Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 55, Issue 4, 15 April 2011, Pages 1587-1592
NeuroImage

Technical Note
Real-time feedback optimization of z-shim gradient for automatic compensation of susceptibility-induced signal loss in EPI,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.045Get rights and content

Abstract

Signal loss in gradient-echo echo planar imaging (GE-EPI) due to susceptibility-induced magnetic field inhomogeneity makes it difficult to assess the blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) effect in fMRI investigations. The z-shim method that applies an additional gradient moment is one of the more popular methods of compensating for GE-EPI signal loss. However, this method requires a calibration sweep scan and post-processing to identify the optimal z-shim gradients, which slows down fMRI experiments. This study attempts to decrease the calibration time by introducing a real-time feedback framework. Creating a feedback loop between the image processing and the GE-EPI pulse sequence converts the calibration of z-shim gradients to an optimization problem, which can be accelerated by local search methods. This study proposes an interleaved scan that allows the simultaneous optimization of two z-shim gradient moments and allocates sufficient processing time for networking and computation. The z-shim compensated images obtained by the proposed real-time method are comparable to those created by the sweep method. The optimization procedure for obtaining negative and positive gradient moments generally requires about twenty GE-EPI repetitions. In conclusion, the proposed z-shim method includes an automated real-time framework to achieve a significant reduction in susceptibility-induced signal loss in GE-EPI with a minimal increase in calibration time. The proposed procedure is fully automatic and compatible with conventional GE-EPI and can thus serve as a pre-adjustment module in EPI-based fMRI researches.

Introduction

Gradient-echo echo planar imaging (GE-EPI) (Mansfield, 1977) is a fast acquisition technique that is commonly employed in functional magnetic resonance image (fMRI) because it provides a high sensitivity to blood oxygen level-dependent (BOLD) signals (Ogawa et al., 1990). However, brain images acquired with GE-EPI often exhibit significant signal loss in areas near air-tissue or bone-tissue interfaces due to susceptibility-induced local magnetic field inhomogeneity. These areas include the ventral prefrontal, temporal lobes, and orbitofrontal cortex (Lipschutz et al., 2001, Ojemann et al., 1997, Stenger et al., 2000). This inhomogeneity accelerates intravoxel dephasing and substantially attenuates the signal, especially in high magnetic fields.

Researchers have proposed several methods of compensating for susceptibility-induced signal loss by z-shimming, tailored RF pulse, high-resolution imaging, reducing TE using parallel imaging with phased array coils, or employing local shimming coils (Bellgowan et al., 2006, Chen and Wyrwicz, 1999, Frahm et al., 1993, Hsu and Glover, 2005, Schmidt et al., 2005, Wilson et al., 2003, Wong and Mazaheri, 2004). Z-shimming, which is based on adjusting the refocusing gradient in the slice selection direction, is one of the more popular methods in fMRI exams (Constable and Spencer, 1999, Cordes et al., 2000, Deichmann et al., 2002, Frahm et al., 1988, Gu et al., 2002, Ordidge et al., 1994, Song, 2001). Adding additional gradient moments allows through-plan spin refocusing, which reduces the signal loss caused by intravoxel incoherent phases. A general z-shimming exam acquires several images with different strengths of refocusing gradient in the slice direction (referred to as the z-shim gradient hereafter). These images are then combined using a composite formula such as direct sum (Frahm et al., 1988), weighted sum, maximum intensity projection (MIP)(Constable, 1995, Marshall et al., 2009), or the square root of the squared sum method (SSQ)(Ordidge et al., 1994). The optimal strength of a z-shim gradient is generally determined by a discrete global search procedure. A series of GE-EPI scans (i.e., a sweep scan) is acquired with stepping the z-shim gradients (Constable, 1995, Deichmann et al., 2002, Frahm et al., 1988). A post-processing method then calculates the optimal z-shim gradients for subsequent fMRI experiments. However, sweep scans and post-processing delay the overall fMRI studies.

A real-time feedback mechanism for advanced MRI systems may be a solution to this problem. Researchers have used real-time feedback methods, which adjust the scan parameters or the MR pulse sequences according to the acquired signal, to solve MRI problems. Application examples include, but are certainly not limited to, prospective motion correction (McConnell et al., 1997, Zaitsev et al., 2006), stabilization of frequency drifts (Wu et al., 2007), and the determination of scan parameters (Xie et al., 2010). This study proposes a real-time feedback method that automatically and rapidly determines the optimal z-shim gradients for GE-EPI experiments. This method employs the same pulse sequence (i.e., GE-EPI) as the following scans and requires neither user interactions nor pulse sequence interruption. Thus, the proposed method can serve as a pre-adjustment module for z-shim GE-EPI sequences.

Section snippets

Adaptive z-shim GE-EPI and real-time feedback system

The GE-EPI sequence was modified to allow a configuration file (Z-file) to adjust the gradient strength of slice refocusing pulse. Before performing the GE-EPI sequence, the program adjusted the slice refocusing pulse with a z-shim gradient moment (ZM) based on the value storage in the Z-file. This study develops a real-time feedback system to optimize the ZM of z-shim GE-EPI to correct the susceptibility-induced signal loss in GE-EPI. The proposed system consists of three major parts: image

Results

We first demonstrate the usage of MIP instead of SSQ as the cost function for reconstruction of composite images in order to achieve uniform signal intensity. Fig. 2 shows z-shim EPI images acquired with a zero ZM (ZM0, i.e., a conventional EPI; see Fig. 2a), a negative ZM (ZMN; Fig. 2b), and a positive ZM (ZMP; Fig. 2e). Fig. 2b and e are combined with Fig. 2a using MIP (Fig. 2c and f) and SSQ (Fig. 2d and g), respectively. The cost functions (i.e., cost-MIP and cost-SSQ) normalized with the

Discussion

This study attempts to optimize the z-shim parameters using a real-time feedback optimization system. The z-shim compensated images obtained by this method are comparable to those created by the sweep method that requires longer time to accomplish. The iteration loops needed for optimization are about 20 EPI repetitions for both negative and positive ZMs. When applying this method before an fMRI experiment, 30 additional measurements before the fMRI stimulation paradigm should be sufficient.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Dr. Wen-Chau Wu of Graduate Institute of Oncology, National Taiwan University, for his valuable discussions on EPI physics, and the Department of Medical Imaging in the National Taiwan University Hospital for the support of MRI experiment.

References (32)

  • J.L. Wilson et al.

    Protocol to determine the optimal intraoral passive shim for minimisation of susceptibility artifact in human inferior frontal cortex

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • M. Zaitsev et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging of freely moving objects: prospective real-time motion correction using an external optical motion tracking system

    Neuroimage

    (2006)
  • N. Chen et al.

    Removal of intravoxel dephasing artifact in gradient-echo images using a field-map based RF refocusing technique

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1999)
  • R.T. Constable

    Functional MR imaging using gradient-echo echo-planar imaging in the presence of large static field inhomogeneities

    J. Magn. Reson. Imaging

    (1995)
  • R.T. Constable et al.

    Composite image formation in z-shimmed functional MR imaging

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1999)
  • J. Frahm et al.

    Direct FLASH MR imaging of magnetic field inhomogeneities by gradient compensation

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (1988)
  • Cited by (6)

    Supported by the National Science Council under grant NSC-99-2628-E-011-003.

    ☆☆

    Presented in part at the Joint Annual Meeting ISMRM-ESMRMB, Stockholm, Sweden, 2010.

    View full text