Imperfect repair and lifesaving in heterogeneous populations
Introduction
Most of the papers on reliability and survival analysis deal with the homogeneous case although one can hardly find homogeneous populations in practice. Heterogeneity can introduce new and sometimes unexpected features in reliability analysis when compared with a homogeneous case. It is well known that the (observed) failure rate in a heterogeneous population does not follow the pattern of the subpopulations failure rates. For instance, the mortality rate of a homogeneous human population is approximately an exponentially increasing function (Gompertz law), but recently the deceleration of this increase for old ages was observed. A natural explanation of this fact lies in the population heterogeneity.
In conventional reliability analysis of repairable systems, it was also always assumed that objects to be repaired ‘are chosen’ from a homogeneous population. It turns out, that generalization to the heterogeneous case is straightforward only for the perfect repair. In this case, the process of functioning of an instantaneously repaired item can be, as usually, modeled by the renewal process with a corresponding mixture as a distribution of inter-arrival times.
Even the simplest type of imperfect repair-a minimal repair, complicates modeling to a great extent, which is shown in 2 Homogeneous case, 3 Heterogeneous minimal repair model. In Section 4, we introduce a new imperfect repair model based on the proportional impact of the repair action on the corresponding failure rate and generalize this approach to the heterogeneous setting. In Section 5 the heterogeneous lifesaving model is considered. This model is also based on the notion of minimal repair and can be considered as the corresponding application.
This is a theoretical note, but we believe that the results modeling an impact of heterogeneity on reliability characteristics of real objects can be important in various applications. They show specifically that this impact should be taken into account in reliability analysis of repairable systems.
Section snippets
Homogeneous case
Consider an object with an absolutely continuous time to failure cumulative density function (Cdf) F(t) and a failure rate λ(t), which starts operating at t=0. Assume that the repair action is performed instantaneously upon failure. The repair is usually qualified as perfect, if the Cdf of the repaired object is F(t) (as good as new) and as the minimal repair at time x, if its Cdf is:
It is clear that the minimal repair does not change the failure rate of our object.
Heterogeneous minimal repair model
Let T⩾0 be a lifetime random variable (r.v.) with the Cdf F(t). As usually, denote the survival function by . Assume that F(t) is indexed by a r.v. Z: and that the probability density function (pdf) f(t,z) exists. Then the corresponding failure rate λ(t,z) is defined by . Let Z be interpreted as a non-negative r.v. with support in [a,b], a⩾0, b⩽∞ and the pdf π(z).
Another meaningful interpretation defines an unobserved Z as a frailty in the
A new model of imperfect repair
Firstly, we define this new model for the conventional homogeneous case. Assume, as previously that the failure rate λ(t) of the governing distribution is monotonically increasing (IFR). Let the first failure occurs at t=t1. Define the imperfect repair as repair, decreasing the pre-failure value of λ(t) in the following way:where k1 is an improvement factor:The case k1=1 corresponds to a minimal repair. The subsequent cycles are defined in
Heterogeneous lifesaving model
In this section, we are coming back to the lifesaving model of Section 2. Let θ(t) in Eqs. (5), (6) be constant in time for simplicity: θ(t)=θ and assume that it is a random variable (independent of the non-homogeneous process Pt, t⩾0) with support in [0,1]. This is another way of implementing the population heterogeneity into the model. Indeed, for instance, probability of survival after some diseases can vary a lot in the population of the same age. The same argument holds for repairable
Conclusions
Repeated statistical minimal repair in homogeneous populations gives rise to the non-homogeneous Poisson process of failures (repairs), which is a nice and simple model to deal with. Mixture of distributions is a useful tool for modeling heterogeneity. It is well known that the shape of the failure rate in heterogeneous populations can differ dramatically from the baseline failure rate. On the other hand, it is not trivial to define the analog of minimal repair for heterogeneous populations. A
References (14)
- et al.
Change of life distribution via hazard transformation: an inequality with application to minimal repair
Math Oper Res
(1989) Optimal replacement under a minimal repair strategy: a general failure model
Adv Appl Prob
(1983)- et al.
Stochastic models in reliability
(1999) - et al.
A general minimal repair model
J Appl Prob
(2000) - et al.
Age-dependent minimal repair
J Appl Prob
(1985) - et al.
Statistical and information based minimal repair for k out of n systems
J Appl Prob
(1998) - Finkelstein MS. Modeling a process of non-ideal repair. In: Limnios N, Nikulin M, editors. Recent Advances in...
Cited by (12)
Incorrect modeling of the failure process of minimally repaired systems under random conditions: The effect on the maintenance costs
2015, Reliability Engineering and System SafetyRepairable system analysis in presence of covariates and random effects
2014, Reliability Engineering and System SafetyCitation Excerpt :The residual part (often called the unobserved heterogeneity or random effects) remains rather unexplained, since it is caused by unassignable (unidentified or not recorded) factors. Refs. [1–7] considered, among others, heterogeneity in non-homogeneous Poisson processes, whereas Lindqvist et al. [8] discussed heterogeneity in the more general case of trend-renewal processes. An interesting example of the joint presence of explained heterogeneity and random effects is provided by the powertrain system of a fleet of buses employed in urban and suburban routes of Naples, Italy.
Balancing burn-in and mission times in environments with catastrophic and repairable failures
2009, Reliability Engineering and System SafetyCitation Excerpt :The perfect/imperfect repair model has been extensively considered by many authors (see, e.g., [3–10]), but the focus of many of the latter papers is on situations where the repair mode is not identified.
Special Issue on ESREL 2005
2007, Reliability Engineering and System SafetyRobust Statistical Modeling of Heterogeneity for Repairable Systems Using Multivariate Gaussian Convolution Processes
2023, IEEE Transactions on ReliabilityMixed-effects model for reliability assessment of dump trucks in heterogeneous operating environment: A case study
2022, Quality and Reliability Engineering International