A probabilistic algorithm integrating source localization and noise suppression for MEG and EEG data
Introduction
Mapping the spatiotemporal neural activity of the entire brain is an important problem in basic neuroscience research. It is also clinically important for patients with brain tumors and epilepsy, both in localizing regions important for cognitive function and for identifying epileptogenic brain regions. Such brain mapping procedures are useful to guide neurosurgical planning, navigation, and resection.
Many noninvasive techniques have emerged for functional brain mapping, such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG). Although fMRI is the most popular method for functional brain imaging with high spatial resolution, it suffers from poor temporal resolution since it measures blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signals with fluctuations in the order of seconds. These BOLD signals are also indirect measures of neural activity which might not accurately reflect neural activity, especially in regions of altered vasculature. However, dynamic neuronal activity has fluctuations in the submillisecond time scale that can only be directly measured with magnetoencephalography (MEG) and/or electroencephalography (EEG). MEG data are the measurements of tiny magnetic fields surrounding the head while EEG data are the measurements of voltage potentials using an electrode array placed on the scalp.
The past decade has shown rapid development of whole-head MEG/EEG sensor arrays and of algorithms for reconstruction of brain source activity from MEG and EEG data, termed source localization. All existing methods for brain source localization are hampered by the many sources of noise present in MEG/EEG data. The magnitude of the stimulus-evoked neural sources is on the order of noise on a single trial, and so typically 50–200 averaged trials are needed in order to clearly distinguish the sources above noise. This limits the type of cognitive questions that can be asked and is prohibitive for examining processes such as learning that can occur over just one or several trials. Needing to average trials is time consuming and therefore difficult for a subject or patient to hold still or pay attention through the duration of the experiment. Gaussian thermal noise or Gaussian electrical noise is present at the MEG or EEG sensors themselves. Background room interference such as from powerlines and electronic equipment can be problematic. Biological noise such as heartbeat, eyeblink or other muscle artifact can also be present. Ongoing brain activity itself, including the drowsy-state alpha (∼ 10 Hz) rhythm can drown out evoked brain sources. Finally, many localization algorithms have difficulty in separating neural sources of interest that have temporally overlapping activity.
Noise in MEG and EEG data is typically reduced by a variety of preprocessing algorithms before being used by source localization algorithms. Simple forms of preprocessing include filtering out frequency bands not containing a brain signal of interest. Additionally and more recently, ICA algorithms have been used to remove artefactual components, such as eyeblinks (Jung et al., 2000). More sophisticated techniques have also recently been developed using graphical models for preprocessing prior to source localization (Nagarajan et al., 2005, Nagarajan et al., 2006). Therefore, current algorithms for source localization from MEG and EEG data typically use a two-stage procedure — the first for noise/interference removal and the second for source localization.
This paper presents a probabilistic modeling framework for MEG/EEG source localization that estimates Source Activity using Knowledge of Event Timing and Independence from Noise and Interference (SAKETINI). The framework uses a probabilistic hidden variable model that describes the observed sensor data in terms of activity from unobserved brain and interference sources. The unobserved source activities and model parameters are inferred from the data by a variational Bayesian Expectation Maximization algorithm. The algorithm then creates a spatiotemporal image of brain activity by scanning the brain, inferring the model parameters and variables from sensor data, and using them to compute the likelihood of a dipole at each grid location in the brain.
We first describe the generative model for the data. We complete specification of the model for post-stimulus sources by including prior distributions and compute the unknown quantities learned from the data. We then describe the model for learning interference and noise sources from pre-stimulus data. We finish the Methods by showing that an established source localization method, the minimum variance adaptive beamformer (MVAB) (Sekihara et al., 2001), is an approximation of our framework. In the Results section, we show performance of SAKETINI relative to MVAB and sLORETA (Pascual-Marqui, 2002) both in localization ability and in time course estimation for MEG data. We show the effect of number of sensors and time points for all three methods. We further show the proposed method's performance applied to a real auditory-evoked MEG dataset, a low-SNR somatosensory MEG dataset, and an epileptic spike MEG dataset. We conclude with a discussion on the model order and inputs to the algorithm, extensions of the model, and its relationship to other methods in the literature. A preliminary report of this work was shown in Zumer et al. (2007).
