The power of imagination — How anticipatory mental imagery alters perceptual processing of fearful facial expressions
Research Highlights
►Anticipatory imagery proactively generated the “illusion” of reduced fearfulness. ►Enhanced prefrontal influences on fusiform gyrus primed the brain for a misperception. ►Anticipatory imagery strengthened higher-level internal processing during perception. ►Anticipatory imagery reduced stimulus-driven attention and arousal during perception.
Introduction
Human survival critically depends on the ability to anticipate and prepare for likely future events in the absence of sensory stimulation (Bar, 2007, Holland, 1990, Ingvar, 1985). Central to this capacity is the ability to recur on mental representations of prior experiences or general preconceptions in higher-order brain regions, which limits the number of possible percepts and helps lower-level cortices to decide between competing percepts (Bar, 2007, Bar, 2009, Bouton, 1994, Engel et al., 2001, Frith and Dolan, 1997, Friston, 2005, Kveraga et al., 2007, Murray et al., 2004, Moulton and Kosslyn, 2009; see also Bar et al., 2006, Summerfield et al., 2006a, Summerfield and Koechlin, 2008).
However, if a subjective experience is indeed a composite of predictive information and sensory input (Petrovic et al., 2005), then the partial reliance on internal processing also bears that risk that mental representations can gain precedence over sensory input. In particular when preconceptions are strong, ‘predictive codes’ (Friston, 2005, Mumford, 1992) in higher-order brain regions may incorrectly ‘explain’ lower-level sensory information resulting in the generation of false or illusory percepts (Summerfield et al., 2006b). Evidence from brain imaging studies suggests that false expectations have the power to alter perceptual judgment, affective responses and neural processing in various stimulus modalities, including gustatory processing (e.g., Nitschke et al., 2006a), olfaction (e.g., De Araujo et al., 2005), vision (e.g., Petrovic et al., 2005), kinesthesia (e.g., Naito et al., 2007), and pain (e.g., Wager et al., 2004). One key finding of these studies was that misleading advance information modulated the perceptual experience by enhancing prefrontal top-down influences on category-specific sensory brain activation. For example, during face perception activation in the fusiform gyrus was found to be controlled by content-sensitive backward connections from various prefrontal regions, which determined whether illusory faces were detected in pure noise images (Li et al., 2009). Similarly, after subjects learned to associate a ‘placebo cue’ with a factual analgesic or otherwise comforting effect, increased prefrontal activation scaled with the attenuation of sensory-affective processing during perception of the aversive event and correlated with the concurrent decrease of negative affect (Keltner et al., 2006, Kong et al., 2006, Petrovic et al., 2005, Sarinopoulos et al., 2006, Wager et al., 2004, Watson et al., 2009; see also Benedetti et al. (2005) for a review of findings).
Although it is well established that false expectancies modulate the subjective experience of sensory-affective stimuli, the actual role of anticipatory neural processing in the generation of illusory percepts and in the reduction of negative affect has been widely neglected. One possibility is that crude forms of mental simulation operating prior to stimulus onset may contribute to the conscious expectancy of a certain stimulus and may act as a prime for the upcoming event and its relevant features (Bar, 2009, Ingvar, 1985, Holland, 1990, Moulton and Kosslyn, 2009, Rescorla, 1988, Rilling and Neiworth, 1987). In fact, a number of neuroimaging studies have demonstrated that anticipation activated partly the same or directly adjacent brain regions as those operating during actual stimulus perception (Bermpohl et al., 2006, Boly et al., 2007, Carlsson et al., 2000, Ploghaus et al., 1999, Porro et al., 2002, Nitschke et al., 2006b, Onoda et al., 2008). Moreover, there is evidence that the individual susceptibility to noxious somatosensory stimulation is related to fluctuations in both prestimulus activity and the anticipatory connectivity of networks relevant for somatosensory perception and its modulation (Boly et al., 2007, Ploner et al., 2010). Finally, it has already been demonstrated that the expectancy of a less noxious event than actually presented (i.e., a placebo stimulus) increased anticipatory activation in the prefrontal cortex (PFC), which correlated with both the effectiveness of the placebo treatment and the decrease of negative sensory-affective responses during stimulus perception (Sarinopoulos et al., 2006, Wager et al., 2004, Watson et al., 2009). Together, these previous findings converge to imply that (1.) the perceptual system may be part of a simulation network that can already shape sensory-affective representations during anticipation, and that (2.) prefrontal top-down influences during the anticipatory period may modulate sensory-affective responses in lower levels of the perceptual system. This could promote the generation of misperceptions and could also help to regulate fear-related arousal and negative affect during perception.
