Short communication
Single versus mixture Weibull distributions for nonparametric satellite reliability

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2009.10.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Long recognized as a critical design attribute for space systems, satellite reliability has not yet received the proper attention as limited on-orbit failure data and statistical analyses can be found in the technical literature. To fill this gap, we recently conducted a nonparametric analysis of satellite reliability for 1584 Earth-orbiting satellites launched between January 1990 and October 2008. In this paper, we provide an advanced parametric fit, based on mixture of Weibull distributions, and compare it with the single Weibull distribution model obtained with the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method. We demonstrate that both parametric fits are good approximations of the nonparametric satellite reliability, but that the mixture Weibull distribution provides significant accuracy in capturing all the failure trends in the failure data, as evidenced by the analysis of the residuals and their quasi-normal dispersion.

Introduction

The present work expands on satellite reliability models previously derived by the authors and based on recent on-orbit failure data [1]. Given the previously derived nonparametric satellite reliability, we provide in this work an advanced parametric fit, based on mixture of Weibull distributions, and compare it with the single Weibull distribution model obtained with the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method. We assess the quality of the two parametric models (single MLE Weibull versus the mixture Weibull distribution), and conclude with recommendations for researchers and industry professionals should they wish to use these satellite reliability results.

Reliability has long been recognized as a critical attribute for space systems. Spacecraft operate in remote environments, and since for the majority of them maintenance is not an option, designing high-reliability into these high-value assets is an essential engineering and financial imperative. Unfortunately, limited on-orbit failure data and statistical analyses of satellite reliability exist in the literature. To fill this gap, we recently conducted a nonparametric analysis of satellite reliability for 1584 Earth-orbiting satellites launched between January 1990 and October 2008 [1], [2]. Because our dataset is censored, we made extensive use of the Kaplan–Meier estimator [3] for calculating the satellite reliability function. We also derived confidence intervals for the nonparametric reliability result [4], [5], [6]. Fig. 1 shows the nonparametric satellite reliability with 95% confidence intervals.

Fig. 1 reads as follows. For example, after a successful launch, satellite reliability drops to approximately 96% after 2 years on-orbit. More precisely, we haveR(t)=0.964for1.982years(724days)t<2.155years(787days)

The complete tabular data for Fig. 1 are provided in Appendix A. Vertical cuts across Fig. 1 read as follows. For example, after one year on-orbit (t=1 year), satellite reliability will fall between 96.1% and 97.8% with a 95% likelihood—these values constitute the lower and upper bounds of the 95% confidence interval at t=1 year. In addition, the most likely estimate of satellite reliability at this point in time is R^(t=1year)=96.9%.

Nonparametric analysis provides powerful results (as shown in Fig. 1) since the reliability calculation is unconstrained to fit any particular pre-defined lifetime distribution. However, this flexibility makes nonparametric results inconvenient to use for practical purposes often encountered in engineering design (e.g., reliability-based design optimization). In addition, some failure trends and patterns such as infant mortality or wear-out are more clearly identified and recognizable with parametric analysis. Several parametric forms can be fitted to the nonparametric reliability, such as single distributions or mixture distributions. Single distributions are simpler than the mixture distributions, whose added complexity must be balanced by an increased accuracy in the parametric fit to justify their use. In the following, we provide a brief overview of these two parametric fits and calculate the parameters for a single Weibull distribution, as well as a mixture of 2-Weibull distributions, fitted to the nonparametric results. We then analyze the quality of fit of the two resulting fits with respect to the benchmark that is the nonparametric satellite reliability. The justification for the use of Weibull distribution for satellite reliability can be found in Ref. [1].

Section snippets

Single distribution: Weibull distribution and maximum likelihood estimation

Several methods are available to fit a parametric distribution to the nonparametric function, such as graphical procedures (also known as probability plotting) and the Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) method. Two Weibull fits have already been fitted to the satellite nonparametric reliability in previous works [1], [7]. Only the MLE fit is presented in this paper due to the better accuracy of the parametric model it provides. Recall that the Weibull reliability function can be expressed asR(t

Comparative analysis of the single versus the mixture distributions Weibull fits

Both parametric models provide relatively precise approximation of the nonparametric reliability as can been seen from Fig. 2a and b. However, a visual inspection of Fig. 2b indicates that the 2-Weibull mixture distribution follows with a higher precision the trends present in the nonparametric satellite reliability. To quantitatively gauge the improvement between the single Weibull and the 2-Weibull mixture distribution, we first calculate both the maximum and the average error between the

Conclusion

In this work, we fitted 2-Weibull mixture distribution to the previously derived nonparametric satellite reliability. We analyzed and compared the quality of fit of the mixture distribution with that of the single MLE Weibull fit. While both parametric models provide relatively accurate approximation of the nonparametric satellite reliability, the use of mixtures of Weibull distributions demonstrated a significant improvement in the quality of the fit compared with the single distribution model.

References (8)

  • J.-F. Castet et al.

    Satellite reliability: statistical data analysis and modeling

    Journal of Spacecraft and Rockets

    (2009)
  • Ascend SpaceTrak® [online database], URL: 〈http://www.ascendworldwide.com/spacetrak.aspx〉 [cited 24 September...
  • E.L. Kaplan et al.

    Nonparametric estimation from incomplete observations

    Journal of the American Statistical Association

    (1958)
  • J.I. Ansell et al.

    Practical methods for reliability data analysis

    (1994)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (53)

  • Integration of the heterogeneous reliability data for fusion-specific components of the DONES Accelerator Systems

    2021, Fusion Engineering and Design
    Citation Excerpt :

    Two main trends can be distinguished on this issue that were published so far. The first one is focused on the mixture models of a certain number of homogeneous sub-populations extracted from the dataset that can be characterized by simple distributions (e.g., Weibull, Gamma, Lognormal, Uniform, etc.) [15–17]. This approach is constrained, however, by the subjectivity in the determination of the number of sub-populations and some limitations in the incorporation of the reliability impact factors – usage stress and environmental conditions.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text