Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 58, Issue 3, 1 October 2011, Pages 741-748
NeuroImage

Parcellation of human amygdala in vivo using ultra high field structural MRI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.06.047Get rights and content

Abstract

Histological studies show that human amygdala is subdivided into several nuclei with specific connections to other brain areas. One such study has been recently used as the basis of a probabilistic amygdala map, to enable in vivo identification of specifically located functions within the amygdala and connections to it. The involvement of the amygdala in cognition, emotion and action, which may underlie several psychiatric disorders, points to a need for discrimination of these nuclei in living human brains using different techniques. Structural MRI scans of the human amygdala at standard field strengths (≤ 3 T) have shown a region of generally featureless gray matter. Apparently homogeneous regions may reveal internal structure, however, when improved imaging strategies and better SNR are available. The goal of this study is the in vivo anatomical segmentation of the amygdala using high resolution structural MR data. The use of different MRI tissue contrast mechanisms at high field strengths has been little explored so far. Combining two different contrasts, and using cutting-edge image analysis, the following study provides a robust clustering of three amygdala components in vivo using 7 T structural imaging.

Highlights

► The high CNR available at 7 T enables the segmentation of the amygdala in vivo. ► MR contrast combination provides a more precise tissue segmentation. ► Spectral clustering provided three sets of robustly distinguishable areas on structural images. ► Consistency is checked across subjects, coils used and image intensities. ► These segments have been compared to previous in vivo and ex vivo amygdala maps.

Introduction

One important objective of magnetic resonance imaging is to distinguish human brain areas in vivo. In an attempt to understand the functions of the amygdala complex, a structure located deep within the temporal lobe, the segmentation of its components has always been of wide interest (Alheid et al., 1995, Amunts et al., 2005, Aylward et al., 1999, Johnston, 1923, Price et al., 1987). However, standard radiological MRI techniques do not discriminate intra-amygdala structures, and the amygdala generally appears as a relatively uniform large gray matter region.

The amygdala is an anatomically complex region of about 1500 mm3 which suggests a substantial functional diversity also manifested by its role in multiple disorders (Amunts et al., 2005, Ball et al., 2009, Boccardi et al., 2002, Floresco and Ghods-Sharifi, 2007, Garcia-Marti et al., 2008, Hayman et al., 1998, Lanteaume et al., 2007, LeDoux et al., 1988, Sah et al., 2003, Schiller et al., 2009, Sharot et al., 2007, Walker and Davis, 2002, Wiest et al., 2006). Pioneering studies of amygdala segmentation were performed by Johnston (1923). He dissociated two amygdala compartments on the basis of cell migration behavior: the primitive group and the new group, each of which consisted of several amygdala subnuclei (Johnston, 1923).

More recent cytoarchitectonic studies support a segmentation comprising three main groups of amygdala nuclei: superficial, basolateral and centromedial, together with a recently added independent area known as the extended amygdala (Alheid et al., 1995). These studies have provided maps of the amygdala nuclei in a sample of cadaver brains (Amunts et al., 2005) from which a probabilistic atlas has been derived. This has been increasingly used as a reference frame for the localization of particular functions and connections in the amygdala complex (Ball et al., 2009, Onur et al., 2009). This allows a better understanding of the relation between amygdala tissue and its function.

A recent study has shown a two compartment segmentation by utilizing diffusion tensor imaging data at a 3 T scanner (Solano-Castiella et al., 2010). Structural MRI studies at 2 T and 3 T have attempted volumetric delineation of the amygdala as a whole (Bonilha et al., 2004, Morey et al., 2009, Pruessner et al., 2000), resulting in an improved in vivo identification of the entire area and its boundaries. Due to the low contrast variations within this structure, the amygdala nuclei have not been previously anatomically delineated in MR structural images. However, the neighboring hippocampus, which has more easily observable internal structure, has been successfully parcellated at 7 T (Thomas et al., 2008).

Currently, attention regarding in vivo segmentation has been drawn to the evident higher sensitivity available at higher field strengths such as 7 T. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) quantifies the mean overall intensity of the MR image, as compared with background noise, which is only thermal noise in ideal conditions. CNR or contrast to noise-ratio-compares with background noise the signal difference between tissue components of interest, typically gray matter and white matter. The SNR is at least proportional to the strength of the static magnetic field, (Collins and Smith, 2001, Edelstein et al., 1986, Triantafyllou et al., 2005) resulting in more than twice the SNR compared to 3 T. Hence, images show an excellent anatomical detail due to the high contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) which increases dramatically with the magnetic field (Li et al., 2006, Thomas et al., 2008).

Besides utilizing a 7 T scanner, in the present study, T2 and T2*-weighting were combined. Previous MR contrast combination has already shown great success in structural identification of different brain regions (Aubert-Broche et al., 2009, Dijkhuizen and Nicolay, 2003, Helms et al., 2006, Lalys et al., 2010, Ordidge et al., 1994). Thus, this study attempts to differentiate regions within the amygdala on the basis of in vivo ultra high field MR structural imaging.