Section snippets
Probabilistic model integrating source localization and noise suppression
This section describes the generative model for the data. We assume that the MEG/EEG data have been collected such that stimulus onset or some other experimental marker indicated the “zero” time point. Ongoing brain activity, biological noise, background environmental noise, and sensor noise are present in both pre-stimulus and post-stimulus periods; however, the evoked neural sources of interest are only present in the post-stimulus time period. We therefore assume that the sensor data can be
Results
We first report results from an example simulation. Then we describe performance for the averages of the simulations discussed above, including varying the amount of sensors or time points available. We finish by demonstrating performance in the real datasets discussed above.
Discussion
We have described the proposed method in a graphical model framework, which is a powerful and flexible technique for describing probabilistic dependencies between observed and unobserved quantities. We have chosen a scanning-based method to formulate the problem, rather than to solve the full tomographic problem which is very ill parameterized. The variational Bayesian Expectation Maximization algorithm is used to solve for the values of the unknown quantities that maximize the marginal log
Conclusion
We have described a novel probabilistic algorithm which performs source localization while robust to interference and demonstrated its superior performance over standard methods in a variety of simulations and real datasets. The model takes advantage of knowledge of when sources of interest are not occurring (such as in the pre-stimulus period of a evoked response paradigm). It learns the statistical structure of the interference sources from the pre-stimulus period and then can suppress these
Acknowledgments
We would like to thank Kenneth Hild and Ben Inglis for their helpful discussions and comments on the manuscript, Sarang Dalal for helping with NUTMEG programming, Mary Mantle, Anne Findlay, and Susanne Honma for helping with data collection, and the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on the manuscript. This work was supported by NIH grants R01 NS44590, DC4855 and DC6435.
References (43)
- et al.
The spatiotemporal MEG covariance matrix modeled as a sum of Kronecker products
NeuroImage
(2005) - et al.
Beamformer reconstruction of correlated sources using a modified source model
NeuroImage
(2007) - et al.
Mapping human brain function with MEG and EEG: methods and validation
NeuroImage
(2004) - et al.
Independent component analysis for noisy data–MEG data analysis
Neural Netw.
(2000) - et al.
Spatiotemporal Bayesian inference dipole analysis for MEG neuroimaging data
NeuroImage
(2005) - et al.
MEG source localization under multiple constraints: an extended Bayesian framework
NeuroImage
(2006) - et al.
A graphical model for estimating stimulus-evoked brain responses from magnetoencephalography data with large background brain activity
NeuroImage
(2006) - et al.
Hierarchical Bayesian estimation for MEG inverse problem
NeuroImage
(2004) - et al.
Localization bias and spatial resolution of adaptive and non-adaptive spatial filters for MEG source reconstruction
NeuroImage
(2005) Inferring parameters and structure of latent variable models by variational Bayes
A graphical model for audiovixual object tracking
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.
A free response approach to the measurement and characterization of radiographic-observer performance
J. Appl. Photogr. Eng.
NUTMEG: a neuromagnetic source reconstruction toolbox
Neurol. Clin. Neurophysiol 52.
Modified beamformers for coherent source region suppression
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
A maximum-likelihood estimator for trial-to-trial variations in noisy MEG/EEG data sets
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
Estimating evoked dipole responses in unknown spatially correlated noise with EEG/MEG arrays
IEEE Trans. Signal
Markov chain Monte Carlo methods in biostatistics
Stat. Methods Med. Res.
Graphical models and variational methods
Magnetoencephalography-theory, instrumentation, and applications to noninvasive studies of the working human brain
Rev. Mod. Phys.
Spatiotemporal EEG/MEG source analysis based on a parametric noise covariance model
IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.
Cited by (59)
Robust estimation of noise for electromagnetic brain imaging with the champagne algorithm
2021, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :In such situations, it is unclear how noise estimation should be accomplished for algorithms such as Champagne. This predicament also applies to other Bayesian source reconstruction methods such as Saketini (Zumer et al., 2007), NSEFALoc (Zumer et al., 2008) and LowSNR-BSI (Hashemi and Haufe, 2018). In this technical note, we propose robust methods to estimate the contributions to sensors from noise without the need for additional ”baseline” or ”control” measurements.
A systematic review of EEG source localization techniques and their applications on diagnosis of brain abnormalities
2020, Journal of Neuroscience MethodsMagnetoencephalography for Schizophrenia
2020, Neuroimaging Clinics of North AmericaBrain Imaging With Magnetoencephalography During Rest and During Speech and Language Processing
2016, Genomics, Circuits, and Pathways in Clinical Neuropsychiatry