Differentiating functions of the lateral and medial prefrontal cortex in motor response inhibition
Highlights
► Motor response inhibition induced bilateral activation of inferior frontal gyri (IFG). ► Highly accurate participants showed more deactivation in left IFG. ► Medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) showed deactivation during response inhibition. ► Extent of mPFC deactivation was associated with fewer commission errors. ► Findings suggest distinct functions of the IFG and mPFC in motor response inhibition.
Introduction
The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is a complex brain region that is thought to subserve a number of higher-order cognitive abilities (Miller and Cohen, 2001). Response inhibition represents perhaps one of the most extensively studied of these abilities, particularly with respect to motor control. The Go/No-Go paradigm has frequently been used to measure motor response inhibition across a variety of response modalities, including the hand, eye, and foot (Van't Ent and Apkarian, 1999). In general, this paradigm asks respondents to provide a specific motor response to a target stimulus (termed the Go stimulus) but to withhold this response to a non-target stimulus (known as the No-Go stimulus). Regardless of response modality, the Go/No-Go paradigm has been found to reliably activate the right inferior frontal gyrus (right IFG) under conditions of motor response inhibition (Chikazoe et al., 2007). Accordingly, Aron et al. (2004) concluded that this region, in coordination with the basal ganglia and perhaps other subcortical regions, is critical to response inhibition based on their analysis of neuroimaging and human lesion-mapping studies.
A recent meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging studies, however, suggests a different perspective on the prominence of the right IFG in response inhibition. Swick et al. (2011) examined 47 neuroimaging studies that employed a Go/No-Go paradigm and quantitatively synthesized their results using an activation-likelihood-estimation approach. This study revealed significant areas of right-hemisphere activation extending from the right IFG and middle frontal gyrus to the insular cortex and inferior parietal lobule. Significant foci of activation were also identified in the left superior, middle, and inferior frontal gyri. Therefore, in contrast to the widely reported finding of primarily right IFG activation on the Go/No-Go task, the anticipated dominance of this region in supporting response inhibition was not strongly implicated in this meta-analytic review. Notable limitations of this meta-analysis, however, were there it included a variety of Go/No-Go tasks which varied in their relative proportions of Go versus No-Go stimuli, which could impact the relative potency of a motor response and its associated functional activation (Nieuwenhuis et al., 2003). Also, given that most studies included in this meta-analysis comprised functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) contrasts of a condition requiring a motor response (Go) with one that does not (No-Go), it is difficult to disentangle those areas of PFC activation related to the execution of a motor response (e.g., manually pressing a button on a Go trial) versus response inhibition (e.g., withholding a manual button press on a No-Go trial) when these two specific conditions are contrasted (Hester et al., 2004b).
Although fMRI has been used most frequently in prior studies of response inhibition, investigations based on other neuroimaging modalities may help to elucidate the relative contributions of distinct regions of the PFC to motor response inhibition. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) is an optical brain imaging technique which measures relative changes in the concentrations of oxygenated (oxy-Hb) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (deoxy-Hb) based on the differential absorption and backscattering of infrared light in cortical tissue (for a review, see Irani et al., 2007). An important advantage of using fNIRS to advance our understanding of the role of the PFC in response inhibition is that it can generate distinct biological measures of cortical activation (i.e., oxy- and deoxy-Hb) which may convey information unique to that provided by the fMRI blood-oxygen level dependent signal (Steinbrink et al., 2006, Strangman et al., 2002). Importantly, fNIRS can supply these measures of cortical activation with high levels of temporal and spatial precision within the PFC, which may be crucial for unravelling the complexities of how functioning of this region may support response inhibition.
Only a small number of studies have employed fNIRS to investigate activation of the PFC under conditions of response inhibition using Go/No-Go tasks. These studies have revealed bilateral activation in the most anterior aspect of the IFG bilaterally (Herrmann et al., 2005), but also more dominant right IFG activation (Tsujii et al., 2011) during response inhibition. Similarly, Nishimura et al. (2011) detected significant activation within the left anterior IFG associated with response inhibition as well as an area of deactivation within the medial PFC (a finding which was not observed in a schizophrenia comparison group). Recently, Wriessnegger et al. (2012) used fNIRS to measure activation of the medial PFC and sensorimotor areas for 11 participants who completed finger and foot versions of a Go/No-Go task. They found significant activation of the medial PFC as well as deactivation of the corresponding sensorimotor cortex during motor response inhibition. Taken together, these findings suggest that activation of the homologous left IFG may also support response inhibition, whereas deactivation of specific prefrontal and sensorimotor cortical regions may also be implicated in some as yet unknown manner.