Section snippets

Data acquisition

Ten healthy volunteers (five males and five females) underwent MRI scanning. One subject was excluded from later analysis due to inconsistent artifactual image intensity, probably due to head motion. All subjects were healthy, with ages between 21 and 29 years (mean age 25.2). None of the subjects had a history of neurological or psychiatric conditions. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants in accordance with ethics requirements from the university hospital of Leipzig.

Contrast contribution to the clustering

Fig. 2 shows a false-color image based on the image intensities of all voxels within the amygdala complex. The weight of each sequence is represented by a different color RGB, where red channel corresponds to TSE data, green shows GRE data, and blue indicates the MP-RAGE data. This figure reveals a clear distribution of image intensities within amygdala tissue. The higher CNR found at 7 T allowed easier analysis of image intensity variation. Combining the image intensity maps given by each

Discussion

Several studies have investigated the anatomical complexity of the amygdala. However, these studies have mainly focused on histological procedures. At standard MR field strength (≤ 3 T), MRI shows few internal details and it is unlikely that similar results could be obtained. Since the amygdala complex is not entirely devoid of myelin, we could show that MRI reveals features, given a high enough field strength and spatial resolution. The increased CNR available at 7 T has allowed this study to

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Domenica Wilfling and Elisabeth Wladimirow for providing expert technical support, MRI scanning and subject recruitment.

References (40)

  • C. Triantafyllou et al.

    Comparison of physiological noise at 1.5 T, 3 T and 7 T and optimization of fMRI acquisition parameters

    NeuroImage

    (2005)
  • David L. Walker et al.

    The role of amygdala glutamate receptors in fear learning, fear-potentiated startle, and extinction

    Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav.

    (2002)
  • G.F. Alheid et al.

    Amygdala and extended amygdala

  • K. Amunts et al.

    Cytoarchitectonic mapping of the human amygdala, hippocampal region and entorhinal cortex: intersubject variability and probability maps

    Anat. Embryol. (Berl)

    (2005)
  • E.H. Aylward et al.

    MRI volumes of amygdala and hippocampus in non-mentally retarded autistic adolescents and adults

    Neurology

    (1999)
  • L. Bonilha et al.

    Protocol for volumetric segmentation of medial temporal structures using high-resolution 3-D magnetic resonance imaging

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2004)
  • C.M. Collins et al.

    Signal-to-noise ratio and absorbed power as functions of main magnetic field strength and definition of “90°” RF pulse for the head in the birdcage coil

    Magn. Reson. Med.

    (2001)
  • H. Cramer

    Mathematical Methods of Statistics

    (1946)
  • R.M. Dijkhuizen et al.

    Magnetic resonance imaging in experimental models of brain disorders

    J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab.

    (2003)
  • H. Duvernoy

    Human Brain: Surface, Three-Dimensional Sectional Anatomy with MRI, and Blood Supply

    (1999)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Restructuring of amygdala subregion apportion across adolescence

      2021, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      The heterogeneous structure and function of the amygdala nuclei play a vital role in mediating a number of cognitive, affective, and motivational processes (Baxter and Murray, 2002; Hariri et al., 2002; Meyer-Lindenberg et al., 2005; Raznahan et al., 2011; Bzdok et al., 2013; Tottenham and Gabard-Durnam, 2017). Cytoarchitecture and lesion studies have helped determine how these diverse groupings of amygdala neurons mediate specific processes (Krettek and Price, 1978; Amaral and Price, 1984; Ghashghaei and Barbas, 2002; Amunts et al., 2005; Solano-Castiella et al., 2011). Previous studies have shown the basal and lateral nuclei process high-level sensory input and emotional regulation (Sananes and Davis, 1992; Wan and Swerdlow, 1997; Schoenbaum et al., 1999), while the central nucleus is involved in reward and aversive learning (Killcross et al., 1997; Baxter and Murray, 2002).

    • Parcellation of the human amygdala using recurrence quantification analysis

      2021, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      The results of this analysis are available in the SPM Anatomy toolbox for future MRI-based research (Eickhoff et al., 2005). One such research aimed at the in vivo anatomical segmentation of the human amygdala (Solano-Castiella et al., 2011). That study provided a robust contrast dependent clustering of three amygdala components at a very high resolution (7 T) using two different contrasts and cutting-edge image analysis.

    • Human amygdala functional network development: A cross-sectional study from 3 months to 5 years of age

      2018, Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
      Citation Excerpt :

      The amygdala’s precocious structural development in utero facilitates examination of infant amygdala subregions using the adult-derived atlas (Nikolić and Kostović, 1986; O’Rahilly and Müller, 2006; Ulfig et al., 2003). Cytoarchitectonic analyses have revealed that the amygdala is about 1500 mm3 unilaterally in the adult, larger than the partial volumes deduced from manual tracing with structural MRIs or extracted from standard atlases (e.g. Talairach, Harvard-Oxford atlases) (Amunts et al., 2005; Bzdok et al., 2013; Solano-Castiella et al., 2011). Studies performing manual amygdala segmentation with structural MRIs in neonates report volumes already about 750 mm3 unilaterally (e.g. Cismaru et al., 2016), and studies in early infancy that overlap in age with the present sample suggest volumes of 1000 mm3 or greater (Ortiz-Mantilla et al., 2010; Uematsu et al., 2012).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text