Elsevier

Signal Processing

Volume 87, Issue 6, June 2007, Pages 1234-1250
Signal Processing

IF estimation for multicomponent signals using image processing techniques in the time–frequency domain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2006.10.013Get rights and content

Abstract

This paper presents a method for estimating the instantaneous frequency (IF) of multicomponent signals. The technique involves, firstly, the transformation of the one-dimensional signal to the two-dimensional time–frequency (TF) domain using a reduced interference quadratic TF distribution. IF estimation of signal components is then achieved by implementing two image processing steps: local peak detection of the TF representation followed by an image processing technique called component linking. The proposed IF estimator is tested on noisy synthetic monocomponent and multicomponent signals exhibiting linear and nonlinear laws. For low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) environments, a TF peak filtering preprocessing step is used for signal enhancement. Application of the IF estimation scheme to real signals is illustrated with newborn EEG signals. Finally, to illustrate the potential use of the proposed IF estimation method in classifying signals based on their TF components’ IFs, a classification method using least squares data-fitting is proposed and illustrated on synthetic and real signals.

Introduction

The instantaneous frequency (IF) is a signal parameter which is of significant importance in many real applications, such as radar, sonar, telecommunications and biomedicine [1]. For an analytic [2], monocomponent signal,z(t)=a(t)ejφ(t)the IF is defined asfi(t)=12πdφ(t)dt,where a(t) and φ(t) are two real functions that are referred to as the instantaneous amplitude and instantaneous phase, respectively.

A review of techniques for estimating the IF, such as phase difference estimators, zero crossing-based IF estimation, adaptive parameterization methods and time–frequency (TF)-based techniques, can be found in [3]. Among those, TF-based IF estimation techniques have received considerable attention recently, as illustrated by the papers [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].

As discussed in [1], an ideal TF representation of a monocomponent signal of the form (1) would exhibit a peak about the IF, with an amplitude related to the signal envelope. It has been shown that some quadratic time–frequency distributions (QTFDs), such as the Wigner–Ville distribution (WVD) and modified B-distribution (MBD) [11], [12], provide a peak centered at the IF for linear frequency modulated (LFM) signals. Therefore, an intuitive method for estimating the IF is to take the peak of these QTFDs, as described in [3]. However, care must be taken with nonlinear frequency modulated signal components as the peak estimate is biased (see [5], [6], [12] for further details).

Consider now a multicomponent signal, z(t), composed of a sum of monocomponent signals corrupted with complex-valued additive white Gaussian noise, r(t), with independently and identically distributed (i.i.d) real and imaginary parts, such thatz(t)=i=1Mai(t)ejφi(t)+r(t),where ai(t) and φi(t) are the amplitude envelope and instantaneous phase of the ith signal component, respectively, and M is the number of signal components. In this paper, we classify a multicomponent signal as being either TF separable or TF nonseparable. A TF nonseparable signal is defined as a signal whose TF components are either too close to separate in the TF domain or with components that actually intersect. A TF separable multicomponent signal is, however, a signal whose TF components are clearly separated in the TF domain and hence possess a unique TF decomposition. We restrict our present study to the case of TF separable multicomponent (referred to from this point on as just multicomponent) signals whose TF components are characterized by continuous IFs. This characteristic is shared by most physiological signals such as newborn EEG [13] and heart rate variability [14].

The idea of a single IF for a multicomponent signal, as defined by (3), becomes meaningless [1]. Instead, estimation of the IF of each individual component is the desired information to be extracted from multicomponent signals.

Component IF estimation for multicomponent signals using the local peaks of QTFDs has previously been proposed. In [12], an adaptive QTFD was presented and local peaks were used to estimate the IF of components. However, this method requires a priori information about the ratio between signal component amplitudes, assuming the component amplitudes are constant, so that local maxima caused by crossterms and noise can be ignored by setting an appropriate threshold level [12]. For this reason, the method was not assessed with low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) signals or real signals with time-varying amplitudes.

The two-dimensional representation of a signal in the joint TF domain has led to the use of pattern recognition techniques to extract the individual IFs of multicomponent signals. In [7], the authors developed a method for estimating the parameters associated with LFM signals using a Wigner–Hough transform. This technique was extended in [8] to be applicable to nonlinear frequency modulated signals. In [9], the authors proposed a combined Hough–Radon transform of a positive TF distribution to estimate multicomponent IFs. The authors in [10] developed a technique for multicomponent IF estimation based on the randomized Hough transform (RHT) of the TF representation, using edge information obtained from matched filtering-based edge detection to eliminate spurious votes in the RHT.

The Hough transform, used in each of the methods presented in [7], [8], [9], [10], is a well-known method for finding curves in images [15]. However, the Hough transform requires a priori information about the class of IF law (e.g. linear, quadratic, cubic, hyperbolic, sinusoidal, etc.) contained in the signal so that the TF representation can be transformed to the appropriate Hough parameter space. This means that the component IF laws of a signal which contains, for example, a component with a linear IF law and a component with a sinusoidal IF law, cannot both be accurately estimated simultaneously. The IF estimation methods incorporating the Hough transform also provide poor results if the IF of a signal component is not easily represented by a parametric function [9].

This paper proposes a new technique for multicomponent IF estimation without requiring a threshold to be set for local peaks in the TF domain or a priori knowledge of the class of IF law. The technique involves a TF transformation of the signal using a high resolution, reduced interference QTFD. Component IFs are then extracted by a two-step process: detection of local peaks in the TF representation to produce a binary image, followed by component linking. To allow for low SNR environments, a time–frequency peak filtering (TFPF) [16] preprocessing step is applied for signal enhancement.

