Elsevier

Signal Processing

Volume 102, September 2014, Pages 207-215
Signal Processing

Target localization in a multi-static passive radar system through convex optimization

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sigpro.2014.02.023Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Efficient target localization methods exploiting time-of-arrival information are developed based on semi-definite relaxation (SDR).

  • The proposed methods provide root mean-square error (RMSE) performance that is close to the Cramer–Rao lower bound (CRLB) and outperform existing SDR-based target localization techniques.

  • The application to bistatic passive radar systems with multiple illuminators is new.

  • The computation complexity of the proposed methods is shown to be advantageous as compared to existing SDR-based methods.

Abstract

We propose efficient target localization methods for a passive radar system using time-of-arrival (TOA) information of the signals received from multiple illuminators, where the position of the receiver is subject to random errors. Since the maximum likelihood (ML) formulation of this target localization problem is a non-convex optimization problem, semi-definite relaxation (SDR)-based optimization methods in general do not provide satisfactory performance. As a result, approximated ML optimization problems are proposed and solved with SDR plus bisection methods. For the case without position error, it is shown that the relaxation guarantees a rank-one solution. The optimization problem for the case with position error involves only a relaxation of a scalar quadratic term. Simulation results show that the proposed algorithms outperform existing methods and provide root mean-square error performance very close to the Cramer–Rao lower bound.

Introduction

In recent years, multi-static passive radar (MPR) systems, which utilize multiple broadcast signals as sources of opportunity, have attracted significant interests due to their low cost, covertness, and availability of rich illuminator sources [1], [2], [3], [4]. Compared to conventional active radar systems which typically operate in a monostatic mode and emit stronger signals with a wide signal bandwidth, MPR systems use broadcast signals which in general are very weak and have an extremely narrow bandwidth. These features make it difficult to exploit a MPR system for accurate target position estimation. In addition, MPR receivers may often be implemented on aerial or ground moving vehicles. In this case, the radar platform may only have inaccurate knowledge about its own instantaneous position. This uncertainty is caused by the accuracy limitation of the positioning system as well as multipath propagations.

Target localization is an important task that has received extensive attention in various applications, such as wireless communications, sensor networks, urban canyon, and through-the-wall radar systems [5], [6], [7], [8]. Specifically, multi-lateration techniques utilize the range information observed at multiple positions, which are distributed over a region, to uniquely localize a target. Depending on the applications, range information can be obtained using time-of-arrival (TOA), time-delay-of-arrival (TDOA), and received signal strength indicator (RSSI). On the other hand, the observation positions may be achieved using fixed receivers, or synthesized using a single moving platform. In the latter case, the receiver positions are subject to inaccuracy.

In all these applications, maximum likelihood (ML) estimation is considered as a powerful method of estimating the targets׳ location, which in general is a non-convex optimization problem. When the measurement noise is sufficiently small, the ML estimation problem may be solved using linearized least squares (LLS) estimation methods [5], [7]. The key steps of the LLS estimation methods are linearizing the objective function using Taylor׳s series expansion at some initial guess of target position and updating it with the least squares (LS) solution in an iterative approach. Like in many iterative optimization techniques for non-convex problems, however, the accuracy of the LLS estimator highly depends on the initial guess of the target׳s location. This has motivated researchers to consider more efficient designs. One such approach is the semi-definite relaxation (SDR) technique [6], [9], [10], [11], which converts a non-convex optimization problem into a convex one by relaxing certain rank constraints. It is worth noting that SDR-based approaches outperform computationally efficient two-step weighted least squares method proposed in [12], especially when the noise level is high and the sensor positions are not perfectly known.

The accuracy (or tightness) of SDR techniques, however, is problem specific, as shown in [13] for the TOA based optimization problems. For example, in optimization problems based on TDOA [9] and TOA [10], where an unknown time instant of the source׳s signal transmission is also optimized, SDR relaxations may not be tight and, thus, the penalty function approach is introduced. This is true also for robust designs where sensor positions are subject to certain random errors [9], [10]. In this context, neglecting the second-order noise terms [12], the authors in [14] proposed to use an approximate ML function in the SDR-based source localization problem.

In this paper, we pursue approximated ML estimation approach in developing efficient target localization algorithms in a MPR system using TOA information of signals received from multiple illuminators and the target. As discussed above, the range resolution is poor because of the narrow signal bandwidth and weak signal levels, and the receiver position is subject to inaccurate knowledge of its own position. Therefore, an optimization problem is also formulated for the case where the receiver position is subject to estimation error. The underlying optimization problems are still non-convex, but can be reformulated as convex problems using SDR and solved in conjunction with the bisection method. When no position error is present, the SDR provides a rank-one solution. With position estimation error, the corresponding optimization problem involves only a relaxation of a quadratic scalar term.

The target localization problem and optimization technique described in this paper differs from the existing literature in a number of ways. In contrast to the optimization problems in [6], [13], where the objective function is solely a function of monostatic range, the objective function in our case involves bistatic range, which makes accurate target position estimation much more challenging. Further, unlike [9], [10], where SDR of several variables and a penalty function approach are employed, our approach involves SDR of only one variable, though in conjunction with the bisection approach. For these reasons, the proposed method outperforms methods in [9], [10] and does not require refinement through local optimization. Moreover, although we employ ML approximation approach, the effect of the approximation renders our optimization problem to be different from [14] due to different system models. As a result, a new optimization method that solves relaxed SDR problem in conjunction with bisection method is proposed for both cases where receiver position is perfectly and imperfectly known.

