Review
Cognitive radio technology: From distributed spectrum coordination to adaptive network collaboration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmcj.2008.01.004Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents an integrated view of cognitive radio technologies for efficient wireless services in dense spectrum environments. The rationale for cognitive radio based systems is discussed, leading to an identification of the available design space that ranges from reactive interference avoidance to spectrum etiquette and eventually network collaboration. After reviewing prior work in the dynamic spectrum area, a specific distributed spectrum etiquette protocol called “common spectrum coordination channel (CSCC)” is introduced. Performance gains achieved with CSCC relative to simpler reactive time/frequency/power control algorithms are evaluated for example in WiFi/Bluetooth and WiFi/WiMax co-existence scenarios. The next level of system performance can be achieved through opportunistic collaboration between radios to form ad hoc multi-hop networks in which neighboring nodes associate with each other at high bit-rate and low power. Adaptive wireless networks of this type will require new protocol architectures which integrate flexible PHY/MAC and cross-layer capabilities with ad hoc network discovery and multi-hop routing. A specific “CogNet” protocol architecture based on the concept of a “global control plane (GCP)” is described. Major CogNet protocol modules for bootstrapping, discovery, data path setup and naming/addressing are outlined, and representative ns-2 simulation results are provided for validation. In conclusion, the paper gives a preview of the network-centric WiNC2R prototype under development at WINLAB as an experimental cognitive radio platform.

Introduction

Recent “Moore’s law” advances in programmable integrated circuits have created an opportunity to develop a new class of intelligent or “cognitive” radios [1], [2], [3], [4] which can adapt to a wide variety of radio interference conditions and multiple protocol standards for collaboration between otherwise incompatible systems. Such a cognitive radio would be capable of very dynamic physical layer adaptation via scanning of available spectrum, selection from a wide range of operating frequencies (possibly non-contiguous), rapid adjustment of modulation waveforms and adaptive power control. In addition, a suitably designed cognitive radio with a software-defined physical layer would be capable of collaborating with neighboring radios to ameliorate interference using higher-layer protocols. These higher-layer coordination protocols could range from multi-node signal combining and coding methods to etiquette mechanisms all the way to fully collaborative multi-hop forwarding between radio nodes. Thus, suitably designed cognitive radios have the potential for creating a next-generation adaptive wireless network, [5] in which a single universal radio device is capable of operating in a variety of spectrum allocation and interference conditions by selecting appropriate physical and network layer parameters often in collaboration with other radios operating in the same region. Such a “cognitive network” will lead to increased network capacity and user performance. Perhaps for the first time in the short history of networking, cognitive radios offer the potential for organic formation of infrastructure-less collaborative network clusters with dynamic adaptation at every layer of the protocol stack including physical, link and network layers [6], [7].

While the development of cognitive radio hardware and software, especially at the physical layer, has received considerable attention, the question of how one transforms a set of cognitive radios into a cognitive network is much less well understood, and there is a lack of research on protocols for cognitive radio networks in the community. As such, adaptive networks of cognitive radios represent an important but demanding research challenge for both the wireless and networking communities. The extreme flexibility of cognitive radios has significant implications for the design of network algorithms and protocols at both local/access network and global internetworking levels. In particular, support for cross-layer algorithms which adapt to changes in physical link quality, radio interference, radio node density, network topology or traffic demand may be expected to require an advanced control and management framework with support for cross-layer information and inter-node collaboration. At the wireless local-area network level, an important technical challenge is that of distributing and managing this inter-node and cross-layer information than using this control information to design stable adaptive networking algorithms that are not overly complex. At the global internetworking level, clusters of cognitive radios represent a new category of access network that needs to be interfaced efficiently with the wired network infrastructure both in terms of control and data. End-to-end architecture issues of importance include naming and addressing consistent with the needs of self-organizing network clusters, as well as the definition of sufficiently aggregated control and management interfaces between cognitive radio networks and the global Internet [8].

