Technical NoteSimultaneous intracranial EEG–fMRI in humans: Protocol considerations and data quality
Introduction
We have recently reported the first simultaneous intracranial EEG and fMRI (icEEG–fMRI) experiments in humans which were obtained in patients with epilepsy with the aim of mapping and characterising the brain areas associated with epileptic discharges (Vulliemoz et al., 2011). The main technical challenges of recording intracranial EEG (icEEG) and fMRI simultaneously (icEEG–fMRI) are patient safety (Carmichael et al., 2010), MRI scanner-induced EEG artefacts (Allen et al., 1998, Allen et al., 2000) and fMRI image quality degradation (Vulliemoz et al., 2011).
Initial experimental results were encouraging in that the quality of intracranial EEG recorded during fMRI was good based on visual assessment and many more events were detected as compared to scalp EEG–fMRI recordings in the same patients (Vulliemoz et al., 2011), as expected from studies of intracranial and scalp EEG (Tao et al., 2005). However, in order to fully exploit the greater sensitivity of icEEG every effort must be made to capture the electrophysiological activity occurring across a wide frequency range and small spatial scale with minimum contamination from interactions between the EEG and scanning processes. Responses linked to epileptic events were detected within a centimetre of electrode contacts, but there was loss of GE-EPI signal proximal to each electrode contact (Vulliemoz et al., 2011). Visual assessment of the fMRI image data obtained in those studies showed that the extent of the GE-EPI signal loss was dependent on electrode type and location. These observations motivate a more quantitative characterisation of the imaging artefacts.
In this work, we report in-vitro temperature measurements with our study protocol performed prior to patient studies, quantify both the effect of scanning on EEG using spectral analysis and the effect of electrodes on GE-EPI signal intensity in patient data. For the latter, we considered the following factors: electrode type (grid, depth), distance from the electrode, anatomical localisation, and orientation of the electrode relative to the MRI scanner's main magnetic field (B0, and by convention the z-axis).
Section snippets
In-vitro RF heating safety testing
This set of experiments was designed to complement previously published studies by considering new electrode connection configurations and to determine likely heating effects in the actual configuration used in subsequent patient studies. We previously studied heating in experiments where the electrodes were either all not connected (Carmichael et al., 2008a) or all connected to the EEG recording amplifier (Carmichael et al., 2010). Our MR compatible EEG system can record up to 64 channels but
In vitro temperature measurements
Temperature variations during the entire scanning protocol used for in-vivo experiments (≤ 0.1 W/kg head average SAR) were below the resolution of our temperature measurement system (≤ 0.1 °C). Temperature changes of maximum value 1.5 °C were measured when a high SAR (3.0 W/kg head average) sequence was used. Temperature changes were not increased by partially connecting electrode contacts to the EEG amplifier leaving the remaining electrodes unconnected (but electrically isolated). Temperature data
Discussion
We have quantified EEG and image quality in simultaneously acquired intracranial EEG and fMRI data in humans, to further demonstrate the technique's potential and limitations and set a baseline for possible future developments aimed at improving data quality. We have also described additional temperature measurements we performed to extend our previous studies, and confirm that our patient protocol avoided excessive heating for realistic electrode-lead configurations.
Conclusions
We have performed icEEG–fMRI using a 1.5 T MRI scanner with a head transmit–receive coil, low SAR sequences and electrode leads and wires external to the head with specific lengths and precisely positioned along the RF coil's central z-axis. In this configuration, heating in-vitro was limited to ≤ 0.1 °C, implying a safety factor of 10 in relation to the statutory temperature increase limits. In measurements in two patients icEEG quality during MRI was quantitatively comparable to recordings
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to our colleagues in the Telemetry Unit and the Neuroradiology Department at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (UCLH), Queen Square, London UK for their help in data collection. DC, RR and LL acknowledge the financial support of the UK Medical Research Council (MRC grant G0301067). S. Vulliemoz was supported by a fellowship for advanced researcher and by the SNF grant 33CM30-124089 and 320030‐141165 (SPUM Epilepsy) from the Swiss National Science Foundation.
References (17)
- et al.
Identification of EEG events in the MR scanner: the problem of pulse artifact and a method for its subtraction
Neuroimage
(1998) - et al.
A method for removing imaging artifact from continuous EEG recorded during functional MRI
Neuroimage
(2000) Image quality issues
- et al.
Safety of localizing epilepsy monitoring intracranial electroencephalograph electrodes using MRI: radiofrequency-induced heating
J. Magn. Reson. Imaging
(2008) - et al.
Compensation of susceptibility-induced BOLD sensitivity losses in echo-planar fMRI imaging
Neuroimage
(2002) - et al.
Basic principles of thermal dosimetry and thermal thresholds for tissue damage from hyperthermia
Int. J. Hyperthermia
(2003) Medical electrical equipment — particular requirements for the safety of magnetic resonance equipment for medical diagnosis
- et al.
Intracranial EEG substrates of scalp EEG interictal spikes
Epilepsia
(2005)
Cited by (58)
Safety of intracranial electroencephalography during functional electromagnetic resonance imaging in humans at 1.5 tesla using a head transmit RF coil: Histopathological and heat-shock immunohistochemistry observations
2022, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :We hope that this work may encourage other studies of existing tissue samples from subjects who underwent MRI with implants. While this investigation is not a substitute for preparatory safety evaluations (as were performed previously to the present data being acquired (Carmichael et al., 2010, 2012)), we suggest that data derived from human in-vivo experiments following prospective evaluation such as presented here is rare and valuable. Furthermore, phantom tests and/or computational simulations such as those recommended for off-label use (as was the case for the acquisition of the MRI data described here), or legally required for device commercialization regulatory approval (e.g. FDA), have their own limitations – they are models of very complex systems that require validation.
Combining brain perturbation and neuroimaging in non-human primates
2021, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :During es-fMRI scanning, radio-frequency (RF) exciting pulses (MHz range) and magnetic gradient field switching (kHz range) can induce current in the intracranial contacts. The RF pulse can cause heating of the electrode contacts, which should be kept within the safety limit of less than 1 °C increase (Carmichael et al., 2012). Gradient-Echo EPI sequences that are commonly used for es-fMRI are low-SAR (specific absorption rate) sequences and do not usually cause heating above this limit.
BOLD mapping of human epileptic spikes recorded during simultaneous intracranial EEG-fMRI: The impact of automated spike classification
2019, NeuroImageCitation Excerpt :However, the sensitivity of detecting IEDs during an fMRI scan can be a limitation for scalp EEG-fMRI studies (Aghakhani et al., 2015; Salek-Haddadi et al., 2006). In contrast, the sensitivity of intracranial EEG (icEEG) to IEDs is much greater, due to the lack of attenuation and spatial integration from the scalp and the skull (Carreno and Luders, 2001), which has led to the implementation of simultaneous icEEG and fMRI acquisitions (icEEG-fMRI) in an effort to better understand the haemodynamic changes associated with epileptic activity (Carmichael et al., 2012; Boucousis et al., 2012). To date, there have only been three studies investigating the whole-brain haemodynamic correlates of IEDs detected on icEEG (Vulliemoz et al., 2011; Cunningham et al., 2012; Aghakhani et al., 2015).