk, 2002, Budd et al., 2003, Giraud et al., 2000, Guimaraes et al., 1998, Hesselmann et al., 2001, Melcher et al., 2000, Yetkin et al., 2004).

The anatomical structure of the central auditory system is outlined schematically in Fig. 1. It comprises several processing centers that are distributed over the lower brainstem, midbrain, thalamus, and temporal lobes, and that perform extensive spectral and temporal processing (Eggermont, 2001, Ehret and Romand, 1996, Moore, 1991, Nieuwenhuys, 1984, Toga et al., 2000, Yost, 2000). Signals from the stimulated ear first enter the ipsilateral cochlear nucleus via the cochlear nerve to subsequently continue via multiple pathways towards nuclei on both sides of the brain. Binaural information is received first in the superior olivary nuclei and is integrated to construct a representational mapping of the spatial auditory environment in the inferior colliculi. Hereafter, information is transmitted via the medial geniculate nuclei in the thalamus towards the primary auditory cortices in both cerebral hemispheres.

Although the human auditory cortex eventually receives sensory input from both ears, it is excited most strongly by stimulation of the contralateral ear (Lipschutz et al., 2002, Suzuki et al., 2002, Woldorff et al., 1999). However, in unilaterally deaf people cortical activation is known to shift towards a more symmetrical pattern (Bilecen et al., 2000, Ponton et al., 2001, Scheffler et al., 1998, Tschopp et al., 2000). An important issue concerns the extent to which such redistributions reflect processes that occur in the cerebral cortex itself or in subcortical structures. In animal studies, evidence for changes in preferred stimulus lateralization has been demonstrated in the lower brainstem, midbrain and thalamus following unilateral loss of hearing. However, it is yet unclear at what level changes are most prominent, and reports vary from the olivary nuclei and the colliculi to the medial geniculate nuclei (Illing et al., 2000, Kamke et al., 2003, McAlpine et al., 1997, Mossop et al., 2000, Popelar et al., 1994). Moreover, in humans, information regarding the response lateralization at these levels is sparse, and it is yet unknown whether similar shifts exist for the subcortical nuclei in subjects with unilateral deafness.

Changes in response lateralization can presumably be attributed to changes in the strengths of functional relationships between various processing centers. Functional MRI has traditionally been used to localize the structures that are involved in the processing of auditory stimuli with certain characteristics and to determine their response characteristics. However, most studies do not address the relations between the various centers in the processing network. The fact that multiple processing centers respond to a given stimulus supplies evidence that these centers are part of a distributed system, but provides no information on the mutual interactions. To quantify connectivity levels between the involved centers in such a network, correlations between (induced) blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signal fluctuations can be determined (Friston, 1994). Connectivity measures are independent of activation measures in the sense that centers that show significant responses to the same stimuli do not necessarily have to show high levels of connectivity, while centers that show activation to different stimuli potentially can. Connectivity analysis is expected to supplement the information regarding stimulus activation and response lateralization with more insights concerning the signal flow in the central auditory system.

The goal of our study was to investigate the human central auditory system as a whole, using fMRI to characterize the responses in various centers, and to consider the relations between these centers building on prior knowledge gained from animal studies. Auditory stimuli were varied systematically in left and right presentation intensities to determine the lateralization characteristics in both normal hearing and unilaterally deaf subjects.

Section snippets

Subjects

Eight healthy subjects with normal hearing were recruited. In addition, five subjects with unilateral deafness were selected from a patient database of the audiology department at the Maastricht University Hospital (Maastricht, the Netherlands). All subjects gave written informed consent to participate in this study, in approved accordance with the requirements of the medical ethical committee of the institute. Subjects were examined by an audiologist prior to the fMRI exams using pure tone

Activation and lateralization

The significance of the hemodynamic BOLD responses to auditory stimuli that were presented to the left and the right ear was visualized by means of t test statistic parametric maps (Friston et al., 1995). Fig. 2 illustrates examples of single subject activation patterns. Table 2 lists the volume, level and significance of the responses to stimulation of either ear in the bilateral IC, MG and AC for all subjects individually. The estimates for the response levels to left and right ear

Normal hearing

Using a standard 1.5-T fMRI system, activation could be detected in multiple processing centers of the central auditory system, including the cochlear nuclei (CN) and superior olivary nuclei (SO) in the lower brainstem, the inferior colliculi (IC) in the midbrain, the medial geniculate nuclei (MG) in the thalamus, and the auditory cortices (AC) in the cerebral temporal lobes. Activation in the IC, MG and AC was detected most consistently and was quantified for all subjects.