The paper is organized as follows. Section 2 introduces QTFDs and TFPF preprocessing and gives a detailed description of the local peak detection and component linking algorithms that make up the proposed IF estimation technique. In Section 3, the IF estimation algorithm is demonstrated on noisy synthetic monocomponent and multicomponent signals with components exhibiting linear and nonlinear IF laws. The performance of the proposed IF estimation, when applied to real newborn EEG data, is also given. In Section 4, a method of classifying the extracted components IF laws using linear and nonlinear least squares data-fitting is outlined. A discussion and interpretation of the results obtained using the proposed IF estimation and component classification techniques are presented in Section 5.

Section snippets

Quadratic time–frequency distributions

QTFDs are commonly used for joint TF representation. The most basic QTFD is the WVD. All other QTFDs can be obtained by a TF averaging or smoothing of the WVD [17]. The general formula for a QTFD of a real signal, s(t), is expressed as [17]ρz(t,f)=--G(t-u,τ)zu+τ2z*u-τ2e-j2πfτdudτ,where G(t,τ) is the time-lag kernel which defines the QTFD and z(t) is the analytic associate of s(t) [18]. The WVD has the simplest time-lag kernel, expressed as G(t,τ)=δ(t).

The WVD satisfies many mathematically

Monocomponent signal with 2nd order polynomial phase in WGN

The combined Wigner–Hough transform for IF estimation of 2nd order polynomial phase, or LFM, signals was originally presented in [7]. The phase function for a LFM signal is given asφLFM(t)=2πf0+fr2tt,where f0 is the start frequency of the LFM and fr is the linear frequency rate.

The performance assessment of the proposed IF estimation algorithm begins with a noisy, monocomponent LFM signal as it allows for (1) a comparison with the Cramer–Rao bound (CRB), calculated from [24] and (2) a direct

Classification and parameter estimation of signal components

Classification is a very important application in signal and image processing. For nonstationary signals, IFs of signal components are often very informative and can be used as features in signal classification [13], [26]. To show a potential application of the proposed IF estimation technique for multicomponent signals, we propose a signal classification method based on the IF estimates of a multicomponent signal. The classification process is composed of the following stages: IF estimation,

Discussion and conclusion

The marriage of image processing techniques and TF representations appears highly suitable for IF estimation. Previous attempts of applying image processing techniques to TF representations, [7], [8], [9], [10], have all employed some modified version of the Hough transform to estimate the IF and parameterize the IF function. However, many limitations arise when using the Hough transform of the TF representation for IF estimation. That is, a priori knowledge of component IF class is required

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge Prof. Paul Colditz (Perinatal Research Centre), Dr. Chris Burke and Jane Richmond (Royal Children's Hospital, Brisbane, Australia) for organizing the aquisition of real newborn EEG seizure data used in this paper.

References (32)

  • J. Illingworth et al.

    A survey of the Hough transform

    Comput. Vision Graph. Image Process.

    (1988)
  • A. Farag et al.

    Edge linking by sequential search

    Pattern Recognition

    (1995)
  • R. Agrawal et al.

    A fresh look at the Hough transform

    Pattern Recognition Lett.

    (1996)
  • M. Scher et al.

    Comparison of EEG spectral and correlation measures between healthy term and preterm infants

    Pediatr. Neurol.

    (1994)
  • B. Boashash

    Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal-part 1: fundamentals

    Proc. IEEE

    (1992)
  • J.J.L. Brown

    Analytic signals and product theorems for Hilbert transforms

    IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst.

    (1974)
  • B. Boashash

    Estimating and interpreting the instantaneous frequency of a signal-part 2: algorithms and applications

    Proc. IEEE

    (1992)
  • B. Ristic et al.

    Instantaneous frequency estimation of quadratic and cubic FM signals using the cross polynomial Wigner–Ville distribution

    IEEE Trans. Signal Process.

    (1996)
  • V. Katkovnik et al.

    Instantaneous frequency estimation using the Wigner distribution with varying and data driven window length

    IEEE Trans. Signal Process.

    (1998)
  • V. Ivanović et al.

    Performance of quadratic time–frequency distributions as instantaneous frequency estimators

    IEEE Trans. Signal Process.

    (2003)
  • S. Barbarossa

    Analysis of multicomponent LFM signals by a combined Wigner–Hough transform

    IEEE Trans. Signal Process.

    (1995)
  • S. Barbarossa et al.

    Analysis of nonlinear FM signals by pattern recognition of their time–frequency representation

    IEEE Signal Process. Lett.

    (1996)
  • R.M. Rangayyan et al.

    Feature identification in the time–frequency plane by using the Hough–Radon transform

    Pattern Recognition

    (2001)
  • N. Bennett et al.

    Using edge information in time–frequency representations for chirp parameter estimation

    Appl. Comput. Harmonic Anal.

    (2005)
  • B. Boashash

    Heuristic formulation of TFDs

  • Z. Hussain et al.

    Adaptive instantaneous frequency estimation of multicomponent FM signals using quadratic time–frequency distributions

    IEEE Trans. Signal Process.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (111)

    • Skeleton-based reassignment of nonstationary signals spectrogram

      2022, Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal
    • Time-frequency readability enhancement of compact support kernel-based distributions using image post-processing: Application to instantaneous frequency estimation of M-ary frequency shift keying signals

      2022, Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      In other sense, several studies have shown that image processing techniques can be applied to the images produced by time-frequency representations of one-dimensional signals, so that to allow IF estimation and crossterm reduction [20–23]. To resolve the problem of discontinuity of IF trajectories, the peaks in [20] were tracked and their local connectivity was exploited. Like the pixels connection in images, the discrete peak points were linked to form individual components.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    This work was supported through grants from the NHMRC and ARC.

    View full text