This paper presents an integrated view of cognitive radio technology as it evolves from autonomous interference avoidance methods to explicit spectrum etiquette protocols and eventually to adaptive wireless networks of collaborating radios. We start with a discussion of the rationale for cognitive radios, leading to an identification of the available design space defined in terms of hardware capabilities and protocol complexity. Different levels of spectrum coordination methods will be introduced, ranging from autonomous reactive control [9] of radio parameters (time/frequency/power) to more complex proactive coordination schemes [10] based on explicit spectrum etiquette protocols, which define rules or “etiquettes” for how to utilize and share spectrum resources between wireless devices by allowing them to exchange appropriate messages and parameters. The protocol called “common spectrum coordination channel (CSCC)” [11] is proposed as a specific spectrum etiquette solution, and is evaluated using example WiFi/Bluetooth and WiFi/WiMax co-existence scenarios. The next step up from spectrum etiquette is the concept of collaborative networks of cognitive radios, an approach which may be expected to provide significant performance gains in dense usage scenarios. In a collaborative adaptive wireless network, radio nodes avoid interference at the PHY and MAC layers by opportunistically forming or joining an ad hoc network which carries data packets (at relatively high speed and low power) over multiple radio hops. A specific protocol architecture (“CogNet”) [12] based on the concept of a cleanly separated “global control plane (GCP)” [13] is introduced as a candidate architecture for these adaptive wireless networks. The GCP supports spectrum coordination, PHY/MAC adaptation, ad hoc network discovery and cross-layer routing requirements which arise in a general adaptive wireless network scenario. This paper will provide design and validation results for a baseline CogNet protocol design that includes node bootstrapping, discovery, addressing and routing.

Another aspect of importance for the development of cognitive radio networks is the platform technology in terms of both hardware and software. A number of cognitive radio platform development projects are under way in the research community, including the Vanu SDR [14], WARP [15], KU Radio [16], WiNC2R [17] and GNU USRP [18] boards. The WINLAB network-centric cognitive radio (WiNC2R) architecture is aimed at providing a high-performance platform for experimentation with various adaptive wireless network protocols ranging from simple etiquettes to more complex ad hoc collaboration. The WiNC2R board is differentiated from other cognitive radio projects in the sense that the design uses hardware accelerators to achieve programmability and high performance at each layer of the protocol stack. We will present the results of prototype development in progress to give an idea of representative hardware architecture and implementation issues that arise in this emerging field.

The following sections provide more detail on each of the topics outlined above. Section 2 discusses the spectrum coordination problem and alternative reactive and proactive etiquette protocol based solutions. Section 3 describes a specific CogNet protocol architecture for cognitive radio networks along with some validation results. Finally, the WiNC2R hardware platform under development is briefly outlined in Section 4. Concluding remarks and future work are given in Section 5.

Section snippets

Cognitive radio design space

One of the important goals of designing cognitive radio is to improve the spectrum sharing efficiency. Notable approaches for spectrum sharing have been discussed in the technical and regulatory communities, including property rights regimes [19], [20], [21], [22], spectrum clearinghouse [23], unlicensed bands with simple spectrum etiquette [24], [25], open access [26], [27], [28], [29] and cognitive radio. The cognitive radio principles currently under consideration by the FCC and the research

Architectural considerations

As discussed earlier, collaborative networks of cognitive radios have the potential of achieving significantly higher performance relative to the reactive or proactive spectrum etiquette protocol approaches discussed in Section 2. In particular, such networks reduce spectral interference by encouraging high-speed/low-power transmissions to nearby radio nodes, with collaborative multi-hop forwarding of packets to their desired destination.

Cognitive radio networks have a number of new and

Cognitive radio platforms

A number of software-defined radio (SDR) and cognitive radio (CR) hardware design and prototyping projects have been reported in the past few years. These include the Vanu software-defined radio [14], the WARP programmable radio from Rice University [15], the KU Radio from University of Kansas [16], and the GNU/USRP board from Blossom Research [18], [66]. Common to all these platforms is their implementation flexibility, which enables interoperability, upgradeability and future-proofing.

Conclusions and future work

Cognitive radio technology has the potential to dramatically improve spectral efficiency and performance in the next generation of wireless networks. We have identified the design space for cognitive radios as ranging from simple reactive algorithms to proactive spectrum etiquettes and finally to collaborative adaptive wireless networks. A “common spectrum coordination channel (CSCC)” approach is proposed as a mechanism to enable efficient spectrum etiquettes, and we have shown that CSCC-based

Dipankar Raychaudhuri is Professor, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department and Director, WINLAB (Wireless Information Network Lab) at Rutgers University. As WINLAB’s Director, he is responsible for a cooperative industry–university research center with focus on next-generation wireless technologies. WINLAB’s current research scope includes topics such as RF/sensor devices, UWB, spectrum management, future 3G and WLAN systems, ad hoc networks and pervasive computing. He has previously held

References (68)

  • J. Mitola III., Cognitive radio: an integrated agent architecture for software radio, Ph.D. Thesis, Royal Institute of...
  • G. Maguire et al.

