When Wireless Crowd Charging Meets Online Social Networks: A Vision for Socially Motivated Energy Sharing

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.osnem.2020.100069Get rights and content

Abstract

Individual users of a social crowd are bound by finite resource capacity. Other users (such as online friends) may have surplus capacity or resources that, if shared, could be used to meet fluctuating demand. A particularly important resource in modern societies is the energy supplies of mobile portable devices like smartphones; quick energy depletion is an everyday problem in the lives of billions of smartphone users worldwide. Peer-to-peer wireless crowd charging has recently emerged as an alternative energy replenishment option. Although there have been some recent advances on this type of wireless energy sharing, to the best of our knowledge, none of the related works has considered using online social network information as input. In this paper, for the first time in the state of the art, we introduce the vision of socially motivated wireless energy sharing and we provide a holistic framework for socially aware wireless crowd charging. We present a taxonomy of the existing representative use cases, and we define a model which takes into account not only the wireless power transfer specifics, but also the online social information. After having selected a target use case (balanced crowd energy efficiency), we design two socially aware wireless energy sharing protocols. The design of each protocol is inspired by the social topology and structural characteristics of diverse datasets of online social relationships among real users. In fact, aligning to studies on psychology which conclude that users typically favor friends over strangers in allocating resources (especially when the sharing task is costly), our protocols favor energy exchanges among friends or friendly groups. For the purposes of the protocol evaluation, we simulate the energy sharing interactions based on the user encounters, as reported in the datasets. In order to demonstrate the effects of the social component, we compare the performance of our protocols to the performance of another state of the art protocol that does not use online social information. Interestingly enough, we demonstrate that online social network information can indeed influence the selected use case, in terms of energy losses, as well as level of and time elapsed until a balanced energy distribution in the crowd. We conclude the paper by providing some interesting open research directions.

Introduction

Digital relationships between individuals are becoming as important as their real world counterparts. For many people, online social networks and media provide a primary means of bonding and communication between friends, family, and coworkers. Like any community, individual users of a social network are bound by finite capacity and limited capabilities. In many cases however, other members (such as online friends) may have surplus capacity or resources that, if shared, could be used to meet fluctuating demand [2].

A particularly important resource in modern societies is the energy supplies of mobile portable devices, like smartphones [3]. As such devices (which often combine a phone, camera, music player and personal organizer) become more powerful, they are consuming more power and battery technology is not keeping pace. Unfortunately, the residual energy supplies of these smart devices and applications are limited and dependent on their battery power, which directly effects their usability. Google announced in May 2019, that it had activated over 2.5 billion Android devices [4]. Moreover, a recent survey of 1000 users, conducted by the research company GMI, showed that 89% rated long battery life as an “important” factor when buying a new smartphone - long battery life rated higher than all other features [5]. Finally, with the introduction of newer, sophisticated mobile applications and increased phone usage habits, users expect a high impact on their battery lifetime. For example, taking into account practical reports, depending on the mobile applications used, battery lifetime could be reduced from 24 hours (crowdsensing [6]) to 12 hours (GPS [7]), or even 2.5 hours (mobile gateway [8]). Consequently, quick energy depletion is an everyday problem in the lives of billions of smartphone users worldwide; users who are required to charge their smartphones frequently to keep them operational.

Wired charging, although efficient and robust, can many times be unavailable due to the high mobility of everyday users. Wireless charging has recently emerged as an alternative energy replenishment option in various types of networked environments [9], with the greatest mobile device manufacturers already adopting suitable wireless charging standards, such as the inductive charging standard Qi [10]. Among the various methods to implement wireless charging in crowds of mobile device users, the recent concept of peer-to-peer wireless energy sharing1 [11], [12] has been gaining more and more attention lately. In the wireless energy sharing paradigm, users from the crowd carry mobile devices like smartphones which are equipped with a power transmitter and a power receiver, and are able to wirelessly share (transmit and receive) energy with other mobile devices in the surroundings. Due to the technological constraints of the current wireless power transfer technology, two mobile devices need to be within a sufficient proximity in order to effectively exchange energy. Wireless energy sharing can be implemented using either far- [13], [14] or near- [15], [16] field technologies. In the far-field case, using electromagnetic signals, the same antenna, designed to exploit its far-field properties for communication purposes, can be suitably configured for simultaneously realizing wireless power transfer via its near-field properties. In the near-field case, using inductive coupling with transmitting and receiving coils, we can achieve higher power transmission efficiency and avoid RF exposure.

As recent studies in the wireless energy sharing paradigm [17], [18] have theoretically and experimentally demonstrated, having even limited knowledge on the crowd properties, can be crucial for the energy conservation of the devices in the crowd. On the contrary, not using any knowledge at all about network structure properties, efficient energy distributions among the users cannot be achieved in a timely manner, which means that energy sharing might experience high energy losses during the energy redistribution process. Energy balancing can provide efficient utilization of scarce energy in mobile social networks and can prolong the network lifetime, as noted in the recent state-of-the-art survey [19]. Distributing energy such that each node in the network has access to similar level of energy or energy proportional to its weight (e.g., importance in the network) can be thought of a fair way of collaboration among mobile users in efficient utilization of the energy resources. For this reason, it is desirable to “fairly” replenish energy to the requested users such that as many users as possible are satisfied [20]. Otherwise, some users with sufficiently residual energy will be fully charged while others with barely left energy will miss the charging opportunities and run out of their energy very soon. Consequently, it is highly beneficial for the related use cases to employ smart ways of distributing energy by exploiting existing network information.

