Elsevier

NeuroImage

Volume 161, 1 November 2017, Pages 179-187
NeuroImage

Measuring the effects of attention to individual fingertips in somatosensory cortex using ultra-high field (7T) fMRI

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.08.014Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Attending to tactile stimulation modulates primary somatosensory cortex, S1.

  • High-resolution fMRI at 7T can measure fingertip specific attentional modulation.

  • This modulation is somatotopically appropriate and directly linked to task-relevance.

  • Such measurements are critical for examining neural mechanisms of somatosensation.

Abstract

Attention to sensory information has been shown to modulate the neuronal processing of that information. For example, visuospatial attention acts by modulating responses at retinotopically appropriate regions of visual cortex (Puckett and DeYoe, 2015, Tootell et al., 1998). Much less, however, is known about the neuronal processing associated with attending to other modalities of sensory information. One reason for this is that visual cortex is relatively large, and therefore easier to access non-invasively in humans using tools such as functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). With high-resolution fMRI, however, it is now possible to access smaller cortical areas such as primary somatosensory cortex (Martuzzi et al., 2014; Sanchez-Panchuelo et al., 2010; Schweisfurth et al. 2014; Schweizer et al. 2008). Here, we combined a novel experimental design and high-resolution fMRI at ultra-high field (7T) to measure the effects of attention to tactile stimulation in primary somatosensory cortex, S1. We find that attention modulates somatotopically appropriate regions of S1, and importantly, that this modulation can be measured at the level of the cortical representation of individual fingertips.

Introduction

Attention to incoming sensory information has been shown to modulate neuronal responses and subsequently alter perception of that information and, accordingly, influence behavior (Driver, 2001). To date, the majority of attention research has investigated the processing of visual and auditory information, with a lesser focus on other sensory modalities such as somatosensation. It is clear, however, that people are able to voluntarily direct their attention to a part of their body and that doing so speeds up processing of somatosensory information at that location (Spence and Gallace, 2007). Understanding how attentional processes interact with the cortical processing of sensory information is, thus, central to understanding the neural basis of human somatosensation.

The neuronal processing of tactile information occurs in humans, in large part, in primary somatosensory cortex, S1 (Kandel et al., 2000). Early demonstrations of tactile stimulation eliciting focal neuronal activation within human S1 were performed using Positron Emission Tomography (PET) (Fox et al., 1987, Greenberg et al., 1981). Using fMRI, it became possible to further resolve this activation to individuate the responses to stimulation of individual fingers (Francis et al., 2000, Gelnar et al., 1998; Schweisfurth et al., 2014, Schweizer et al., 2008). More recently, research employing high-resolution fMRI has revealed that human S1 contains multiple orderly somatotopic maps of the fingers, both across digits (Maldjian et al., 1999, Martuzzi et al., 2014, Sanchez-Panchuelo et al., 2010) and within digits (Sanchez-Panchuelo et al., 2012).

Human neuroimaging studies have also investigated the influence of attention in somatosensory cortex finding that attention modulates activity in a number of cortical areas, including early somatosensory cortex (Burton and Sinclair, 2000). For example, using PET it has been shown that attention to tactile information modulates activity in S1 (Meyer et al., 1991, Roland, 1981). Supporting these findings, studies using fMRI have shown that Blood Oxygenation Level Dependent (BOLD) signals elicited in S1 are greater for attended compared to actively ignored (Sterr et al., 2007) or passively experienced (Nelson et al., 2004) tactile stimulation. Although this work has provided clear evidence that attentional modulation occurs at regions of somatotopically organized cortex, these measurements have been rather limited, considering only a single finger, or toe (Johansen-Berg et al., 2000). The limited nature of the measurements in the studies reporting attentional modulation in S1 along with the fact that there have been other studies that have failed to demonstrate robust modulation in S1 during active attention to somatosensory information (Backes et al., 2000, Mima et al., 1998) highlight the need for additional investigation.

Here we show that attending to tactile stimulation does indeed modulate somatotopically appropriate regions in S1 and that using high-resolution fMRI allows these effects to be measured at the spatial scale necessary to resolve modulation associated with attending to each individual fingertip. The fact that attention is able to differentially modulate neuronal responses when attending to individual fingertips is in line with known, touch-related behavioral abilities of humans that require individuation of sensory information at each fingertip such as haptic exploration and tactile object recognition (Lederman and Klatzky, 2009). Moreover, the ability to measure this attention-related modulation in awake and behaving humans promises a better understanding of the neural basis of attentional processes and how they influence our perception of somatosensory information.

Section snippets

Subjects

Six, right-handed subjects (23–31 years, mean 27 years) with no history of neurological or psychiatric diseases completed the experiment. A partial dataset was collected on a seventh subject; however, issues with the MRI scanner prevented collection of half of the functional data as well as the anatomical data. As such, the analysis of this data is only included as supplementary material. The experiment was conducted with the understanding and written consent of each subject and was approved by

Results

As expected, the sensory condition elicited phasic BOLD activation along the post-central gyrus in all subjects. This can be seen in the Fig. 2 sensory activation maps, in which a patch of cortex along the post-central gyrus is marked by a strong degree of correlation. The attention condition was also found to elicit phasic BOLD activation along the post-central gyrus (Fig. 2, attention condition activation maps) in all subjects showing that the experimental design permitted the measurement of

Discussion

This study used high-resolution fMRI and a novel experimental design to demonstrate that attending to tactile stimulation modulates somatotopically appropriate regions in S1. In each subject, both vibrotactile stimulation of the fingertips and endogenous attention to vibrotactile stimulation of the fingertips modulated the BOLD response along the post-central gyrus. Although reflecting different processes (i.e. sensory-driven vs. attention-related), the BOLD modulation was strikingly similar