    Cognitive radio: Making pcs personal

    IEEE PCS Magazine

    (1999)
  • FCC Notice of Inquiry, In the matter of additional spectrum for unlicensed below 900 MHz and in the 3 GHz band, ET...
  • FCC 03-322 NPRM on Cognitive Radio....
  • D. Raychaudhuri, Adaptive wireless networks using cognitive radios as a building block, MobiCom 2004 Keynote Speech,...
  • A. Lippman, D. Reed, Viral communications, MIT Media Laboratory Research....
  • A. Bletsas, A. Lippman, Efficient collaborative (Viral) communication in OFDM based WLANs in: IEEE/ITS International...
  • D. Raychaudhuri, M. Gerla, New architectures and disruptive technologies for the future internet: The wireless, mobile...
  • X Jing, S Mau, D. Raychaudhuri, R. Matyas, Reactive cognitive radio algorithms for co-existence between IEEE 802.11b...
  • X Jing, D. Raychaudhuri, Spectrum co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a networks using the CSCC etiquette protocol,...
  • D. Raychaudhuri, X. Jing, A spectrum etiquette protocol for efficient coordination of radio devices in unlicensed...
  • D. Raychaudhuri, N.B. Mandayam, J.B. Evans, B.J. Ewy, S. Seshan, P. Steenkiste, CogNet — An architectural foundation...
  • X. Jing, D. Raychaudhuri, Global control plane architecture for cognitive radio networks, in: Proc. of IEEE CogNet’07...
  • Vanu Software Radio....
  • Wireless Open-access Research Platform (WARP)....
  • KU Agile radio....
  • I. Seskar, X. Jing, K. Le, Z. Miljanic, D. Raychaudhuri, E. Blossom, Design and prototyping of an experimental...
  • GNU Radio Project....
  • G.G. Stevenson

    Common Property Economics: A General Theory and Land Use Applications

    (1991)
  • A. De Vany

    Property rights in electromagnetic spectrum

  • E. Ostrom

    Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action

    (1990)
  • G. Faulhaber, D. Farber, Spectrum management: Property rights, markets and the commons, in: Proc. of the...
  • Y. Benkler

    Some economics of wireless communications

    Harvard Journal of Law and Technology

    (2002)
  • D. Satapathy, J.M. Peha, Etiquette modification for unlicensed spectrum: Approach and impact, in: Proc. of the IEEE...
  • M. Buddhikot, P. Kolodzy, S. Miller, K. Ryan, J. Evans, DIMSUMNet: New directions in wireless networking using...
  • T.W. Hazlett

    Spectrum flash dance: Eli Noam’s proposals for “open access” to radio waves

    Journal of Law and Economics

    (1998)
  • Y. Benkler

    Overcoming agoraphobia: Building the commons of the digitally networked environment

    Harvard Journal of Law and Technology

    (1998)
  • T.W. Hazlett, The wireless craze, the unlimited bandwidth myth, the spectrum auction faux-pas, and the punchline to...
  • G. Rosston, et al., Comments of 37 concerned economists, In Submitted to the U.S. Federal Communications Commission In...
  • Kiran Challapali, Stefan Mangold, Zhun Zhong, Spectrum agile radio: Detecting spectrum opportunities, in: 6th Annual...
  • X. Jing et al.

    Spectrum Co-existence of IEEE 802.11b and 802.16a Networks using Reactive and Proactive Etiquette Policies

    ACM Journal of Mobile Networks and Applications

    (2006)
  • IEEE International Symposium on Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks....
  • ACM/Springer Mobile Networks and Applications (MONET) Special Issue on “Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and...
  • IET Communications Special Issue on Cognitive Spectrum Access....
  • Cited by (18)

    • Stochastic backlog and delay bounds of generic rate-based AIMD congestion control scheme in cognitive radio sensor networks

      2015, Pervasive and Mobile Computing
      Citation Excerpt :

      Inefficient usage of spectrum in traditional wireless networks has lead to use of dynamic spectrum access (DSA) solutions. Cognitive radio (CR) technology is a capable tool to provide DSA and significantly improve performance and spectral efficiency in the next generation wireless networks [1]. A wireless network with CR-equipped nodes is called a cognitive radio network (CRN) [2].

