Dynamic emergency inspection routing and restoration scheduling to enhance the post-earthquake resilience of a highway–bridge network

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108282Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Updating inspection and restoration plans in real time improves network resilience.

  • Inaccurate estimation of network damages leads to low levels of network resilience.

  • Different levels of dynamism affect the performance of the dynamic model.

  • Hybrid genetic algorithm effectively solves dynamic routing and scheduling problems.

Abstract

In the immediate aftermath of earthquakes, effective scheduling of emergency restoration for transportation networks depends fundamentally on information about damage to those networks, which for the most part can only be acquired via a lengthy process of inspection. This paper proceeds from the insight that, rather than waiting to commence restoration activities until after all inspection activities are completed, damage information revealed gradually via inspection efforts could be incorporated into parallel scheduling of inspection routes and restoration schedules, allowing inspection and restoration to occur simultaneously, thus more efficiently boosting transportation networks’ resilience. To achieve this, however, it will be necessary to understand the real-time interaction between inspection and restoration, as well as such interaction's impacts on the inspection-routing and restoration-scheduling process. Assuming that multiple inspection and restoration crews operate simultaneously and that their optimal routes and schedules are updated dynamically whenever additional inspection information is obtained, this study proposes an integer program for modeling inspection-routing and restoration-scheduling problems and determining the optimal inspection routes and restoration schedules for damaged highway–bridge networks, with the specific aim of maximizing a resilience measure, network travel time. The results of a case study using the proposed method and data from the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake in China show that, as compared to a traditional inspection-restoration model, simultaneously performing and dynamically scheduling inspection and restoration can significantly boost networks’ resilience.

Section snippets

Introduction and background

Bridges are commonly considered the most seismically vulnerable components of a highway–bridge network [1], and when damaged by severe earthquakes, they can significantly disrupt emergency response by impeding transportation of rescue crews and humanitarian supplies among the areas such a network is meant to connect. Thus, rapid restoration of damaged bridges is of paramount importance to the recovery of such highway–bridge networks’ functionality in support of emergency-response actions. The

Problem description

This section begins by defining dynamic emergency inspection-routing and restoration-scheduling for post-disaster highway–bridge networks in the form of a problem and goes on to describe the solution of that problem using integer programs. This definitional process begins with an estimation of the damage states of all bridges within the focal network in the immediate aftermath of an earthquake via a deterministic risk analysis approach, which can determine the expected damage state of each

Model assumptions

The present study makes the following six assumptions for the sake of easing the modeling of its focal problem.

  • (1)

    A number of cities are set as command centers, from which both types of work crews (i.e., inspection crews and restoration crews) depart.

  • (2)

    Work crews work continuously during the time horizon tT and will not run out of fuel, or require any replacement of their restoration equipment. Thus, they will not need to visit their own or any other command center for replenishment after their work

Framework of the solution program

As shown in Fig. 3, the solution program consists of two phases: an initial phase (t=0) before work crews start to work, and a real-time update phase (t>0) when work crews are executing inspection and restoration activities. With the input parameters (1) to (7) in Fig. 3, the initial phase's output is the set of initial optimal inspection routes and restoration schedules arrived at by solving the integer program P0 using the proposed hybrid GA, and the real-time update phase commences with the

Experimental design and parameter setting

A highway–bridge network including 16 cities, 21 highway segments, and 48 bridges in central Sichuan, China, was selected as a case study to illustrate the proposed methodology, as shown in Fig. 1. The lengths, design speeds, and traffic capacity of these highway segments, as recorded by Zhuang and Chen (2012) at the time of the 2008 Wenchuan Earthquake, are presented in Appendix B. According to the relief record [90], a command center was set at City 1 in the immediate aftermath of the

Conclusions

Post-earthquake recovery plans for highway–bridge networks have generally not incorporated real-time parallel scheduling of inspection and restoration, but the results of the present study clearly demonstrate the benefits of doing so. To understand the impacts of real-time inspection-restoration interactions on post-earthquake emergency inspection-routing and restoration-scheduling prioritization problems, the present study has proposed an integer program that models such interactions in the

Funding

This work was supported by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (HKRGC) [grant numbers 25,223,119].

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Zhenyu Zhang: Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. Tingting Ji: Writing – review & editing. Hsi-Hsien Wei: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Project administration, Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support for this research by the Hong Kong Research Grants Council (HKRGC) under Grant No. 25223119. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this paper are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the HKRGC. The authors would also like to thank Prof. Elise Miller-Hooks of George Mason University for her advice on the research.

References (95)

  • P. Cowling et al.

    Using real time information for effective dynamic scheduling

    Eur J Oper Res

    (2002)
  • J. Long et al.

