Elsevier

Systems & Control Letters

Volume 58, Issue 12, December 2009, Pages 826-833
Systems & Control Letters

Natural consensus filters for second order infinite dimensional systems

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sysconle.2009.10.001Get rights and content

Abstract

This work proposes consensus filters for a class of second order infinite dimensional systems. The proposed structure of the consensus filters is that of a local filter written in the natural setting of a second order formulation with the additional coupling that enforces consensus by minimizing the disagreement between all local filters. An advantage of the second order formulation imposed on the local filters is the natural interpretation that they retain, namely that the time derivative of the estimated position is equal to the estimated velocity. Stability analysis of the collective dynamics is achieved via the use of a parameter-dependent Lyapunov functional, and which guarantees that asymptotically, all filters agree with each other and that they all converge to the true state of the second order system.

Introduction

The advent of sensor technologies and ever increasing computing capabilities spurred the use of sensor networks, mobile or fixed, in improving the estimation of physical processes; see [1], [2], [3], [4] and the references therein. Employing an array of sensing devices, either homogeneous or heterogeneous, provides additional flexibility and improvement in filtering and smoothing of many processes. A dramatic increase in works dealing with sensor networks has been witnessed since the early 90s and the main recipients were systems governed by lumped parameter systems.

The control and estimation of infinite dimensional systems also enjoyed continuous attention of many researchers in the past 50 years. Works concentrated from system-theoretic properties to optimal and robust control design. Many aspects of control implementation were also considered, as for example finite dimensional approximation, optimal model reduction. Optimization of parameters (damping design) and of actuator/sensor shape and location were also considered. A special class of infinite dimensional systems, namely second order infinite dimensional systems, often describing structural systems and acoustic systems, was traditionally viewed in a first order formulation. However, as was pointed out in [5], such a framework will not lead to a physically meaningful state estimator. The reason is that the derivative of the first component of the estimated state is not equal to the second component of the estimated state. This means that the derivative of the estimated position is not equal to the estimated velocity. Such an equality may be achieved asymptotically, but when one desires a state observer with a physically meaningful estimate, one must then resort to the design in a second order formulation. In fact, such an observer was considered in [5]. The design proposed a Luenberger-type observer and a parameter-dependent Lyapunov functional produced the requisite stability, providing asymptotic convergence of the state position and state velocity errors to zero, while retaining at all times, the physical relation of the estimated position and velocity.

When moving to a second order system with multiple sensors, one approach is to consider a centralized observer where all measurements are used by a single filter. An alternative approach is to consider multiple filters, each producing its own state estimate by using a smaller number of sensor measurements. In order to ensure that all such state estimates agree and collectively produce the same estimate, a modification is included in order to induce and enforce consensus.

The use of sensor networks for the estimation of spatially distributed processes did not receive comparable attention as the finite dimensional case. Sporadic attempts to extend and apply the use of sensor networks for the estimation of spatially distributed processes is rather meager, concentrated in few researchers [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11]. Even further, the use of a sensor network in estimating spatially distributed processes that enforce dynamic agreement has not appeared in the literature. The latter constitutes the main thrust of this manuscript, which proposes: (i) the use of multiple local filters utilizing natural observers and obtaining measurements from a portion of the sensors within the sensor network, (ii) the enforcement of a dynamic agreement among all local filters via the inclusion of terms penalizing disagreement between different filters. The structure of the consensus filters that consist of the local filter coupled via the consensus step was inspired by the one presented for finite dimensional systems [12], [13]. It should be emphasized that due to the structure of the natural second order form that the local filters employ, two outcomes arise: (1) that the estimated velocity of each filter is equal to the time derivative of the estimated displacement produced by each filter, and (2) that the consensus terms penalize the disagreement of the filters over both the estimated velocity and the estimated displacement.

The manuscript is organized as follows: The next section provides the mathematical framework for which the class of systems under consideration can be viewed in. Additionally, the problem of consensus filters for a class of infinite dimensional systems is stated and possible approaches are suggested. The proposed natural Luenberger-consensus filters are introduced in Section 3 and both well-posedness and stability of the collective dynamics of the consensus filters are presented. An example with extensive numerical results of cable dynamics utilizing two consensus filters is presented in Section 4 to demonstrate the effectiveness of the dynamic agreement proposed for the consensus filters. Conclusions follow in Section 5.

Section snippets

Mathematical framework and problem statement

It is natural to consider second order infinite dimensional systems in a five-space setting, as this allows damping operators to be defined in different spaces than stiffness operators; a classical example is the flexible beam in one spatial dimension with “square root” damping where the damping operator is defined in different spaces than the stiffness operator. Another example is the wave equation in one spatial dimension with air damping, and in this case the damping operator is the identity

Natural Luenberger-consensus filters

As was delineated above, the m position and m velocity sensors can be used collectively in the estimator to produce a single centralized natural observer, or can be used separately by m different filters to produce m stable consensus filters.

