Elsevier

Pattern Recognition Letters

Volume 28, Issue 1, 1 January 2007, Pages 166-172
Pattern Recognition Letters

Phase congruence measurement for image similarity assessment

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2006.06.019Get rights and content

Abstract

In the performance assessment of an image processing algorithm, an image is often compared with an available reference. Measuring image similarity can be achieved in many ways; comparison algorithm varies from pixel-based mean square error method to structure-based image quality index. In this paper, we present a new feature-based approach that utilizes image phase congruency measurement to quantify the assessment of the similarities or differences between two images. Test results with standard images and industrial inspection images are presented.

Introduction

The assessment of an image can be carried out by comparing it with a reference image, which is assumed to be perfect for a particular application. Usually, such comparison is implemented on pixel-based operations, like mean square error (MSE) or root mean square error (RMSE). However, such operations’ performance is questionable because the same MSE or RMSE value does not always assure a comparable image similarity under different distortion to perceptually significant features (Paolo, 1998).

According to Wilson et al. (1997), there are three major methods for comparing images: human perception, objective measures based on theoretical models, and subjective measures defined mathematically. In their publication (Wilson et al., 1997), they used a distance measure of two sets of pixels to characterize the numerical difference between two images. Metrics for binary image (Δb) and gray-scale image (Δg) comparison were developed. Lees and Henshaw (1986) used a phase-only approach for printed circuit board (PCB) inspection. The phase-only imaging has the advantages of being light intensity invariant, insensitive to illumination gradients, and tolerant to misregistration. Lorenzetoo and Kovesi proposed to compute phase difference between images using Gabor filters (Leronzetto and Kovesi, 1999). One strength of this algorithm resides in its ability to discriminate simple translation from distortion.

In practical applications, some post-processing operations largely depends on the availability of image features. Operations, like classification, segmentation, and quantification, are often carried out in a feature space. Therefore, the availability of image features plays an important role for further analysis. This paper proposes a new feature-based method to quantitatively assess image similarity by employing the phase congruency measurement suggested by Kovesi, 2000, Kovesi, 1996. Phase congruency provides an absolute measure of image features such as step edges, lines and Mach bands; it is viewing condition-independent and invariant to changes in illumination and magnification. A local cross-correlation of the phase congruence map can then be calculated between a processed image and a reference image. The averaged cross-correlation value provides a quantitative assessment of the overall image similarity. Experiments are carried out on some standard images and on nondestructive inspection images.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows: in Section 2, a brief review of current available techniques is presented. Then, the proposed feature-based metric is described. Experimental results are demonstrated in Section 3. Finally Section 4 is a conclusion.

Section snippets

Relevant works

There are a number of metrics available for image comparison. The commonly used approaches include root mean square error (RMSE), normalized least-square error (NLSE), peak signal to noise ration (PSNR), and correlation (CORR). The definition of these metrics mentioned above are given in Eqs. (1), (2), (3), (4) in which R(x, y) and I(x, y) stand for the reference and target image respectively and L is the maximum pixel value; the size of the images is M × N. These methods are widely used because

Comparison with a reference image

An experiment involving different degraded versions of a source image has been performed. The resulting images were transformed such to result in an identical root mean square error (RMSE) although they differ in appearance. In these various processes, the original image is contaminated by salt-pepper noise, Gaussian noise, speckle noise, mean shifting, contrast stretching, blurring operation, and JPEG compressing respectively. Besides the RMSE, a group of metrics are also computed for

Conclusion

In this paper, a new feature-based metric for image comparison was proposed. It is based on phase congruency features that are locally correlated and from which a global similarity measure is obtained. The effectiveness of this metric has been investigated through different experiments with standard images and NDE images. The measure is invariant to changes in image contrast or in illumination and exhibits good sensitivity to various image distortion categories.

Comparisons with different

References (14)

  • M.C. Morrone et al.

    Feature detection from local energy

    Pattern Recognition Lett.

    (1987)
  • Kovesi, P., 1996. Invariant measures of image features from phase information, Ph.D. thesis, University of Western...
  • P. Kovesi

    Phase congruency: A low-level image invariant

    Psychol. Res.

    (2000)
  • Kubota, T., 1995. Orientational filters for real–time computer vision problems, Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of...
  • Lees, D.E.B., Henshaw, P.D., 1986. Printed circuit board inspection – a novel approach. In: Proc. SPIE (Automated...
  • Lepine, B.A., Giguere, J.S.R., Forsyth, D.S., Dubois, J.M.S., Chahbaz, A., 2001. Applying pulsed eddy current NDI to...
  • Leronzetto, G.P., Kovesi, P., 1999. A phase based image comparison technique. In: Proc. DICTA, Western...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text