Although previous research using fNIRS to study response inhibition has revealed meaningful information about the potential roles of the left IFG and medial PFC in these processes, this research is limited in a number of ways. First, these investigations tended to utilize very brief activation periods (and sometimes only one activation period per condition) for their response inhibition tasks, thereby limiting the statistical power of these research designs. Second, nearly all prior fNIRS studies on this topic used probes that were limited in their spatial extent, and therefore, only one study simultaneously measured activation within medial and lateral portions of the PFC (including the IFG) (Nishimura et al., 2011). Given preliminary evidence from separate studies showing increased bilateral IFG activity in conjunction with reduced medial PFC activity during motor response inhibition, understanding the relative engagement and disengagement of these regions in a single study is potentially important. Third, the majority of this fNIRS research is based on considerably small samples of adults, limiting the extent to which meaningful conclusions can be drawn from any single study. Fourth, little research has examined the relationship between accuracy on response inhibition tasks and the extent of activation in specific neural regions. For example, research suggests that deactivation in midline areas (insula, medial PFC) prior to the inhibition of a motor response may be predictive of subsequent success in withholding that response (Hester et al., 2004b). Investigating the interaction between performance accuracy and cortical activation may elucidate whether discrete areas of the PFC function to support distinct response inhibition processes.
The present study accordingly set out to investigate several important unanswered questions regarding the role of inferior-lateral and medial areas of the PFC in motor response inhibition. First, we examined whether the homologous region in the left IFG is also recruited for motor response inhibition, contrary to previous claims of predominantly right IFG involvement (Aron et al., 2004). Second, we investigated whether the medial PFC shows significant deactivation associated with motor response inhibition, a finding which has been reported in only a small number of studies (Nishimura et al., 2011, Wriessnegger et al., 2012). To understand the potential interaction between behavioral performance and cortical activation, we also explored the relationship between accuracy on the Go/No-Go task and activation within inferior-lateral and medial aspects of the PFC.
Section snippets
Participants
Forty-four right-handed healthy adults participated in this study. Participants were recruited from the University of Toronto Scarborough undergraduate research participant pool and the surrounding community. From this original sample, one participant was excluded due to problems with fNIRS signal acquisition during the experiment. In total, fNIRS data for seven men and 36 women with a mean age of 24.8 years (SD = 11.3) were included in our analyses. All individuals provided written informed
Behavioral
High levels of accuracy were achieved on the SNAG with regard to true negative responses (i.e., correctly withholding responses to No-Go stimuli), M = 93.7%, SD = 6.09, and true positive responses (i.e., correctly responding to Go stimuli), M = 99.9%, SD = 0.36, with a mean reaction time (RT) of 344.6 ms (SD = 54.9). As expected, commission errors on the SNAG were significantly correlated with the same index on the CPT-II, r (41) = 0.32, p = 0.04, supporting the SNAG as a measure of motor response inhibition.
Discussion
The current study evaluated manual motor response inhibition using a Go/No-Go task while activation in the PFC was monitored using 16-channel fNIRS. Analyses revealed higher levels of activity bilaterally in the middle/inferior frontal gyri as well as the left superior frontal gyrus under conditions of response inhibition. Conversely, significantly reduced activity was observed in the right medial PFC. Importantly, deactivation in this region during response inhibition was associated with
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Dr. Elizabeth Page-Gould for statistical consultation.
References (48)
- et al.
Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2004) - et al.
Optical brain monitoring for operator training and mental workload assessment
NeuroImage
(2012) - et al.
Controlling the false discovery rate in behavior genetics research
Behav. Brain Res.
(2001) - et al.
Individual differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control
Brain Res.
(2006) - et al.
Optical topography during a Go-NoGo task assessed with multi-channel near-infrared spectroscopy
Behav. Brain Res.
(2005) - et al.
Efficient learning produces spontaneous neural repetition suppression in prefrontal cortex
Behav. Brain Res.
(2010) - et al.
Gender differences in the neural correlates of response inhibition during a stop signal task
NeuroImage
(2006) Social psychology as a natural kind
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2009)- et al.
Prefrontal cortex activity during response inhibition associated with excitement symptoms in schizophrenia
Brain Res.
(2011) - et al.
Cortical midline structures and the self
Trends Cogn. Sci.