Conclusion

Recent advances in fMRI, particularly accelerated image acquisition and ultra-high field (7T), have enabled high-resolution measurements and thus have provided the capability to non-invasively study the organization and function of smaller cortical areas. Here we showed that high-resolution fMRI at 7T can be used to access and measure neural correlates of attention to individual fingertips in the primary somatosensory cortex of individual subjects. Using a phase-encoded design, we showed that

Acknowledgments

We thank Aiman Al-Najjar, Nicole Atcheson, and Steffen Bollmann for help with data collection, and the authors acknowledge the facilities of the National Imaging Facility (NIF) at the Centre for Advanced Imaging, University of Queensland. This work was supported by the National Health and Medical Research Council (APP 1088419). M.B. acknowledges funding from Australian Research Council Future Fellowship grant FT140100865, and S.B. acknowledges support through the Australian Government Research

References (71)

  • J.A. Maldjian et al.

    The sensory somatotopic map of the human hand demonstrated at 4 Tesla

    Neuroimage

    (1999)
  • J.P. Marques et al.

    MP2RAGE, a self bias-field corrected sequence for improved segmentation and T1-mapping at high field

    Neuroimage

    (2010)
  • A.J. Nelson et al.

    Activation in SI and SII: the influence of vibrotactile amplitude during passive and task-relevant stimulation

    Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res.

    (2004)
  • B.A. Poser et al.

    Three dimensional echo-planar imaging at 7 Tesla

    Neuroimage

    (2010)
  • Z.S. Saad et al.

    Estimation of FMRI response delays

    Neuroimage

    (2003)
  • Z.S. Saad et al.

    Suma

    Neuroimage

    (2012)
  • H.P. Saal et al.

    Touch is a team effort: interplay of submodalities in cutaneous sensibility

    Trends Neurosci.

    (2014)
  • R.M. Sanchez-Panchuelo et al.

    Regional structural differences across functionally parcellated Brodmann areas of human primary somatosensory cortex

    Neuroimage

    (2014)
  • R. Schweizer et al.

    Finger representations in human primary somatosensory cortex as revealed by high-resolution functional MRI of tactile stimulation

    Neuroimage

    (2008)
  • R.B. Tootell et al.

    The retinotopy of visual spatial attention

    Neuron

    (1998)
  • P.A. Bandettini

    MRI Studies of Brain Activation: Temporal Characteristics. Functional MRI of the Brain. Berkeley

    (1993)
  • P. Berens

    CircStat: a MATLAB toolbox for circular statistics

    J. Stat. Softw.

    (2009)
  • J. Besle et al.

    Single-subject fMRI mapping at 7 T of the representation of fingertips in S1: a comparison of event-related and phase-encoding designs

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (2013)
  • J. Besle et al.

    Event-related fMRI at 7T reveals overlapping cortical representations for adjacent fingertips in S1 of individual subjects

    Hum. Brain Mapp.

    (2014)
  • S.J. Blakemore et al.

    Somatosensory activations during the observation of touch and a case of vision-touch synaesthesia

    Brain

    (2005)
  • F. Blankenburg et al.

    Evidence for a rostral-to-caudal somatotopic organization in human primary somatosensory cortex with mirror-reversal in areas 3b and 1

    Cereb. Cortex

    (2003)
  • F.A. Breuer et al.

    Controlled aliasing in volumetric parallel imaging (2D CAIPIRINHA)

    Magn. Reson Med.

    (2006)
  • K. Brodmann

    Vergleichende Lokalisationslehre der Großhirnrinde

    (1909)
  • H. Burton et al.

    Attending to and remembering tactile stimuli: a review of brain imaging data and single-neuron responses

    J. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (2000)
  • A.M. Dale et al.

    Improved localization of cortical activity by combining EEG and MEG with MRI cortical surface reconstruction: a linear approach

    J. Cogn. Neurosci.

    (1993)
  • E.A. DeYoe et al.

    Mapping striate and extrastriate visual areas in human cerebral cortex

    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A.

    (1996)
  • W.C. Drevets et al.

    Blood flow changes in human somatosensory cortex during anticipated stimulation

    Nature

    (1995)
  • J. Driver

    A selective review of selective attention research from the past century

    Br. J. Psychol.

    (2001)
  • S.A. Engel et al.

    fMRI of human visual cortex

    Nature

    (1994)
  • P.T. Fox et al.

    Mapping human somatosensory cortex with positron emission tomography

    J. Neurosurg.

    (1987)
  • Cited by (37)

    • New acquisition techniques and their prospects for the achievable resolution of fMRI

      2021, Progress in Neurobiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The examples discussed above highlight the small voxel volumes that can be achieved with various techniques. However, the substantial reduction in SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio at these resolutions, especially when surface coils are not available, means that in practice 2D and 3D EPI sequences with more moderate voxel volumes between 1 μl (13 mm3) and 500 nl (0.83 mm3) are used (Finn et al., 2019; Huber et al., 2020b; Koizumi et al., 2019; Lawrence et al., 2019; Lewis et al., 2018; Moerel et al., 2019; Nasr et al., 2016; Puckett et al., 2017; Qian et al., 2020). Spiral acquisitions (Barth et al., 1999; Engel et al., 2018; Glover, 2012; Graedel et al., 2020; Kashyap et al., 2020; Kasper et al., 2020; Liberman and Poser, 2019; Ress et al., 2007) and radial readout schemes (Graedel et al., 2017; Lee et al., 2010) hold promise to improve resolution further by optimising the efficiency of the readout.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text