Here we investigated with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) whether voluntary anticipatory mental imagery of mildly fearful expressions has the power to proactively modulate perception of highly fearful faces and to generate the “illusion” of reduced fearfulness. Mental imagery or ‘seeing with the mind's eye’ holds the power to build up vivid internal ‘as if’ representations, which enable a mental simulation of actual visceral and emotional responses (Bensafi et al., 2007, Dadds et al., 1997, Kim et al., 2007, Kosslyn et al., 1996, Vrana and Lang, 1990). It has been proposed that mental imagery reflects the effects of prior knowledge on sensory processing areas in the absence of sensory input (Dolan et al., 1997, Frith and Dolan, 1997), and further allows a simulation of the future (Moulton and Kosslyn, 2009). Based on these considerations, we hypothesized that if anticipatory mental imagery is considered as a special case of ‘predictive coding’, then it should proactively modulate the subjective experience of fearful facial expressions. This would be in agreement with recent contemplations (Bar, 2007, Bar, 2009, Moulton and Kosslyn, 2009) and empirical evidence (Mechelli et al., 2004, Summerfield et al., 2006a) suggesting that voluntary mental imagery and ‘predictive coding’ of forthcoming perceptions share a common mechanism that enhances and directs prefrontal top-down influences on down-stream perceptual brain regions. We therefore made the prediction that anticipatory mental imagery would create a perceptual bias that is strong enough to proactively alter sensory-affective processing, which should predispose the perceptual system for a misperception of reduced fearfulness. Our study was designed to answer the following questions: (1.) How does the use of mental imagery modulate intensity-specific processing of fearful facial expressions during the expectancy phase? (2.) Which are the neurophysiological mechanisms that promote the impact of misleading advance information on perceptual judgment, if subjects mentally simulate the expected intensity of fearfulness during anticipation?
Participants performed an emotional evaluation task, in which they had to evaluate the fearfulness of human faces presented after an anticipatory period (see Experimental procedure). Trials were subdivided into three phases (anticipation, perception and rating phase) that were temporally jittered. Three cues predicted facial expressions of varying intensities of fearfulness (i.e., neutral, mildly and highly fearful; see Fig. 1 and Experimental procedure). Most cues correctly predicted the intensity of fearfulness of the upcoming expression. Only occasionally, a misleading cue predicted a less fearful expression than actually presented. This misleading condition was intended to induce the “illusory” perception of reduced fearfulness. Subjects were not informed about the misleading condition. We employed a between-subjects design with two matched groups, who were either explicitly instructed to prepare for the upcoming stimulus by imagining the expected facial expression during the complete anticipation phase (Imagery group) or who, as a control group, were simply informed that a cue predicted the intensity of the upcoming expression (NoImagery group). This allowed us to directly assess the mechanisms underlying anticipatory imagery of fearful expressions and its impact on subsequent perceptual processing.
Section snippets
Subjects
Participants were 25 healthy volunteers, who were recruited from an academic environment (undergraduate students of the medical faculty). The participants were randomly assigned to one of the two experimental groups prior to the experiment. One of these groups only received the general instructions (i.e., information about the cue meaning, the trial structure and the general purpose of the study, which was to assess neural responses related to anticipation and perception of emotional stimuli;
Rating of fearful facial expressions
As hypothesized, anticipatory imagery led to a significant change in the mean rating of the highly fearful face after the perception phase. Accordingly, subjects that used mental imagery to prepare themselves for the upcoming face rated the highly fearful expression as significantly less fearful if predated by the misleading cue (t = −2.32, p = 0.034) and as significantly more fearful if preceded by the correct cue (t = 2.57, p = 0.021), when compared to the group that was not instructed to imagine the
Discussion
In this fMRI study, we explored the impact of stimulus-specific anticipatory imagery on emotional perception. As expected, we were able to show that mental imagery proactively altered the neural representation of fearful facial expressions (i.e., intensified the “illusory” perception of reduced fearfulness), when a misleading cue made subjects believe that the upcoming expression was less fearful than objectively measurable. Our data demonstrate that the enhancement of prefrontal top-down
Conclusion and future perspectives
We were able to demonstrate for the first time that vivid mental images of upcoming percepts have a strong influence on the way the brain interprets the world. Mental imagery profoundly modified perception of the external environment, when simulatory processing was consciously engaged early during anticipation and focused on the particular stimulus feature relevant for subsequent perceptual judgment. Importantly, our data suggest that it may be the strength of the internally generated
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) within the priority program 1107 “Executive Functions” [grant Gr 1950/2-3]. We would like to thank the staff of the unit ‘MR-Research in Neurology & Psychiatry’ at the University Medical Center Goettingen (Germany) and in particular Mrs. I. Pfahlert for the help with data acquisition.
References (121)
The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2007)- et al.