(2004)
Abnormal prefrontal cortical response during affective processing in borderline personality disorder
Psychiatry Res.
Illuminating the BOLD signal: combined fMRI-fNIRS studies
Magn. Reson. Imaging
A quantitative comparison of simultaneous BOLD fMRI and NIRS recordings during functional brain activation
NeuroImage
Are the neural correlates of stopping and not going identical? Quantitative meta-analysis of two response inhibition tasks
NeuroImage
Motoric response inhibition in finger movement and saccadic eye movement: a comparative study
Clin. Neurophysiol.
Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions
Functional near infrared spectroscopy based brain computer interface
Registering fNIR data to brain surface image using MRI templates
Sliding-window motion artifact rejection for Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Conf. Proc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc.
Using MazeSuite and functional near infrared spectroscopy to study learning in spatial navigation
J. Vis. Exp.
Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing
J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B
Multilevel Modeling in R (2.3): A brief introduction to R, the multilevel package and the nlme package
Hierarchical linear models
Activation of right inferior frontal gyrus during response inhibition across response modalities
J. Cogn. Neurosci.
Cited by (54)
Sustained attention alterations in major depressive disorder: A review of fMRI studies employing Go/No-Go and CPT tasks
2022, Journal of Affective DisordersCitation Excerpt :With regards to the mPFC, three of the included studies reported either a lower (Jenkins et al., 2018; Nixon et al., 2013) or a higher (Richard-Devantoy et al., 2016) activation of this structure in rMDD and in MDD vs. HC, respectively. Evidence from task-based fMRI studies on healthy individuals documented a peculiar pattern of deactivation of this region in correspondence to motor response inhibition, with higher levels of inhibition corresponding to better performances (Rodrigo et al., 2014) and a pattern of activation correlated to errors during the attentional tasks (Menon et al., 2001). Regarding the role of the mPFC in depression, this brain area seemed to be particularly involved in the process of rumination (Northoff, 2016; Zhou et al., 2020) and there is evidence that its connectivity with areas involved in emotional regulation is altered in MDD (Koenigs and Grafman, 2009; Sawaya et al., 2015; Zhang et al., 2018).
Neurophysiological biomarkers of response inhibition and the familial risk for borderline personality disorder
2021, Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological PsychiatryCitation Excerpt :Given that relatives with greater impulsive traits showed increased bilateral PFC activation during response inhibition (an inverse pattern compared to probands and controls), heightened activation could reflect a neural inefficiency that underlies a propensity toward impulsive behaviours in individuals at a familial risk for BPD. The study findings may be considered robust considering the large sample size and focused hypotheses pertaining to response inhibition and a priori defined regions of interest in the PFC, based in part on our previous work validating the neuroimaging paradigm (Rodrigo et al., 2014). Nevertheless, limitations of the research should be considered.
Cognitive deficits and rehabilitation mechanisms in mild traumatic brain injury patients revealed by EEG connectivity markers
2021, Clinical NeurophysiologyCitation Excerpt :And the decreased connectivity also occurred between temporal areas (T3-T4) in the EDH-ab, SDH-n and SDH-ab groups. Some research showed that the substantial role of the frontal area in response inhibition (i.e. the ability to withhold a dominant and prepotent response following a change in circumstance or sensory stimuli) (Rodrigo et al., 2014), and decision operations in the face of ambiguous sensory input or conflicting possible responses (Alexander et al., 2007). While, the middle temporal area was involved in coding objects' appropriate grasp ability (Amoruso et al., 2018), which plays a supporting role in response inhibition.
Cognitive-Motor Interference Heightens the Prefrontal Cortical Activation and Deteriorates the Task Performance in Children With Hemiplegic Cerebral Palsy
2021, Archives of Physical Medicine and RehabilitationAPOE-ε4 risk variant for Alzheimer's disease modifies the association between cognitive performance and cerebral morphology in healthy middle-aged individuals
2019, NeuroImage: ClinicalCitation Excerpt :It is possible that, due to inefficient recruitment of white matter circuitry, reduced GMv in orbitofrontal areas aids processing speed in APOE-ε4 homozygous. For example, the orbitofrontal cortex is considered a critical region for motor response inhibition (Bryden and Roesch, 2015; Rodrigo et al., 2014), hence less volume in these areas would facilitate or sustain motor activation necessary for this task. Accordingly, a reduced volume in the middle cingulate gyrus would disengage conflict monitoring, supporting the execution of the psychomotor task (Parvaz et al., 2014; Sohn et al., 2007).