A key characteristic of such crowds of mobile device users is their involvement in online social networks and media. The widespread diffusion of such networks has given unforeseen opportunities to their users to share contents and mutually interact [21]. Social network research has begun to take advantage of fine-grained communications regarding coordination, decision-making, and knowledge sharing [22]. As relationships within online social networks are at least partly based on real-world relationships, we can use them to infer a level of trust that underpins and transcends the online community in which they exist [2].

An interesting way of understanding how the resource sharing among users is established emerges from various studies in the domain of psychology. In particular, in the physical realm, studies in the field of social psychology traditionally suggest that simple reciprocal interactions are a potent trigger of altruism for human users, and that those interactions lead them to believe that their relationships are characterized by mutual care and commitment [23]. Evolutionary psychology suggests that such behavior is primarily the product of adaptations for reciprocal altruism, dependent on the degree of relatedness and exchange of benefits [24]. More specifically, within the context of resource allocation, numerous studies have explored various ages at which humans begin to demonstrate sharing and helping behavior [25]. A consistent finding among those studies is that, in the context of economic games, humans typically favor friends over strangers in allocating resources, especially when the sharing task is costly. In other words, the global organization of many socially networked groups is constituted of communities where people have denser and better interactions with their intra-community members than with the inter-community members [26].

Similar conclusions can be drawn about the reciprocity in the online social realm. There is a certain discrepancy between the concept of friendship in the physical realm (e.g., inner circle in Dunbar’s theory), and friendship in virtual life: Sometimes people share friendships on social networks even if they do not know each other. However, the analysis of [27], indicates that online communities have very similar structural characteristics to offline face-to-face networks. In particular, it confirms the existence of the layered structure of ego-centric social networks, and it identifies the existence of an additional network layer whose existence was only hypothesized in offline social networks. Furthermore, an additional positive verification of the social exchange theory in online communities is provided in [28], where the authors demonstrate strong empirical evidence that an increase in the reciprocity quantity of an online social user increases the reciprocity reactions from his or her imminent online social graph.

Those findings can help us introduce a social dimension in the energy sharing process, by taking advantage of the available online social network information.

Given those involvements, in this paper we suggest the exploitation of online social network information in order to define a socially aware wireless energy sharing framework and better tune the wireless crowd charging process. This suggestion reflects an impressive instance of the cyber-physical convergence concept, i.e., the process whereby the physical realm around us and the virtual realm of the Internet are deeply interwoven, constantly interacting with, and dependent upon, each other [29]. Although there have been some recent relevant works on wireless energy sharing, to the best of our knowledge, none of those works has considered the exploitation of online social network information in order to assist wireless energy sharing operations. Consequently this is the first work in the literature to combine concepts from the diverse fields of wireless energy sharing and online social networks and media. More specifically, our contribution in this paper includes the following:

  • In section 2, we introduce the vision of socially motivated energy sharing. Then, we define the socially aware energy sharing framework and its fundamental components.

  • In section 3, we define the social crowd charging model which takes into account not only the wireless power transfer specifics, but also (for the first time) online social network information. The model is reflecting the framework introduced in section 2 and is consequently abstracting all its fundamental components.

  • In section 4, after having selected a target use case (balanced crowd energy efficiency), we design two socially aware wireless energy sharing protocols. The design of each protocol is inspired by the social topology and structural characteristics of two diverse datasets of online social relationships among users of real crowds. For the purposes of the evaluation, we use the real physical interaction traces of the crowds of users. In particular, we simulate energy sharing interactions based on the user encounters as they are reported in the datasets. In order to demonstrate the effects of the social component of the protocol design on the crowd charging process, we compare their performance to the performance of another state of the art protocol that does not use online social information. Finally, in order to highlight some scalability effects, we simulate the crowd charging process in a larger dataset for significantly more user interactions.

  • In section 2 we present the current state of the art and we derive a taxonomy of the existing use cases for wireless crowd charging.

  • In section 2, we provide some interesting open directions for this new, fascinating field of research.

  • In section 7, we conclude the paper.

Section snippets

A vision of socially motivated wireless energy sharing

The vision of socially motivated wireless energy sharing can be implemented as a holistic framework. In this section, we describe the framework and its fundamental components. The framework introduces a few attractive benefits for the crowd users, most notably the ability to use online social information as input for the energy sharing process. The fundamental components of socially aware wireless energy sharing framework are displayed in Fig. 1.