The rest of the paper is organized as follows. The system model of the MPR system is described in Section 2, whereas the proposed optimization methods for target localization are presented in Section 3.2. The computational complexity of the proposed method is compared with the approach of [9] in Section 4. Numerical results are provided in Section 5 and conclusions are drawn in Section 6.

Notations: Upper (lower) bold face letters will be used for matrices (vectors); (·)T, In, ·, tr(·), A0, diag(·) denote transpose, n×n identity matrix, Euclidean norm, matrix trace operator, positive semi-definiteness of A, and diagonal matrix, respectively.

Section snippets

System model

We consider a standard MPR system with M illuminators of opportunity, which can be broadcast stations for digital-video broadcasting – terrestrial (DVB-T) [15] or base stations for global system for mobile communications (GSM) [16]. Because the deployment scenario of these broadcast and base stations is publicly available, their numbers and locations are considered to be precisely known. A narrow-band multi-frequency (NBMF) transmission is considered, where the illuminators use well separated

Proposed optimization approaches

The unconstrained minimization problem (4) is non-convex. Thus, it is difficult to obtain the global optimum solution with a reasonable complexity. The SDR-based optimization methods applied in [9], [10] may not be tight enough in general and, thus, may often fail to provide performance sufficiently close to CRLB. In this section, and motivated by [12], we propose an alternative approach that approximates the ML target localization problem. However, this approximate ML problem is shown to be

Complexity analysis

We present the computational complexity of the proposed optimization algorithms using the approach in [25]. For a given q, the number of iterations required for solving (19) is upper bounded by O˜((n+1)1/2), whereas the work load per iteration is upper bounded by O˜((n2+n)2(n+1)2). The bisection search w.r.t. q requires L¯=log2((quql)/ϵ) iterations. This means that the overall complexity for the case without position errors is approximately O˜(n6.5L¯). It is interesting to note that the

Numerical results

Computer simulations are conducted to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method. The stationary target and receiver are located at positions p=[600,550]T meters and r=[200,10] meters, respectively. The illuminators are located at the following positions: [80090010001100110011001100200200200200300400500]meters.A two-dimensional coordinate system for the locations of the target, illuminators and receiver is shown in Fig. 2.

The CVX toolbox [27] is used to solve the convex optimization

Conclusions

We considered the problem of localizing a target using time-of-arrival information measured at a receiver from the signals of multiple illuminators in a multistatic passive radar system. The localization problems are formulated using an approximate maximum likelihood estimate of the target location. The resulting non-convex problems are reformulated as convex problems using the semi-definite relaxation approach and solved in a framework of bisection algorithm. The optimization problems are

Acknowledgments

The work of B. K. Chalise, Y. D. Zhang, and M. G. Amin was supported in part by a subcontract with Dynetics, Inc. for research sponsored by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) under Contract FA8650-08-D-1303, and by a subcontract with Defense Engineering Corporation for research sponsored by the AFRL under Contract FA8650-12-D-1376.

References (27)

  • M.S. Lobo et al.

    Applications of second-order cone programming

    Linear Algebra Appl.

    (1998)
  • H.D. Griffiths, N.R.W. Long, Television-based bistatic radar, Proceedings of the IEE – Radar Sonar Navigation, vol. 133...
  • V. Koch et al.

    New approach to a multistatic passive radar sensor for air/space defense

    IEEE Aerosp. Electron. Syst. Mag.

    (1995)
  • H.D. Griffiths, C.J. Baker, Passive coherent location radar systems. Part 1: performance prediction, Proceedings of the...
  • C.J. Baker, H.D. Griffiths, I. Papoutsis, Passive coherent location radar systems. Part 2: waveform properties,...
  • Y. Huang et al.

    Real-time passive source localizationa practical linear correction least-squares approach

    IEEE Trans. Speech Audio Proc.

    (2001)
  • K.W. Cheung, W.-K. Ma, H.C. So, Accurate approximation algorithm for TOA-based maximum likelihood mobile location using...
  • D. Li, Y.H. Hu, Least square solutions of energy based acoustic source localization problems, in: Proceedings of the...
  • Y. Zhang, M.G. Amin, A. Fauzia, Localization of inanimate moving targets using dual-frequency synthetic aperture radar...
  • K. Yang et al.

    Efficient convex relaxation methods for robust target localization by a sensor network using time differences of arrivals

    IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc.

    (2009)
  • E. Xu et al.

    Source localization in wireless sensor networks from signal time-of-arrival measurements

    IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc.

    (2011)
  • Y. Zhang, K. Yang, M.G. Amin, Robust target localization in moving radar platform through semi-definite relaxation, in:...
  • K.C. Ho et al.

    An accurate algebraic solution for moving source location using TDOA and FDOA measurements in the presence of receiver location errorsanalysis and solution

    IEEE Trans. Sig. Proc.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (96)

    • A view on radar and communication systems coexistence and dual functionality in the era of spectrum sensing

      2021, Digital Signal Processing: A Review Journal
      Citation Excerpt :

      The third category in Fig. 2 casts passive radar as a cooperative coexistence strategy. Passive radars [72–74] share the same underlying strategy as dual-function systems in the sense that one of the RF services is completely dependent on the presence of the others. Passive radar has seen significant progress over the last decade in diverse applications, including border crossing and patrol.

    • Ambiguity Analysis of Multiple-Target Localization in a Bistatic Radar

      2024, 2024 International Conference on Electronics, Information, and Communication, ICEIC 2024
    • An Improved Adaptive Sparrow Search Algorithm for TDOA-Based Localization

      2023, ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Currently with Arraycomm LLC, San Jose, CA 95110, USA.

    View full text