For the AC,

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Research Fund of the Maastricht University Hospital and the Heinsius Houbolt Foundation. Furthermore, the authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of A. Vrijling, who participated in the initial data exploration.

References (50)

  • J.E. Mossop et al.

    Down-regulation of inhibition following unilateral deafening

    Hear. Res.

    (2000)
  • R.C. Oldfield

    The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory

    Neuropsychologia

    (1971)
  • W.D. Penny et al.

    Comparing dynamic causal models

    NeuroImage

    (2004)
  • C.W. Ponton et al.

    Plasticity in the adult human central auditory system: evidence from late-onset profound unilateral deafness

    Hear. Res.

    (2001)
  • J. Popelar et al.

    Plastic changes in ipsi-contralateral differences of auditory cortex and inferior colliculus evoked potentials after injury to one ear in the adult guinea pig

    Hear. Res.

    (1994)
  • N. Ramnani et al.

    New approaches for exploring anatomical and functional connectivity in the human brain

    Biol. Psychiatry

    (2004)
  • C. Rodrigues-Dagaeff et al.

    Functional organization of the ventral division of the medial geniculate body of the cat: evidence for a rostro-caudal gradient of response properties and cortical projections

    Hear. Res.

    (1989)
  • M. Suzuki et al.

    Cortical and subcortical activation with monaural monosyllabic stimulation by functional MRI

    Hear. Res.

    (2002)
  • A.Z. Alwatban et al.

    A method for the direct electrical stimulation of the auditory system in deaf subjects: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study

    J. Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (2002)
  • E. Amaro et al.

    Acoustic noise and functional magnetic resonance imaging: current strategies and future prospects

    J. Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (2002)
  • W.H. Backes et al.

    Simultaneous sampling of event-related BOLD responses in auditory cortex and brainstem

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2002)
  • D. Bilecen et al.

    Cortical reorganization after acute unilateral hearing loss traced by fMRI

    Neurology

    (2000)
  • W.B. Edmister et al.

    Improved auditory cortex imaging using clustered volume acquisitions

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (1999)
  • G. Ehret et al.

    The Central Auditory System

    (1996)
  • K.J. Friston

    Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (1994)
  • Cited by (120)

    • Topography and lateralization of long-latency trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials

      2022, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      An understanding of the topography and lateralisation of peripherally evoked potentials in TEPs is relevant as masking procedures may be imperfect in suppressing them (Jarczok et al., 2021) AEPs result from the clicking sound of the TMS coil (Nikouline et al., 1999; Rogasch et al., 2014; ter Braack et al., 2015). AEPs have been suggested to consist of a biphasic N100-P180 complex with fronto-central and temporal peaks (Rogasch et al., 2014; ter Braack et al., 2015), but also show a contralateral asymmetry when stimulating monaurally (Hine and Debener, 2007; Langers et al., 2005). Furthermore, TMS of especially the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) activates the supraorbital branch of the trigeminal nerve that evokes trigeminal SSEPs.

    • Widespread plasticity of cognition-related brain networks in single-sided deafness revealed by randomized window-based dynamic functional connectivity

      2021, Medical Image Analysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      However, studies of the underlying morphology and molecular-level mechanisms in SSD should be performed to further clarify the underlying mechanism. Since many previous studies on SSD have indicated obvious alterations of the interhemispheric symmetry and synchronization of the auditory system, significant alterations in connectivity were expected for the auditory cortex (Khosla et al., 2003; Langers et al., 2005; Ponton et al., 2001). Furthermore, previous FC studies using the primary auditory cortex as the seed revealed significant FC alterations in SSD (Liu et al., 2015).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text