Socially aware wireless energy sharing is

The social crowd charging model

In this section we define the social crowd charging model that we use in this paper in order to design our wireless energy sharing protocols. As shown on the left side of the visual representation of the framework in Fig. 2, we consider three fundamental domains, the device domain, the physical realm, and online social realm. The three domains merge into the socially aware energy sharing model, shown on the right side of Fig. 2, as follows. We consider a crowd of n mobile users N={u1,u2,...,un},

How social information can influence crowd charging

In this section we examine two diverse datasets of user encounters and related online social information. In order to demonstrate how online social network information can affect the design and the performance of crowd charging protocols, we design two new, socially aware, wireless crowd charging protocols, and we compare their performance to the performance of another (non-social) protocol from the state of the art, which targets at addressing the same use case.

State of the art and use case families

Contrary to the socially motivated approach introduced in the current paper, the related literature, although quite mature already, focuses on protocol design for various crowd charging use cases, without any social components. This literature is nevertheless an interesting starting point for identifying the existing use cases and define their target objectives. A taxonomy of the use cases for wireless crowd charging can be found in table 3. Note that the table is split in two parts. In the

Future directions

Interesting research challenges still remain open in this emerging field.

  • A deeper investigation could be achieved by using datasets which take into account the amount of time spent for each user encounter, thus providing a more realistic user interaction and crowd charging model. Also, the datasets can be examined for longer periods of encounters, so as to demonstrate the impact of the crowd charging process in the longer term. Finally, advanced interaction protocols can be designed by taking

Conclusion

Among the various methods for energy replenishment of battery powered devices like smartphones, the recent paradigm of wireless crowd charging has been gaining more and more attention. Having even limited knowledge on the crowd network properties can be crucial for the crowd energy conservation protocol design. This work is a first attempt to demonstrate that fueling protocol design with social network information can influence the performance of wireless crowd charging, especially with respect

Declaration of Competing Interest

  • All authors have participated in (a) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final version.

  • This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue.

  • The authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript

References (64)

  • S. Nikoletseas et al.

    Decentralizing and adding portability to an iot test-bed through smartphones

    2014 IEEE International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems

    (2014)
  • A. Al-Heeti, Android is on over 2.5 billion active devices, 2019,...
  • X. Chen et al.

    Smartphone energy drain in the wild: Analysis and implications

    SIGMETRICS Perform. Eval. Rev.

    (2015)
  • P. Foremski et al.

    Energy-efficient crowdsensing of human mobility and signal levels in cellular networks

    Sensors

    (2015)
  • T.O. Oshin et al.

    Improving the energy-efficiency of gps based location sensing smartphone applications

    2012 IEEE 11th International Conference on Trust, Security and Privacy in Computing and Communications

    (2012)
  • G. Aloi et al.

    Enabling iot interoperability through opportunistic smartphone-based mobile gateways

    Journal of Network and Computer Applications

    (2017)
  • C. Angelopoulos et al.

    Improving sensor network performance with wireless energy transfer

    International Journal of Ad Hoc and Ubiquitous Computing

    (2015)
  • Wireless Power Consortium, The Qi standard, 2019,...
  • P. Worgan et al.

    Mobile Energy Sharing Futures

    Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct

    (2016)
  • M.D. Prete et al.

    Exploitation of a dual-band cell phone antenna for near-field WPT

    2015 IEEE Wireless Power Transfer Conference (WPTC)

    (2015)
  • T. Le et al.

    Efficient Far-Field Radio Frequency Energy Harvesting for Passively Powered Sensor Networks

    IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits

    (2008)
  • A. Kurs et al.

    Wireless Power Transfer via Strongly Coupled Magnetic Resonances

    Science

    (2007)
  • J. Jadidian et al.

    Magnetic MIMO: How to Charge Your Phone in Your Pocket

    Proceedings of the 20th Annual International Conference on Mobile Computing and Networking

    (2014)
  • E. Bulut et al.

    Opportunistic wireless charging for mobile social and sensor networks

    2014 IEEE Globecom Workshops (GC Wkshps)

    (2014)
  • A. Madhja et al.

    Peer-to-Peer Energy-Aware Tree Network Formation

    Proceedings of the 16th ACM International Symposium on Mobility Management and Wireless Access

    (2018)
  • A. Dhungana et al.

    Peer-to-peer energy sharing in mobile networks: Applications, challenges, and open problems

    Ad Hoc Networks

    (2020)
  • W. Xu et al.

    Maximizing charging satisfaction of smartphone users via wireless energy transfer

    IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing

    (2017)
  • B. Guidi et al.

    Managing social contents in Decentralized Online Social Networks: A survey

    Online Social Networks and Media

    (2018)
  • D.M. Romero et al.

    Social networks under stress: Specialized team roles and their communication structure

    ACM Trans. Web

    (2019)
  • R. Cortes Barragan et al.

    Rethinking natural altruism: Simple reciprocal interactions trigger children’s benevolence

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

    (2014)
  • H.J. Lu et al.

    Resource allocation to kin, friends, and strangers by 3- to 6-year-old children

    Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

    (2016)
  • R. Dunbar et al.

    The structure of online social networks mirrors those in the offline world

    Social Networks

    (2015)
  • Cited by (0)

    A preliminary version of this paper was presented in the 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing in Sensor Systems (DCOSS 2019) [1]

    View full text