    • Implications of dynamic spectrum management for regulation

      2015, Telecommunications Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Several authors highlight the benefits of a spectrum regime that includes tradability of rights and higher flexibility in interference management (Cave & Webb, 2012; Freyens, 2009; Ting et al., 2005). Other researchers study how DSM may increase spectrum efficiency (Attar, Ghorashi, Sooriyabandara, & Aghvami, 2008; Crocioni & Franzoni, 2011; Freyens & Yerokhin, 2011; Raychaudhuri, Jing, Seskar, Le, & Evans, 2008), the feasibility of different business scenarios for DSM (Grønsund, Grøndalen, & Lähteenoja, 2013; Sayrac, Uryga, Bocquet, Cordier, & Grimoud, 2013) and the importance of regulation and standardization (Baldini et al., 2013; Durantini & Martino, 2013). Interference management has been until the date either too restrictive, such as in an exclusive regime which allows no other operators to interfere, or too relaxed, such as in a commons regime in which interference precludes assuring quality of service (QoS).

    • Spectrum coordination for intelligent wireless Internet of Things networks

      2018, 2017 25th Telecommunications Forum, TELFOR 2017 - Proceedings
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Dipankar Raychaudhuri is Professor, Electrical & Computer Engineering Department and Director, WINLAB (Wireless Information Network Lab) at Rutgers University. As WINLAB’s Director, he is responsible for a cooperative industry–university research center with focus on next-generation wireless technologies. WINLAB’s current research scope includes topics such as RF/sensor devices, UWB, spectrum management, future 3G and WLAN systems, ad hoc networks and pervasive computing. He has previously held progressively responsible corporate R&D positions in the telecom/networking area including: Chief Scientist, Iospan Wireless (2000–01), Assistant General Manager & Dept Head-Systems Architecture, NEC USA C&C Research Laboratories (1993–99) and Head, Broadband Communications Research, Sarnoff Corp (1990–92).

    Dr. Raychaudhuri obtained his B.Tech (Hons) from the Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur in 1976 and the M.S. and Ph.D degrees from SUNY, Stony Brook in 1978, 79. He is a Fellow of the IEEE.

    Xiangpeng Jing received the B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from Peking University, Beijing, PR China in 2000 and the M.E. degree in Electrical Engineering from City College of City University of New York, New York in 2002. He is currently a Ph.D. candidate at WINLAB (Wireless Information Network Laboratory), Rutgers University, NJ. His research interests include spectrum etiquette protocols, co-existence between heterogeneous wireless communication systems, cognitive radio technologies, and adaptive wireless ad hoc networks.

    Ivan Seskar received a B.S. degree in electrical engineering and computer science from the University of Novi Sad, Yugoslavia. and an M.S degree in electrical engineering from Rutgers University. Since 1991 he has been at the Wireless Information Networks Laboratory (WINLAB) at Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, where he is currently senior manager for information and computing. His current research interests include wireless, mobile and ad hoc networks, wireless testbeds, and cognitive radios.

    Khanh Le received the B.S. degree in Electrical Engineering from the Engineering College of Copenhagen, Denmark in 1993 and the M.S. from the Technical University of Denmark in 1997. He is currently a member of WINLAB, Rutgers University research staff, where he is involved in the development of WINLAB Cognitive Radio platform. His area of interests includes, wireless system design, Cognitive Radio Flexible MAC, processor architecture and ASIC/FPGA developments. Prior to joining WINLAB, he held various product development engineering positions in the telecom/networking industry, including: CIENA, Internet Photonics and Sycamore Networks. In this capacity, he participated in the development and deployment of multiple successful product lines. He was also research staff at NEC USA C&C Research Laboratories, and Technical University of Denmark, Center for Broadband Telecommunications.

    Joseph B. Evans is the Deane E. Ackers Distinguished Professor of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science and Director of Research Information Technology at the University of Kansas. He recently served as a Program Director in the Division of Computer & Network Systems in the Directorate for Computer & Information Science & Engineering at the National Science Foundation. His research interests include mobile and wireless networking, pervasive computing systems, high-speed networks, and adaptive computing systems. He has been involved in major national high-performance networking testbeds and broadband wireless mobile networking efforts, and has published over 100 journals and conference works. He has been a researcher at the Olivetti & Oracle Research Laboratory, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory, USAF Rome Laboratories, and AT&T Bell Laboratories. He has been involved in several startups, and was co-founder and member of the board of directors of a network gaming company acquired by Microsoft in 2000. Dr. Evans received his Ph.D. degree from Princeton University in 1989, is a senior member of the IEEE, and a member of the ACM.

    Research supported by NSF grants #0205362, #CNS-0435370 and #CNS-0626740. Manuscript submitted for publication after partial presentation at IEEE PIMRC’03, DySPAN’05 and MobiArch’07.

    View full text