Dissociable networks for the expectancy and perception of emotional stimuli in the human brain
Neuroimage
(2006) - et al.
Mechanisms of placebo analgesia: rACC recruitment of a subcortical antinociceptive network
Pain
(2006) - et al.
Cognitive modulation of olfactory processing
Neuron
(2005) - et al.
Neural circuitry underlying the regulation of conditioned fear and its relation to extinction
Neuron
(2008) - et al.
Psychophysiological and modulatory interactions in neuroimaging
Neuroimage
(1997) - et al.
Modeling regional and psychophysiologic interactions in fMRI: the importance of hemodynamic deconvolution
Neuroimage
(2003) - et al.
The distributed human neural system for face perception
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2000) - et al.
I feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation
Curr. Opin. Neurobiol.
(2008) - et al.
Modulation of anticipatory emotion and perception processing by cognitive control
Neuroimage
(2007)
Information-processing bias in social phobia
Clin. Psychol. Rev.
Mental imagery in anxiety disorders
Psychiatry
Event representation in Pavlovian conditioning: image and action
Cognition
Mental imagery as an emotional amplifier: application to bipolar disorder
Behav. Res. Ther.
Let's face it: it's a cortical network
Neuroimage
Distributed neural systems for the generation of visual images
Neuron
Visual imagery of famous faces: effects of memory and attention revealed by fMRI
Neuroimage
Face perception is mediated by a distributed cortical network
Brain Res. Bull.
The neural mechanism of imagining facial affective expression
Brain Res.
An fMRI study on the interaction and dissociation between expectation of pain relief and acupuncture treatment
Neuroimage
The functional neuroanatomy of the human orbitofrontal cortex: evidence from neuroimaging and neuropsychology
Prog. Neurobiol.
Top-down predictions in the cognitive brain
Brain Cogn.
A distributed neural system for top-down face processing
Neurosci. Lett.
The neural correlates of placebo effects: a disruption account
Neuroimage
Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing
Neuroimage
Recall of fear extinction in humans activates the ventromedial prefrontal cortex and hippocampus in concert
Biol. Psychiatry
A role for the human dorsal anterior cingulate cortex in fear expression
Biol. Psychiatry
Neurobiological basis of failure to recall extinction memory in posttraumatic stress disorder
Biol. Psychiatry
Perceptual grouping and the interactions between visual cortical areas
Neural Netw.
Functional neuroanatomy of aversion and its anticipation
Neuroimage
The cognitive control of emotion
Trends Cogn. Sci.
For better or for worse: neural systems supporting the cognitive down- and up-regulation of negative emotion
Neuroimage
Anterior cingulate cortex modulates preparatory activation during certain anticipation of negative picture
Neuropsychologia
Placebo in emotional processing—induced expectations of anxiety relief activate a generalized modulatory network
Neuron
Extinction learning in humans: role of the amygdala and vmPFC
Neuron
Theoretical and methodological considerations for the study of imagery in animals
Learn. Motivation
Brain mechanisms of expectation associated with insula and amygdala response to aversive taste: implications for placebo
Brain Behav. Immun.
fMRI responses to pictures of mutilation and contamination
Neurosci. Lett.
Brain activity underlying emotional valence and arousal: a response-related fMRI study
Hum. Brain Mapp.
Amygdala-frontal connectivity during emotion regulation
Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci.
The proactive brain: memory for predictions
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci.
Top-down facilitation of visual recognition
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
Famous faces activate contextual associations in the parahippocampal cortex
Cereb. Cortex
Flow of information for emotions through temporal and orbitofrontal pathways
J. Anat.
Medial prefrontal cortices are unified by common connections with superior temporal cortices and distinguished by input from memory-related areas in the rhesus monkey
J. Comp. Neurol.
Conscious expectation and unconscious conditioning in analgesic, motor, and hormonal placebo/nocebo responses
J. Neurosci.
Neurobiological mechanisms of the placebo effect
J. Neurosci.
Hedonic-specific activity in piriform cortex during odor imagery mimics that during odor perception
J. Neurophysiol.
Effects of attention and emotion on repetition priming and their modulation by cholinergic enhancement
J. Neurophysiol.
Baseline brain activity fluctuations predict somatosensory perception in humans
Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.
Cited by (34)
Stopping information search: An fMRI investigation
2021, Decision Support SystemsCitation Excerpt :In the present task people were asked to choose among products based on verbal descriptions of their characteristics. This might require creating a mental picture of the product—a task the fusiform would be well suited to handle, as the fusiform is implicated in imagining objects as well as recognizing them [33,41,51,64]. The important finding is that the fusiform showed heightened activation during the stopping phase.
Belief updating in depression is not related to increased sensitivity to unexpectedly negative information
2019, Behaviour Research and Therapy