    A robust dynamic scheduling approach based on release time series forecasting for the steelmaking-continuous casting production

    Appl Soft Comput

    (2020)
  • V. Pillac et al.

    A review of dynamic vehicle routing problems

    Eur J Oper Res

    (2013)
  • C. Paquay et al.

    Recovery management for a dial-a-ride system with real-time disruptions

    Eur J Oper Res

    (2020)
  • M. Okulewicz et al.

    A metaheuristic approach to solve dynamic vehicle routing problem in continuous search space

    Swarm Evol Comput

    (2019)
  • S.A. Argyroudis et al.

    Fragility of transport assets exposed to multiple hazards: state-of-the-art review toward infrastructural resilience

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2019)
  • K. Adjetey-Bahun et al.

    A model to quantify the resilience of mass railway transportation systems

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2016)
  • A.W. Righi et al.

    A systematic literature review of resilience engineering: research areas and a research agenda proposal

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2015)
  • W. Liu et al.

    Review of studies on the resilience of urban critical infrastructure networks

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2020)
  • N. Goldbeck et al.

    Resilience assessment for interdependent urban infrastructure systems using dynamic network flow models

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2019)
  • C. Zhou et al.

    Analytics with digital-twinning: a decision support system for maintaining a resilient port

    Decis Support Syst

    (2021)
  • A. Asadabadi et al.

    Maritime port network resiliency and reliability through co-opetition

    Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev

    (2020)
  • N. Vodopivec et al.

    Transit system resilience: quantifying the impacts of disruptions on diverse populations

    ReliabEng Syst Saf

    (2019)
  • H.T. Tran et al.

    A framework for the quantitative assessment of performance-based system resilience

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2017)
  • Y. Almoghathawi et al.

    Resilience-driven restoration model for interdependent infrastructure networks

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2019)
  • A. Reggiani et al.

    Transport resilience and vulnerability: the role of connectivity

    Transp Res Part A Policy Pract

    (2015)
  • Z. Xu et al.

    A new resilience-based component importance measure for multi-state networks

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2020)
  • H. Fotouhi et al.

    Quantifying the resilience of an urban traffic-electric power coupled system

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2017)
  • Q. Zou et al.

    Enhancing resilience of interdependent traffic-electric power system

    Reliab Eng Syst Saf

    (2019)
  • M.A. Taylor

    Remoteness and accessibility in the vulnerability analysis of regional road networks

    Transp Res Part A Policy Pract

    (2012)
  • M. Florian et al.

    Network equilibrium models and algorithms

    (1995)
  • S. Hougardy

    The Floyd–Warshall algorithm on graphs with negative cycles

    Inf Process Lett

    (2010)
  • S. Yan et al.

    Logistical support scheduling under stochastic travel times given an emergency repair work schedule

    Comput Ind Eng

    (2014)
  • B. Balcik

    Site selection and vehicle routing for post-disaster rapid needs assessment

    Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev

    (2017)
  • M. Shinozuka et al.

    Effect of seismic retrofit of bridges on transportation networks

    Earthq Eng Eng Vib

    (2003)
  • D.T. Aksu et al.

    A mathematical model for post-disaster road restoration: enabling accessibility and evacuation

    Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev

    (2014)
  • X. Zhang et al.

    Scheduling short-term recovery activities to maximize transportation network resilience

    J Comput Civil Eng

    (2015)
  • W. Zhang et al.

    Resilience-based post-disaster recovery strategies for road-bridge networks

    Struct Infrastruct Eng

    (2017)
  • Y. Dong et al.

    Sustainability of highway bridge networks under seismic hazard

    J Earthq Eng

    (2014)
  • J.C. Lam et al.

    Functional loss assessment and restoration analysis to quantify indirect consequences of hazards

    J Risk Uncertain Eng Syst Part A Civil Eng

    (2016)
  • J.B. Mander

    Fragility curve development for assessing the seismic vulnerability of highway bridges

    Res Prog

    (1999)
  • V. Huria et al.

    Nonlinear finite element analysis of RC slab bridge

    J Struct Eng

    (1993)
  • B.M. Ayyub

    Risk analysis in engineering and economics

    (2014)
  • Roads maintenance manual

    (2013)
  • National disaster recovery framework: strengthening disaster recovery for the nation

    (2011)
  • Y. Liu et al.

    Prioritizing transportation network recovery using a resilience measure

    Sustain Resilient Infrastruct

    (2020)
  • W. Orabi et al.

    Optimizing postdisaster reconstruction planning for damaged transportation networks

    J Constr Eng Manag

    (2009)
  • Cited by (16)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text