Challenges in leveraging existing human performance data for quantifying the IDHEAS HRA method
- Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
Our article documents an exploratory study for collecting and using human performance data to inform human error probability (HEP) estimates for a new human reliability analysis (HRA) method, the IntegrateD Human Event Analysis System (IDHEAS). The method was based on cognitive models and mechanisms underlying human behaviour and employs a framework of 14 crew failure modes (CFMs) to represent human failures typical for human performance in nuclear power plant (NPP) internal, at-power events [1]. A decision tree (DT) was constructed for each CFM to assess the probability of the CFM occurring in different contexts. Data needs for IDHEAS quantification are discussed. Then, the data collection framework and process is described and how the collected data were used to inform HEP estimation is illustrated with two examples. Next, five major technical challenges are identified for leveraging human performance data for IDHEAS quantification. Furthermore, these challenges reflect the data needs specific to IDHEAS. More importantly, they also represent the general issues with current human performance data and can provide insight for a path forward to support HRA data collection, use, and exchange for HRA method development, implementation, and validation.
- Research Organization:
- Sandia National Lab. (SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States)
- Sponsoring Organization:
- USDOE National Nuclear Security Administration (NNSA)
- Grant/Contract Number:
- AC04-94AL85000
- OSTI ID:
- 1236204
- Alternate ID(s):
- OSTI ID: 1237368
- Report Number(s):
- SAND-20153925J; SAND-2015-0552J; PII: S0951832015002239; TRN: US1600450
- Journal Information:
- Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Vol. 144, Issue C; ISSN 0951-8320
- Publisher:
- ElsevierCopyright Statement
- Country of Publication:
- United States
- Language:
- English
Web of Science
BAYES-HEP: Bayesian belief networks for estimation of human error probability
|
journal | September 2017 |
Combined Effect of Multiple Performance Shaping Factors on Human Reliability: Multiplicative or Additive?
|
journal | November 2019 |
Similar Records
Bridging Human Reliability Analysis and Psychology, Part 1: The Psychological Literature Review for the IDHEAS Method
Determination of a Generic Human Error Probability Distribution, Part 1: A Dynamic Formulation of SPAR-H
Related Subjects
99 GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS
human reliability analysis (HRA)
HRA data
the IntegrateD human event analysis system (IDHEAS)
crew failure mode (CFM)
probabilistic risk assessment (PRA)
error of commission
nuclear power plant (NPP)
decision tree (DT)
42 ENGINEERING
Human reliability analysis (HRA)
The IntegrateD Human Event Analysis System (IDHEAS)
Crew failure mode (CFM)
Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA)
Nuclear power plant (NPP)
Decision tree (DT)