Example

As an example, we consider a one-dimensional cable equation given by ϕtt(t,ξ)=ϕξξ(t,ξ)+103ϕtξξ(t,ξ)101ϕt(t,ξ)+b(ξ)u(t),ξ(0,1),ϕ(t,0)=ϕ(t,1),t0. For initial conditions, we consider ϕ(0,ξ)=0.05χ[0.4,0.65](ξ)sin(πξ),ϕt(0,ξ)=0.01χ[0.7,0.84](ξ)(1cos(2πξ)), and for measurements, we consider one position and one velocity sensor for each of the two filters. The sensor outputs were given by yp1(t)=0δ(ξ0.126)ϕ(t,ξ)dξ,yv1(t)=0δ(ξ0.679)ϕt(t,ξ)dξ,yp2(t)=0δ(ξ0.103)ϕ(t,ξ)dξ,yv2(t)=0δ(ξ

Conclusions

The aim of this work was to propose ways to enforce consensus in filters used for state estimation for systems governed by second order infinite dimensional systems. The structure of the proposed filters were that of a local natural observer that included terms penalizing disagreement between all other filters. This consensus was dynamic in nature in the sense that all disagreement amongst filter, both position and velocity, was incorporate into the dynamics of each local filter. Due to the

Acknowledgement

The author gratefully acknowledges financial support from the AFOSR, grant FA9550-09-1-0469.

References (18)

  • M.A. Demetriou

    Natural second-order observers for second-order distributed parameter systems

    Systems & Control Letters

    (2004)
  • T.D. Nguyen

    Second-order observers for second-order distributed parameter systems in R2

    Systems & Control Letters

    (2008)
  • C.G. Cassandras et al.

    Sensor networks and cooperative control

    European Journal of Control

    (2005)
  • P. Antsaklis et al.

    Networked control systems

    IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control

    (2004)
  • P. Antsaklis et al.

    Technology of networked control systems

    Proceedings of the IEEE

    (2007)
  • F. Bullo et al.

    Control and optimization in cooperative networks

    SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization

    (2009)
  • D. Uciński

    Optimal Measurement Methods for Distributed Parameter System Identification

    (2004)
  • H. Chao, Y. Chen, W. Ren, Consensus of information in distributed control of a diffusion process using centroidal...
  • C. Tricaud, M. Patan, D. Uciński, Y. Chen, D-optimal trajectory design of heterogeneous mobile sensors for parameter...
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (35)

  • Virtual leader-follower synchronization controller design for distributed parameter multi-agent systems with time-varying disturbances

    2021, Neurocomputing
    Citation Excerpt :

    By contrast, the multi-agent system modeled by distributed parameter system got less attention than its finite dimensional counterpart. It is also worth noting that the following papers [8–16] have examined various aspects of synchronization in the distributed parameter multi-agent systems. In distributed systems, the optimal placement of sensor or actuator can be transformed into a diffusion process control problem (see [8,9]), e.g., for the sensor network with static topology, the spraying control was carried out by using mobile actuator in [8].

  • Containment control for partial differential multi-agent systems

    2019, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
    Citation Excerpt :

    Wang et al. [22] considered the output formation-containment problem of interacted heterogeneous linear systems, where each heterogeneous system, whether the leader or the follower, has different dimensions and dynamics, and by the impulsive control method, a distributed hybrid active controller was designed using the discrete-time information of neighbors. On the other hand, since the variables of DPSs are related to infinite dimensional space, there have been only a few research achievements about the coordination control for the MASs with PDEs, and most of them were obtained based on the operator theory and the coordination problem was solved by transforming the PDE problem into ODE problem on a Hilbert space [24–27]. More recently, the consensus control of PDE MASs based on the Lyapunov functional approach [3–6] was put forward in Ref. [28], and the PDE MASs in Ref. [28] are leaderless and governed by the parabolic equations (heat equations) or the second-order hyperbolic equations (wave equations).

  • Distributed attitude tracking for multiple flexible spacecraft described by partial differential equations

    2019, Acta Astronautica
    Citation Excerpt :

    Subsequently, Demetriou developed a spatial PID penalization of the pairwise disagreement of state estimates in the design of consensus filters for a class of parabolic PDEs [36]. In the listed papers [32–36], the cooperative control of multiple systems governed by the second-order PDEs is considered. However, essentially, the vibration of a flexible appendage should be described by a fourth-order PDE, which is more complicated than lower-order PDE.

  • Dissipative consensus problems for multi-agent networks via sliding mode control

    2017, Journal of the Franklin Institute
    Citation Excerpt :

    Different from [20], which relies on passivity or finite-gain properties of each subsystem, [21] does not require each nodes error dynamics to be passive, or small-gain, but still implies dissipativity of the interconnected error dynamics. Distributed consensus control strategies have been used in observer estimation and filters [2,3,10–12]. By measuring the H∞-type cost of disagreement between adjacent nodes of networks, [10] guarantees a worst-case consensus performance of observer networks.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text